Pathways for outpatient management of venous thromboembolism in a UK centre.

It has become widely recognised that outpatient treatment may be suitable for many patients with venous thromboembolism. In addition, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants that have been approved over the last few years have the potential to be an integral component of the outpatient care pathway, owing to their oral route of administration, lack of requirement for routine anticoagulation monitoring and simple dosing regimens. A robust pathway for outpatient care is also vital; one such pathway has been developed at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals in the UK. This paper describes the pathway and the arguments in its favour as an example of best practice and value offered to patients with venous thromboembolism. The pathway has two branches (one for deep vein thrombosis and one for pulmonary embolism), each with the same five-step process for outpatient treatment. Both begin from the point that the patient presents (in the Emergency Department, Thrombosis Clinic or general practitioner's office), followed by diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment choice and, finally, follow-up. The advantages of these pathways are that they offer clear, evidence-based guidance for the identification, diagnosis and treatment of patients who can safely be treated in the outpatient setting, and provide a detailed, stepwise process that can be easily adapted to suit the needs of other institutions. The approach is likely to result in both healthcare and economic benefits, including increased patient satisfaction and shorter hospital stays

Incremental Health Care Burden of Bleeding Among Patients with Venous Thromboembolism in the United States

BACKGROUND: The health care and economic burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been evaluated in regard to acute VTE, VTE recurrence, and some VTE complications, such as postthrombotic syndrome, but the cost burden attributed to bleedings is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health care resource utilization and costs associated with major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) among a large U.S. commercially and Medicare-insured population with VTE. METHODS: Patients (≥ 18 years of age, continuously insured) with a diagnosis of VTE between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2011, were identified from the Truven Health Analytics Commercial and Medicare MarketScan databases. Patients who did not have any bleedings during the study period were grouped into a no-bleedings cohort and a random date after VTE diagnosis was selected as the index date. VTE patients who experienced MB within 1 year of the initial VTE diagnosis were grouped into a MB cohort, and patients without MB but with CRNMB were grouped into a CRNMB cohort. Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics were determined for study cohorts. All-cause and bleeding-related health care resource utilization and costs (inflation adjusted to 2013 level) during a 12-month follow-up period after the index date of the initial bleeding event were measured and compared. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and unadjusted health care resource utilization and costs of patient cohorts. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to evaluate incremental health care costs of bleedings after adjusting for key patient characteristics.   RESULTS: Among the 112,885 patients identified with a VTE diagnosis, 14% (n = 15,897) had MB and 14% (n = 15,842) had CRNMB; 72% (n = 81,146) had neither of these events occur during the study period. The mean ages of the MB and CRNMB cohorts were both 63.6 years, while the mean age of the no-bleedings cohort was significantly lower at 59.6 years (P  less than  0.001). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were highest for the MB cohort (3.2), followed by those of the CRNMB cohort (2.5) and the no-bleedings cohort (1.6). The MB cohort had the greatest proportion of patients with an initial VTE event of pulmonary embolism only (23.5%), followed by that of the CRNMB cohort (20.2%), and the no-bleedings cohort (16.7%). For MB and CRNMB cohorts, the total mean bleeding-related inpatient and outpatient costs during the follow-up period were $49,779 (SE =$820) and $2,187 ($89), respectively. After adjustment for key patient characteristics, the estimated mean differences in total bleeding-related medical costs were $45,367 ($1,853) for patients with MB and $2,140 ($88) for patients with CRNMB versus patients with no bleedings. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with VTE diagnosis in the United States, approximately 28% have a bleeding event within 1 year of VTE diagnosis, and about half of these patients experience MB. Patients with MB have greatly elevated health care costs

Abnormal vaginal bleeding in women of reproductive age treated with edoxaban or warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics and outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding in women receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). DESIGN AND SETTING: Post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study, a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial comparing edoxaban with warfarin for acute symptomatic VTE. POPULATION: Women below 50 years receiving edoxaban or warfarin for treatment of VTE. METHODS: We collected data on diagnostic measures, treatment, and clinical outcome of abnormal vaginal bleeding events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) abnormal vaginal bleeding events. RESULTS: In all, 628 women aged under 50 years were treated with edoxaban and 665 with warfarin. The rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding was 15/100 person-years (py) (95% CI 11-19) in women receiving edoxaban and 9/100 py (95% CI 6-12) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). Major abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in eight (1.3%) women on edoxaban and in three (0.9%) women receiving warfarin [odds ratio (OR) 2.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8], and CRNM abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred in 53 (8.4%) women treated with edoxaban and in 37 (5.6%) on warfarin therapy (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4). Over 85% of all vaginal bleeds were characterised by heavy menstrual bleeding. Major bleeds frequently required treatment, and in more than 75% of patients anticoagulant therapy was adjusted. The severity of clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds was mild in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin. Reassuringly, most events could be managed conservatively and had a mild outcome. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Abnormal vaginal bleeding occurred more frequently in women treated with edoxaban than with warfarin