An Octave-Range, Watt-Level, Fully-Integrated CMOS Switching Power Mixer Array for Linearization and Back-Off-Efficiency Improvement

The power mixer array is presented as a novel power generation approach for non-constant envelope signals. It comprises several power mixer units that are dynamically turned on and off to improve the linearity and back-off efficiency. At the circuit level, the power mixer unit can operate as a switching amplifier to achieve high peak power efficiency. Additional circuit level linearization and back-off efficiency improvement techniques are also proposed. To demonstrate the feasibility of this idea, a fully-integrated octave-range CMOS power mixer array is implemented in a 130 nm CMOS process. It is operational between 1.2 GHz and 2.4 GHz and can generate an output power of +31.3 dBm into an external 50 Ω load with a PAE of 42% and a gain compression of only 0.4 dB at 1.8 GHz. It achieves a PAE of 25%, at an average output power of +26.4 dBm, and an EVM of 4.6% with a non-constant-envelope 16 QAM signal. It can also produce arbitrary signal levels down to -70 dBm of output power with the 16 QAM-modulated signal without any RF gain control circuit

An Offset Cancelation Technique for Latch Type Sense Amplifiers

An offset compensation technique for a latch type sense amplifier is proposed in this paper. The proposed scheme is based on the recalibration of the charging/discharging current of the critical nodes which are affected by the device mismatches. The circuit has been designed in a 65 nm CMOS technology with 1.2 V core transistors. The auto-calibration procedure is fully digital. Simulation results are given verifying the operation for sampling a 5 Gb/s signal dissipating only 360 uW

Phased Array Systems in Silicon

Phased array systems, a special case of MIMO systems, take advantage of spatial directivity and array gain to increase spectral efficiency. Implementing a phased array system at high frequency in a commercial silicon process technology presents several challenges. This article focuses on the architectural and circuit-level trade-offs involved in the design of the first silicon-based fully integrated phased array system operating at 24 GHz. The details of some of the important circuit building blocks are also discussed. The measured results demonstrate the feasibility of using integrated phased arrays for wireless communication and vehicular radar applications at 24 GHz

A Fully integrated D-band Direct-Conversion I/Q Transmitter and Receiver Chipset in SiGe BiCMOS Technology

This paper presents design and characterization of single-chip 110-170 GHz (D-band) direct conversion in-phase/quadrature-phase (I/Q) transmitter and receiver monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs), realized in a 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS process with ft/fmax of 250 GHz/370 GHz. The chipset is suitable for low power wideband communication and can be used in both homodyne and heterodyne architectures. The Transmitter chip consists of a six-stage power amplifier, an I/Q modulator, and a LO multiplier chain. The LO multiplier chain consists of frequency sixtupler followed by a two-stage amplifier. It exhibits a single sideband conversion gain of 23 dB and saturated output power of 0 dBm. The 3 dB RF bandwidth is 31 GHz from 114 to 145 GHz. The receiver includes a low noise amplifier, I/Q demodulator and x6 multiplier chain at the LO port. The receiver provides a conversion gain of 27 dB and has a noise figure of 10 dB. It has 3 dB RF bandwidth of 28 GHz from 112-140 GHz. The transmitter and receiver have dc power consumption of 240 mW and 280 mW, respectively. The chip area of each transmitter and receiver circuit is 1.4 mm x 1.1 mm

Low-Power D-Band CMOS Amplifier for Ultrahigh-Speed Wireless Communications

This paper presents a low-power D-Band amplifier suitable for ultrahigh-speed wireless communications. The three-stage fully differential amplifier with capacitive neutralization is fabricated in 40 nm CMOS provided by TSMC. Measurement results show that the D-band amplifier obtains a peak gain of 9.6 dB over a -3 dB bandwidth from 138 GHz to 164.5 GHz. It exhibits an output 1 dB compression point (OP1dB) of 1.5 dbm at the center frequency of 150 GHz. The amplifier consumes a low power of 27.3 mW from a 0.7 V supply voltage while its core occupies a chip area of 0.06 mm2

A review of technologies and design techniques of millimeter-wave power amplifiers

his article reviews the state-of-the-art millimeter-wave (mm-wave) power amplifiers (PAs), focusing on broadband design techniques. An overview of the main solid-state technologies is provided, including Si, gallium arsenide (GaAs), GaN, and other III-V materials, and both field-effect and bipolar transistors. The most popular broadband design techniques are introduced, before critically comparing through the most relevant design examples found in the scientific literature. Given the wide breadth of applications that are foreseen to exploit the mm-wave spectrum, this contribution will represent a valuable guide for designers who need a single reference before adventuring in the challenging task of the mm-wave PA design

Design and Analysis of Low-power Millimeter-Wave SiGe BiCMOS Circuits with Application to Network Measurement Systems

Interest in millimeter (mm-) wave frequencies covering the spectrum of 30-300 GHz has been steadily increasing. Advantages such as larger absolute bandwidth and smaller form-factor have made this frequency region attractive for numerous applications, including high-speed wireless communication, sensing, material science, health, automotive radar, and space exploration. Continuous development of silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistor (SiGe HBT) and associated BiCMOS technology has achieved transistors with fT/fmax of 505/720 GHz and integration with 55 nm CMOS. Such accomplishment and predictions of beyond THz performance have made SiGe BiCMOS technology the most competitive candidate for addressing the aforementioned applications. Especially for mobile applications, a critical demand for future mm-wave applications will be low DC power consumption (Pdc), which requires a substantial reduction of supply voltage and current. Conventionally, reducing the supply voltage will lead to HBTs operating close to or in the saturation region, which is typically avoided in mm-wave circuits due to expectated performance degradation and often inaccurate models. However, due to only moderate speed reduction at the forward-biased base-collector voltage (VBC) up to 0.5 V and the accuracy of the compact model HICUM/L2 also in saturation, low-power mm-wave circuits with SiGe HBTs operating in saturation offer intriguing benefits, which have been explored in this thesis based on 130 nm SiGe BiCMOS technologies: • Different low-power mm-wave circuit blocks are discussed in detail, including low-noise amplifiers (LNAs), down-conversion mixers, and various frequency multipliers covering a wide frequency range from V-band (50-75 GHz) to G-band (140-220 GHz). • Aiming at realizing a better trade-off between Pdc and RF performance, a drastic decrease in supply voltage is realized with forward-biased VBC, forcing transistors of the circuits to operate in saturation. • Discussions contain the theoretical analysis of the key figure of merits (FoMs), topology and bias selection, device sizing, and performance enhancement techniques. • A 173-207 GHz low-power amplifier with 23 dB gain and 3.2 mW Pdc, and a 72-108 GHz low-power tunable amplifier with 10-23 dB gain and 4-21 mW Pdc were designed. • A 97 GHz low-power down-conversion mixer was presented with 9.6 dB conversion gain (CG) and 12 mW Pdc. • For multipliers, a 56-66 GHz low-power frequency quadrupler with -3.6 dB peak CG and 12 mW Pdc, and a 172-201 GHz low-power frequency tripler with -4 dB peak CG and 10.5 mW Pdc were realized. By cascading these two circuits, also a 176-193 GHz low-power ×12 multiplier was designed, achieving -11 dBm output power with only 26 mW Pdc. • An integrated 190 GHz low-power receiver was designed as one receiving channel of a G-band frequency extender specifically for a VNA-based measurement system. Another goal of this receiver is to explore the lowest possible Pdc while keeping its highly competitive RF performance for general applications requiring a wide LO tuning range. Apart from the low-power design method of circuit blocks, the careful analysis and distribution of the receiver FoMs are also applied for further reduction of the overall Pdc. Along this line, this receiver achieved a peak CG of 49 dB with a 14 dB tunning range, consuming only 29 mW static Pdc for the core part and 171 mW overall Pdc, including the LO chain. • All designs presented in this thesis were fabricated and characterized on-wafer. Thanks to the accurate compact model HICUM/L2, first-pass access was achieved for all circuits, and simulation results show excellent agreement with measurements. • Compared with recently published work, most of the designs in this thesis show extremely low Pdc with highly competitive key FoMs regarding gain, bandwidth, and noise figure. • The observed excellent measurement-simulation agreement enables the sensitivity analysis of each design for obtaining a deeper insight into the impact of transistor-related physical effects on critical circuit performance parameters. Such studies provide meaningful feedback for process improvement and modeling development.:Table of Contents Kurzfassung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 List of symbols and acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Technology 7 2.1 Fabrication Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.1 SiGe HBT performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1.2 B11HFC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.3 SG13G2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.4 SG13D7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2 Commonly Used Components . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.1 Grounded-sidewall-shielded microstrip line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.2 Zero-impedance Transmission Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2.3 Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.3.1 Active Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.2.3.2 Passive Balun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3 Low-power Low-noise Amplifiers 25 3.1 173-207 GHz Ultra-low-power Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.1 Topology Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.2 Bias Dependency of the Small-signal Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.1.2.1 Bias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.1.2.2 Bias vs Gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.1.2.3 Bias vs Noise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.2.4 Bias vs Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1.3 Bias selection and Device sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.1 Bias Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.1.3.2 Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.1.4 Performance Enhancement Technologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.1 Gm-boosting Inductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.1.4.2 Stability Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.1.4.3 Noise Improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.1.5 Circuit Realization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.1 Layout Scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 3.1.5.2 Inductors Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3.1.5.3 Dual-band Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.1.5.4 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 3.1.6 Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.1 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.2 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 3.1.6.3 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.2 72-108 GHz Low-Power Tunable Amplifier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.1 Configuration, Sizing, and Bias Tuning Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.2.2 Regional Matching Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.1 Impedance Variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.2.2.2 Regional Matching Network Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2.3 Circuit Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 3.2.4.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 4 Low-power Down-conversion Mixers 73 4.1 97 GHz Low-power Down-conversion Mixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1 Mixer Design and Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.1 Mixer Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4.1.1.2 Bias Selection and Device Sizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1.1.3 Mixer Implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.1.2 Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.1 Measurement Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.1.2.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 4.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5 Low-power Multipliers 87 5.1 General Design Flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.2 56-66 GHz Low-power Frequency Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.3 172-201 GHz Low-power Frequency Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.4 176-193 GHz Low-power ×12 Frequency Multiplier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 6 Low-power Receivers 101 6.1 Receiver Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6.2 LO Chain (×12) Integrated 190 GHz Low-Power Receiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.1 Receiver Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.2.2 Low-power Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.2.3 Building Blocks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.1 LNA and LO DA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 6.2.3.2 Tunable Mixer and IF BA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2.3.3 65 GHz (V-band) Quadrupler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 6.2.3.4 G-band Tripler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.2.4 Receiver Results and Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.2.5 Measurement Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.2.6 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 6.3 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 7 Conclusions 133 7.1 Summaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 7.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Bibliography 135 List of Figures 149 List of Tables 157 A Derivation of the Gm 159 A.1 Gm of standard cascode stage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 A.2 Gm of cascode stage with Lcas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 A.3 Gm of cascode stage with Lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 B Derivation of Yin in the stability analysis 163 C Derivation of Zin and Zout 165 C.1 Zin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 C.2 Zout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 D Derivation of the cascaded oP1dB 169 E Table of element values for the designed circuits 17

Wideband integrated circuits for optical communication systems

The exponential growth of internet traffic drives datacenters to constantly improvetheir capacity. Several research and industrial organizations are aiming towardsTbps Ethernet and beyond, which brings new challenges to the field of high-speedbroadband electronic circuit design. With datacenters rapidly becoming significantenergy consumers on the global scale, the energy efficiency of the optical interconnecttransceivers takes a primary role in the development of novel systems. Furthermore,wideband optical links are finding application inside very high throughput satellite(V/HTS) payloads used in the ever-expanding cloud of telecommunication satellites,enabled by the maturity of the existing fiber based optical links and the hightechnology readiness level of radiation hardened integrated circuit processes. Thereare several additional challenges unique in the design of a wideband optical system.The overall system noise must be optimized for the specific application, modulationscheme, PD and laser characteristics. Most state-of-the-art wideband circuits are builton high-end semiconductor SiGe and InP technologies. However, each technologydemands specific design decisions to be made in order to get low noise, high energyefficiency and adequate bandwidth. In order to overcome the frequency limitationsof the optoelectronic components, bandwidth enhancement and channel equalizationtechniques are used. In this work various blocks of optical communication systems aredesigned attempting to tackle some of the aforementioned challenges. Two TIA front-end topologies with 133 GHz bandwidth, a CB and a CE with shunt-shunt feedback,are designed and measured, utilizing a state-of-the-art 130 nm InP DHBT technology.A modular equalizer block built in 130 nm SiGe HBT technology is presented. Threeultra-wideband traveling wave amplifiers, a 4-cell, a single cell and a matrix single-stage, are designed in a 250 nm InP DHBT process to test the limits of distributedamplification. A differential VCSEL driver circuit is designed and integrated in a4x 28 Gbps transceiver system for intra-satellite optical communications based in arad-hard 130nm SiGe process

4-channel 200 Gb/s WDM O-band silicon photonic transceiver sub-assembly

We demonstrate a 200G capable WDM O-band optical transceiver comprising a 4-element array of Silicon Photonics ring modulators (RM) and Ge photodiodes (PD) co-packaged with a SiGe BiCMOS integrated driver and a SiGe transimpedance amplifier (TIA) chip. A 4 x 50 Gb/s data modulation experiment revealed an average extinction ratio (ER) of 3.17 dB, with the transmitter exhibiting a total energy efficiency of 2 pJ/bit. Data reception has been experimentally validated at 50 Gb/s per lane, achieving an interpolated 10E-12 bit error rate (BER) for an input optical modulation amplitude (OMA) of -9.5 dBm and a power efficiency of 2.2 pJ/bit, yielding a total power efficiency of 4.2 pJ/bit for the transceiver, including heater tuning requirements. This electro-optic subassembly provides the highest aggregate data-rate among O-band RM-based silicon photonic transceiver implementations, highlighting its potential for next generation WDM Ethernet transceivers. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement