57 research outputs found
“What is an appropriate dosage and interval of vitamin D2 supplementation to achieve a sufficiency level in postmenopausal women of Thailand?” A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
AbstractObjectiveThis study primarily evaluated serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels in postmenopausal women with vitamin D insufficiency who received different dosages and intervals of vitamin D2 supplementation. We secondarily evaluated the percentages of those who achieved vitamin D sufficiency level (Defined as ≥30 ng/ml).Study designRandomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.MethodsPostmenopausal women who met the criteria of vitamin D insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) were randomized into 4 groups (N = 25/group). Participants received a 12 week-treatment of different dosages and intervals of vitamin D2 (placebo, vitamin D2 20,000 IU/2 weeks, vitamin D2 20,000 IU/week, and vitamin D2 40,000 IU/week). Serum total 25-hydroxy vitamin D was determined at baseline, after 4 and 12 weeks of supplementation with electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecys, Roche Diagnostics). Changes of 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were compared among the groups.ResultsForty seven percent of postmenopausal women (100/212) screened for study enrolment were found to have vitamin D insufficiency. At 12 weeks, serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D increased significantly from baseline in all groups (p < 0.01) (mean serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level increased from 23.03 ± 4.56 at baseline to 25.60 ± 4.79 ng/ml (placebo), 23.54 ± 5.14 to 27.83 ± 5.27 ng/ml (vitamin D2 20,000 IU/2 weeks), 22.68 ± 5.21 to 30.50 ± 5.14 ng/ml (vitamin D2 20,000 IU/week), and 22.88 ± 4.83 to 37.89 ± 5.47 ng/ml (vitamin D2 40,000 IU/week)). In addition, the 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were statistically significantly different at 4 and 12 weeks (p < 0.01) among all 4 groups. The percentages of those achieving vitamin D sufficiency level after 12 weeks of supplementation were 16% (placebo), 27.3% (vitamin D2 20,000 IU/2 weeks), 44% (vitamin D2 20,000 IU/week), and 86.4% (vitamin D2 40,000 IU/week); statistically significantly different among the four groups (p < 0.01). There was no participant with 25-hydroxy vitamin D after 12 weeks of >50 ng/mL in this study.ConclusionVitamin D2 40,000 IU/week was found to be the most effective dosage for postmenopausal women in this study to achieve serum vitamin D sufficiency level
Compliance of Different Contraceptive Methods in Thai Women
Objective:To evaluate the compliance of different contraceptive methods, i.e., combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), progestin-only injectable (DMPA), condoms, intrauterine devices (IUDs) and progestin implants in Thai women and to evaluate factors affecting contraceptive users’ compliance. Materials and Methods:Women aged between 15-49 years old who had used contraceptive methods for at least 6 months were invited to participate in this study. Participants were interviewed for the correctness and consistency of contraceptive use. We defined compliance as correct (use) and consistency in using these contraceptive methods. Results:The compliance of contraceptive methods were 96.7% for DMPA, 83.4% for IUDs, 72.3% for progestin implants, 65.1% for OCPs and 32.7% for condoms. Compliance of OCPs and condoms were associated with the levels of education. Compliance of IUDs was inversely related to the income. No factors were found to be associated with the compliance of DMPA and progestin implants.Conclusion: DMPA, IUDs and progestin implants which required less users’ attention revealed good compliance while OCPs and condoms showed poor compliance. This may reflect the improper knowledge of users and practicality of the contraceptive methods
Efficacy Of Human Papillomavirus 16 And 18 (hpv-16/18) As04-adjuvanted Vaccine Against Cervical Infection And Precancer In Young Women: Final Event-driven Analysis Of The Randomized, Double-blind Patricia Trial
We report final event-driven analysis data on the immunogenicity and efficacy of the human papillomavirus 16 and 18 ((HPV16/18) AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in young women aged 15 to 25 years from the PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults (PATRICIA). The total vaccinated cohort (TVC) included all randomized participants who received at least one vaccine dose (vaccine, n = 9,319; control, n = 9,325) at months 0, 1, and/or 6. The TVC-naive (vaccine, n = 5,822; control, n = 5,819) had no evidence of high-risk HPV infection at baseline, approximating adolescent girls targeted by most HPV vaccination programs. Mean follow-up was approximately 39 months after the first vaccine dose in each cohort. At baseline, 26% of women in the TVC had evidence of past and/or current HPV-16/18 infection. HPV-16 and HPV-18 antibody titers postvaccination tended to be higher among 15- to 17-year-olds than among 18- to 25-year-olds. In the TVC, vaccine efficacy (VE) against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or greater (CIN1+), CIN2+, and CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/18 was 55.5% (96.1% confidence interval [CI], 43.2, 65.3), 52.8% (37.5, 64.7), and 33.6% (-1.1, 56.9). VE against CIN1+, CIN2+, and CIN3+ irrespective of HPV DNA was 21.7% (10.7, 31.4), 30.4% (16.4, 42.1), and 33.4% (9.1, 51.5) and was consistently significant only in 15- to 17-year-old women (27.4% [10.8, 40.9], 41.8% [22.3, 56.7], and 55.8% [19.2, 76.9]). In the TVC-naive, VE against CIN1+, CIN2+, and CIN3+ associated with HPV-16/ 18 was 96.5% (89.0, 99.4), 98.4% (90.4, 100), and 100% (64.7, 100), and irrespective of HPV DNA it was 50.1% (35.9, 61.4), 70.2% (54.7, 80.9), and 87.0% (54.9, 97.7). VE against 12-month persistent infection with HPV-16/18 was 89.9% (84.0, 94.0), and that against HPV-31/33/45/51 was 49.0% (34.7, 60.3). In conclusion, vaccinating adolescents before sexual debut has a substantial impact on the overall incidence of high-grade cervical abnormalities, and catch-up vaccination up to 18 years of age is most likely effective.224361373GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SAMerck Sharp DohmeQiagenSanofi Pasteur MSDCSL Ltd
Prior human papillomavirus‐16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccination prevents recurrent high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after definitive surgical therapy: Post‐hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial
We evaluated the efficacy of the human papillomavirus (HPV)−16/18 AS04‐adjuvanted vaccine in preventing HPV‐related disease after surgery for cervical lesions in a post‐hoc analysis of the PApilloma TRIal against Cancer In young Adults (PATRICIA; NCT00122681). Healthy women aged 15–25 years were randomized (1:1) to receive vaccine or control at months 0, 1 and 6 and followed for 4 years. Women were enrolled regardless of their baseline HPV DNA status, HPV‐16/18 serostatus, or cytology, but excluded if they had previous or planned colposcopy. The primary and secondary endpoints of PATRICIA have been reported previously; the present post‐hoc analysis evaluated efficacy in a subset of women who underwent an excisional procedure for cervical lesions after vaccination. The main outcome was the incidence of subsequent HPV‐related cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) 60 days or more post‐surgery. Other outcomes included the incidence of HPV‐related CIN1+, and vulvar or vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN/VaIN) 60 days or more post‐surgery. Of the total vaccinated cohort of 18,644 women (vaccine = 9,319; control = 9,325), 454 (vaccine = 190, control = 264) underwent an excisional procedure during the trial. Efficacy 60 days or more post‐surgery for a first lesion, irrespective of HPV DNA results, was 88.2% (95% CI: 14.8, 99.7) against CIN2+ and 42.6% (−21.1, 74.1) against CIN1+. No VIN was reported and one woman in each group had VaIN2+ 60 days or more post‐surgery. Women who undergo surgical therapy for cervical lesions after vaccination with the HPV‐16/18 vaccine may continue to benefit from vaccination, with a reduced risk of developing subsequent CIN2+.139122812282
Natural history of progression of HPV infection to cervical lesion or clearance: analysis of the control arm of the large, randomised PATRICIA study
Background: The control arm of PATRICIA (PApillomaTRIal against Cancer In young Adults, NCT00122681) was used to investigate the risk of progression from cervical HPV infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or clearance of infection, and associated determinants. Methods and Findings: Women aged 15-25 years were enrolled. A 6-month persistent HPV infection (6MPI) was defined as detection of the same HPV type at two consecutive evaluations over 6 months and clearance as ≥2 type-specific HPV negative samples taken at two consecutive intervals of approximately 6 months following a positive sample. The primary endpoint was CIN grade 2 or greater (CIN2+) associated with the same HPV type as a 6MPI. Secondary endpoints were CIN1+/CIN3+ associated with the same HPV type as a 6MPI; CIN1+/CIN2+/CIN3+ associated with an infection of any duration; and clearance of infection. The analyses included 4825 women with 16,785 infections (3363 womenwith 6902 6MPIs). Risk of developing a CIN1+/CIN2+/CIN3+ associated with same HPV type as a 6MPI varied with HPV type and was significantly higher for oncogenic versus non-oncogenic types. Hazard ratios for development of CIN2+ were 10.44 (95% CI: 6.96-15.65), 9.65 (5.97-15.60), 5.68 (3.50-9.21), 5.38 (2.87-10.06) and 3.87 (2.38-6.30) for HPV-16, HPV-33, HPV-31, HPV-45 and HPV-18, respectively. HPV-16 or HPV-33 6MPIs had ~25-fold higher risk for progression to CIN3+. Previous or concomitant HPV infection or CIN1+ associated with a different HPV type increased risk. Of the different oncogenic HPV types, HPV-16 and HPV-31 infections were least likely to clear. Conclusions: Cervical infections with oncogenic HPV types increased the risk of CIN2+ and CIN3+. Previous or concomitant infection or CIN1+ also increased the risk. HPV-16 and HPV-33 have by far the highest risk of progression to CIN3+, and HPV-16 and HPV-31 have the lowest chance of clearance
Risk of first cervical HPV infection and pre-cancerous lesions after onset of sexual activity: analysis of women in the control arm of the randomized, controlled PATRICIA trial
BACKGROUND: More information is needed about time between sexual initiation and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and development of cervical precancer. METHODS: The objectives were to investigate the time between first sexual activity and detection of first cervical HPV infection or development of first cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and associated factors in women from the double-blind, multinational, 4-year PATRICIA trial. PATRICIA enroled women aged 15-25 years with no more than 6 lifetime sexual partners. Women were randomized 1:1 to the HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine or to control, but only women from the control arm who began sexual intercourse during the study or within 6 months before enrolment, and had no HPV infection detected before the recorded date of their first sexual intercourse, were included in the present analysis. The time between onset of sexual activity and detection of the first cervical HPV infection or development of the first CIN lesion was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 9337 women were enroled in the control arm of PATRICIA of whom 982 fulfilled the required inclusion criteria for analysis. A cumulative total of 28%, 44%, and 62% of the subjects had HPV infection within 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. The overall incidence rate was 27.08 per 100 person-years. The most common oncogenic types associated with 6-month persistent infection were HPV-16 (incidence rate: 2.74 per 100 person-years), HPV-51 (2.70), HPV-52 (1.66), HPV-66 (1.14), and HPV-18 (1.09). Increased infection risk was associated with more lifetime sexual partners, being single, Chlamydia trachomatis history, and duration of hormone use. CIN1+ and CIN2+ lesions were most commonly associated with HPV-16, with an overall incidence rate of 1.87 and 1.07 per 100 person-years, respectively. Previous cervical HPV infection was most strongly associated with CIN development. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25% of women were infected with HPV within 1 year of beginning sexual activity. Without underestimating the value of vaccination at older ages, our findings emphasize its importance before sexual initiation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00122681
Risk of first cervical HPV infection and pre-cancerous lesions after onset of sexual activity : analysis of women in the control arm of the randomized, controlled PATRICIA trial
Peer reviewe
Natural History of Progression of HPV Infection to Cervical Lesion or Clearance: Analysis of the Control Arm of the Large, Randomised PATRICIA Study
Peer reviewe
A comparison of combined oral contraceptives containing chlormadinone acetate versus drospirenone for the treatment of acne and dysmenorrhea: a randomized trial
Abstract Background Oral contraceptives (OCs), aside from contraceptive efficacy, have been widely known for their non-contraceptive benefits. Different progestogens component of the OCs have been shown to improve the skin, hair, menstrual cycle related disorders and dysmenorrhoeic pain. Thus, we compared the efficacy of OCs containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and chlormadinone acetate (CMA) versus OCs containing EE and drospirenone (DRSP) for the treatment of acne and dysmenorrhea. Methods This study was an investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel group study conducted at the Family Planning Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Women aged between 18 and 45 years were randomly assigned into two treatment groups, either EE/CMA at the dosage of 30 mcg/2 mg once daily (OD) or EE/DRSP at the dosage of 30 mcg/3 mg OD. The subjects were evaluated for the OC’s efficacy for the treatment of acne and dysmenorrhea at baseline visit and after 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment. Results A total of 180 women were randomized into the study. Each group had 90 women. Baseline characteristics between both groups were comparable. At Month 6, there was a significantly greater reduction of total acne lesion in the EE/CMA group than EE/DRSP (72.2% vs 64.5%; p = 0.009). As per the investigator’s global assessment of acne treatment, a higher proportion of the subjects from the EE/CMA group was rated “excellent” than those from the EE/DRSP (75.3% vs 49.4%). More subjects from the EE/CMA group had graded their improvement in acne as “excellent” compared to the EE/DRSP group (66.3% vs 48.3%). A higher proportion of the subjects in the EE/CMA group reported a decrease in dysmenorrhoeic pain as “much decrease” and “decrease”. The absence of dysmenorrhea pain was more frequently found in the EE/CMA group and significantly seen as early as Month 1 also in the EE/CMA group compared to EE/DRSP (47.2% vs 27.3%, respectively). The treatments were generally well-tolerated in both groups. There were no significant differences between both groups for adverse events. Conclusions EE/CMA is more effective for the treatment of acne and dysmenorrhea in women with mild to moderate acne vulgaris and dysmenorrhea than EE/DRSP. Trial registration Thai Clinical Trial Registry ID: TCTR20170518001 (date of registration: May 17, 2017; retrospectively registered)
- …