Exploring Conditional Rewriting Logic Computations

[EN] Trace exploration is concerned with techniques that allow computation traces to be dynamically searched for specific contents. Depending on whether the exploration is carried backward or forward, trace exploration techniques allow provenance tracking or impact tracking to be done. The aim of provenance tracking is to show how (parts of) a program output depends on (parts of) its input and to help estimate which input data need to be modified to accomplish a change in the outcome. The aim of impact tracking is to identify the scope and potential consequences of changing the program input. Rewriting Logic (RWL) is a logic of change that supplements (an extension of) the equational logic by adding rewrite rules that are used to describe (nondeterministic) transitions between states. In this paper, we present a rich and highly dynamic, parameterized technique for the forward inspection of RWL computations that allows the nondeterministic execution of a given conditional rewrite theory to be followed up in different ways. With this technique, an analyst can browse, slice, filter, or search the traces as they come to life during the program execution. The navigation of the trace is driven by a user-defined, inspection criterion that specifies the required exploration mode. By selecting different inspection criteria, one can automatically derive a family of practical algorithms such as program steppers and more sophisticatedThis work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MEC project Ref. TIN2010-21062-C02-02, the Spanish MICINN complementary action Ref. TIN2009-07495-E, and by Generalitat Valenciana Ref. PROMETEO2011/052. This work was carried out during the tenure of D. Ballis' ERCIM "Alain Bensoussan" Postdoctoral Fellowship. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement N. 246016. F. Frechina was supported by FPU-ME grant AP2010-5681, and J. Sapina was supported by FPI-UPV grant SP2013-0083.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Frechina Navarro, F.; Sapiña Sanchis, J. (2015). Exploring Conditional Rewriting Logic Computations. Journal of Symbolic Computation. 69:3-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsc.2014.09.028S3396

Debugging of Web Applications with Web-TLR

Web-TLR is a Web verification engine that is based on the well-established Rewriting Logic--Maude/LTLR tandem for Web system specification and model-checking. In Web-TLR, Web applications are expressed as rewrite theories that can be formally verified by using the Maude built-in LTLR model-checker. Whenever a property is refuted, a counterexample trace is delivered that reveals an undesired, erroneous navigation sequence. Unfortunately, the analysis (or even the simple inspection) of such counterexamples may be unfeasible because of the size and complexity of the traces under examination. In this paper, we endow Web-TLR with a new Web debugging facility that supports the efficient manipulation of counterexample traces. This facility is based on a backward trace-slicing technique for rewriting logic theories that allows the pieces of information that we are interested to be traced back through inverse rewrite sequences. The slicing process drastically simplifies the computation trace by dropping useless data that do not influence the final result. By using this facility, the Web engineer can focus on the relevant fragments of the failing application, which greatly reduces the manual debugging effort and also decreases the number of iterative verifications.Comment: In Proceedings WWV 2011, arXiv:1108.208

A rewriting logic approach to the formal specification and verification of web applications

[EN] This paper develops a Rewriting Logic framework for the automatic specification and verification of Web applications that considers the critical aspects of concurrent Web interactions, browser navigation features (e.g., forward/back-ward navigation, page refresh, and new window/tab opening), and Web script evaluation. By encompassing the main features of the most popular Web scripting languages (e.g., PHP, ASP, and Java Servlets), our scripting language is powerful enough to model the dynamics of complex Web applications, where the interactions among Web servers and Web browsers are formalized through a landmark communicating protocol that abstracts HTTP. We provide a detailed characterization of browser actions via rewrite rules and show how our models can be naturally model-checked by using the Linear Temporal Logic of Rewriting (LTLR), which is a Linear Temporal Logic that is specifically designed for model-checking rewrite theories. The framework has been completely implemented in Maude, and we report on some successful experiments that we conducted using the Maude LTLR model-checker.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MEC project ref. TIN2010-21062-C02-02, and by Generalitat Valenciana ref. PROMETE02011/052. This work was carried out during the tenure by Demis Ballis of an ERCIM "Alain Bensoussan" Postdoctoral Fellowship. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 246016. Daniel Romero was partially supported by FPI-MEC grant BES-2008-004860.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Romero, DO. (2014). A rewriting logic approach to the formal specification and verification of web applications. Science of Computer Programming. 81:79-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.07.014S791078

Rewriting-based repairing strategies for XML repositories

[EN] Keeping XML data in a consistent state w.r.t. both structure and content is a burdensome task. To maintain the consistency of ever-larger, complex XML repositories, suitable mechanisms that are able to x every possible inconsistency are needed. In this article, we present a methodology for semi-automatically repairing faulty XML repositories that can be integrated on top of an existing rewriting-based veri cation engine. As a formal basis for representing consistency criteria, we use a rule-based description formalism that is realized in the language Maude. Then, starting from a categorization of the kinds of errors that can be found during the veri cation process, we formulate a stepwise transformation procedure that achieves correctness and completeness of the XML repository w.r.t. its Maude formal speci cation while strictly observing the structure of the XML documents. With the aim of increasing the level of automation of our repair methodology, we also de ne two correction strategies and two completion strategies that reduce either the amount of information to be changed or the number of repair actions to be executed in order to deliver an XML repository that is both correct and complete. Finally, we describe a prototype implementation of the repairing tool, which we use for an experimental evaluation of our method with good results. ©2013 Elsevier Inc.All rights reserved.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MEC project ref. TIN2010-21062-C02-02, and by Generalitat Valenciana ref. PROMETEO2011/052. This work was carried out during the tenure of D. Ballis’ ERCIM “Alain Bensoussan” Postdoctoral Fellowship. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement n. 246016. F. Frechina was supported by FPU-ME grant AP2010-5681 and D. Romero by FPI-MEC grant BES-2008-004860 We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Falaschi, M.; Frechina, F.; Romero, D. (2013). Rewriting-based repairing strategies for XML repositories. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming. 82(8):326-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlap.2013.05.002S32635282

Using conditional trace slicing for improving Maude programs

[EN] Understanding the behavior of software is important for the existing software to be improved. In this paper, we present a trace slicing technique that is suitable for analyzing complex, textually-large computations in rewriting logic, which is a general framework efficiently implemented in the Maude language that seamlessly unifies a wide variety of logics and models of concurrency. Given a Maude execution trace T and a slicing criterion for the trace (i.e., a piece of information that we want to observe in the final computation state), we traverse T from back to front and the backward dependence of the observed information is incrementally computed at each execution step. At the end of the traversal, a simplified trace slice is obtained by filtering out all the irrelevant data that do not impact on the data of interest. By narrowing the size of the trace, the slicing technique favors better inspection and debugging activities since most tedious and irrelevant inspections that are routinely performed during diagnosis and bug localization can be eliminated automatically. Moreover, cutting down the execution trace can expose opportunities for further improvement, which we illustrate by means of several examples that we execute by using iJulienne, a trace slicer that implements our conditional slicing technique and is endowed with a trace querying mechanism that increases flexibility and reduction power.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MEC project ref. TIN2010-21062-C02-02, and by Generalitat Valenciana ref. PROMETEO2011/052. This work was carried out during the tenure of D. Ballis' ERCIM "Alain Bensoussan" Postdoctoral Fellowship. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. 246016. F. Frechina was supported by FPU-ME grant AP2010-5681 and D. Romero by FPI-MEC grant BES-2008-004860.Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Ballis, D.; Frechina, F.; Romero, DO. (2014). Using conditional trace slicing for improving Maude programs. Science of Computer Programming. 80:385-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.09.018S3854158

A Partial Evaluation Framework for Order-sorted Equational Programs modulo Axioms

[EN] Partial evaluation is a powerful and general program optimization technique with many successful applications. Existing PE schemes do not apply to expressive rule-based languages like Maude, CafeOBJ, OBJ, ASF+SDF, and ELAN, which support: 1) rich type structures with sorts, subsorts, and overloading; and 2) equational rewriting modulo various combinations of axioms such as associativity, commutativity, and identity. In this paper, we develop the new foundations needed and illustrate the key concepts by showing how they apply to partial evaluation of expressive programs written in Maude. Our partial evaluation scheme is based on an automatic unfolding algorithm that computes term variants and relies on high-performance order-sorted equational least general generalization and order-sorted equational homeomorphic embedding algorithms for ensuring termination. We show that our partial evaluation technique is sound and complete for convergent rewrite theories that may contain various combinations of associativity, commutativity, and/or identity axioms for different binary operators. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Maude's automatic partial evaluator, Victoria, on several examples where it shows significant speed-ups. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.This work has been partially supported by the EU (FEDER) and the Spanish MCIU under grant RTI2018-094403-B-C32, by Generalitat Valenciana under grant PROMETEO/2019/098, and by NRL under contract number N00173-17-1-G002. Angel Cuenca-Ortega has been supported by the SENESCYT, Ecuador (scholarship program 2013).Alpuente Frasnedo, M.; Cuenca-Ortega, AE.; Escobar Román, S.; Meseguer, J. (2020). A Partial Evaluation Framework for Order-sorted Equational Programs modulo Axioms. Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming. 110:1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlamp.2019.100501S13611