Ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy and prognosis

The studies in this thesis contribute to more accurate risk assessment and prognosis prediction for DCIS and to better response evaluation of IBC treatment.For the Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) studies, unbiased cohorts were used within the international Grand Challenge PRECISION consortium, funded by Cancer Research UK and KWF Dutch Cancer Society. DCIS is graded as low-, intermediate-, or high-grade depending on how abnormal the DCIS-cells look like. However, we showed that pathologists often disagree on grade. To overcome this limitation, we found that almost all DCIS scored as non-high-grade by the majority of pathologists express the estrogen receptor (ER) and are negative for the growth factor receptor HER2, whereas high-grade DCIS is mixed in expression for ER and HER2. We also provided insights in the recurrence risks of DCIS after treatment. See also https://cancergrandchallenges.org/teams/precision.The studies on Invasive Breast Cancer (IBC) were performed on a hospital-based cohort. We found for example substantial variation in tumour response evaluation for HER2-positive IBC after pre-operative chemotherapy due to different guidelines used. For accurate outcome analysis, reducing such variation is mandatory. Therefore, we are working on reaching international consensus of response evaluation. The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis The Netherlands Comprehensive organisation (IKNL)LUMC / Geneeskund

The impact of patient characteristics and lifestyle factors on the risk of an ipsilateral event after a primary DCIS: a systematic review

ObjectiveThe ma­jor­ity of ‘low-risk’ (grade I/​II) Duc­tal Car­ci­noma In Situ (DCIS) may not progress to in­va­sive breast can­cer dur­ing a wom­en's life­time. There­fore, the safety of ac­tive sur­veil­lance ver­sus stan­dard sur­gi­cal treat­ment for DCIS is prospec­tively be­ing eval­u­ated in clin­i­cal tri­als. If proven safe and se­lec­tively im­ple­mented in clin­i­cal prac­tice, a sig­nif­i­cant group of women with low-risk DCIS may forego surgery and ra­dio­ther­apy in the fu­ture. Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of mod­i­fi­able and non-mod­i­fi­able risk fac­tors as­so­ci­ated with prog­no­sis af­ter a pri­mary DCIS would also en­hance our care of women with low-risk DCIS.MethodsTo iden­tify mod­i­fi­able and non-mod­i­fi­able risk fac­tors for sub­se­quent breast events af­ter DCIS, we per­formed a sys­tem­atic lit­er­a­ture search in PUBMED, EM­BASE and Sco­pus.ResultsSix out of the 3870 ar­ti­cles re­trieved were in­cluded for fi­nal data ex­trac­tion. These six stud­ies in­cluded a to­tal of 4950 pa­tients with pri­mary DCIS and 640 recorded sub­se­quent breast events. There was mod­er­ate ev­i­dence for an as­so­ci­a­tion of a fam­ily his­tory of breast can­cer, pre­menopausal sta­tus, high BMI, and high breast den­sity with a sub­se­quent breast can­cer or fur­ther DCIS.ConclusionThere is a lim­ited num­ber of re­cent stud­ies pub­lished on the im­pact of mod­i­fi­able and non-mod­i­fi­able risk fac­tors on sub­se­quent events af­ter DCIS. The avail­able ev­i­dence is in­suf­fi­cient to iden­tify po­ten­tial tar­gets for risk re­duc­tion strate­gies, re­flect­ing the rel­a­tively small num­bers and the lack of long-term fol­low-up in DCIS, a low-event con­di­tion.</p

CD34+cells augment endothelial cell differentiation of CD14+endothelial progenitor cells in vitro

Neovascularization by endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) for the treatment of ischaemic diseases has been a topic of intense research. The CD34+ cell is often designated as EPC, because it contributes to repair of ischaemic injuries through neovascularization. However, incorporation of CD34+ cells into the neovasculature is limited, suggesting another role which could be paracrine. CD14+ cells can also differentiate into endothelial cells and contribute to neovascularization. However, the low proliferative capacity of CD14+ cell-derived endothelial cells hampers their use as therapeutic cells. We made the assumption that an interaction between CD34+ and CD14+ cells augments endothelial differentiation of the CD14+ cells. In vitro, the influence of CD34+ cells on the endothelial differentiation capacity of CD14+ cells was investigated. Endothelial differentiation was analysed by expression of endothelial cell markers CD31, CD144, von Willebrand Factor and endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase. Furthermore, we assessed proliferative capacity and endothelial cell function of the cells in culture. In monocultures, 63% of the CD14+-derived cells adopted an endothelial cell phenotype, whereas in CD34+/CD14+ co-cultures 95% of the cells showed endothelial cell differentiation. Proliferation increased up to 12% in the CD34+/CD14+ co-cultures compared to both monocultures. CD34-conditioned medium also increased endothelial differentiation of CD14+ cells. This effect was abrogated by hepatocyte growth factor neutralizing antibodies, but not by interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 neutralizing antibodies. We show that co-culturing of CD34+ and CD14+ cells results in a proliferating population of functional endothelial cells, which may be suitable for treatment of ischaemic diseases such as myocardial infarction

Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question

Abstract: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20–25% of all ‘breast cancers’ consequent upon detection by population-based breast cancer screening programmes. Currently, all DCIS lesions are treated, and treatment comprises either mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery supplemented with radiotherapy. However, most DCIS lesions remain indolent. Difficulty in discerning harmless lesions from potentially invasive ones can lead to overtreatment of this condition in many patients. To counter overtreatment and to transform clinical practice, a global, comprehensive and multidisciplinary collaboration is required. Here we review the incidence of DCIS, the perception of risk for developing invasive breast cancer, the current treatment options and the known molecular aspects of progression. Further research is needed to gain new insights for improved diagnosis and management of DCIS, and this is integrated in the PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now) initiative. This international effort will seek to determine which DCISs require treatment and prevent the consequences of overtreatment on the lives of many women affected by DCIS

Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials.

Funder: Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF); doi: https://doi.org/10.13039/100001006Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting

Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting

Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting