47 research outputs found
Bio-energy retains its mitigation potential under elevated CO2
Background
If biofuels are to be a viable substitute for fossil fuels, it is essential that they retain their potential to mitigate climate change under future atmospheric conditions. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration [CO2] stimulates plant biomass production; however, the beneficial effects of increased production may be offset by higher energy costs in crop management.
Methodology/Main findings
We maintained full size poplar short rotation coppice (SRC) systems under both current ambient and future elevated [CO2] (550 ppm) and estimated their net energy and greenhouse gas balance. We show that a poplar SRC system is energy efficient and produces more energy than required for coppice management. Even more, elevated [CO2] will increase the net energy production and greenhouse gas balance of a SRC system with 18%. Managing the trees in shorter rotation cycles (i.e. 2 year cycles instead of 3 year cycles) will further enhance the benefits from elevated [CO2] on both the net energy and greenhouse gas balance.
Conclusions/significance
Adapting coppice management to the future atmospheric [CO2] is necessary to fully benefit from the climate mitigation potential of bio-energy systems. Further, a future increase in potential biomass production due to elevated [CO2] outweighs the increased production costs resulting in a northward extension of the area where SRC is greenhouse gas neutral. Currently, the main part of the European terrestrial carbon sink is found in forest biomass and attributed to harvesting less than the annual growth in wood. Because SRC is intensively managed, with a higher turnover in wood production than conventional forest, northward expansion of SRC is likely to erode the European terrestrial carbon sink
Elevated CO2 increased phosphorous loss from decomposing litter and soil organic matter at two FACE experiments with trees
Работа с текстом по специальности как средство обучения языку профессионального общения
The quickly rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)‐levels, justify the need to explore all carbon (C) sequestration possibilities that might mitigate the current CO2 increase. Here, we report the likely impact of future increases in atmospheric CO2 on woody biomass production of three poplar species (Populus alba L. clone 2AS‐11, Populus nigra L. clone Jean Pourtet and Populus×euramericana clone I‐214). Trees were growing in a high‐density coppice plantation during the second rotation (i.e., regrowth after coppice; 2002–2004; POPFACE/EUROFACE). Six plots were studied, half of which were continuously fumigated with CO2 (FACE; free air carbon dioxide enrichment of 550 ppm). Half of each plot was fertilized to study the interaction between CO2 and nutrient fertilization. At the end of the second rotation, selective above‐ and belowground harvests were performed to estimate the productivity of this bio‐energy plantation. Fertilization did not affect growth of the poplar trees, which was likely because of the high rates of fertilization during the previous agricultural land use. In contrast, elevated CO2 enhanced biomass production by up to 29%, and this stimulation did not differ between above‐ and belowground parts. The increased initial stump size resulting from elevated CO2 during the first rotation (1999–2001) could not solely explain the observed final biomass increase. The larger leaf area index after canopy closure and the absence of any major photosynthetic acclimation after 6 years of fumigation caused the sustained CO2‐induced biomass increase after coppice. These results suggest that, under future CO2 concentrations, managed poplar coppice systems may exhibit higher potential for C sequestration and, thus, help mitigate climate change when used as a source of C‐neutral energy
Response of emergent macrophytes to hydrological changes in a shallow lake, with special reference to nutrient cycling
Impacts of peat bulk density, ash deposition and rainwater chemistry on establishment of peatland mosses
Soil absorbing complex properties of Russian boreal soils and its dependence on the spatial scale of study area
Leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus from rural areas to surface waters in the Netherlands
Regression model to predict travel time for chloride leaching through pedons using soil morphological characteristics
Grassland responses to elevated CO2 determined by plant–microbe competition for phosphorus
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this recordData availability:
Data used to produce this paper are available via the EIDC data repository https://doi.org/10.5285/35921c93-2d9e-4e35-8de5-adbfc37641b4Rising atmospheric CO2 has stimulated plant productivity, with terrestrial ecosystems currently absorbing nearly one-third of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Increases in photosynthesis can subsequently lead to increased carbon (C) storage in plants and soil. However, there is growing evidence that nitrogen (N) availability constrains elevated CO2 (eCO2) responses, yet we know much less about the role of phosphorus (P) limitation on productivity under eCO2. This is important because P-limited ecosystems are globally widespread, and the biogeochemical cycles of N and P differ fundamentally. In the Peak District National Park of northern England, we conducted a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment for three years on two contrasting P-limited grasslands under long-term nutrient manipulation. Here we show that competition between plants and microbes for P can determine plant productivity responses to eCO2. In a limestone grassland, aboveground productivity increased (16%) and microbial biomass P remained unchanged, whereas in an acidic grassland, aboveground productivity and P uptake declined (11% and 20%, respectively), but P immobilization into microbial biomass increased (36%). Our results demonstrate that strong competition with microbes can cause plant P uptake to decline under eCO2, with implications for the future productivity of P-limited ecosystems in response to climate change.Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC