Novel mechanisms of DC and kilohertz electrical stimulation

Transcranial electrical stimulation is a promising technique where a weak electrical current is applied to the scalp with the goal of modulating brain activity. Understanding the cellular mechanism of direct current (DC) and kilohertz (kHz) electrical stimulation is of broad interest in neuromodulation. More specifically, there is a large mismatch between enthusiasm for clinical applications of the method and understanding of DC and kHz novel mechanisms of action. This dissertation is centered around two main fundamental aims: 1) systematic study of the acute and long-term effects of kilohertz electrical stimulation and amplitude-modulated waveform with kHz carrier frequency using a well-established animal model, hippocampal brain slice, 2) study the effect of tDCS on water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier using an advanced MRI imaging technique in a healthy population to investigate effect of tDCS stimulation on neurovascular units. The neuronal membrane has a well-established low pass filtering characteristic. This feature attenuates the sensitivity of the nervous system to any waveforms with high-frequency components. On the contrary, kilohertz stimulation has recently revolutionized spinal cord stimulation and even generated promising results in transcranial electrical stimulation. Investigating the effect of low kilohertz stimulation for neuromodulation is of huge interest. In chapters 2 and 3, several experimental designs are used to systematically investigate the frequency and dose-response of neuronal activity to unmodulated and amplitude modulated waveforms in low kilohertz range. The results support the theory of membrane attenuation of high-frequency stimulation. This dissertation provides the first direct in vitro evidence on acute effects of kilohertz electrical stimulation on modulating gamma oscillation using both unmodulated and Amplitude-modulated waveforms. While supported by membrane characteristics of neurons, we uncovered that using low kilohertz stimulation diminishes the sensitivity of hippocampal neurons to electrical stimulation. Moreover, Amplitude-Modulated waveforms can generate a different pattern of modulation with even higher sensitivity to stimulation. However, the required electric field, in this case, is still significantly higher than low-frequency stimulation methods such as tACS. Effects of DC stimulation have been studied in neuronal depolarization/hyperpolarization, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal network modulation. Recent evidence suggests that DC stimulation can induce polarity-dependent water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in cell culture experiments through a mechanism called electroosmosis. Modulating water exchange rate across BBB is of broad interest in neurological diseases such as dementia, Alzheimer’s, and stroke where the brain clearance system is disrupted. Investigating the effect of electrical stimulation on water exchange across BBB can potentially lead to complimentary treatment options. In chapter 4, an advanced MRI technique was used to investigate induced changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and water exchange rate across BBB during stimulation in areas under electrodes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we could not resolve an effect in the water exchange rate across BBB. In conclusion, in our efforts to investigate effects of high frequency stimulation we found that sensitivity of neuronal networks to oscillating electrical stimulation is governed by time constant of neuronal membrane. Moreover, neuronal networks are selective to different kilohertz waveforms (i.e., amplitude modulated) and this is governed by a nonlinear adaptive mechanism present in the network. For the effect of DC stimulation on neurovascular units, we hypothesized that stimulation affects water exchange rate across BBB through a mechanism known as electroosmosis which is a very small portion of a large water exchange across BBB in active transport. We believe that this may be the answer to our negative results in experiments

Dataset of concurrent EEG, ECG, and behavior with multiple doses of transcranial electrical stimulation

We present a dataset combining human-participant high-density electroencephalography (EEG) with physiological and continuous behavioral metrics during transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). Data include within participant application of nine High-Definition tES (HD-tES) types, targeting three cortical regions (frontal, motor, parietal) with three stimulation waveforms (DC, 5 Hz, 30 Hz); more than 783 total stimulation trials over 62 sessions with EEG, physiological (ECG, EOG), and continuous behavioral vigilance/alertness metrics. Experiment 1 and 2 consisted of participants performing a continuous vigilance/alertness task over three 70-minute and two 70.5-minute sessions, respectively. Demographic data were collected, as well as self-reported wellness questionnaires before and after each session. Participants received all 9 stimulation types in Experiment 1, with each session including three stimulation types, with 4 trials per type. Participants received two stimulation types in Experiment 2, with 20 trials of a given stimulation type per session. Within-participant reliability was tested by repeating select sessions. This unique dataset supports a range of hypothesis testing including interactions of tDCS/tACS location and frequency, brain-state, physiology, fatigue, and cognitive performance

Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation

Objective. Understanding how current reaches the brain during transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) underpins efforts to rationalize outcomes and optimize interventions. To this end, computational models of current flow relate applied dose to brain electric field. Conventional tES modeling considers distinct tissues like scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), gray matter and white matter. The properties of highly conductive CSF are especially important. However, modeling the space between skull and brain as entirely CSF is not an accurate representation of anatomy. The space conventionally modeled as CSF is approximately half meninges (dura, arachnoid, and pia) with lower conductivity. However, the resolution required to describe individual meningeal layers is computationally restrictive in an MRI-derived head model. Emulating the effect of meninges through CSF conductivity modification could improve accuracy with minimal cost. Approach. Models with meningeal layers were developed in a concentric sphere head model. Then, in a model with only CSF between skull and brain, CSF conductivity was optimized to emulate the effect of meningeal layers on cortical electric field for multiple electrode positions. This emulated conductivity was applied to MRI-derived models. Main results. Compared to a model with conventional CSF conductivity (1.65 S m−1), emulated CSF conductivity (0.85 S m−1) produced voltage fields better correlated with intracranial recordings from epilepsy patients. Significance. Conventional tES models have been validated using intracranial recording. Residual errors may nonetheless impact model utility. Because CSF is so conductive to current flow, misrepresentation of the skull-brain interface as entirely CSF is not realistic for tES modeling. Updating the conventional model with a CSF conductivity emulating the effect of the meninges enhances modeling accuracy without increasing model complexity. This allows existing modeling pipelines to be leveraged with a simple conductivity change. Using 0.85 S m−1 emulated CSF conductivity is recommended as the new standard in non-invasive brain stimulation modeling

Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modulate neural tissue. Neuromodulation apparently improves cognitive functions in several neurologic diseases treatment and sports performance. In this study, we present a comprehensive, integrative review of tDCS for motor rehabilitation and motor learning in healthy individuals, athletes and multiple neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. We also report on neuromodulation mechanisms, main applications, current knowledge including areas such as language, embodied cognition, functional and social aspects, and future directions. We present the use and perspectives of new developments in tDCS technology, namely high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) which promises to overcome one of the main tDCS limitation (i.e., low focality) and its application for neurological disease, pain relief, and motor learning/rehabilitation. Finally, we provided information regarding the Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in clinical applications, Cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) and its influence on motor learning, and TMS combined with electroencephalography (EEG) as a tool to evaluate tDCS effects on brain function161CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO - CNPQCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DE PESSOAL DE NÍVEL SUPERIOR - CAPESFUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO - FAPESP465686/2014-1Não tem2014/50909-8; 13/10187–0; 14/10134–7The authors thank the Ministry of Education (MEC), FAPESP - São Paulo Research Foundation, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte and Universidade Federal do ABC for its support. Postdoctoral scholarships to DGSM from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). Source(s) of financial support: This study was partially funded by grants to MB from NIH (NIH-NIMH 1R01MH111896, NIH-NINDS 1R01NS101362, NIH-NCI U54CA137788/U54CA132378, R03 NS054783) and New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH, DOH01-C31291GG), CEPID/BRAINN - The Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology (Process: 13/07559–3) to LML, Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq, Grant # 465686/2014-1) and the São Paulo Research Foundation (Grant # 2014/50909-8) to MSC, and Postdoctoral scholarships to AHO from FAPESP - Sao Paulo Research Foundation (Process: 13/10187–0 and 14/10134–7

A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement

Background: Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), including alternating or direct current stimulation (tACS or tDCS), applies weak electrical stimulation to modulate the activity of brain circuits. Integration of tES with concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows for the mapping of neural activity during neuromodulation, supporting causal studies of both brain function and tES effects. Methodological aspects of tES-fMRI studies underpin the results, and reporting them in appropriate detail is required for reproducibility and interpretability. Despite the growing number of published reports, there are no consensus-based checklists for disclosing methodological details of concurrent tES-fMRI studies. Objective: To develop a consensus-based checklist of reporting standards for concurrent tES-fMRI studies to support methodological rigor, transparency, and reproducibility (ContES Checklist). Methods: A two-phase Delphi consensus process was conducted by a steering committee (SC) of 13 members and 49 expert panelists (EP) through the International Network of the tES-fMRI (INTF) Consortium. The process began with a circulation of a preliminary checklist of essential items and additional recommendations, developed by the SC based on a systematic review of 57 concurrent tES-fMRI studies. Contributors were then invited to suggest revisions or additions to the initial checklist. After the revision phase, contributors rated the importance of the 17 essential items and 42 additional recommendations in the final checklist. The state of methodological transparency within the 57 reviewed concurrent tES-fMRI studies was then assessed using the checklist. Results: Experts refined the checklist through the revision and rating phases, leading to a checklist with three categories of essential items and additional recommendations: (1) technological factors, (2) safety and noise tests, and (3) methodological factors. The level of reporting of checklist items varied among the 57 concurrent tES-fMRI papers, ranging from 24% to 76%. On average, 53% of checklist items were reported in a given article. Conclusions: Use of the ContES checklist is expected to enhance the methodological reporting quality of future concurrent tES-fMRI studies, and increase methodological transparency and reproducibility

Notes on Human Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation between 1960 and 1998

Background:: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated to modulate neuronal function including cognitive neuroscience and neuropsychiatric therapies. While cases of human stimulation with rudimentary batteries date back more than 200 years, clinical trials with current controlled stimulation were published intermittently since the 1960s. The modern era of tDCS only started after 1998. Objectives:: To review methods and outcomes of tDCS studies from old literature (between 1960 and 1998) with intention of providing new insight for ongoing tDCS trials and development of tDCS protocols especially for the purpose of treatment. Methods:: Articles were identified through a search in PubMed and through the reference list from its selected articles. We included only non-invasive human studies that provided controlled direct current and were written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese before the year of 1998, the date in which modern stimulation paradigms were implemented. Results:: Fifteen articles met our criteria. The majority were small-randomized controlled clinical trials that enrolled a mean of approximately 26 subjects (Phase II studies). Most of the studies (around 83%) assessed the role of tDCS in the treatment of psychiatric conditions, in which the main outcomes were measured by means of behavioral scales and clinical observation, but the diagnostic precision and the quality of outcome monitoring, including adverse events, were deficient by modern standards. Compared to modern tDCS dose, the stimulation intensities used (0.1–1 mA) were lower, however as the electrodes were typically smaller (e.g., 1.26 cm2), the average electrode current density (0.2 mA/cm2) was approximately 4× higher. The number of sessions ranged from one to 120 (median 14). Notably, the stimulation session durations of several minutes to 11 h (median 4.5 h) could markedly exceed modern tDCS protocols. Twelve studies out of 15 showed positive results. Only mild side effects were reported, with headache and skin alterations the most common. Conclusion:: Most of the studies identified were for psychiatric indications, especially in patients with depression and/or schizophrenia and majority indicated some positive results. Variability in outcome is noted across trials and within trials across subjects, but overall results were reported as encouraging, and consistent with modern efforts, given some responders and mild side effects. The significant difference with modern dose, low current with smaller electrode size and interestingly much longer stimulation duration may worth considering