Razvoj spletne aplikacije za urejanje slik

Today, both the concept of the web and of applications are heavily intertwined. Their union is embodied by web applications that allow the user to perform various operations, or more generally, do work over the web. On the application layer, communication often uses the HTTP protocol via its basic methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE and HEAD). Since web traffic is slowly moving from desktop computers to smart phones and tablets, it is advisable to build web applications with these devices in mind. The main purpose or goal of this thesis is the development of a web application that will allow users to register, upload and edit pictures or photos. The editing will be triggered with a request to the server, which will call a specific function in a program called ImageMagick. A mobile app will be also available to the users, which will enable direct storing of photos, taken with their mobile phone or tablet, in their account

Razvoj spletne aplikacije za urejanje slik

Today, both the concept of the web and of applications are heavily intertwined. Their union is embodied by web applications that allow the user to perform various operations, or more generally, do work over the web. On the application layer, communication often uses the HTTP protocol via its basic methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE and HEAD). Since web traffic is slowly moving from desktop computers to smart phones and tablets, it is advisable to build web applications with these devices in mind. The main purpose or goal of this thesis is the development of a web application that will allow users to register, upload and edit pictures or photos. The editing will be triggered with a request to the server, which will call a specific function in a program called ImageMagick. A mobile app will be also available to the users, which will enable direct storing of photos, taken with their mobile phone or tablet, in their account

Biološka zdravila v sodobnem zdravljenju hudih oblik astme in kroničnega rinosinuzitisa

Med pogoste kronične vnetne bolezni zgornjih in spodnjih dihalnih poti sodijo alergijski rinitis, kronični rinosinuzitis in astma. Bolezni so znotraj enotne dihalne pot med seboj epidemiološko in patofiziološko povezane. Pri večini bolnikov z astmo lahko preodzivnost in obstrukcijo dihalnih poti nadzorujemo z zdravili. Bolnike s kroničnim rinosinuzitisom z nosnimi polipi zdravimo z lokalnimi glukokortikoidi, sistemskimi antibiotiki v podaljšanem odmerjanju, pulzno s sistemskimi glukokortikoidi in kirurško. Slab nadzor bolezni zgornjih dihal lahko povzroči poslabšanje bolezni spodnjih dihal, saj jih v okviru enotne dihalne poti razumemo kot eno funkcionalno enoto. S pomočjo bioloških označevalcev je treba bolnike z astmo in/ali kroničnim rinosinuzitisom z nosnimi polipi razdeliti v endotipe. Z endotipizacijo bi utegnili v prihodnosti razkriti tudi patofiziološko ozadje bolezni in napovedati odziv na zdravljenje. Huda astma in hud kronični rinosinuzitis sta stanji, ko bolnikovih težav, kljub skrajnim oblikam zdravljenja, ne uspe več nadzorovati, sistemsko zdravljenje z glukokortikoidi pa povzroča obolevnost zaradi njihovih neugodnih učinkov. Biološka zdravila so protitelesa, ki predstavljajo bolj usmerjen način zdravljenja težkega rinosinusitisa z nosnimi polipi in težke astme. Vsako biološko zdravilo je tarčno zdravilo, ki zavira samo določene dele vnetne poti, zato gre za personalizirano zdravljenje bolezni dihalnih poti. Na aktivnost posameznih poti sklepamo iz klinične slike in nekaterih bioloških označevalcev. Dragoceno bi bilo zgodnje prepoznavanje dejavnikov in bioloških označevalcev ugodnega odziva, kar bi omogočilo hitrejšo in lažjo odločitev o načinih zdravljenja

Immunological Outcomes of Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Food Allergy

IgE-mediated food allergies are caused by adverse immunologic responses to food proteins. Allergic reactions may present locally in different tissues such as skin, gastrointestinal and respiratory tract and may result is systemic life-threatening reactions. During the last decades, the prevalence of food allergies has significantly increased throughout the world, and considerable efforts have been made to develop curative therapies. Food allergen immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach for food allergies that is based on the administration of increasing doses of culprit food extracts, or purified, and sometime modified food allergens. Different routes of administration for food allergen immunotherapy including oral, sublingual, epicutaneous and subcutaneous regimens are being evaluated. Although a wealth of data from clinical food allergen immunotherapy trials has been obtained, a lack of consistency in assessed clinical and immunological outcome measures presents a major hurdle for evaluating these new treatments. Coordinated efforts are needed to establish standardized outcome measures to be applied in food allergy immunotherapy studies, allowing for better harmonization of data and setting the standards for the future research. Several immunological parameters have been measured in food allergen immunotherapy, including allergen-specific immunoglobulin levels, basophil activation, cytokines, and other soluble biomarkers, T cell and B cell responses and skin prick tests. In this review we discuss different immunological parameters and assess their applicability as potential outcome measures for food allergen immunotherapy that may be included in such a standardized set of outcome measures

Importance of basophil activation testing in insect venom allergy

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only effective treatment for prevention of serious allergic reactions to bee and wasp stings in sensitized individuals. However, there are still many questions and controversies regarding immunotherapy, like selection of the appropriate allergen, safety and long term efficacy.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Literature review was performed to address the role of basophil activation test (BAT) in diagnosis of venom allergy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In patients with positive skin tests or specific IgE to both honeybee and wasp venom, IgE inhibition test can identify sensitizing allergen only in around 15% and basophil activation test increases the identification rate to around one third of double positive patients. BAT is also diagnostic in majority of patients with systemic reactions after insect stings and no detectable IgE. High basophil sensitivity to allergen is associated with a risk of side effects during VIT. Persistence of high basophil sensitivity also predicts a treatment failure of VIT.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>BAT is a useful tool for better selection of allergen for immunotherapy, for identification of patients prone to side effects and patients who might be treatment failures. However, long term studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of the test.</p

Academic productivity of young people with allergic rhinitis:A MASK-air® study

Peer reviewe

Behavioural Patterns in Allergic Rhinitis Medication in Europe: A Study Using MASK‐Air ® Real‐World Data

Background: Co-medication is common among patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), but its dimension and patterns are unknown. This is particularly relevant since AR is understood differently across European countries, as reflected by rhinitis-related search patterns in Google Trends. This study aims to assess AR co-medication and its regional patterns in Europe, using real-world data. Methods: We analysed 2015-2020 MASK-air® European data. We compared days under no medication, monotherapy and co-medication using the visual analogue scale (VAS) levels for overall allergic symptoms ('VAS Global Symptoms') and impact of AR on work. We assessed the monthly use of different medication schemes, performing separate analyses by region (defined geographically or by Google Trends patterns). We estimated the average number of different drugs reported per patient within 1 year. Results: We analysed 222,024 days (13,122 users), including 63,887 days (28.8%) under monotherapy and 38,315 (17.3%) under co-medication. The median 'VAS Global Symptoms' was 7 for no medication days, 14 for monotherapy and 21 for co-medication (p < .001). Medication use peaked during the spring, with similar patterns across different European regions (defined geographically or by Google Trends). Oral H1 -antihistamines were the most common medication in single and co-medication. Each patient reported using an annual average of 2.7 drugs, with 80% reporting two or more. Conclusions: Allergic rhinitis medication patterns are similar across European regions. One third of treatment days involved co-medication. These findings suggest that patients treat themselves according to their symptoms (irrespective of how they understand AR) and that co-medication use is driven by symptom severity.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Allergen Immunotherapy in MASK‐Air Users in Real‐Life: Results of a Bayesian Mixed‐Effects Model

Background: Evidence regarding the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on allergic rhinitis has been provided mostly by randomised controlled trials, with little data from real-life studies. Objective: To compare the reported control of allergic rhinitis symptoms in three groups of users of the MASK-air® app: those receiving sublingual AIT (SLIT), those receiving subcutaneous AIT (SCIT), and those receiving no AIT. Methods: We assessed the MASK-air® data of European users with self-reported grass pollen allergy, comparing the data reported by patients receiving SLIT, SCIT and no AIT. Outcome variables included the daily impact of allergy symptoms globally and on work (measured by visual analogue scales-VASs), and a combined symptom-medication score (CSMS). We applied Bayesian mixed-effects models, with clustering by patient, country and pollen season. Results: We analysed a total of 42,756 days from 1,093 grass allergy patients, including 18,479 days of users under AIT. Compared to no AIT, SCIT was associated with similar VAS levels and CSMS. Compared to no AIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower values of VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 7.5 units out of 100; 95% credible interval [95%CrI] = -12.1;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 5.0; 95%CrI = -8.5;-1.5), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 3.7; 95%CrI = -9.3;2.2). When compared to SCIT, SLIT-tablet was associated with lower VAS global allergy symptoms (average difference = 10.2; 95%CrI = -17.2;-2.8), lower VAS Work (average difference = 7.8; 95%CrI = -15.1;0.2), and a lower CSMS (average difference = 9.3; 95%CrI = -18.5;0.2). Conclusion: In patients with grass pollen allergy, SLIT-tablet, when compared to no AIT and to SCIT, is associated with lower reported symptom severity. Future longitudinal studies following internationally-harmonised standards for performing and reporting real-world data in AIT are needed to better understand its 'real-world' effectiveness.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Behavioural patterns in allergic rhinitis medication in Europe : A study using MASK-air(R) real-world data

Background Co-medication is common among patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), but its dimension and patterns are unknown. This is particularly relevant since AR is understood differently across European countries, as reflected by rhinitis-related search patterns in Google Trends. This study aims to assess AR co-medication and its regional patterns in Europe, using real-world data. Methods We analysed 2015-2020 MASK-air(R) European data. We compared days under no medication, monotherapy and co-medication using the visual analogue scale (VAS) levels for overall allergic symptoms ('VAS Global Symptoms') and impact of AR on work. We assessed the monthly use of different medication schemes, performing separate analyses by region (defined geographically or by Google Trends patterns). We estimated the average number of different drugs reported per patient within 1 year. Results We analysed 222,024 days (13,122 users), including 63,887 days (28.8%) under monotherapy and 38,315 (17.3%) under co-medication. The median 'VAS Global Symptoms' was 7 for no medication days, 14 for monotherapy and 21 for co-medication (p < .001). Medication use peaked during the spring, with similar patterns across different European regions (defined geographically or by Google Trends). Oral H-1-antihistamines were the most common medication in single and co-medication. Each patient reported using an annual average of 2.7 drugs, with 80% reporting two or more. Conclusions Allergic rhinitis medication patterns are similar across European regions. One third of treatment days involved co-medication. These findings suggest that patients treat themselves according to their symptoms (irrespective of how they understand AR) and that co-medication use is driven by symptom severity.Peer reviewe

Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Guidelines - 2016 Revision

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects 10% to 40% of the population. It reduces quality of life and school and work performance and is a frequent reason for office visits in general practice. Medical costs are large, but avoidable costs associated with lost work productivity are even larger than those incurred by asthma. New evidence has accumulated since the last revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines in 2010, prompting its update. OBJECTIVE: We sought to provide a targeted update of the ARIA guidelines. METHODS: The ARIA guideline panel identified new clinical questions and selected questions requiring an update. We performed systematic reviews of health effects and the evidence about patients' values and preferences and resource requirements (up to June 2016). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence-to-decision frameworks to develop recommendations. RESULTS: The 2016 revision of the ARIA guidelines provides both updated and new recommendations about the pharmacologic treatment of AR. Specifically, it addresses the relative merits of using oral H1-antihistamines, intranasal H1-antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids, and leukotriene receptor antagonists either alone or in combination. The ARIA guideline panel provides specific recommendations for the choice of treatment and the rationale for the choice and discusses specific considerations that clinicians and patients might want to review to choose the management most appropriate for an individual patient. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate treatment of AR might improve patients' quality of life and school and work productivity. ARIA recommendations support patients, their caregivers, and health care providers in choosing the optimal treatment