Pilot hearing screening in school age children in Republic of Moldova

Introduction: Many countries have implemented newborn hearing screening programs, resulting in early intervention and therapy. In spite of that, there is a significant number of schoolchildren with hearing problems. Hearing loss is a common and considerable disability that harms educational performance of schoolchildren in developing countries. Lack of a simple and practical screening protocol often deters routine and systematic hearing screening at school entry. Purpose and Objectives: The pilot study assessing the hearing in the population of pupils who begin their education in five random primary schools in Moldova. Material and Methods: Hearing screening was conducted in a group of 179 children from three primary schools in Chisinau in Republic of Moldova. Screening was performed using the Sense Examination Platform; on the basis of the audiometric procedure of measuring the hearing threshold. Positive result of hearing screening was defined as equal as or more than 25dB at least at one frequency in either ear. Additionally subjective assessment was carried out on the basis of parents questionnaires. Results: The study was performed in 3 schools: in the 1st were examined 69 children, from which a positive result was at 8.7%, in the 2nd - 52 (25% positive) and in the III-rd - 58, with positive result at 10.34%. A total of 179 children were examined, out of which at 13.97% - a positive test result'. All children with positive results of hearing screening were examined by local otolaryngologists. Conclusions: The obtained results confirm the significant prevalence of hearing problems in school-aged children. Based on the results, the implementation of hearing screening as a routine procedure in the medical care in schools is strongly recommended

The Listening Network and Cochlear Implant Benefits in Hearing-Impaired Adults

Older adults with mild or no hearing loss make more errors and expend more effort listening to speech. Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing to deaf patients but with limited fidelity. We hypothesized that patient-reported hearing and health-related quality of life in CI patients may similarly vary according to age. Speech Spatial Qualities (SSQ) of hearing scale and Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI) questionnaires were administered to 543 unilaterally implanted adults across Europe, South Africa, and South America. Data were acquired before surgery and at 1, 2, and 3 years post-surgery. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models with visit, age group (18–34, 35–44, 45–54, 55–64, and 65+), and side of implant as main factors and adjusted for other covariates. Tinnitus and dizziness prevalence did not vary with age, but older groups had more preoperative hearing. Preoperatively and postoperatively, SSQ scores were significantly higher (¿0.75–0.82) for those aged <45 compared with those 55+. However, gains in SSQ scores were equivalent across age groups, although postoperative SSQ scores were higher in right-ear implanted subjects. All age groups benefited equally in terms of HUI gain (0.18), with no decrease in scores with age. Overall, younger adults appeared to cope better with a degraded hearing before and after CI, leading to better subjective hearing performance.

Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis

In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists’ gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for organizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed

Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) tests in a school-age hearing screening programme – analysis of 76,429 children

Introduction and objective Hearing disorders among school-age children are a current concern. Continuing studies have been performed in Poland since 2008, and on 2 December 2011 the EU Council adopted Conclusions on the Early Detection and Treatment of Communication Disorders in Children, Including the Use of e-Health Tools and innovative Solutions. The discussion now focuses not only on the efficacy of hearing screening programmes in schoolchildren, but what should be its general aim and what tests it should include? This paper makes the case that it is important to include central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) tests. One such test is the dichotic digits test (DDT). The aim of the presented study was to evaluate the usefulness of the DDT in detecting central hearing disorders in school-age children. Material and Methods During hearing screening programmes conducted in Poland in 2008–2010, exactly 235,664 children (7–12-years-old) were screened in 9,325 schools. Of this number, 7,642 were examined using the DDT test for CAPD. Screening programmes were conducted using the Sense Examination Platform. Results With the cut-off criterion set at the 5th percentile, results for the DDT applied in a divided attention mode were 11.4% positive for 7-year-olds and 11.3% for 12-year-olds. In the focused attention mode, the comparable result for 12-year-olds was 9.7%. There was a clear right ear advantage. In children with positive DDT results, a higher incidence of other disorders, such as dyslexia, was observed. Conclusions A test for CAPD should be included in the hearing screening of school-age children. The results of this study form the basis for developing Polish standards in this are

Results of a 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating Long-term Audiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Transcutaneous Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate 2-year audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous implant for bone conduction hearing of a previously published 6-month evaluation. DESIGN: Fifty-four unilaterally implanted adult patients with conductive or mild mixed hearing loss or single-sided sensorineural deafness were included in this prospective multicenter study. Follow-up visits were scheduled post-surgery at 10 days; 4, 6, and 12 weeks; 6, 12, and 24 months. Main outcomes were audiological benefit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), soft tissue status, pain, numbness, implant survival, and daily usage. RESULTS: In the study population, the transcutaneous implant resulted in statistically significant improvement in objective hearing test and PROs compared with the unaided situation. Soft tissue complications were observed in 4.6% of the patients per visit. Pain/discomfort and numbness were initially reported in the majority of the patients, but declined over time; approximately 9% of patients reported some degree of numbness and 15% (slight) pain/discomfort after 2 years. During the 24-month period, two implant magnets were removed (3.7%), while two other implants were converted to the percutaneous counterpart (3.7%). At the final visit, 89.6% (n = 42 out of 47) of the patients used their sound processor, with a median daily usage of 6 h/d (range, 0-18 h/d). CONCLUSIONS: After 24 months, the transcutaneous implant provided statistically significant mean improvement in objective and subjective hearing performance as well as PROs compared with the preoperative unaided condition and had a low soft tissue complication rate. The test device could be considered as an alternative treatment option for appropriately selected and counseled patients

Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis

In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists’ gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for organizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed