5,170 research outputs found

    A roadmap to robot motion planning software development

    Get PDF
    "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: PĂ©rez, A. and Rosell, J. (2010), A roadmap to robot motion planning software development. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., 18: 651-660. doi:doi.org/10.1002/cae.20269, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20269. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving."PhD programs and graduate studies in robotics usually include motion planning among its main subjects. Students that focus their research in this subject find themselves trapped in the necessity of programming an environment where to test and validate their theoretic contributions. The programming of this robot motion planning environment is a big challenge. It requires on the one hand good programming skills involving the use of software development tools, programming paradigms, or the knowledge of computational complexity and efficiency issues. On the other hand it requires coping with different related issues like the modeling of objects, computational geometry problems and graphical representations and interfaces. The mastering of all these techniques is good for the curricula of roboticists with a motion planning profile. Nevertheless, the time and effort devoted to this end must remain reasonable. Within this framework, the aim of this paper is to provide the students with a roadmap to help them in the development of the software tools needed to test and validate their robot motion planners. The proposals are made within the scope of multi-platform open source codePeer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft

    Internet of robotic things : converging sensing/actuating, hypoconnectivity, artificial intelligence and IoT Platforms

    Get PDF
    The Internet of Things (IoT) concept is evolving rapidly and influencing newdevelopments in various application domains, such as the Internet of MobileThings (IoMT), Autonomous Internet of Things (A-IoT), Autonomous Systemof Things (ASoT), Internet of Autonomous Things (IoAT), Internetof Things Clouds (IoT-C) and the Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT) etc.that are progressing/advancing by using IoT technology. The IoT influencerepresents new development and deployment challenges in different areassuch as seamless platform integration, context based cognitive network integration,new mobile sensor/actuator network paradigms, things identification(addressing, naming in IoT) and dynamic things discoverability and manyothers. The IoRT represents new convergence challenges and their need to be addressed, in one side the programmability and the communication ofmultiple heterogeneous mobile/autonomous/robotic things for cooperating,their coordination, configuration, exchange of information, security, safetyand protection. Developments in IoT heterogeneous parallel processing/communication and dynamic systems based on parallelism and concurrencyrequire new ideas for integrating the intelligent “devices”, collaborativerobots (COBOTS), into IoT applications. Dynamic maintainability, selfhealing,self-repair of resources, changing resource state, (re-) configurationand context based IoT systems for service implementation and integrationwith IoT network service composition are of paramount importance whennew “cognitive devices” are becoming active participants in IoT applications.This chapter aims to be an overview of the IoRT concept, technologies,architectures and applications and to provide a comprehensive coverage offuture challenges, developments and applications

    Special issue on smart interactions in cyber-physical systems: Humans, agents, robots, machines, and sensors

    Get PDF
    In recent years, there has been increasing interaction between humans and non‐human systems as we move further beyond the industrial age, the information age, and as we move into the fourth‐generation society. The ability to distinguish between human and non‐human capabilities has become more difficult to discern. Given this, it is common that cyber‐physical systems (CPSs) are rapidly integrated with human functionality, and humans have become increasingly dependent on CPSs to perform their daily routines.The constant indicators of a future where human and non‐human CPSs relationships consistently interact and where they allow each other to navigate through a set of non‐trivial goals is an interesting and rich area of research, discovery, and practical work area. The evidence of con- vergence has rapidly gained clarity, demonstrating that we can use complex combinations of sensors, artificial intelli- gence, and data to augment human life and knowledge. To expand the knowledge in this area, we should explain how to model, design, validate, implement, and experiment with these complex systems of interaction, communication, and networking, which will be developed and explored in this special issue. This special issue will include ideas of the future that are relevant for understanding, discerning, and developing the relationship between humans and non‐ human CPSs as well as the practical nature of systems that facilitate the integration between humans, agents, robots, machines, and sensors (HARMS).Fil: Kim, Donghan. Kyung Hee University;Fil: Rodriguez, Sebastian Alberto. Universidad TecnolĂłgica Nacional; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - TucumĂĄn; ArgentinaFil: Matson, Eric T.. Purdue University; Estados UnidosFil: Kim, Gerard Jounghyun. Korea University

    Parallelizing RRT on distributed-memory architectures

    Get PDF
    This paper addresses the problem of improving the performance of the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm by parallelizing it. For scalability reasons we do so on a distributed-memory architecture, using the message-passing paradigm. We present three parallel versions of RRT along with the technicalities involved in their implementation. We also evaluate the algorithms and study how they behave on different motion planning problems
    • 

    corecore