Assessing enrollment of eligible infants in the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) through linkage to the pediatric cardiac critical care consortium (PC4) registry

Background:The National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) lacks a rigorous enrollment audit process, unlike other collaborative networks. Most centers require individual families to consent to participate. It is unknown whether there is variation across centers or biases in enrollment. Methods:We used the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) registry to assess enrollment rates in NPC-QIC for those centers participating in both registries using indirect identifiers (date of birth, date of admission, gender, and center) to match patient records. All infants born 1/1/2018-12/31/2020 and admitted 30 days of life were eligible. In PC4, all infants with a fundamental diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart or variant or who underwent a surgical or hybrid Norwood or variant were eligible. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort and center match rates were plotted on a funnel chart. Results:Of 898 eligible NPC-QIC patients, 841 were linked to 1,114 eligible PC4 patients (match rate 75.5%) in 32 centers. Match rates were lower in patients of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity (66.1%, p = 0.005), and those with any specified chromosomal abnormality (57.4%, p = 0.002), noncardiac abnormality (67.8%, p = 0.005), or any specified syndrome (66.5%, p = 0.001). Match rates were lower for patients who transferred to another hospital or died prior to discharge. Match rates varied from 0 to 100% across centers. Conclusions:It is feasible to match patients between the NPC-QIC and PC4 registries. Variation in match rates suggests opportunities for improvement in NPC-QIC patient enrollment

Effect of Cardiopulmonary Bypass on SARS‐CoV‐2 Vaccination Antibody Levels

Background Adults undergoing heart surgery are particularly vulnerable to respiratory complications, including COVID‐19. Immunization can significantly reduce this risk; however, the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on immunization status is unknown. We sought to evaluate the effect of CPB on COVID‐19 vaccination antibody concentration after cardiac surgery. Methods and Results This prospective observational clinical trial evaluated adult participants undergoing cardiac surgery requiring CPB at a single institution. All participants received a full primary COVID‐19 vaccination series before CPB. SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein‐specific antibody concentrations were measured before CPB (pre‐CPB measurement), 24 hours following CPB (postoperative day 1 measurement), and approximately 1 month following their procedure. Relationships between demographic or surgical variables and change in antibody concentration were assessed via linear regression. A total of 77 participants were enrolled in the study and underwent surgery. Among all participants, mean antibody concentration was significantly decreased on postoperative day 1, relative to pre‐CPB levels (−2091 AU/mL, P<0.001). Antibody concentration increased between postoperative day 1and 1 month post CPB measurement (2465 AU/mL, P=0.015). Importantly, no significant difference was observed between pre‐CPB and 1 month post CPB concentrations (P=0.983). Two participants (2.63%) developed symptomatic COVID‐19 pneumonia postoperatively; 1 case of postoperative COVID‐19 pneumonia resulted in mortality (1.3%). Conclusions COVID‐19 vaccine antibody concentrations were significantly reduced in the short‐term following CPB but returned to pre‐CPB levels within 1 month. One case of postoperative COVID 19 pneumonia‐specific mortality was observed. These findings suggest the need for heightened precautions in the perioperative period for cardiac surgery patients