Trial protocol OPPTIMUM : does progesterone prophylaxis for the prevention of preterm labour improve outcome?

Background Preterm birth is a global problem, with a prevalence of 8 to 12% depending on location. Several large trials and systematic reviews have shown progestogens to be effective in preventing or delaying preterm birth in selected high risk women with a singleton pregnancy (including those with a short cervix or previous preterm birth). Although an improvement in short term neonatal outcomes has been shown in some trials these have not consistently been confirmed in meta-analyses. Additionally data on longer term outcomes is limited to a single trial where no difference in outcomes was demonstrated at four years of age of the child, despite those in the “progesterone” group having a lower incidence of preterm birth. Methods/Design The OPPTIMUM study is a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial to determine whether progesterone prophylaxis to prevent preterm birth has long term neonatal or infant benefit. Specifically it will study whether, in women with singleton pregnancy and at high risk of preterm labour, prophylactic vaginal natural progesterone, 200 mg daily from 22 – 34 weeks gestation, compared to placebo, improves obstetric outcome by lengthening pregnancy thus reducing the incidence of preterm delivery (before 34 weeks), improves neonatal outcome by reducing a composite of death and major morbidity, and leads to improved childhood cognitive and neurosensory outcomes at two years of age. Recruitment began in 2009 and is scheduled to close in Spring 2013. As of May 2012, over 800 women had been randomized in 60 sites. Discussion OPPTIMUM will provide further evidence on the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth and improvement of neonatal outcomes in selected groups of women with singleton pregnancy at high risk of preterm birth. Additionally it will determine whether any reduction in the incidence of preterm birth is accompanied by improved childhood outcome

Neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants in a population-based clinical cohort with a definite perinatal treatment policy

BACKGROUND: With constant changes in neonatal care practices, recent information is valuable for healthcare providers and for parental counselling. The aim of the study was to describe the neurodevelopmental outcome in a cohort of very preterm (VPT)/very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants at 2 years corrected age (CA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a population-based cohort study of all infants born with a GA <31 weeks and/or BW < 1500 g between 2014 and 2016 admitted to the Flemish (Belgium) neonatal intensive care units. Infants had routine clinical follow-up around 2 years CA. The diagnosis of cerebral palsy (CP), visual and hearing impairments were recorded. Motor, cognitive and language outcomes were assessed using the Bayley-III. Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was classified as mild (<1 standard deviation [SD]) or moderate-severe (<2SD) based on the defined categories of motor, cognitive, hearing, and vision impairments. RESULTS: Of the 1941 admissions, 92% survived to discharge and follow-up data were available for 1089 infants (61.1%). Overall, 19.3%, 18.9% and 41.8% of infants had a motor, cognitive and language delay, respectively. CP was diagnosed in 4.3% of the infants. Mild and moderate-to-severe NDI was observed in 25.2% and 10.9% of the infants, respectively. The number of infants with a normal outcome increased from nearly 40% in the category of GA<26 weeks to 70% for infants in the category of 30─31 weeks GA. CONCLUSION: At 2 years CA, 64% were free from NDI and 90% were free from moderate-to-severe NDI. However, a lower GA and BW are associated with higher rates of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years CA.status: publishe