8 research outputs found
Człowiek wobec zagrożeń, psychospołeczne uwarunkowania oceny i akceptacja ryzyka - recenzja
Warunkiem trafnego decydowania i sprawnego funkq'onowania w sytuacji ryzyka jest posiadanie wiedzy o jego naturze oraz pułapkach, jakie sami zastawiamy na siebie wskutek popełniania błędów w postrzeganiu zagrożeń, optymistycznego oceniania szansy powodzenia oraz nadmiernej koncentracji na wartości wyniku z pominięciem trudności i przeszkód w jego osiągnięciu. W innych przypadkach, stojąc u progu sukcesu, wskutek nierealistycznego pesymizmu i przesadnej oceny prawdopodobieństwa niepowodzenia, nie podejmujemy aktywności mającej dużą szansę powodzenia. Tą zawiłą, skomplikowaną i niedostatecznie jeszcze zbadaną problematykę postrzegania, oceny i akceptacji ryzyka przedstawiła Maryla Goszczyńska w książce Człowiek wobec zagrożeń..., w sposób interesujący i przystępny dla czytelników chcących wzbogacać swoją wiedzę psychologiczną[...
Nieśmiałość a funkcjonowanie w sytuacjach nie wymagających ekspozycji społecznej
Shyness is regarded as a trait which interferes with social functioning. In the presented re-search the attempt was made to check whether the consequences of shyness manifest themselves outside the domain of social interaction and are visible in self-evaluations of such qualities as resistance to stress, coping with risk, openness to experience and independence. Participants were 174 women and men aged between 18 and 23. Apart from shyness such variables were measured as: temperamental traits (EAS), personality traits (NEO-FFI), risk propensity, the need to change oneself and environment, locus of control, sensation seeking (SSS-V), self – esteem and five factors of learning autonomy. By means of standard multiple regression analysis it was shown that the contribution of tem-peramental traits in the prediction of shyness is not significantly different in comparison with the contribution of thee Big – Five personality traits. It was also found that shyness is positively correlated with the qualities which affect emotional instability level, i.e. with emotionality – fear, emotionality-distress and with neuroticism. Shyness proved to be negatively correlated with the traits affecting socio-centric behaviour such as sociability and extraversion. It was noticed that the influence of shyness my be transferred outside the social domain. Shy individuals in comparison with the bold ones judged themselves as less prone to take risks, more rarely exhibiting behaviors connected with self-creation and more rarely introducing changes in their environment. Shy persons compared with the bold ones evaluated themselves as having the sense of external locus of control, exhibiting stronger tendency to underestimate their self-esteem and being less open to new experiences and less autonomous in formulating learning goals, in planning their learning and evaluating the effectiveness of learning strategies
Skłonność do ryzyka jako wskaźnik jakości biologiczne
Występuje wiele różnych przyczyn podejmowania ryzyka. Zazwyczaj są nimi chęć zaoszczędzenia czasu, zmniejszenia wysiłku lub zwiększenia osiąganych korzyści (Starr, 1969). Ludzie ryzykują również w następstwie motywacji wzbudzonej odczuwaną potrzebą stymulacji i nowości (S t r e l au, 1974; Z u c k e r m a n , 1979), względnie w sytuacji dążenia do realizacji celów transgresyjnych (Ko z ie le c ki , 1987). Istnieją również dowody pozwalające sądzić, że źródłem motywacji do zachowań ryzykownych jest facylitujący wpływ grupy (Blank, 1968). Hazardziści np. zawierają bardziej ryzykowne zakłady w obecności innych niż samotnie ( B r o c k n e r i in. 1981). W zbiorowych decyzjach podejmowane jest większe ryzyko niż w indywidualnych (W il czy ńs ka , 1979). Ryzykowanie jest również zachowaniem autoprezen- tacyjnym (Lightfoot, 1997; L e a r y, 1999), motywowanym chęcią utrzymania lub poprawienia wizerunku społecznego[..
Risk propensity, absent-mindedness and depression versus involvement in accidents
Relations between individual traits and frequency of causing accidents have been analyzed. On the basis of
results from 465 women and 277 men it has been found that the causing of accidents correlates with risk propensity and
with risk taking infl uenced by self-destructive motivation. Persons often causing accidents are also absent minded to a
greater degree, and experience depressive moods more frequently than persons rarely involved in accidents
Shyness and self-evaluation of functioning in situations not requiring social exposition
Shyness is regarded as a trait which interferes with social functioning. In the presented research the attempt was made to check whether the consequences of shyness manifest themselves
outside the domain of social interaction and are visible in self-evaluations of such qualities as
resistance to stress, coping with risk, openness to experience and independence.
Participants were 174 women and men aged between 18 and 23. Apart from shyness such
variables were measured as: temperamental traits (EAS), personality traits (NEO-FFI), risk
propensity, the need to change oneself and environment, locus of control, sensation seeking (SSS-
V), self – esteem and five factors of learning autonomy.
By means of standard multiple regression analysis it was shown that the contribution of temperamental traits in the prediction of shyness is not significantly different in comparison with the
contribution of thee Big – Five personality traits. It was also found that shyness is positively
correlated with the qualities which affect emotional instability level, i.e. with emotionality – fear,
emotionality-distress and with neuroticism. Shyness proved to be negatively correlated with the
traits affecting socio-centric behaviour such as sociability and extraversion.
It was noticed that the influence of shyness my be transferred outside the social domain. Shy
individuals in comparison with the bold ones judged themselves as less prone to take risks, more
rarely exhibiting behaviors connected with self-creation and more rarely introducing changes in
their environment. Shy persons compared with the bold ones evaluated themselves as having the
sense of external locus of control, exhibiting stronger tendency to underestimate their self-esteem
and being less open to new experiences and less autonomous in formulating learning goals, in
planning their learning and evaluating the effectiveness of learning strategies
Risk propensity, absent-mindedness and depression versus involvement in accidents
Relations between individual traits and frequency of causing accidents have been analyzed. On the basis of
results from 465 women and 277 men it has been found that the causing of accidents correlates with risk propensity and
with risk taking infl uenced by self-destructive motivation. Persons often causing accidents are also absent minded to a
greater degree, and experience depressive moods more frequently than persons rarely involved in accidents