50 research outputs found

    Impact of Software Modeling on the Accuracy of Perfusion MRI in Glioma

    Full text link
    PURPOSE: To determine whether differences in modeling implementation will impact the correction of leakage effects (from blood brain barrier disruption) and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) calculations as measured on T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC)-MRI at 3T field strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study included 52 glioma patients undergoing DSC-MRI. Thirty-six patients underwent both non Preload Dose (PLD) and PLD-corrected DSC acquisitions, with sixteen patients undergoing PLD-corrected acquisitions only. For each acquisition, we generated two sets of rCBV metrics using two separate, widely published, FDA-approved commercial software packages: IB Neuro (IBN) and NordicICE (NICE). We calculated 4 rCBV metrics within tumor volumes: mean rCBV, mode rCBV, percentage of voxels with rCBV > 1.75 (%>1.75), and percentage of voxels with rCBV > 1.0 (Fractional Tumor Burden or FTB). We determined Pearson (r) and Spearman (ρ) correlations between non-PLD- and PLD-corrected metrics. In a subset of recurrent glioblastoma patients (n=25), we determined Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) Areas-Under-Curve (AUC) for FTB accuracy to predict the tissue diagnosis of tumor recurrence versus post-treatment effect (PTRE). We also determined correlations between rCBV and microvessel area (MVA) from stereotactic biopsies (n=29) in twelve patients. RESULTS: Using IBN, rCBV metrics correlated highly between non-PLD- and PLD-corrected conditions for FTB (r=0.96, ρ=0.94), %>1.75 (r=0.93, ρ=0.91), mean (r=0.87, ρ=0.86) and mode (r=0.78, ρ=0.76). These correlations dropped substantially with NICE. Using FTB, IBN was more accurate than NICE in diagnosing tumor vs PTRE (AUC=0.85 vs 0.67) (p<0.01). The highest rCBV-MVA correlations required PLD and IBN (r=0.64, ρ=0.58, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Different implementations of perfusion MRI software modeling can impact the accuracy of leakage correction, rCBV calculation, and correlations with histologic benchmarks

    Quantitative analysis of CT-perfusion parameters in the evaluation of brain gliomas and metastases

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The paper reports a quantitative analysis of the perfusion maps of 22 patients, affected by gliomas or by metastasis, with the aim of characterizing the malignant tissue with respect to the normal tissue. The gold standard was obtained by histological exam or nuclear medicine techniques. The perfusion scan provided 11 parametric maps, including Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV), Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF), Average Perfusion (P<sub>mean</sub>) and Permeability-surface area product (PS).</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The perfusion scans were performed after the injection of 40 ml of non-ionic contrast agent, at an injection rate of 8 ml/s, and a 40 s cine scan with 1 s interval was acquired. An expert radiologist outlined the region of interest (ROI) on the unenhanced CT scan, by using a home-made routine. The mean values with their standard deviations inside the outlined ROIs and the contralateral ROIs were calculated on each map. Statistical analyses were used to investigate significant differences between diseased and normal regions. Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were also generated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Tumors are characterized by higher values of all the perfusion parameters, but after the statistical analysis, only the <it>PS</it>, <it>Pat</it><sub><it>Rsq </it></sub>(Patlak Rsquare) and <it>T</it><sub><it>peak </it></sub>(Time to Peak) resulted significant. ROC curves, confirmed both <it>Pat</it><sub><it>Rsq </it></sub>and <it>PS </it>as equally reliable metrics for discriminating between malignant and normal tissues, with areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.82 and 0.81, respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>CT perfusion is a useful and non invasive technique for evaluating brain neoplasms. Malignant and normal tissues can be accurately differentiated using perfusion map, with the aim of performing tumor diagnosis and grading, and follow-up analysis.</p

    Advanced MR techniques for preoperative glioma characterization: Part 1

    Get PDF
    Preoperative clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation or lack thereof. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this first part, we discuss dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting. The second part of this review addresses magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, susceptibility-weighted imaging, MRI-PET, MR elastography, and MR-based radiomics applications. Evidence Level: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2

    Sensitivity of MRI Tumor Biomarkers to VEGFR Inhibitor Therapy in an Orthotopic Mouse Glioma Model

    Get PDF
    MRI biomarkers of tumor edema, vascular permeability, blood volume, and average vessel caliber are increasingly being employed to assess the efficacy of tumor therapies. However, the dependence of these biomarkers on a number of physiological factors can compromise their sensitivity and complicate the assessment of therapeutic efficacy. Here we examine the response of these MRI tumor biomarkers to cediranib, a potent vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, in an orthotopic mouse glioma model. A significant increase in the tumor volume and relative vessel caliber index (rVCI) and a slight decrease in the water apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were observed for both control and cediranib treated animals. This contrasts with a clinical study that observed a significant decrease in tumor rVCI, ADC and volume with cediranib therapy. While the lack of a difference between control and cediranib treated animals in these biomarker responses might suggest that cediranib has no therapeutic benefit, cediranib treated mice had a significantly increased survival. The increased survival benefit of cediranib treated animals is consistent with the significant decrease observed for cediranib treated animals in the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative microvascular blood volume (rMBV), transverse relaxation time (T2), blood vessel permeability (Ktrans), and extravascular-extracellular space (Îœe). The differential response of pre-clinical and clinical tumors to cediranib therapy, along with the lack of a positive response for some biomarkers, indicates the importance of evaluating the whole spectrum of different tumor biomarkers to properly assess the therapeutic response and identify and interpret the therapy-induced changes in the tumor physiology
    corecore