146 research outputs found
High-level tolerance to triclosan may play a role in Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic resistance in immunocompromised hosts: evidence from outbreak investigation
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background and methods</p> <p><it>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </it>is a major infectious threat to immunocompromised patients. We recently reported a fatal epidemic of multidrug-resistant <it>P. aeruginosa </it>in an onchoematology unit, linked to massive contamination of a triclosan-based disinfectant. The aim of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of triclosan and chlorhexidine digluconate against the epidemic strain of <it>P. aeruginosa</it>, to confirm the hypothesis that the soap dispenser acted as a continuous source of the infection during the outbreak, and to explore the potential role of triclosan in increasing the level of resistance to selected antibiotics.</p> <p>Susceptibility tests and time-kill assays for disinfectans were performed using two commercial formulations containing triclosan and chlorhexidine digluconate, respectively. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the broth microdilution method.</p> <p>Findings</p> <p>The <it>P. aeruginosa </it>epidemic strain exhibited an extremely high level of triclosan resistance (apparent MIC = 2,125 mg/L), while it was markedly susceptible to chlorhexidine digluconate (apparent MIC = 12.5 mg/L). Upon gradual adaptation to triclosan, the epidemic strain survived for a long period (> 120 h) in the presence of 3,400 mg/L (equivalent to 1.6 × MIC) of triclosan, concomitantly increasing the resistance to six antibiotics that are typical substrates of drug efflux pumps of the resistance nodulation division family. This effect was reversed by efflux pump inhibitors.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The epidemic <it>P. aeruginosa </it>strain was resistant to triclosan and its previous exposure to triclosan increases antibiotic resistance, likely through active efflux mechanisms. Since <it>P. aeruginosa </it>can become tolerant to elevated triclosan concentrations, the use of triclosan-based disinfectants should be avoided in those healthcare settings hosting patients at high risk for <it>P. aeruginosa </it>infection.</p
How much do needlestick injuries cost? a systematic review of the economic evaluations of needlestick and sharps injuries among healthcare personnel
objective. To provide an overview of the economic aspects of needlestick and sharps injury (NSI) management among healthcare personnel
(HCP) within a Health Technology Assessment project to evaluate the impact of safety-engineered devices on health care
methods. A systematic review of economic analyses related to NSIs was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement and by searching
PubMed and Scopus databases (January 1997–February 2015). Mean costs were stratified by study approach (modeling or data driven) and type of
cost (direct or indirect). Costs were evaluated using the CDC operative definition and converted to 2015 International US dollars (Int747 (range, Int1,691).
The medians of the means for disaggregated costs were Int48–Int322 (range, Int413) for indirect costs (6 studies). When compared with data-driven studies, modeling studies had higher disaggregated and aggregated costs, but
data-driven studies showed greater variability. Indirect costs were consistent between studies, mostly referring to lost productivity, while direct costs
varied widely within and between studies according to source infectivity, HCP susceptibility, and post-exposure diagnostic and prophylactic protocols.
Costs of treating infections were not included, and intangible costs could equal those associated with NSI medical evaluations.
conclusions. NSIs generate significant direct, indirect, potential, and intangible costs, possibly increasing over time. Economic efforts
directed at preventing occupational exposures and infections, including provision of safety-engineered devices, may be offset by the savings from
a lower incidence of NSIs
The importance of implementing safe sharps practices in the laboratory setting in Europe
Healthcare workers are at risk of sharps injuries and subsequent infection from more than 40 bloodborne pathogens or species. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) together account for the vast majority of cases. The Directive 2010/32/EU “Prevention from sharp injuries in the hospital and healthcare sector”, issued to protect workers from these risks, requires an integrated approach to prevention including awareness-raising, education, training, elimination of unnecessary needles, safe procedures for sharps use and disposal, banning of recapping, vaccination, use of personal protective equipment, provision of safety-engineered devices, and appropriate surveillance, monitoring, response and follow-up.
As laboratories represent a high-risk setting both in the preanalytical and analytical phase, we reviewed accidents and prevention in this setting in the light of the new legislation.
Phlebotomy is the procedure carrying the highest risk of exposure and infection, involved in 30-50% of HIV and HCV cases detected in nationwide systems following accidental blood exposures implemented since the 1990s in Italy and France. In laboratories, problems in the management of sharps containers, recapping, needle disassembly by hand and blood transfer from syringes into tubes were observed and accounted for two-thirds of injuries. These accidents could be reduced through education and monitoring of behaviours, and introduction of medical devices incorporating safety-engineered protection mechanisms with appropriate training. Laboratory staff should be immunized against HBV, and know policies and procedures for the post-exposure management and prophylaxis. The management commitment to safety is crucial to ensure the necessary support to these changes
Diagnostic issues and capabilities in 48 isolation facilities in 16 European countries: data from EuroNHID surveys
Background: Highly infectious diseases (HIDs) are defined as being transmissible from person to person, causing life-threatening illnesses and presenting a serious public health hazard. The sampling, handling and transport of specimens from patients with HIDs present specific bio-safety concerns. Findings The European Network for HID project aimed to record, in a cross-sectional study, the infection control capabilities of referral centers for HIDs across Europe and assesses the level of achievement to previously published guidelines. In this paper, we report the current diagnostic capabilities and bio-safety measures applied to diagnostic procedures in these referral centers. Overall, 48 isolation facilities in 16 European countries were evaluated. Although 81% of these referral centers are located near a biosafety level 3 laboratory, 11% and 31% of them still performed their microbiological and routine diagnostic analyses, respectively, without bio-safety measures.
Conclusions: The discrepancies among the referral centers surveyed between the level of practices and the European Network of Infectious Diseases (EUNID) recommendations have multiple reasons of which the interest of the individuals in charge and the investment they put in preparedness to emerging outbreaks. Despite the fact that the less prepared centers can improve by just updating their practice and policies any support to help them to achieve an acceptable level of biosecurity is welcome
Awareness, discussion and non-prescribed use of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among persons living with HIV/AIDS in Italy: a Nationwide, cross-sectional study among patients on antiretrovirals and their treating HIV physicians
Before Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) was officially recommended and made available, a few surveys among gay and bisexual men, and persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), identified an informal use of antiretrovirals (ARVs) for PrEP among HIV-negative individuals. Before PrEP availability in Italy, we aimed to assess whether PLWHA in Italy shared their ARVs with HIV-negative individuals, whether they knew people who were on PrEP, and describe the level of awareness and discussion on this preventive measure among them and people in their close circle
Isolation facilities for highly infectious diseases in Europe - A cross-sectional analysis in 16 countries
BACKGROUND: Highly Infectious Diseases (HIDs) are (i) easily
transmissible form person to person; (ii) cause a
life-threatening illness with no or few treatment options; and
(iii) pose a threat for both personnel and the public. Hence,
even suspected HID cases should be managed in specialised
facilities minimizing infection risks but allowing
state-of-the-art critical care. Consensus statements on the
operational management of isolation facilities have been
published recently. The study presented was set up to compare
the operational management, resources, and technical equipment
among European isolation facilities. Due to differences in
geography, population density, and national response plans it
was hypothesized that adherence to recommendations will vary.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: Until mid of 2010 the European Network for
Highly Infectious Diseases conducted a cross-sectional analysis
of isolation facilities in Europe, recruiting 48 isolation
facilities in 16 countries. Three checklists were disseminated,
assessing 44 items and 148 specific questions. The median
feedback rate for specific questions was 97.9% (n = 47/48)
(range: n = 7/48 (14.6%) to n = 48/48 (100%). Although all
facilities enrolled were nominated specialised facilities'
serving countries or regions, their design, equipment and
personnel management varied. Eighteen facilities fulfilled the
definition of a High Level Isolation Unit'. In contrast, 24
facilities could not operate independently from their co-located
hospital, and five could not ensure access to equipment
essential for infection control. Data presented are not
representative for the EU in general, as only 16/27 (59.3%) of
all Member States agreed to participate. Another limitation of
this study is the time elapsed between data collection and
publication; e.g. in Germany one additional facility opened in
the meantime. CONCLUSION: There are disparities both within and
between European countries regarding the design and equipment of
isolation facilities. With regard to the International Health
Regulations, terminology, capacities and equipment should be
standardised
Surgical site infection after caesarean section. Space for post-discharge surveillance improvements and reliable comparisons
Surgical site infections (SSI) after caesarean section (CS) represent a substantial health system concern. Surveying SSI has been associated with a reduction in SSI incidence. We report the findings of three (2008, 2011 and 2013) regional active SSI surveillances after CS in community hospital of the Latium region determining the incidence of SSI. Each CS was surveyed for SSI occurrence by trained staff up to 30 post-operative days, and association of SSI with relevant characteristics was assessed using binomial logistic regression. A total of 3,685 CS were included in the study. A complete 30 day post-operation follow-up was achieved in over 94% of procedures. Overall 145 SSI were observed (3.9% cumulative incidence) of which 131 (90.3%) were superficial and 14 (9.7%) complex (deep or organ/space) SSI; overall 129 SSI (of which 89.9% superficial) were diagnosed post-discharge. Only higher NNIS score was significantly associated with SSI occurrence in the regression analysis. Our work provides the first regional data on CS-associated SSI incidence, highlighting the need for a post-discharge surveillance which should assure 30 days post-operation to not miss data on complex SSI, as well as being less labour intensive
Infection control management of patients with suspected highly infectious diseases in emergency departments: data from a survey in 41 facilities in 14 European countries
Heli Siikamäki on työryhmän EuroNHID Working Group jäsen.Peer reviewe
Cross-subtype Immunity against Avian Influenza in Persons Recently Vaccinated for Influenza
Seasonal influenza vaccination may induce heterosubtypic immunity against avian influenza virus (H5N1)
- …