Metal organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation

[EN] Composites incorporating two-dimensional nanostructures within polymeric matrices have potential as functional components for several technologies, including gas separation. Prospectively, employing metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as versatile nanofillers would notably broaden the scope of functionalities. However, synthesizing MOFs in the form of freestanding nanosheets has proved challenging. We present a bottom-up synthesis strategy for dispersible copper 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate MOF lamellae of micrometre lateral dimensions and nanometre thickness. Incorporating MOF nanosheets into polymer matrices endows the resultant composites with outstanding CO2 separation performance from CO2/CH4 gas mixtures, together with an unusual and highly desired increase in the separation selectivity with pressure. As revealed by tomographic focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy, the unique separation behaviour stems from a superior occupation of the membrane cross-section by the MOF nanosheets as compared with isotropic crystals, which improves the efficiency of molecular discrimination and eliminates unselective permeation pathways. This approach opens the door to ultrathin MOF-polymer composites for various applications.The research leading to these results has received funding (J.G., B.S.) from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 335746, CrystEng-MOF-MMM. T.R. is grateful to TUDelft for funding. G.P. acknowledges the A. von Humboldt Foundation for a research grant. A.C., I.L. and F.X.L.i.X. thank Consolider-Ingenio 2010 (project MULTICAT) and the ‘Severo Ochoa’ programme for support. I.L. also thanks CSIC for a JAE doctoral grant.Ródenas Torralba, T.; Luz Mínguez, I.; Prieto González, G.; Seoane, B.; Miro, H.; Corma Canós, A.; Kapteijn, F.... (2015). Metal organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nature Materials. 14(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4113S4855141Stankovich, S. et al. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442, 282–286 (2006).Wang, Q. H., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Kis, A., Coleman, J. N. & Strano, M. S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nature Nanotech. 7, 699–712 (2012).Choi, S. et al. Layered silicates by swelling of AMH-3 and nanocomposite membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 552–555 (2008).Varoon, K. et al. Dispersible exfoliated zeolite nanosheets and their application as a selective membrane. Science 334, 72–75 (2011).Corma, A., Fornes, V., Pergher, S. B., Maesen, Th. L. M. & Buglass, J. G. Delaminated zeolite precursors as selective acidic catalysts. Nature 396, 353–356 (1998).Hernandez, Y. et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nature Nanotech. 3, 563–568 (2008).Li, P-Z., Maeda, Y. & Xu, Q. Top-down fabrication of crystalline metal-organic framework nanosheets. Chem. Commun. 47, 8436–8438 (2011).Choi, M. et al. Stable single-unit-cell nanosheets of zeolite MFI as active and long-lived catalysts. Nature 461, 246–249 (2009).Hu, G., Wang, N., O’Hare, D. & Davis, J. One-step synthesis and AFM imaging of hydrophobic LDH monolayers. Chem. Commun. 287–289 (2006).Yamamoto, K., Sakata, Y., Nohara, Y., Takahashi, Y. & Tatsumi, T. Organic-inorganic hybrid zeolites containing organic frameworks. Science 300, 470–472 (2003).Yaghi, O. M. et al. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423, 705–714 (2003).Férey, G. Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 191–214 (2008).Gücüyener, C., Bergh, J., Gascon, J. & Kapteijn, F. Ethane/ethene separation turned on its head: Selective ethane adsorption on the metal-organic framework ZIF-7 through a gate-opening mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17704–17706 (2010).Deng, H. et al. Multiple functional groups of varying ratios in metal-organic frameworks. Science 12, 846–850 (2010).Khaletskaya, K. et al. Integration of porous coordination polymers and gold nanorods into core-shell mesoscopic composites toward light-induced molecular release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10998–11005 (2013).Corma, A., Garcia, H. & Llabrés i Xamena, F. X. Engineering metal organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Rev. 110, 4606–4655 (2010).Mueller, U. et al. Metal-organic frameworks-prospective industrial applications. J. Mater. Chem. 16, 626–636 (2006).Gascon, J. & Kapteijn, F. Metal-organic framework membranes-high potential, bright future? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1530–1532 (2010).Li, Y. S. et al. Controllable synthesis of metal-organic frameworks: From MOF nanorods to oriented MOF membranes. Adv. Mater. 22, 3322–3326 (2010).Gascon, J. et al. Practical approach to zeolitic membranes and coatings: State of the art, opportunities, barriers, and future perspectives. Chem. Mater. 24, 2829–2844 (2012).Bae, T-H. et al. A high-performance gas-separation membrane containing submicrometer-sized metal-organic framework crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 9863–9866 (2010).Zornoza, B. et al. Functionalized flexible MOFs as fillers in mixed matrix membranes for highly selective separation of CO2 from CH4 at elevated pressures. Chem. Commun. 47, 9522–9524 (2011).Zornoza, B., Tellez, C., Coronas, J., Gascon, J. & Kapteijn, F. Metal organic frameworks based mixed matrix membranes: An increasingly important field of research with a large application potential. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 166, 67–78 (2013).Zhang, C., Dai, Y., Johnson, J. R., Karvan, O. & Koros, W. High performance ZIF-8/6FDA-DAM mixed matrix membrane for propylene/propane separations. J. Mem. Sci. 389, 34–42 (2012).Li, T., Pan, Y., Peinemann, K-V. & Lai, Z. Carbon dioxide selective mixed matrix composite membrane containing ZIF-7 nano-fillers. J. Mem. Sci. 425–426, 235–242 (2013).Makiura, R. et al. Surface nano-architecture of a metal-organic framework. Nature Mater. 9, 565–571 (2010).Mori, W. et al. Synthesis of new adsorbent copper(II) terephthalate. Chem. Lett. 26, 1219–1220 (1997).Xin, Z., Bai, J., Shen, Y. & Pan, Y. Hierarchically micro- and mesoporous coordination polymer nanostructures with high adsorption performance. Cryst. Growth Des. 10, 2451–2454 (2010).Adams, R., Carson, C., Ward, J., Tannenbaum, R. & Koros, W. Metal organic framework mixed matrix membranes for gas separations. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 131, 13–20 (2010).Carson, C. G. et al. Synthesis and structure characterization of copper terephthalate metal-organic framework. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2338–2343 (2009).Ameloot, R. et al. Interfacial synthesis of hollow metal-organic framework capsules demonstrating selective permeability. Nature Chem. 3, 382–387 (2011).Chen, Z. et al. Microporous metal-organic framework with immobilized -OH functional groups within the pore surfaces for selective gas sorption. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 3745–3749 (2010).Karra, J. R. & Walton, K. S. Molecular simulations and experimental studies of CO2, CO, and N2 adsorption in metal-organic frameworks. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 15735–15740 (2010).Liu, J., Thallapally, P. K., McGrail, B. P., Brown, D. R. & Liu, J. Progress in adsorption-based CO2 capture by metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2308–2322 (2012).Seki, K., Takamizawa, S. & Mori, W. Characterization of microporous copper(II) dicarboxylates (fumarate, terephthalate, and trans-1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate) by gas adsorption. Chem. Lett. 30, 122–123 (2001).Carson, C. G. et al. Structure solution from powder diffraction of copper 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 2140–2145 (2014).Corma, A., Diaz, U., Domine, M. E. & Fornes, V. AlITQ-6 and TiITQ-6: Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 1499–1501 (2000).Corma, A., Fornes, V. & Diaz, U. ITQ-18 a new delaminated stable zeolite. Chem. Commun. 2642–2643 (2001).Rouquerol, F., Rouquerol, J. & Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids (Academic, 1999).Dubinin, M. M. The potential theory of adsorption of gases and vapors for adsorbents with energetically nonuniform surfaces. Chem. Rev. 60, 235–241 (1960).Uchic, M. D., Holzer, L., Inkson, B. J., Principe, E. L. & Munroe, P. Three-dimensional microstructural characterization using focused ion beam tomography. Mater. Res. Soc. Bull. 32, 408–416 (2007).Rodenas, T. et al. Visualizing MOF mixed matrix membranes at the nanoscale: Towards structure-performance relationships in CO2/CH4 separation over NH2-MIL-53(Al)@PI. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 249–256 (2013).Wang, X. et al. Unusual rheological behaviour of liquid polybutadiene rubber/clay nanocomposite gels: The role of polymer-clay interaction, clay exfoliation, and clay orientation and disorientation. Macromology 39, 6653–6660 (2006).Yang, Y. et al. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and capture: A review. J. Environ. Sci. 20, 14–27 (2008).Yeo, Z. Y., Chew, T. L., Zhu, P. W., Mohamed, A. R. & Chai, S-P. Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: A review. J. Nature Gas Chem. 21, 282–298 (2012).McKeown, N. B. & Budd, P. M. Polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIMs): Organic materials for membrane separations, heterogeneous catalysis and hydrogen storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 675–683 (2006).Vinh-Thang, H. & Kaliaguine, S. Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: A review. Chem. Rev. 113, 4980–5028 (2013)

Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional outcome after acute stroke (AFFINITY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background Trials of fluoxetine for recovery after stroke report conflicting results. The Assessment oF FluoxetINe In sTroke recoverY (AFFINITY) trial aimed to show if daily oral fluoxetine for 6 months after stroke improves functional outcome in an ethnically diverse population. Methods AFFINITY was a randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 43 hospital stroke units in Australia (n=29), New Zealand (four), and Vietnam (ten). Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke in the previous 2–15 days, brain imaging consistent with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, and a persisting neurological deficit that produced a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or more. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 via a web-based system using a minimisation algorithm to once daily, oral fluoxetine 20 mg capsules or matching placebo for 6 months. Patients, carers, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked to the treatment allocation. The primary outcome was functional status, measured by the mRS, at 6 months. The primary analysis was an ordinal logistic regression of the mRS at 6 months, adjusted for minimisation variables. Primary and safety analyses were done according to the patient's treatment allocation. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000774921. Findings Between Jan 11, 2013, and June 30, 2019, 1280 patients were recruited in Australia (n=532), New Zealand (n=42), and Vietnam (n=706), of whom 642 were randomly assigned to fluoxetine and 638 were randomly assigned to placebo. Mean duration of trial treatment was 167 days (SD 48·1). At 6 months, mRS data were available in 624 (97%) patients in the fluoxetine group and 632 (99%) in the placebo group. The distribution of mRS categories was similar in the fluoxetine and placebo groups (adjusted common odds ratio 0·94, 95% CI 0·76–1·15; p=0·53). Compared with patients in the placebo group, patients in the fluoxetine group had more falls (20 [3%] vs seven [1%]; p=0·018), bone fractures (19 [3%] vs six [1%]; p=0·014), and epileptic seizures (ten [2%] vs two [<1%]; p=0·038) at 6 months. Interpretation Oral fluoxetine 20 mg daily for 6 months after acute stroke did not improve functional outcome and increased the risk of falls, bone fractures, and epileptic seizures. These results do not support the use of fluoxetine to improve functional outcome after stroke

Convolutional Neural Networks Improve Radiologists’ Performance in Breast Cancer Screening for Vietnamese patients

Nowadays, breast cancer is one of the leading cancers in Vietnam, and it causes approximately 6000 deaths every year. The rate of breast cancer patients was calculated as 26.4/100000 persons in 2018. There are 21,555 new cases reported in 2020. However, these figures can be reduced with early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer disease in women through mammographic imaging. In many hospitals in Vietnam, there is a lack of experienced breast cancer radiologists. Therefore, it is helpful to develop an intelligent system to improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening for Vietnamese patients. Our research aims to develop a convolutional neural network-based system for classifying breast cancer X-Ray images into three classes of BI-RADS categories as BI-RADS 1 (“normal”), BI-RADS 23 (“benign”) and BI-RADS 045 (“incomplete and malignance”). This classification system is developed based on the convolutional neural network with ResNet 50. The system is trained and tested on a breast cancer image dataset of Vietnamese patients containing 7912 images provided by Hanoi Medical University Hospital radiologists. The system accuracy uses the testing set achieved a macAUC (a macro average of the three AUCs) of 0.754. To validate our model, we performed a reader study with the breast cancer radiologists of the Hanoi Medical University Hospital, reading about 500 random images of the test set. We confirmed the efficacy of our model, which achieved performance comparable to a committee of two radiologists when presented with the same data. Additionally, the system takes only 6 seconds to interpret a breast cancer X-Ray image instead of 450 seconds interpreted by a Vietnamese radiologist. Therefore, our system can be considered as a “second radiologist,” which can improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening for Vietnamese patients