Hierarchical outranking methods for multi-criteria decision aiding

Els mètodes d’Ajut a la Decisió Multi-Criteri assisteixen en la pressa de decisions implicant múltiples criteris conflictius. Existeixen dos enfocaments principals per resoldre aquest tipus de problemes: els mètodes basats en utilitat i d’outranking, cadascun amb les seves fortaleses i debilitats. Els mètodes outranking estan basats en models d’elecció social combinats amb tècniques d’intel·ligència artificial (com gestió de dades categòriques o d’incertesa). Son eines per una avaluació i comparació realista d’alternatives, basant-se en les necessitats i coneixements del prenedor de la decisió. Una de les debilitats dels mètodes outranking és la no consideració de jerarquies de criteris, que permeten una organització natural del problema, distingint diferents nivells de generalitat que modelen les relacions taxonòmiques implícites entre criteris. En aquesta tesi ens enfoquem en el desenvolupament d’eines d’outranking jeràrquiques i la seva aplicació en casos d’estudi reals per problemes de classificació i rànquing.Los métodos de Ayuda a la Decisión Multi-Criterio asisten en la toma de decisiones involucrando múltiples criterios conflictivos. Existen dos enfoques principales para resolver éste tipo de problemas: los métodos basados en utilidad y de outranking, cada uno con sus fortalezas y debilidades. Los métodos outranking están basados en modelos de elección social combinados con técnicas de Inteligencia Artificial (como gestión de datos categóricos o de incertidumbre). Son herramientas para una evaluación y comparación realista de alternativas, basándose en las necesidades y conocimientos del tomador de decisión. Una de las debilidades de los métodos outranking es la no consideración de jerarquías de criterios, que permiten una organización natural del problema, distinguiendo distintos niveles de generalidad que modelan las relaciones taxonómicas implícitas entre criterios. En ésta tesis nos enfocamos en el desarrollo de herramientas de outranking jerárquicas y su aplicación en casos de estudio reales para problemas de clasificación y ranking.Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA) methods support complex decision making involving multiple and conflictive criteria. MCDA distinguishes two main approaches to deal with this type of problems: utility-based and outranking methods, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Outranking methods are based on social choice models combined with Artificial Intelligence techniques (such as the management of categorical data or uncertainty). They are recognized as providing tools for a realistic assessment and comparison of a set of alternatives, based on the decision maker’s knowledge and needs. One of the main weaknesses of the outranking methods is the lack of consideration of hierarchies of criteria, which enables the decision maker to naturally organize the problem, distinguishing different levels of generality that model the implicit taxonomical relations between the criteria. In this thesis we focus on developing hierarchical outranking tools and their application to real-world case studies for ranking and sorting problems

Sustainable energy transitions in Austria: a participatory multi-criteria appraisal of scenarios

In the light of advancing climate change and the anticipated scarcity of affordable fossil fuels, a transition towards more sustainable energy systems is vital to allow for the long-term sustainability of human wellbeing. Energy is a key sustainability issue, at the heart of the complex interactions of socioeconomic and biophysical systems. The overall aim of this study is to contribute to furthering the understanding of these systems interactions. It intends to deliver methodological insights on how to identify and appraise favourable energy futures in a changing and uncertain world. In order to cope with the complexity and uncertainty of future developments and with the plethora of partly contradictory social preferences, a participatory approach was combined with scenario development and the application of an appraisal tool that takes account of the multidimensionality of system interlinkages. In a case study for Austria, favourable renewable energy scenarios were developed in a participatory setting, involving key Austrian energy stakeholders. The scenario development consisted of two stages: first an exploratory stage with stakeholder engagement and second a modelling stage generating forecasting-type scenarios. Accordingly, the scenarios consist of a narrative part, the storyline, and a modelled, quantitative part. The application of Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) allowed the integration of multi-dimensional sustainability information (social, environmental, economic, and technological criteria) and the social preferences of the stakeholders into the appraisal of the energy scenarios. In the case study presented, five renewable energy scenarios for Austria for 2020 were compared against 17 sustainability criteria. The study illustrates how the combined use of participatory scenario building techniques and MCA acknowledges and integrates inherent complexity, irreducible uncertainty, multi-dimensionality, and, a multiplicity of legitimate perspectives in the appraisal. The main empirical result of the sustainability appraisal undertaken shows that, contrary to the current energy policy in Austria, a profoundly decentralised energy system (scenario E) and an innovative long-term investment strategy (scenario C) rank highest, whereas the renewable strategy based on biomass (scenario D), which represents the dominant political trajectory in Austria’s renewable energy policy, ranks very low. The research demonstrates the integration of biophysical, social, economic, and, technological appraisal criteria, presents and discusses best practice criteria, and, illustrates the challenges and opportunities to incorporate bio-physical aspects into the concept of sociotechnical systems and their transitions in the light of a more sustainable development

Changing Priorities. 3rd VIBRArch

In order to warrant a good present and future for people around the planet and to safe the care of the planet itself, research in architecture has to release all its potential. Therefore, the aims of the 3rd Valencia International Biennial of Research in Architecture are: - To focus on the most relevant needs of humanity and the planet and what architectural research can do for solving them. - To assess the evolution of architectural research in traditionally matters of interest and the current state of these popular and widespread topics. - To deepen in the current state and findings of architectural research on subjects akin to post-capitalism and frequently related to equal opportunities and the universal right to personal development and happiness. - To showcase all kinds of research related to the new and holistic concept of sustainability and to climate emergency. - To place in the spotlight those ongoing works or available proposals developed by architectural researchers in order to combat the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. - To underline the capacity of architectural research to develop resiliency and abilities to adapt itself to changing priorities. - To highlight architecture's multidisciplinarity as a melting pot of multiple approaches, points of view and expertise. - To open new perspectives for architectural research by promoting the development of multidisciplinary and inter-university networks and research groups. For all that, the 3rd Valencia International Biennial of Research in Architecture is open not only to architects, but also for any academic, practitioner, professional or student with a determination to develop research in architecture or neighboring fields.Cabrera Fausto, I. (2023). Changing Priorities. 3rd VIBRArch. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/VIBRArch2022.2022.1686

Fuelling the zero-emissions road freight of the future: routing of mobile fuellers

The future of zero-emissions road freight is closely tied to the sufficient availability of new and clean fuel options such as electricity and Hydrogen. In goods distribution using Electric Commercial Vehicles (ECVs) and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles (HFCVs) a major challenge in the transition period would pertain to their limited autonomy and scarce and unevenly distributed refuelling stations. One viable solution to facilitate and speed up the adoption of ECVs/HFCVs by logistics, however, is to get the fuel to the point where it is needed (instead of diverting the route of delivery vehicles to refuelling stations) using "Mobile Fuellers (MFs)". These are mobile battery swapping/recharging vans or mobile Hydrogen fuellers that can travel to a running ECV/HFCV to provide the fuel they require to complete their delivery routes at a rendezvous time and space. In this presentation, new vehicle routing models will be presented for a third party company that provides MF services. In the proposed problem variant, the MF provider company receives routing plans of multiple customer companies and has to design routes for a fleet of capacitated MFs that have to synchronise their routes with the running vehicles to deliver the required amount of fuel on-the-fly. This presentation will discuss and compare several mathematical models based on different business models and collaborative logistics scenarios

Advancing sustainable nanotechnology with multiple criteria decision aiding

Nanotechnology is currently emerging as the next industrial revolution. It enables the production of goods (i.e. nanoproducts, NPs) with enhanced functionalities, which have nonetheless caused mounting concerns about the potential implications they can have on the environment, economy and society. This thesis employs Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding (MCDA), one form of decision support, to aid the sustainable development of nanotechnology. The first original contribution of this doctoral research is the development of a framework of sustainability assessment criteria for NPs, through a three-phase procedure based on the MCDA process, including a literature review, a pilot and a main survey. It lead to a comprehensive framework of 68 criteria, ranked according to their relative importance, allocated to six main domain areas: (i) economic performance; (ii) environmental impacts; (iii) environmental risk assessment; (iv) human health risk assessment; (v) social implications; and (vi) technical performance. All the criteria are reliable and can be used in real case studies to increase the knowledge about the sustainability of NPs. The second original contribution presented in this thesis is a robust model (DRSA-based model) based on green chemistry principles implementation for the classification of synthesis processes of nanomaterials in preference-ordered classes. This tool was developed through knowledge elicitation techniques based on coconstructive MCDA with the collaboration of two experts (the decision makers) in synthesis of nanomaterials. The robustness of the ensuing model was assessed (and confirmed) by means of another model developed ad hoc (ELECTRE-based model), structured on an MCDA method implementing a stochastic multiple criteria classification strategy. The results confirm that MCDA is an effective decision support approach to foster sustainable development of nanotechnology, providing that the analysts who apply it take these considerations into account. They must ensure that (1) multidisciplinary teams are created to perform comprehensive and credible sustainability evaluations; (2) problem structuring and model construction are as important as (if not more important) than the results (i.e. decision recommendations) themselves; (3) identification of the appropriate MCDA method depends on the problem at hand and not vice-versa; and (4) the credibility of the decision recommendations is subject to the preferences of the decision-makers. If these considerations are accounted for, the possibility of advancing nanotechnology on a sustainable path is very concrete and realistic