26 research outputs found
Long-term observations minus background monitoring of ground-based brightness temperatures from a microwave radiometer network
Abstract. Ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs) offer the capability to provide continuous, high-temporal-resolution observations of the atmospheric thermodynamic state in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) with low maintenance. This makes MWR an ideal instrument to supplement radiosonde and satellite observations when initializing numerical weather prediction (NWP) models through data assimilation. State-of-the-art data assimilation systems (e.g. variational schemes) require an accurate representation of the differences between model (background) and observations, which are then weighted by their respective errors to provide the best analysis of the true atmospheric state. In this perspective, one source of information is contained in the statistics of the differences between observations and their background counterparts (O–B). Monitoring of O–B statistics is crucial to detect and remove systematic errors coming from the measurements, the observation operator, and/or the NWP model. This work illustrates a 1-year O–B analysis for MWR observations in clear-sky conditions for an European-wide network of six MWRs. Observations include MWR brightness temperatures (TB) measured by the two most common types of MWR instruments. Background profiles are extracted from the French convective-scale model AROME-France before being converted into TB. The observation operator used to map atmospheric profiles into TB is the fast radiative transfer model RTTOV-gb. It is shown that O–B monitoring can effectively detect instrument malfunctions. O–B statistics (bias, standard deviation, and root mean square) for water vapour channels (22.24–30.0 GHz) are quite consistent for all the instrumental sites, decreasing from the 22.24 GHz line centre ( ∼ 2–2.5 K) towards the high-frequency wing ( ∼ 0.8–1.3 K). Statistics for zenith and lower-elevation observations show a similar trend, though values increase with increasing air mass. O–B statistics for temperature channels show different behaviour for relatively transparent (51–53 GHz) and opaque channels (54–58 GHz). Opaque channels show lower uncertainties (< 0.8–0.9 K) and little variation with elevation angle. Transparent channels show larger biases ( ∼ 2–3 K) with relatively low standard deviations ( ∼ 1–1.5 K). The observations minus analysis TB statistics are similar to the O–B statistics, suggesting a possible improvement to be expected by assimilating MWR TB into NWP models. Lastly, the O–B TB differences have been evaluated to verify the normal-distribution hypothesis underlying variational and ensemble Kalman filter-based DA systems. Absolute values of excess kurtosis and skewness are generally within 1 and 0.5, respectively, for all instrumental sites, demonstrating O–B normal distribution for most of the channels and elevations angles
An assessment of the potential for atmospheric emission verification in The Netherlands
Doel van dit project was het ontwikkelen van een systeem voor het kwantificeren van het broeikasgasbudget op landelijke en regionale schaal. Het ME2 consortium heeft een ‘protocol’ ontwikkeld om een referentieschatting te maken ten behoeve van de verificatie van nationale emissies. Daarmee is het op termijn mogelijk de nauwkeurigheid en geloofwaardigheid van aan UNFCCC en Kyoto gerapporteerde emissies, en reducties daarvan, te verifiëren. Met verschillende inversie methoden, van data tot model gedreven, zijn emissieschattingen gemaakt. De data gedreven methoden kunnen schattingen maken voor alle drie de broeikasgassen voor NL als geheel en zijn representatief voor meerdere jaren. Met de meer model gedreven inversies zijn meer ruimtelijk en temporeel gedistribueerde schattingen te maken
Intercomparison of aerosol extinction profiles retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements
A first direct intercomparison of aerosol vertical profiles from Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations, performed during the Cabauw Intercomparison Campaign of Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI) in summer 2009, is presented. Five out of 14 participants of the CINDI campaign reported aerosol extinction profiles and aerosol optical thickness (AOT) as deduced from observations of differential slant column densities of the oxygen collision complex (O-4) at different elevation angles. Aerosol extinction vertical profiles and AOT are compared to backscatter profiles from a ceilometer instrument and to sun photometer measurements, respectively. Furthermore, the near-surface aerosol extinction coefficient is compared to in situ measurements of a humidity-controlled nephelometer and dry aerosol absorption measurements. The participants of this intercomparison exercise use different approaches for the retrieval of aerosol information, including the retrieval of the full vertical profile using optimal estimation and a parametrised approach with a prescribed profile shape. Despite these large conceptual differences, and also differences in the wavelength of the observed O-4 absorption band, good agreement in terms of the vertical structure of aerosols within the boundary layer is achieved between the aerosol extinction profiles retrieved by the different groups and the backscatter profiles observed by the ceilometer instrument. AOTs from MAX-DOAS and sun photometer show a good correlation (R > 0.8), but all participants systematically underestimate the AOT. Substantial differences between the near-surface aerosol extinction from MAX-DOAS and from the humidified nephelometer remain largely unresolved.Peer reviewe
Depolarization Lidar Determination Of Cloud-Base Microphysical Properties
The links between multiple-scattering induced depolarization and cloud microphysical properties (e.g. cloud particle number density, effective radius, water content) have long been recognised. Previous efforts to use depolarization information in a quantitative manner to retrieve cloud microphysical cloud properties have also been undertaken but with limited scope and, arguably, success. In this work we present a retrieval procedure applicable to liquid stratus clouds with (quasi-)linear LWC profiles and (quasi-)constant number density profiles in the cloud-base region. This set of assumptions allows us to employ a fast and robust inversion procedure based on a lookup-table approach applied to extensive lidar Monte-Carlo multiple-scattering calculations. An example validation case is presented where the results of the inversion procedure are compared with simultaneous cloud radar observations. In non-drizzling conditions it was found, in general, that the lidar- only inversion results can be used to predict the radar reflectivity within the radar calibration uncertainty (2-3 dBZ). Results of a comparison between ground-based aerosol number concentration and lidar-derived cloud base number considerations are also presented. The observed relationship between the two quantities is seen to be consistent with the results of previous studies based on aircraft-based in situ measurements
Recommended from our members
CloudSat as a Global Radar Calibrator
The calibration of the CloudSat spaceborne cloud radar has been thoroughly assessed using very accurate internal link budgets before launch, comparisons with predicted ocean surface backscatter at 94 GHz, direct comparisons with airborne cloud radars, and statistical comparisons with ground-based cloud radars at different locations of the world. It is believed that the calibration of CloudSat is accurate to within 0.5–1 dB. In the present paper it is shown that an approach similar to that used for the statistical comparisons with ground-based radars can now be adopted the other way around to calibrate other ground-based or airborne radars against CloudSat and/or to detect anomalies in long time series of ground-based radar measurements, provided that the calibration of CloudSat is followed up closely (which is the case). The power of using CloudSat as a global radar calibrator is demonstrated using the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement cloud radar data taken at Barrow, Alaska, the cloud radar data from the Cabauw site, Netherlands, and airborne Doppler cloud radar measurements taken along the CloudSat track in the Arctic by the Radar System Airborne (RASTA) cloud radar installed in the French ATR-42 aircraft for the first time. It is found that the Barrow radar data in 2008 are calibrated too high by 9.8 dB, while the Cabauw radar data in 2008 are calibrated too low by 8.0 dB. The calibration of the RASTA airborne cloud radar using direct comparisons with CloudSat agrees well with the expected gains and losses resulting from the change in configuration that required verification of the RASTA calibration
Pathfinder: applying graph theory to consistent tracking of daytime mixed layer height with backscatter lidar
The height of the atmospheric boundary layer or mixing layer is an
important parameter for understanding the dynamics of the atmosphere and the
dispersion of trace gases and air pollution. The height of the mixing layer
(MLH) can be retrieved, among other methods, from lidar or ceilometer
backscatter data. These instruments use the vertical backscatter lidar signal
to infer MLHL, which is feasible because the main sources of aerosols are
situated at the surface and vertical gradients are expected to go from the
aerosol loaded mixing layer close to the ground to the cleaner free
atmosphere above. Various lidar/ceilometer algorithms are currently applied,
but accounting for MLH temporal development is not always well taken care of.
As a result, MLHL retrievals may jump between different atmospheric
layers, rather than reliably track true MLH development over time. This
hampers the usefulness of MLHL time series, e.g. for process studies, model
validation/verification and climatology. Here, we introduce a new method
pathfinder, which applies graph theory to simultaneously evaluate
time frames that are consistent with scales of MLH dynamics, leading to coherent
tracking of MLH. Starting from a grid of gradients in the backscatter
profiles, MLH development is followed using Dijkstra's shortest path
algorithm (Dijkstra, 1959). Locations of strong gradients are connected
under the condition that subsequent points on the path are limited to a
restricted vertical range. The search is further guided by rules based on the
presence of clouds and residual layers. After being applied to backscatter lidar data
from Cabauw, excellent agreement is found with wind profiler retrievals for a
12-day period in 2008 (R2 = 0.90) and visual judgment of lidar data during a
full year in 2010 (R2 = 0.96). These values compare favourably to other
MLHL methods applied to the same lidar data set and corroborate more
consistent MLH tracking by pathfinder