5,466 research outputs found
Coevolutionary games - a mini review
Prevalence of cooperation within groups of selfish individuals is puzzling in
that it contradicts with the basic premise of natural selection. Favoring
players with higher fitness, the latter is key for understanding the challenges
faced by cooperators when competing with defectors. Evolutionary game theory
provides a competent theoretical framework for addressing the subtleties of
cooperation in such situations, which are known as social dilemmas. Recent
advances point towards the fact that the evolution of strategies alone may be
insufficient to fully exploit the benefits offered by cooperative behavior.
Indeed, while spatial structure and heterogeneity, for example, have been
recognized as potent promoters of cooperation, coevolutionary rules can extend
the potentials of such entities further, and even more importantly, lead to the
understanding of their emergence. The introduction of coevolutionary rules to
evolutionary games implies, that besides the evolution of strategies, another
property may simultaneously be subject to evolution as well. Coevolutionary
rules may affect the interaction network, the reproduction capability of
players, their reputation, mobility or age. Here we review recent works on
evolutionary games incorporating coevolutionary rules, as well as give a
didactic description of potential pitfalls and misconceptions associated with
the subject. In addition, we briefly outline directions for future research
that we feel are promising, thereby particularly focusing on dynamical effects
of coevolutionary rules on the evolution of cooperation, which are still widely
open to research and thus hold promise of exciting new discoveries.Comment: 24 two-column pages, 10 figures; accepted for publication in
BioSystem
Coevolutionary Competence in the Realm of Corporate Longevity: How Long-lived Firms Strategically Renew Themselves
Understanding the phenomena of corporate longevity and self-renewing organizations has become an important topic in recent management literature. However, the majority of the research contributions focus on internal determinants of longevity and self-renewal. Using a co-evolutionary framework, the purpose of this paper is to address the dynamic interaction between organizations and environments in the realm of sustained strategic renewal, i.e. corporate longevity. To this end, we will focus on the competence of long-lived firms to coevolve due to the joint effect of managerial intentionality and environmental selection pressures. Building on coevolutionary framework, we develop a conceptual framework that highlights an organization’s coevolutionary competence. Two longitudinal case studies are presented illustrating the arguments.strategic renewal;corporate longevity;competence-based management;adaptive open systems;coevolutionary competence
Approximating n-player behavioural strategy nash equilibria using coevolution
Coevolutionary algorithms are plagued with a set of problems related to intransitivity that make it questionable what the end product of a coevolutionary run can achieve. With the introduction of solution concepts into coevolution, part of the issue was alleviated, however efficiently representing and achieving game theoretic solution concepts is still not a trivial task. In this paper we propose a coevolutionary algorithm that approximates behavioural strategy Nash equilibria in n-player zero sum games, by exploiting the minimax solution concept. In order to support our case we provide a set of experiments in both games of known and unknown equilibria. In the case of known equilibria, we can confirm our algorithm converges to the known solution, while in the case of unknown equilibria we can see a steady progress towards Nash. Copyright 2011 ACM
Novelty Search in Competitive Coevolution
One of the main motivations for the use of competitive coevolution systems is
their ability to capitalise on arms races between competing species to evolve
increasingly sophisticated solutions. Such arms races can, however, be hard to
sustain, and it has been shown that the competing species often converge
prematurely to certain classes of behaviours. In this paper, we investigate if
and how novelty search, an evolutionary technique driven by behavioural
novelty, can overcome convergence in coevolution. We propose three methods for
applying novelty search to coevolutionary systems with two species: (i) score
both populations according to behavioural novelty; (ii) score one population
according to novelty, and the other according to fitness; and (iii) score both
populations with a combination of novelty and fitness. We evaluate the methods
in a predator-prey pursuit task. Our results show that novelty-based approaches
can evolve a significantly more diverse set of solutions, when compared to
traditional fitness-based coevolution.Comment: To appear in 13th International Conference on Parallel Problem
Solving from Nature (PPSN 2014
Prospects for computational steering of evolutionary computation
Currently, evolutionary computation (EC) typically takes place in batch mode: algorithms are run autonomously, with the user providing little or no intervention or guidance. Although it is rarely possible to specify in advance, on the basis of EC theory, the optimal evolutionary algorithm for a particular problem, it seems likely that experienced EC practitioners possess considerable tacit knowledge of how evolutionary algorithms work. In situations such as this, computational steering (ongoing, informed user intervention in the execution of an otherwise autonomous computational process) has been profitably exploited to improve performance and generate insights into computational processes. In this short paper, prospects for the computational steering of evolutionary computation are assessed, and a prototype example of computational steering applied to a coevolutionary algorithm is presented
Spatial Evolutionary Generative Adversarial Networks
Generative adversary networks (GANs) suffer from training pathologies such as
instability and mode collapse. These pathologies mainly arise from a lack of
diversity in their adversarial interactions. Evolutionary generative
adversarial networks apply the principles of evolutionary computation to
mitigate these problems. We hybridize two of these approaches that promote
training diversity. One, E-GAN, at each batch, injects mutation diversity by
training the (replicated) generator with three independent objective functions
then selecting the resulting best performing generator for the next batch. The
other, Lipizzaner, injects population diversity by training a two-dimensional
grid of GANs with a distributed evolutionary algorithm that includes neighbor
exchanges of additional training adversaries, performance based selection and
population-based hyper-parameter tuning. We propose to combine mutation and
population approaches to diversity improvement. We contribute a superior
evolutionary GANs training method, Mustangs, that eliminates the single loss
function used across Lipizzaner's grid. Instead, each training round, a loss
function is selected with equal probability, from among the three E-GAN uses.
Experimental analyses on standard benchmarks, MNIST and CelebA, demonstrate
that Mustangs provides a statistically faster training method resulting in more
accurate networks
Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
This paper demonstrates that simple yet important characteristics of coevolution can occur in evolutionary algorithms when only a few conditions are met. We find that interaction-based fitness measurements such as fitness (linear) ranking allow for a form of coevolutionary dynamics that is observed when 1) changes are made in what solutions are able to interact during the ranking process and 2) evolution takes place in a multi-objective environment. This research contributes to the study of simulated evolution in a at least two ways. First, it establishes a broader relationship between coevolution and multi-objective optimization than has been previously considered in the literature. Second, it demonstrates that the preconditions for coevolutionary behavior are weaker than previously thought. In particular, our model indicates that direct cooperation or competition between species is not required for coevolution to take place. Moreover, our experiments provide evidence that environmental perturbations can drive coevolutionary processes; a conclusion that mirrors arguments put forth in dual phase evolution theory. In the discussion, we briefly consider how our results may shed light onto this and other recent theories of evolution
- …