Temporal changes in fetal death risk in pregnancies with preeclampsia: Does offspring birthweight matter? A population study

Objectives To study the associations of preeclampsia with fetal death risk within percentiles of offspring birthweight, and whether these associations have changed during 1967–2014. Study design In this population study, we included all singleton pregnancies in the Medical Birth Registry of Norway during 1967–2014 (n = 2 607 199). Odds ratios (ORs) for fetal death associated with preeclampsia were estimated within percentiles of birthweight by applying logistic regression analyses. We estimated ORs for the study period as a whole, and for the years 1967–1983 and 1984–2014. Results During the study period as a whole, preeclampsia increased the risk of fetal death, OR 2.73 (95% CI 2.57–2.89), and the fetal death risk associated with preeclampsia differed across percentiles of offspring birthweight. The overall risk of fetal death decreased during our study period, and the decrease was most prominent in preeclamptic pregnancies with low offspring birthweight (<1 percentile). Thus, in recent years, the risk of fetal death in pregnancies with low offspring birthweight was lower in preeclamptic than in non-preeclamptic pregnancies, OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.12-0.41). Only in pregnancies with offspring birthweight within the 10–90 percentiles, the risk of fetal death associated with preeclampsia remained significantly increased throughout the study period. Conclusions The decline in fetal death risk was most prominent in preeclamptic pregnancies with low offspring birthweight. The introduction of a national screening program for preeclampsia in the 1980s, and identification of growth restricted offspring by fetal ultrasonography, may explain our findings

Offspring birthweight and placental weight—does the type of maternal diabetes matter? A population-based study of 319 076 pregnancies

Introduction Our aim was to estimate the difference in birthweight and in placental weight in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes compared with pregnancies without diabetes. Material and methods By using data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway during the years 2009–2017, we included 319 076 singleton pregnancies with delivery after the 21st week of pregnancy. We used linear regression analyses to estimate the difference in birthweight and in placental weight in grams (g) in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes, using pregnancies without diabetes as the reference. Adjustments were made for pregnancy duration and pre-pregnancy body mass index. Results In pregnancies without diabetes, mean crude birthweight was 3527 g (SD 552 g). The adjusted mean birthweight was 525 g (95% CI 502–548 g) higher in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes compared with pregnancies without diabetes. In pregnancies with type 2 diabetes, and pregnancies with gestational diabetes, birthweights were 192 g (95% CI 160–223 g) and 102 g (95% CI 93–110 g) higher, respectively. Mean crude placental weight was 664 g (SD 147 g) in pregnancies without diabetes. Compared with pregnancies without diabetes, the adjusted mean placental weight was 109 g (95% CI 101–116 g) higher in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes, 50 g (95% CI 39–60 g) higher in pregnancies with type 2 diabetes, and 31 g (95% CI 28–34 g) higher in pregnancies with gestational diabetes. Conclusions The increase in birthweight and in placental weight associated with maternal diabetes was most pronounced for type 1 diabetes, followed by type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes

Factors Affecting Sound-Source Localization in Children With Simultaneous or Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants

Objectives: The study aimed to determine the effect of interimplant interval and onset of profound deafness on sound localization in children with bilateral cochlear implants, controlling for cochlear implant manufacturer, age, and time since second implant. Design: The authors conducted a retrospective, observational study using routinely collected clinical data. Participants were 127 bilaterally implanted children aged 4 years or older, tested at least 12 mo post- second implant. Children used implants made by one of three manufacturers. Sixty-five children were simultaneously implanted, of whom 43% were congenitally, bilaterally profoundly deaf at 2 and 4 kHz and 57% had acquired or progressive hearing loss. Sixty-two were implanted sequentially (median interimplant interval = 58 mo, range 3–143 mo) of whom 77% had congenital and 23% acquired or progressive bilateral profound deafness at 2 and 4 kHz. Children participated in a sound-source localization test with stimuli presented in a random order from five loudspeakers at –60, –30, 0, +30, and +60 degrees azimuth. Stimuli were prerecorded female voices at randomly roved levels from 65 to 75 dB(A). Root mean square (RMS) errors were calculated. Localization data were analyzed via multivariable linear regression models, one applied to the whole group and the other to just the simultaneously implanted children. Results: Mean RMS error was 25.4 degrees (SD = 12.5 degrees) with results ranging from perfect accuracy to chance level (0–62.7 degrees RMS error). Compared with simultaneous implantation, an interimplant interval was associated with worse localization by 1.7 degrees RMS error per year (p < 0.001). Compared with congenital deafness, each year with hearing thresholds better than 90 dB HL at 2 and 4 kHz bilaterally before implantation led to more accurate localization by 1.3 degrees RMS error (p < 0.005). Every year post-second implant led to better accuracy by 1.6 degrees RMS error (p < 0.05). Med-El was associated with more accurate localization than Cochlear by 5.8 degrees RMS error (p < 0.01) and with more accurate localization than Advanced Bionics by 9.2 degrees RMS error (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Interimplant interval and congenital profound hearing loss both led to worse accuracy in sound-source localization for children using bilateral cochlear implants. Interimplant delay should therefore be minimized for children with bilateral profound hearing loss. Children presenting with acquired or progressive hearing loss can be expected to localize better via bilateral cochlear implants than their congenitally deaf peers