Comparing Patch vs Pen Bolus Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Profiles

OBJECTIVE: CeQur Simplicity™ (CeQur, Marlborough, MA) is a 3-day insulin delivery patch designed to meet mealtime insulin requirements. A recently reported 48-week, randomized, multicenter, interventional trial compared efficacy, safety and self-reported outcomes in 278 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin therapy who initiated and managed mealtime insulin therapy with a patch pump versus insulin pen. We assessed changes in key glycemic metrics among a subset of patients who wore a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. METHODS: Study participants (patch, n = 49; pen, n = 48) wore a CGM device in masked setting during the baseline period and prior to week 24. Glycemic control was assessed using international consensus guidelines for percentage of Time In Range (%TIR: \u3e70% at 70-180 mg/dL), Time Below Range (%TBR: \u3c4% at \u3c70 mg/dL; \u3c1% at \u3c54 mg/dL), and Time Above Range (%TAR: \u3c25% at \u3e180 mg/dL; \u3c5% at \u3e250 mg/dL). RESULTS: Both the patch and pen groups achieved recommended targets in %TIR (74.1% ± 18.7%, 75.2 ± 16.1%, respectively) and marked reductions in %TAR \u3e180 mg/dL (21.1% ± 19.9%, 19.7% ± 17.5%, respectively) but with increased %TBR \u3c70 mg/dL (4.7% ± 5.2%, 5.1 ± 5.8, respectively), all P \u3c .0001. No significant between-group differences in glycemic improvements or adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: CGM confirmed that the patch or pen can be used to safely initiate and optimize basal-bolus therapy using a simple insulin adjustment algorithm with SMBG. Preference data suggest that use of the patch vs pen may enhance treatment adherence

Implementation of Basal-Bolus Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes:A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Bolus Insulin Delivery Using an Insulin Patch with an Insulin Pen

Background: Barriers to mealtime insulin include complexity, fear of injections, and lifestyle interference. This multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated efficacy, safety, and self-reported outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled on basal insulin, initiating and managing mealtime insulin with a wearable patch versus an insulin pen. Methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes (n = 278, age: 59.2 +/- 8.9 years), were randomized to patch (n = 139) versus pen (n = 139) for 48 weeks, with crossover at week 44. Baseline insulin was divided 1:1 basal: bolus. Using a pattern-control logbook, subjects adjusted basal and bolus insulin weekly using fasting and premeal glucose targets. Results: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change (least squares mean +/- standard error) from baseline to week 24 (primary endpoint) improved (P \u3c 0.0001) in both arms, -1.7% +/- 0.1% and -1.6% +/- 0.1% for patch and pen (-18.6 +/- 1.1 and -17.5 +/- 1.1 mmol/mol), and was maintained at 44 weeks. The coefficient of variation of 7-point self-monitoring blood glucose decreased more (P = 0.02) from baseline to week 44 for patch versus pen. There were no differences in adverse events, including hypoglycemia (three severe episodes per arm), and changes in weight and insulin doses. Subject-reported treatment satisfaction, quality of life, experience ratings at week 24, and device preferences at week 48 significantly favored the patch. Most health care providers preferred patch for mealtime insulin. Conclusions: Bolus insulin delivered by patch and pen using an algorithm-based weekly insulin dose titration significantly improved HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes, with improved subject and health care provider experience and preference for the patch

Predictors of hospital discharge and mortality in patients with diabetes and COVID-19: updated results from the nationwide CORONADO study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This is an update of the results from the previous report of the CORONADO (Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and Diabetes Outcomes) study, which aims to describe the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with diabetes hospitalised for coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: The CORONADO initiative is a French nationwide multicentre study of patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19 with a 28-day follow-up. The patients were screened after hospital admission from 10 March to 10 April 2020. We mainly focused on hospital discharge and death within 28 days. RESULTS: We included 2796 participants: 63.7% men, mean age 69.7 ± 13.2 years, median BMI (25th-75th percentile) 28.4 (25.0-32.4) kg/m(2). Microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications were found in 44.2% and 38.6% of participants, respectively. Within 28 days, 1404 (50.2%; 95% CI 48.3%, 52.1%) were discharged from hospital with a median duration of hospital stay of 9 (5-14) days, while 577 participants died (20.6%; 95% CI 19.2%, 22.2%). In multivariable models, younger age, routine metformin therapy and longer symptom duration on admission were positively associated with discharge. History of microvascular complications, anticoagulant routine therapy, dyspnoea on admission, and higher aspartate aminotransferase, white cell count and C-reactive protein levels were associated with a reduced chance of discharge. Factors associated with death within 28 days mirrored those associated with discharge, and also included routine treatment by insulin and statin as deleterious factors. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with diabetes hospitalised for COVID-19, we established prognostic factors for hospital discharge and death that could help clinicians in this pandemic period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04324736

Design and baseline characteristics of the finerenone in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in diabetic kidney disease trial

Background: Among people with diabetes, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality and progression of their underlying kidney disease. Finerenone is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on CV and renal outcomes has not yet been investigated in long-term trials. Patients and Methods: The Finerenone in Reducing CV Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease (FIGARO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important CV and renal outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIGARO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 6 years. FIGARO-DKD randomized 7,437 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >= 25 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >= 30 to <= 5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level alpha = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure. Conclusions: FIGARO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of CV and renal events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen. Trial Registration: EudraCT number: 2015-000950-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02545049

DIABEO App Software and Telemedicine Versus Usual Follow-Up in the Treatment of Diabetic Patients: Protocol for the TELESAGE Randomized Controlled Trial

International audienc

DIABEO System Combining a Mobile App Software With and Without Telemonitoring Versus Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Diabetes Patients Poorly Controlled with a Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen

International audienc

J Diabetes Sci Technol

Benefits of telemedicine have been proven in the field of diabetes. Among a number of technical solutions, Diabeo® has been studied in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes with intensive insulin therapy. This digital therapeutic system contains a self-monitoring glucose logbook and offers automated insulin dose recommendations thanks to a fully customizable algorithm. In addition, the cloud-based dedicated software also has features to facilitate remote monitoring, including a platform for diabetes nurses who perform coaching and treatment adjustment. A detailed description of this telemedicine system is provided, as well as results of completed clinical studies. In particular, TeleDiab 1’s positive results on HbA1c in type 1 diabetes are detailed. We conclude with a discussion of the role of this telemedicine system within the landscape of mobile apps for diabetes

SAT-139 Clinical Impact of Oral Semaglutide Compared with Sitagliptin in T2D on Metformin ± Sulfonylurea: The Pioneer 3 Trial.

Long-term effects, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide (SEMA; a GLP-1 receptor agonist [GLP-1RA]) vs sitagliptin (SITA) as add-on to metformin ± sulfonylurea was investigated in patients (pts) with T2D in a 78-week, double-blind, double-dummy trial. Pts were randomized to once daily oral SEMA 3 mg (N=466), 7 mg (N=466) or 14 mg (N=465), or SITA 100 mg (N=467). Primary endpoint was change in HbA, confirmatory secondary endpoint was change in body weight, both from baseline to week 26. Two estimands were defined (‘treatment policy [TPol] estimand’: treatment effect regardless of trial product discontinuation and rescue medication use; ‘trial product estimand’: treatment effect assuming on trial product without rescue medication use) in all randomized pts. Confirmatory testing was based on the TPol estimand; within each dose level, non-inferiority for the primary endpoint (non-inferiority margin: 0.3%) had to be confirmed before testing superiority for the primary and confirmatory secondary endpoints. Estimated week 26 HbA reductions with 7 and 14 mg were –1.0% and –1.3%, vs –0.8% with SITA, and were superior (TPol estimand; estimated treatment difference vs SITA [ETD; 95% CI]: –0.3% [–0.4, –0.1]; –0.5% [–0.6, –0.4]; both P<0.001). Non-inferiority of 3 mg vs SITA was not confirmed (ETD: 0.2% [0.1, 0.3]; P=0.09); HbA reductions favored SITA (P=0.008). Similar results were obtained with the trial product estimand at week 26 (ETD: –0.3% [–0.4, –0.2]; –0.6% [–0.7, –0.5] for 7 and 14 mg; both P<0.001 favoring oral SEMA; 0.2% [0.1, 0.4] for 3 mg; P<0.001 favoring SITA). At week 78, HbA reductions with 14 mg were statistically significantly greater vs SITA for both estimands; there was no statistically significant difference with 3 mg (both estimands) or 7 mg (TPol estimand). All oral SEMA doses significantly lowered body weight vs SITA at week 26 for the TPol estimand (ETD: –0.6 kg [–1.1, –0.1]; –1.6 kg [–2.0, –1.1]; –2.5 kg [–3.0, –2.0] for 3, 7 and 14 mg; all P<0.02), confirming superiority of 7 and 14 mg (3 mg superiority not tested), and the trial product estimand (ETD: –0.5 kg [–1.0, –0.1]; –1.5 kg [–2.0, –1.1]; –2.6 kg [–3.1, –2.1] for 3, 7 and 14 mg; all P<0.03). Week 78 body weight reductions were also statistically significant, favoring oral SEMA (all doses, both estimands). Adverse events (AEs) occurred similarly across treatment arms. The most common AE with oral SEMA was transient mild/moderate nausea, affecting 7.5–15.7% of pts. Serious AEs were reported by 13.7%, 10.1% and 9.5% of pts for 3, 7 and 14 mg, and 12.4% for SITA. AEs led to premature trial product discontinuation in 5.6%, 5.8% and 11.6% of pts for 3, 7 and 14 mg, and 5.2% for SITA, mainly due to gastrointestinal AEs. In conclusion, oral semaglutide 7 and 14 mg provided statistically superior HbA and body weight reductions at week 26 compared with SITA 100 mg (TPol estimand). Safety and tolerability were consistent with other GLP-1RAs.</div

Minoxidil versus placebo in the treatment of arterial wall hypertrophy in children with Williams Beuren Syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

International audienc