49 research outputs found

    Individual bacteria in structured environments rely on phenotypic resistance to phage

    Get PDF
    This is the final version. Available on open access from Public Library of Science via the DOI in this recordData Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.Bacteriophages represent an avenue to overcome the current antibiotic resistance crisis, but evolution of genetic resistance to phages remains a concern. In vitro, bacteria evolve genetic resistance, preventing phage adsorption or degrading phage DNA. In natural environments, evolved resistance is lower possibly because the spatial heterogeneity within biofilms, microcolonies, or wall populations favours phenotypic survival to lytic phages. However, it is also possible that the persistence of genetically sensitive bacteria is due to less efficient phage amplification in natural environments, the existence of refuges where bacteria can hide, and a reduced spread of resistant genotypes. Here, we monitor the interactions between individual planktonic bacteria in isolation in ephemeral refuges and bacteriophage by tracking the survival of individual cells. We find that in these transient spatial refuges, phenotypic resistance due to reduced expression of the phage receptor is a key determinant of bacterial survival. This survival strategy is in contrast with the emergence of genetic resistance in the absence of ephemeral refuges in well-mixed environments. Predictions generated via a mathematical modelling framework to track bacterial response to phages reveal that the presence of spatial refuges leads to fundamentally different population dynamics that should be considered in order to predict and manipulate the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of bacteria-phage interactions in naturally structured environments.Medical Research Council (MRC)Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)Gordon and Betty and Gordon Moore FoundationEuropean Research Council (ERC)Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsDefence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl)Royal Societ

    Type I-F CRISPR-Cas resistance against virulent phages results in abortive infection and provides population-level immunity

    Get PDF
    Funder: Veni grant, Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [016.Veni.171.047 to RHJS] Health Sciences Career Development Award from the University of Otago, NZAbstract: Type I CRISPR-Cas systems are abundant and widespread adaptive immune systems in bacteria and can greatly enhance bacterial survival in the face of phage infection. Upon phage infection, some CRISPR-Cas immune responses result in bacterial dormancy or slowed growth, which suggests the outcomes for infected cells may vary between systems. Here we demonstrate that type I CRISPR immunity of Pectobacterium atrosepticum leads to suppression of two unrelated virulent phages, ɸTE and ɸM1. Immunity results in an abortive infection response, where infected cells do not survive, but viral propagation is severely decreased, resulting in population protection due to the reduced phage epidemic. Our findings challenge the view of CRISPR-Cas as a system that protects the individual cell and supports growing evidence of abortive infection by some types of CRISPR-Cas systems

    Structural basis for CRISPR RNA-guided DNA recognition by Cascade

    Get PDF
    The CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) immune system in prokaryotes uses small guide RNAs to neutralize invading viruses and plasmids. In Escherichia coli, immunity depends on a ribonucleoprotein complex called Cascade. Here we present the composition and low-resolution structure of Cascade and show how it recognizes double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) targets in a sequence-specific manner. Cascade is a 405-kDa complex comprising five functionally essential CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins (CasA1B2C6D1E1) and a 61-nucleotide CRISPR RNA (crRNA) with 5′-hydroxyl and 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate termini. The crRNA guides Cascade to dsDNA target sequences by forming base pairs with the complementary DNA strand while displacing the noncomplementary strand to form an R-loop. Cascade recognizes target DNA without consuming ATP, which suggests that continuous invader DNA surveillance takes place without energy investment. The structure of Cascade shows an unusual seahorse shape that undergoes conformational changes when it binds target DNA.

    The diversity-generating benefits of a prokaryotic adaptive immune system

    Get PDF
    Published onlineJOURNAL ARTICLEProkaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems insert spacers derived from viruses and other parasitic DNA elements into CRISPR loci to provide sequence-specific immunity. This frequently results in high within-population spacer diversity, but it is unclear if and why this is important. Here we show that, as a result of this spacer diversity, viruses can no longer evolve to overcome CRISPR-Cas by point mutation, which results in rapid virus extinction. This effect arises from synergy between spacer diversity and the high specificity of infection, which greatly increases overall population resistance. We propose that the resulting short-lived nature of CRISPR-dependent bacteria-virus coevolution has provided strong selection for the evolution of sophisticated virus-encoded anti-CRISPR mechanisms.S.v.H. has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 660039. E.R.W. received funding from the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Research Executive Agency grant agreement number 327606. E.R.W., A.B. and M.B. also acknowledge the Natural Environment Research Council, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, the Royal Society, the Leverhulme Trust, the Wellcome Trust and the AXA research fund for funding. J.M.B.-D. was supported by the University of California San Francisco Program for Breakthrough in Biomedical Research, the Sandler Foundation, and a National Institutes of Health Director’s Early Independence Award (DP5-OD021344). H.C. was funded by the Erasmus+ programme (European Union), the Explora’Sup programme (Région Rhône-Alpes) and the Centre Régional des Œuvres Universitaires et Scolaires (CROUS; French State)

    Hitting the CRISPR target

    No full text

    Regulation of CRISPR-based immune responses

    No full text
    Nucleic acid cleaving CRISPR effector complexes, consisting of Cas protein(s) and crRNAs, provide protection against invading genetic elements, such as phage and (conjugative) plasmids. However, under some conditions, cells may experience a selective advantage if they avoid energy investment in CRISPR defense, for example, if they contain additional defense systems (e.g., R-M systems, phage exclusion systems) that provide sufficient protection. The formation of CRISPR effector complexes is a multistep process that requires (1) expression of the cas genes, (2) assembly of the Cas proteins into a multiprotein complex, (3) transcription of a CRISPR array into a pre-crRNA molecule, and (4) the subsequent sequence-specific processing of the pre-crRNA by a dedicated endoribonuclease, yielding crRNAs that are then loaded on the Cas protein complex. The resulting ribonucleoprotein complex may have intrinsic cleavage activity on complementary nucleic acids (e.g., the RAMP module complex of Pyrococcus furiosus) or may to this end require recruitment of an additional component upon target binding (e.g., Cas3 recruitment by Cascade in Escherichia coli). The different steps toward the formation of the final effector complexes offer several potential targets for regulation of the CRISPR system. Although studies dealingwith this regulation are limited and thus far restricted to a few organisms, the number of host factors involved in CRISPR regulation increases rapidly. CRISPR defense can be regulated at the level of (cas gene and/or CRISPR) transcription by DNA-binding global regulators such as H-NS, LeuO, cAMP-CRP, or at the posttranscriptional level by the chaperon HtpG, which has been shown to be essential for Cas3 activity in E. coli. The presence of r32-dependent promoters within the cas operon and the involvement of the BaeSR two-component system suggest a coupling of CRISPR activity to membrane or heat stress in E. coli. In this chapter, we will summarize the recent findings on the regulation of the CRISPR system, mainly in E. coli, for which several regulatory components have been identified. We will also discuss the role of other potential regulatory mechanisms, such as translational regulation of cas gene expression through overlapping open reading frames on a polycistronic mRNA and the regulation of pre-crRNA stability or processing (Fig. 4.1).</p

    2.Chevallereau_host mutation rate on the evolution of CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity_data

    No full text
    Data collected in the laboratory and used to make the figures shown in the manuscript

    Data from: Host diversity limits the evolution of parasite local adaptation

    No full text
    Specificity in the interactions between hosts and their parasites can lead to local adaptation. However, the degree of local adaptation is predicted to depend upon the diversity of resistance alleles within the host population; increasing host diversity should decrease mean parasite infectivity and hence reduce local adaptation. In this study, we empirically test this prediction using the highly specific interactions between bacteria with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated (CRISPR/Cas) immunity and their bacteriophage. Bacteria acquire immunity to phage by incorporating a phage-derived spacer sequence into CRISPR loci on the host genome, and phage can escape the CRISPR-mediated immunity of a specific clone by mutating the targeted sequence. We found that high levels of CRISPR allele diversity that naturally evolve in host populations exposed to phage (because each bacterial clone captures a unique phage-derived sequence) prevents phage from becoming locally adapted. By manipulating the number of CRISPR alleles in the host population, we show that phage can become locally adapted to their bacterial hosts but only when CRISPR allele diversity is low
    corecore