An Adaptive Algorithm to Optimize the Dynamics of IEEE 802.15.4 Networks

Presentado en ICST 2013IEEE 802.15.4 standard is becoming one of the most popular technologies for the deployment of low rate Wireless Personal Area Networks with strong power constraints. In order to reduce the energy consumption, beacon-enabled networks with long network inactive periods can be employed. However, the duration of these inactivity periods, as some other configuration parameters, are conventionally set to default values and remain fixed during the whole network operation. This implies that if they are misconfigured the network will not adapt to changes in the conditions of the environment, particularly to the most determining one, i.e. the traffic load. This paper proposes a simple procedure for the dynamic adaptation of several key parameters of IEEE 802.15.4 networks. Under this procedure, the 802.15.4 parameters are modified as a function of the existing traffic conditions.Spanish National Project No.TEC2009-13763-C02-01

A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Moravejosharieh, Amirhossein, Lloret, Jaime. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks.International Journal of Communication Systems, 29, 7, 1269-1292. DOI: 10.1002/dac.3098, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving[EN] Wireless body sensor networks are offered to meet the requirements of a diverse set of applications such as health-related and well-being applications. For instance, they are deployed to measure, fetch and collect human body vital signs. Such information could be further used for diagnosis and monitoring of medical conditions. IEEE 802.15.4 is arguably considered as a well-designed standard protocol to address the need for low-rate, low-power and low-cost wireless body sensor networks. Apart from the vast deployment of this technology, there are still some challenges and issues related to the performance of the medium access control (MAC) protocol of this standard that are required to be addressed. This paper comprises two main parts. In the first part, the survey has provided a thorough assessment of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol performance where its functionality is evaluated considering a range of effective system parameters, that is, some of the MAC and application parameters and the impact of mutual interference. The second part of this paper is about conducting a simulation study to determine the influence of varying values of the system parameters on IEEE 802.15.4 performance gains. More specifically, we explore the dependability level of IEEE 802.5.4 performance gains on a candidate set of system parameters. Finally, this paper highlights the tangible needs to conduct more investigations on particular aspect(s) of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Moravejosharieh, A.; Lloret, J. (2016). A survey of IEEE 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems. 29(7):1269-1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3098S12691292297Alrajeh, N. A., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2014). A Framework for Obesity Control Using a Wireless Body Sensor Network. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(7), 534760. doi:10.1155/2014/534760Lopes I Silva B Rodrigues J Lloret J Proenca M A mobile health monitoring solution for weight control International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) Nanjing / China 2011 1 5Singh, N., Singh, A. K., & Singh, V. K. (2015). Design and performance of wearable ultrawide band textile antenna for medical applications. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 57(7), 1553-1557. doi:10.1002/mop.29131Lan, K., Chou, C.-M., Wang, T., & Li, M.-W. (2012). Using body sensor networks for motion detection: a cluster-based approach for green radio. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 25(2), 199-216. doi:10.1002/ett.2559Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Catala, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2016). A group-based wireless body sensors network using energy harvesting for soccer team monitoring. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 21(4), 208. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2016.079172Garcia M Catala A Lloret J Rodrigues J A wireless sensor network for soccer team monitoring International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems and Workshops (DCOSS) Barcelona / Spain 2011 1 6Penders J Gyselinckx B Vullers R De Nil M Nimmala V van de Molengraft J Yazicioglu F Torfs T Leonov V Merken P Van Hoof C Human++: from technology to emerging health monitoring concepts 5th International Summer School and Symposium ISSS-MDBS on Medical Devices and Biosensors Hong Kong 2008 94 98Penders J Van de Molengraft J. Brown L Grundlehner B Gyselinckx B Van Hoof C Potential and challenges of body area networks for personal health Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Minneapolis, U.S. 2009 6569 6572Ullah, S., Higgins, H., Braem, B., Latre, B., Blondia, C., Moerman, I., … Kwak, K. S. (2010). A Comprehensive Survey of Wireless Body Area Networks. Journal of Medical Systems, 36(3), 1065-1094. doi:10.1007/s10916-010-9571-3Cao, H., Leung, V., Chow, C., & Chan, H. (2009). Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: A survey and outlook. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(12), 84-93. doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.5350373Hall, P. S., Yang Hao, Nechayev, Y. I., Alomainy, A., Constantinou, C. C., Parini, C., … Bozzetti, M. (2007). Antennas and propagation for on-body communication systems. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 49(3), 41-58. doi:10.1109/map.2007.4293935Mamaghanian, H., Khaled, N., Atienza, D., & Vandergheynst, P. (2011). Compressed Sensing for Real-Time Energy-Efficient ECG Compression on Wireless Body Sensor Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 58(9), 2456-2466. doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2156795LAN-MAN Standards Committee the IEEE Computer Society IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.4: low rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs) 2011Petrova M Riihijarvi J Mahonen P Labella S Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2006 487 492Vaithiyanathan, J., Raju, R. K., & Sadayan, G. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 Using Association Process and Channel Measurement. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 409-417. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22555-0_42Yazdi E Moravejosharieh A Willig A Pawlikowski K Coupling power and frequency adaptation for interference mitigation in IEEE 802.15.4-based mobile body sensor networks: part II 2014 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 105 110Pelegris P Banitsas K Investigating the efficiency of IEEE 802.15.4 for medical monitoring applications 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC Boston, U.S. 2011 8215 8218Ranjit, J. S., & Shin, S. (2013). A Modified IEEE 802.15.4 Superframe Structure for Guaranteed Emergency Handling in Wireless Body Area Network. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 5(2), 1. doi:10.5296/npa.v5i2.3375Jianliang Zheng, & Lee, M. J. (2004). Will IEEE 802.15.4 make ubiquitous networking a reality?: a discussion on a potential low power, low bit rate standard. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(6), 140-146. doi:10.1109/mcom.2004.1304251Toscano E Lo Bello L Cross-channel interference in IEEE 802.15.4 networks IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, 2008. WFCS 2008 Dresden, Germany 2008 139 148Bashir F Baek WS Sthapit P Pandey D young Pyun J Coordinator assisted passive discovery for mobile end devices in IEEE 802.15.4 2013 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2013 601 604Tabatabaei Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Shortening orphan time in IEEE 802.15.4: what can be gained 2013 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Park, T. R., Kim, T. H., Choi, J. Y., Choi, S., & Kwon, W. H. (2005). Throughput and energy consumption analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA∕CA. Electronics Letters, 41(18), 1017. doi:10.1049/el:20051662Bianchi, G. (2000). Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3), 535-547. doi:10.1109/49.840210IEEE Computer Society LAN MAN Standards Committee Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications 1997Pollin, S., Ergen, M., Ergen, S. C., Bougard, B., Der Perre, L. V., Moerman, I., … Catthoor, F. (2008). Performance Analysis of Slotted Carrier Sense IEEE 802.15.4 Medium Access Layer. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(9), 3359-3371. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.060057Xinhua Ling, Yu Cheng, Mark, J. W., & Xuemin Shen. (2008). A Renewal Theory Based Analytical Model for the Contention Access Period of IEEE 802.15.4 MAC. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(6), 2340-2349. doi:10.1109/twc.2008.070048Lee, C. Y., Cho, H. I., Hwang, G. U., Doh, Y., & Park, N. (2011). Performance modeling and analysis of IEEE 802.15.4 slotted CSMA/CA protocol with ACK mode. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 65(2), 123-131. doi:10.1016/j.aeue.2010.02.007Wang, F., Zhao, Y., & Li, D. (2011). Analysis of CSMA/CA in IEEE 802.15.4. IET Communications, 5(15), 2187-2195. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.1007Zhu, J., Tao, Z., & Lv, C. (2011). Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA/CA Scheme Adopting a Modified LIB Model. Wireless Personal Communications, 65(1), 25-51. doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0226-6Shu F Sakurai T Analysis of an energy conserving CSMA-CA GLOBECOM Washington DC, U.S. 2007 2536 2540Shu, F., & Sakurai, T. (2011). A new analytical model for the IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA protocol. Computer Networks, 55(11), 2576-2591. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.04.017Cano-Garcia, J. M., & Casilari, E. (2011). An empirical evaluation of the consumption of 802.15.4/ZigBee sensor motes in noisy environments. 2011 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. doi:10.1109/icnsc.2011.5874886Baz, M., Mitchell, P. D., & Pearce, D. A. J. (2013). Versatile Analytical Model for Delay and Energy Evaluation in WPANs: A Case Study for IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA-CA. Wireless Personal Communications, 75(1), 415-445. doi:10.1007/s11277-013-1370-yLiu Q Czylwik A A priority-based adaptive service differentiation scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 sensor networks Proceedings of European Wireless 2014; 20th European Wireless Conference Barcelona, Spain 2014 1 6Golmie, N., Cypher, D., & Rebala, O. (s. f.). Performance evaluation of low rate WPANs for medical applications. IEEE MILCOM 2004. Military Communications Conference, 2004. doi:10.1109/milcom.2004.1494952Misic, J., Misic, V. B., & Shafi, S. (s. f.). Performance of IEEE 802.15.4 beacon enabled PAN with uplink transmissions in non-saturation mode - access delay for finite buffers. First International Conference on Broadband Networks. doi:10.1109/broadnets.2004.61Mišić, J., Shafi, S., & Mišić, V. B. (2005). The impact of MAC parameters on the performance of 802.15.4 PAN. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(5), 509-528. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.08.002Anastasi, G., Conti, M., & Di Francesco, M. (2011). A Comprehensive Analysis of the MAC Unreliability Problem in IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(1), 52-65. doi:10.1109/tii.2010.2085440Lee, B.-H., Al Rasyid, M. U. H., & Wu, H.-K. (2012). Analysis of superframe adjustment and beacon transmission for IEEE 802.15.4 cluster tree networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2012(1). doi:10.1186/1687-1499-2012-219Zimmerling, M., Ferrari, F., Mottola, L., Voigt, T., & Thiele, L. (2012). pTunes. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks - IPSN ’12. doi:10.1145/2185677.2185730Rohm, D., Goyal, M., Hosseini, H., Divjak, A., & Bashir, Y. (2009). Configuring Beaconless IEEE 802.15.4 Networks Under Different Traffic Loads. 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications. doi:10.1109/aina.2009.84Jin-Shyan Lee. (2006). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4 for low-rate wireless personal area networks. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52(3), 742-749. doi:10.1109/tce.2006.1706465De Paz Alberola, R., & Pesch, D. (2012). Duty cycle learning algorithm (DCLA) for IEEE 802.15.4 beacon-enabled wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(4), 664-679. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2011.06.006Barbieri, A., Chiti, F., & Fantacci, R. (2006). WSN17-2: Proposal of an Adaptive MAC Protocol for Efficient IEEE 802.15.4 Low Power Communications. IEEE Globecom 2006. doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.989Jeon, J., Lee, J. W., Ha, J. Y., & Kwon, W. H. (2007). DCA: Duty-Cycle Adaptation Algorithm for IEEE 802.15.4 Beacon-Enabled Networks. 2007 IEEE 65th Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC2007-Spring. doi:10.1109/vetecs.2007.35Kang, M., Chong, J., Hyun, H., Kim, S., Jung, B., & Sung, D. (2007). Adaptive Interference-Aware Multi-Channel Clustering Algorithm in a ZigBee Network in the Presence of WLAN Interference. 2007 2nd International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing. doi:10.1109/iswpc.2007.342601Yi, P., Iwayemi, A., & Zhou, C. (2011). Developing ZigBee Deployment Guideline Under WiFi Interference for Smart Grid Applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(1), 110-120. doi:10.1109/tsg.2010.2091655Tang, L., Wang, K.-C., Huang, Y., & Gu, F. (2007). Channel Characterization and Link Quality Assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-Compliant Radio for Factory Environments. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 3(2), 99-110. doi:10.1109/tii.2007.898414Sha M Xing G Zhou G Liu S Wang X C-MAC: model-driven concurrent medium access control for wireless sensor networks IEEE INFOCOM 2009 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2009 1845 1853 10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5062105Peizhong Yi, Iwayemi, A., & Chi Zhou. (2010). Frequency agility in a ZigBee network for smart grid application. 2010 Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT). doi:10.1109/isgt.2010.5434747Torabi N Wong W Leung VCM A robust coexistence scheme for IEEE 802.15.4 wireless personal area networks IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) Las Vegas, U.S. 2011 1031 1035 10.1109/CCNC.2011.5766322IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.6: wireless body area networks IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 2012 1 271 10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6161600Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, J.-W., & Eom, D.-S. (2012). Flexible beacon scheduling scheme for interference mitigation in body sensor networks. 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON). doi:10.1109/secon.2012.6275772Bradai N Fourati LC Kamoun L Performance analysis of medium access control protocol for wireless body area networks 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) Barcelona, Spain 2013 916 921Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part I: the need for enhancement IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) Sydney, Australia 2013 1226 1231Moravejosharieh A Yazdi ET Willig A Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part II: greedy channel utilization 19th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON) Singapore 2013 1 6Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Willig A Pawlikowski K Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: continuous hopping approach Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC) Melbourne, Australia 2014 93 98 10.1109/ATNAC.2014.7020880Moravejosharieh, A. H. (2015). Frequency-Adaptive Approach In IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Body Sensor Networks: Continuous-Assessment or Periodic-Assessment? International Journal of Information, Communication Technology and Applications, 1(1), 19. doi:10.17972/ajicta2015113Moravejosharieh A Yazdi E Pawlikowski K Sirisena H Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: adaptive phase-shifting approach International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC) Sydney, Australia 2015 93 98Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Channel Assignment for Multi-hop Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 101-116. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_6Bian, K., Park, J.-M., & Gao, B. (2014). Coexistence-Aware Spectrum Sharing for Homogeneous Cognitive Radio Networks. Cognitive Radio Networks, 61-75. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07329-3_4Wu C Yan H Huo H A multi-channel MAC protocol design based on IEEE 802.15.4 standard in industry 2012 10th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN) Beijing, China 2012 1206 1211 10.1109/INDIN.2012.6300916Incel, O. D. (2011). A survey on multi-channel communication in wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 55(13), 3081-3099. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2011.05.020Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 St. Louis MO, U.S. 2008 53 63Demirkol, I., Ersoy, C., & Alagoz, F. (2006). MAC protocols for wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(4), 115-121. doi:10.1109/mcom.2006.1632658Wykret T Correia L Macedo D Giacomin J Andrade L Evaluation and avoidance of interference in WSN: a multi-radio node prototype using dynamic spectrum allocation IFIP Wireless Days (WD) Valencia, Spain 2013 1 3 10.1109/WD.2013.6686533Doyle L Sutton P Nolan K Lotze J Ozgul B Rondeau T Fahmy S Lahlou H DaSilva L Experiences from the IRIS testbed in dynamic spectrum access and cognitive radio experimentation IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Singapore 2010 1 8 10.1109/DYSPAN.2010.5457835Ansari, J., Zhang, X., & Mahonen, P. (2010). Multi-radio medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks, 8(1), 47. doi:10.1504/ijsnet.2010.034066Liu Z Wu W A dynamic multi-radio multi-channel MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks 2nd International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN) Singapore 2010 105 109Xu, W., Trappe, W., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Defending wireless sensor networks from radio interference through channel adaptation. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 4(4), 1-34. doi:10.1145/1387663.1387664Kim Y Shin H Cha H Y-MAC: an energy-efficient multi-channel MAC protocol for dense wireless sensor networks Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks IPSN '08 Washington, DC, USA 2008 53 63Tae Hyun Kim, Jae Yeol Ha, & Sunghyun Choi. (2009). Improving Spectral and Temporal Efficiency of Collocated IEEE 802.15.4 LR-WPANs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8(12), 1596-1609. doi:10.1109/tmc.2009.85Chowdhury, K. R., Nandiraju, N., Chanda, P., Agrawal, D. P., & Zeng, Q.-A. (2009). Channel allocation and medium access control for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(2), 307-321. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2008.03.004Deylami, M., & Jovanov, E. (2012). A distributed and collaborative scheme for mitigating coexistence in IEEE 802.15.4 based WBANs. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Southeast Regional Conference on - ACM-SE ’12. doi:10.1145/2184512.2184514Deylami, M. N., & Jovanov, E. (2014). A Distributed Scheme to Manage The Dynamic Coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4-Based Health-Monitoring WBANs. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 18(1), 327-334. doi:10.1109/jbhi.2013.2278217Deylami M Jovanov E An implementation of a distributed scheme for managing the dynamic coexistence of wireless body area networks Southeastcon, 2013 Proceedings of IEEE Jacksonville, U.S. 2013 1 6 10.1109/SECON.2013.6567446Cavallari, R., Martelli, F., Rosini, R., Buratti, C., & Verdone, R. (2014). A Survey on Wireless Body Area Networks: Technologies and Design Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1635-1657. doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00007Chen, M., Gonzalez, S., Vasilakos, A., Cao, H., & Leung, V. C. M. (2010). Body Area Networks: A Survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(2), 171-193. doi:10.1007/s11036-010-0260-8Movassaghi, S., Abolhasan, M., Lipman, J., Smith, D., & Jamalipour, A. (2014). Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1658-1686. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.121313.00064Patel, M., & Wang, J. (2010). Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 17(1), 80-88. doi:10.1109/mwc.2010.5416354ULLAH, S., KHAN, P., ULLAH, N., SALEEM, S., HIGGINS, H., & Sup KWAK, K. (2009). A Review of Wireless Body Area Networks for Medical Applications. International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences, 02(08), 797-803. doi:10.4236/ijcns.2009.28093Boulis, A., Smith, D., Miniutti, D., Libman, L., & Tselishchev, Y. (2012). Challenges in body area networks for healthcare: the MAC. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(5), 100-106. doi:10.1109/mcom.2012.6194389Pantelopoulos A Bourbakis N A survey on wearable biosensor systems for health monitoring 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Vancouver, Canada 2008 4887 4890 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650309Takei, K., Honda, W., Harada, S., Arie, T., & Akita, S. (2014). Toward Flexible and Wearable Human-Interactive Health-Monitoring Devices. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 4(4), 487-500. doi:10.1002/adhm.201400546Caldeira, J. M. L. P., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Lorenz, P. (2013). Intra-Mobility Support Solutions for Healthcare Wireless Sensor Networks–Handover Issues. IEEE Sensors Journal, 13(11), 4339-4348. doi:10.1109/jsen.2013.2267729Carrano, R. C., Passos, D., Magalhaes, L. C. S., & Albuquerque, C. V. N. (2014). Survey and Taxonomy of Duty Cycling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 181-194. doi:10.1109/surv.2013.052213.00116Sudevalayam, S., & Kulkarni, P. (2011). Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes: Survey and Implications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 13(3), 443-461. doi:10.1109/surv.2011.060710.00094Khanafer, M., Guennoun, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2014). A Survey of Beacon-Enabled IEEE 802.15.4 MAC Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(2), 856-876. doi:10.1

Energy Efficient and Reliable Wireless Sensor Networks - An Extension to IEEE 802.15.4e

Collecting sensor data in industrial environments from up to some tenth of battery powered sensor nodes with sampling rates up to 100Hz requires energy aware protocols, which avoid collisions and long listening phases. The IEEE 802.15.4 standard focuses on energy aware wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and the Task Group 4e has published an amendment to fulfill up to 100 sensor value transmissions per second per sensor node (Low Latency Deterministic Network (LLDN) mode) to satisfy demands of factory automation. To improve the reliability of the data collection in the star topology of the LLDN mode, we propose a relay strategy, which can be performed within the LLDN schedule. Furthermore we propose an extension of the star topology to collect data from two-hop sensor nodes. The proposed Retransmission Mode enables power savings in the sensor node of more than 33%, while reducing the packet loss by up to 50%. To reach this performance, an optimum spatial distribution is necessary, which is discussed in detail

Availability and End-to-end Reliability in Low Duty Cycle Multihop Wireless Sensor Networks

A wireless sensor network (WSN) is an ad-hoc technology that may even consist of thousands of nodes, which necessitates autonomic, self-organizing and multihop operations. A typical WSN node is battery powered, which makes the network lifetime the primary concern. The highest energy efficiency is achieved with low duty cycle operation, however, this alone is not enough. WSNs are deployed for different uses, each requiring acceptable Quality of Service (QoS). Due to the unique characteristics of WSNs, such as dynamic wireless multihop routing and resource constraints, the legacy QoS metrics are not feasible as such. We give a new definition to measure and implement QoS in low duty cycle WSNs, namely availability and reliability. Then, we analyze the effect of duty cycling for reaching the availability and reliability. The results are obtained by simulations with ZigBee and proprietary TUTWSN protocols. Based on the results, we also propose a data forwarding algorithm suitable for resource constrained WSNs that guarantees end-to-end reliability while adding a small overhead that is relative to the packet error rate (PER). The forwarding algorithm guarantees reliability up to 30% PER

Evolving SDN for Low-Power IoT Networks

Software Defined Networking (SDN) offers a flexible and scalable architecture that abstracts decision making away from individual devices and provides a programmable network platform. However, implementing a centralized SDN architecture within the constraints of a low-power wireless network faces considerable challenges. Not only is controller traffic subject to jitter due to unreliable links and network contention, but the overhead generated by SDN can severely affect the performance of other traffic. This paper addresses the challenge of bringing high-overhead SDN architecture to IEEE 802.15.4 networks. We explore how traditional SDN needs to evolve in order to overcome the constraints of low-power wireless networks, and discuss protocol and architectural optimizations necessary to reduce SDN control overhead - the main barrier to successful implementation. We argue that interoperability with the existing protocol stack is necessary to provide a platform for controller discovery and coexistence with legacy networks. We consequently introduce {\mu}SDN, a lightweight SDN framework for Contiki, with both IPv6 and underlying routing protocol interoperability, as well as optimizing a number of elements within the SDN architecture to reduce control overhead to practical levels. We evaluate {\mu}SDN in terms of latency, energy, and packet delivery. Through this evaluation we show how the cost of SDN control overhead (both bootstrapping and management) can be reduced to a point where comparable performance and scalability is achieved against an IEEE 802.15.4-2012 RPL-based network. Additionally, we demonstrate {\mu}SDN through simulation: providing a use-case where the SDN configurability can be used to provide Quality of Service (QoS) for critical network flows experiencing interference, and we achieve considerable reductions in delay and jitter in comparison to a scenario without SDN

A Comprehensive Analysis of Literature Reported Mac and Phy Enhancements of Zigbee and its Alliances

Wireless communication is one of the most required technologies by the common man. The strength of this technology is rigorously progressing towards several novel directions in establishing personal wireless networks mounted over on low power consuming systems. The cutting-edge communication technologies like bluetooth, WIFI and ZigBee significantly play a prime role to cater the basic needs of any individual. ZigBee is one such evolutionary technology steadily getting its popularity in establishing personal wireless networks which is built on small and low-power digital radios. Zigbee defines the physical and MAC layers built on IEEE standard. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of literature reported MAC and PHY enhancements of ZigBee and its contemporary technologies with respect to performance, power consumption, scheduling, resource management and timing and address binding. The work also discusses on the areas of ZigBee MAC and PHY towards their design for specific applications

Just-in-Time Adaptive Algorithm for Optimal Parameter Setting in 802.15.4 WSNs

Recent studies have shown that the IEEE 802.15.4 MAC protocol suffers from severe limitations, in terms of reliability and energy efficiency, when the CSMA/CA parameter setting is not appropriate. However, selecting the optimal setting that guarantees the application reliability requirements, with minimum energy consumption, is not a trivial task in wireless sensor networks, especially when the operating conditions change over time. In this paper we propose a Just-in-Time LEarning-based Adaptive Parameter tuning (JIT-LEAP) algorithm that adapts the CSMA/CA parameter setting to the time-varying operating conditions by also exploiting the past history to find the most appropriate setting for the current conditions. Following the approach of active adaptive algorithms, the adaptation mechanism of JIT-LEAP is triggered by a change detection test only when needed (i.e., in response to a change in the operating conditions). Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms other similar algorithms, both in stationary and dynamic scenarios

Atomic-SDN: Is Synchronous Flooding the Solution to Software-Defined Networking in IoT?

The adoption of Software Defined Networking (SDN) within traditional networks has provided operators the ability to manage diverse resources and easily reconfigure networks as requirements change. Recent research has extended this concept to IEEE 802.15.4 low-power wireless networks, which form a key component of the Internet of Things (IoT). However, the multiple traffic patterns necessary for SDN control makes it difficult to apply this approach to these highly challenging environments. This paper presents Atomic-SDN, a highly reliable and low-latency solution for SDN in low-power wireless. Atomic-SDN introduces a novel Synchronous Flooding (SF) architecture capable of dynamically configuring SF protocols to satisfy complex SDN control requirements, and draws from the authors' previous experiences in the IEEE EWSN Dependability Competition: where SF solutions have consistently outperformed other entries. Using this approach, Atomic-SDN presents considerable performance gains over other SDN implementations for low-power IoT networks. We evaluate Atomic-SDN through simulation and experimentation, and show how utilizing SF techniques provides latency and reliability guarantees to SDN control operations as the local mesh scales. We compare Atomic-SDN against other SDN implementations based on the IEEE 802.15.4 network stack, and establish that Atomic-SDN improves SDN control by orders-of-magnitude across latency, reliability, and energy-efficiency metrics