351 research outputs found
Complexity and Succinctness of Public Announcement Logic
There is a recent trend of extending epistemic logic (EL) with dynamic operators that allow to express the evolution of knowledge and belief induced by knowledge-changing actions. The most basic such extension is public announcement logic (PAL), which is obtained from EL by adding an operator for truthful publix announcements. In this paper, we consider the computational complexity of PAL and show that it coincides with that of EL. This holds in the single- and multi-agent case, and also in the presence of common knowledge operators. We also prove that there are properties that can be expressed exponentially more succint in PAL than in EL. This shows that, despite the known fact that PAL and EL have the same expressive power, ther eis a benefit in adding the public announcement operator to EL: it exponentially increases the succinctness of formulas without having negative effects on computational complexity
Relation-changing modal operators
We study dynamic modal operators that can change the accessibility relation of a model during the evaluation of a formula. In particular, we extend the basic modal language with modalities that are able to delete, add or swap an edge between pairs of elements of the domain. We define a generic framework to characterize this kind of operations. First, we investigate relation-changing modal logics as fragments of classical logics. Then, we use the new framework to get a suitable notion of bisimulation for the logics introduced, and we investigate their expressive power. Finally, we show that the complexity of the model checking problem for the particular operators introduced is PSpace-complete, and we study two subproblems of model checking: formula complexity and program complexity.Fil: Areces, Carlos Eduardo. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Matemática, AstronomĂa y FĂsica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Fervari, Raul Alberto. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Matemática, AstronomĂa y FĂsica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas; ArgentinaFil: Hoffmann, Guillaume Emmanuel. Universidad Nacional de CĂłrdoba. Facultad de Matemática, AstronomĂa y FĂsica; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂficas y TĂ©cnicas; Argentin
A Labelled Sequent Calculus for Public Announcement Logic
Public announcement logic(PAL) is an extension of epistemic logic (EL) with
some reduction axioms. In this paper, we propose a cut-free labelled sequent
calculus for PAL, which is an extension of that for EL with sequent rules
adapted from the reduction axioms. This calculus admits cut and allows
terminating proof search
Refinement Modal Logic
In this paper we present {\em refinement modal logic}. A refinement is like a
bisimulation, except that from the three relational requirements only `atoms'
and `back' need to be satisfied. Our logic contains a new operator 'all' in
addition to the standard modalities 'box' for each agent. The operator 'all'
acts as a quantifier over the set of all refinements of a given model. As a
variation on a bisimulation quantifier, this refinement operator or refinement
quantifier 'all' can be seen as quantifying over a variable not occurring in
the formula bound by it. The logic combines the simplicity of multi-agent modal
logic with some powers of monadic second-order quantification. We present a
sound and complete axiomatization of multi-agent refinement modal logic. We
also present an extension of the logic to the modal mu-calculus, and an
axiomatization for the single-agent version of this logic. Examples and
applications are also discussed: to software verification and design (the set
of agents can also be seen as a set of actions), and to dynamic epistemic
logic. We further give detailed results on the complexity of satisfiability,
and on succinctness
Formula size games for modal logic and -calculus
We propose a new version of formula size game for modal logic. The game
characterizes the equivalence of pointed Kripke-models up to formulas of given
numbers of modal operators and binary connectives. Our game is similar to the
well-known Adler-Immerman game. However, due to a crucial difference in the
definition of positions of the game, its winning condition is simpler, and the
second player does not have a trivial optimal strategy. Thus, unlike the
Adler-Immerman game, our game is a genuine two-person game. We illustrate the
use of the game by proving a non-elementary succinctness gap between
bisimulation invariant first-order logic and (basic) modal logic
. We also present a version of the game for the modal
-calculus and show that is also
non-elementarily more succinct than .Comment: This is a preprint of an article published in Journal of Logic and
Computation Published by Oxford University Press. arXiv admin note:
substantial text overlap with arXiv:1604.0722
Arrow update logic
We present Arrow Update Logic, a theory of epistemic access elimination that can be used to reason about multi-agent belief change. While the belief-changing "arrow updates" of Arrow Update Logic can be transformed into equivalent belief-changing "action models" from the popular Dynamic Epistemic Logic approach, we prove that arrow updates are sometimes exponentially more succinct than action models. Further, since many examples of belief change are naturally thought of from Arrow Update Logic's perspective of eliminating access to epistemic possibilities, Arrow Update Logic is a valuable addition to the repertoire of logics of information change. In addition to proving basic results about Arrow Update Logic, we introduce a new notion of common knowledge that generalizes both ordinary common knowledge and the "relativized" common knowledge familiar from the Dynamic Epistemic Logic literature
Complexity and Expressivity of Branching- and Alternating-Time Temporal Logics with Finitely Many Variables
We show that Branching-time temporal logics CTL and CTL*, as well as
Alternating-time temporal logics ATL and ATL*, are as semantically expressive
in the language with a single propositional variable as they are in the full
language, i.e., with an unlimited supply of propositional variables. It follows
that satisfiability for CTL, as well as for ATL, with a single variable is
EXPTIME-complete, while satisfiability for CTL*, as well as for ATL*, with a
single variable is 2EXPTIME-complete,--i.e., for these logics, the
satisfiability for formulas with only one variable is as hard as satisfiability
for arbitrary formulas.Comment: Prefinal version of the published pape
- …