570 research outputs found

    Risk factors for transport-related problem behaviors in horses: A New Zealand survey

    Get PDF
    Transport-related problem behaviors (TRPBs) are common in horses and can cause injury to both the horses and their handlers. This study aimed to identify possible risk factors for TRPBs to inform approaches to mitigate TRPBs incidence and enhance horse welfare. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted to explore the prevalence of TRPBs and their association with human-, training-and transport management-related factors in New Zealand. The survey generated 1124 valid responses that were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression analyses. Having at least one horse with TRPB was reported by 249/1124 (22.2%) respondents during the two previous years. Of these, 21/249 (8.4%) occurred during pre-loading, 78/249 (31.3%) during loading, 132/249 (53.0%) while travelling, and 18/249 (7.3%) during unloading. Our findings indicate that the use of negative reinforcement and positive punishment as training methods, using a whip or food for loading, and travelling in a straight load trailer/float while offering food were associated with a higher likelihood of TRPBs. Cross-sectional studies cannot determine causality and findings should be interpreted with caution, and evaluated in further experimental studies. The authors suggest that education on appropriate training methods for transport, and vehicle selection may mitigate the risk for TRPBs in horses

    The Grad-Shafranov Reconstruction of Toroidal Magnetic Flux Ropes: Method Development and Benchmark Studies

    Full text link
    We develop an approach of Grad-Shafranov (GS) reconstruction for toroidal structures in space plasmas, based on in-situ spacecraft measurements. The underlying theory is the GS equation that describes two-dimensional magnetohydrostatic equilibrium as widely applied in fusion plasmas. The geometry is such that the arbitrary cross section of the torus has rotational symmetry about the rotation axis ZZ, with a major radius r0r_0. The magnetic field configuration is thus determined by a scalar flux function Ψ\Psi and a functional FF that is a single-variable function of Ψ\Psi. The algorithm is implemented through a two-step approach: i) a trial-and-error process by minimizing the residue of the functional F(Ψ)F(\Psi) to determine an optimal ZZ axis orientation, and ii) for the chosen ZZ, a χ2\chi^2 minimization process resulting in the range of r0r_0. Benchmark studies of known analytic solutions to the toroidal GS equation with noise additions are presented to illustrate the two-step procedures and to demonstrate the performance of the numerical GS solver, separately. For the cases presented, the errors in ZZ and r0r_0 are 9^\circ and 22\%, respectively, and the relative percent error in the numerical GS solutions is less than 10\%. We also make public the computer codes for these implementations and benchmark studies.Comment: submitted to Sol. Phys. late Dec 2016; under review; code will be made public once review is ove

    Effect of Solar Wind Drag on the Determination of the Properties of Coronal Mass Ejections from Heliospheric Images

    Full text link
    The Fixed-\Phi (F\Phi) and Harmonic Mean (HM) fitting methods are two methods to determine the average direction and velocity of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from time-elongation tracks produced by Heliospheric Imagers (HIs), such as the HIs onboard the STEREO spacecraft. Both methods assume a constant velocity in their descriptions of the time-elongation profiles of CMEs, which are used to fit the observed time-elongation data. Here, we analyze the effect of aerodynamic drag on CMEs propagating through interplanetary space, and how this drag affects the result of the F\Phi and HM fitting methods. A simple drag model is used to analytically construct time-elongation profiles which are then fitted with the two methods. It is found that higher angles and velocities give rise to greater error in both methods, reaching errors in the direction of propagation of up to 15 deg and 30 deg for the F\Phi and HM fitting methods, respectively. This is due to the physical accelerations of the CMEs being interpreted as geometrical accelerations by the fitting methods. Because of the geometrical definition of the HM fitting method, it is affected by the acceleration more greatly than the F\Phi fitting method. Overall, we find that both techniques overestimate the initial (and final) velocity and direction for fast CMEs propagating beyond 90 deg from the Sun-spacecraft line, meaning that arrival times at 1 AU would be predicted early (by up to 12 hours). We also find that the direction and arrival time of a wide and decelerating CME can be better reproduced by the F\Phi due to the cancellation of two errors: neglecting the CME width and neglecting the CME deceleration. Overall, the inaccuracies of the two fitting methods are expected to play an important role in the prediction of CME hit and arrival times as we head towards solar maximum and the STEREO spacecraft further move behind the Sun.Comment: Solar Physics, Online First, 17 page

    Effect of Sand and Wood-Shavings Bedding on the Behavior of Broiler Chickens

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of 2 different bedding types, sand and wood shavings, on the behavior of broiler chickens. In experiment 1, 6 pens were divided down the center and bedded half with sand and half with wood shavings. Male broilers (10/pen) were observed by scan sampling at 5- or 12-min intervals throughout the 6-wk growth period during the morning (between 0800 to 0900 h), afternoon (1200 to 1500 h), and night (2300 to 0600 h). There was a significant behavior x substrate x week interaction during the day (P \u3c 0.0001) and at night (P \u3c 0.0002). Drinking, dustbathing, preening, and sitting increased in frequency on the sand side but decreased on the wood shavings side during the day, as did resting at night. In general, broilers performed a greater proportion of their total behavioral time budget on the sand (P \u3c 0.0001) as they aged. Broilers used the divider between the 2 bedding types to perch; perching behavior peaked during wk 4. In experiment 2, male broilers were housed in 8 pens (50 birds/pen) bedded only in sand or wood shavings. Bedding type had no effect on behavioral time budgets (P = 0.8946), although there were age-related changes in behavior on both bedding types. These results indicate that when given a choice, broilers increasingly performed many of their behaviors on sand, but if only one bedding type was provided they performed those behaviors with similar frequency on sand or wood shavings

    Further Experimental Studies of Two-Body Radiative \Upsilon Decays

    Full text link
    Continuing our studies of radiative Upsilon(1S) decays, we report on a search for Upsilon to gamma eta and Upsilon to gamma f_{J}(2220) in 61.3 pb^{-1} of e^{+}e^{-} data taken with the CLEO II detector at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring. For the gamma eta search the three decays of the eta meson to pi^{+}pi^{-}pi^{0}, pi^{0}pi^{0}pi^{0}, and gamma gamma were investigated. We found no candidate events in the two (3\pi)^{0} modes and no significant excess over expected backgrounds in the gamma gamma mode to set a limit on the branching fraction of B(Upsilon to gamma eta) < 2.1 x 10^{-5} at 90% C.L. The three charged two-body final states h h-bar (h = pi^{+}, K^{+}, p) were investigated for f_{J}(2220) production, with one, one, and two events found, respectively. Limits at 90% C.L. of B(\Upsilon to gamma f_{J}) x B(f_{J} to h h-bar) ~ 1.5 x 10^{-5} have been set for each of these modes. We compare our results to measurements of other radiative Upsilon decays, to measurements of radiative J/psi decays, and to theoretical predictions.Comment: 19 pages postscript, also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS, submitted to Physical Review

    Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B --> D* rho Decays

    Full text link
    Using 9.1 fb-1 of e+ e- data collected at the Upsilon(4S) with the CLEO detector using the Cornell Electron Storage Ring, measurements are reported for both the branching fractions and the helicity amplitudes for the decays B- -> D*0 rho- and B0bar -> D*+ rho-. The fraction of longitudinal polarization in B0bar -> D*+ rho- is found to be consistent with that in B0bar -> D*+ l- nubar at q^2 = M^2_rho, indicating that the factorization approximation works well. The longitudinal polarization in the B- mode is similar. The measurements also show evidence of non-trivial final-state interaction phases for the helicity amplitudes.Comment: 11 pages postscript, also available through http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLNS, submitted to PR

    Static and dynamic structure factors with account of the ion structure for high-temperature alkali and alkaline earth plasmas

    Full text link
    The electron-electron, electron-ion, ion-ion and charge-charge static structure factors are calculated for alkali (at T = 30 000 K, 60 000 K, n (e) = 0.7 x 10(21) A center dot 1.1 x 10(22) cm(-3)) and Be2+ (at T = 20 eV, n (e) = 2.5 x 10(23) cm(-3)) plasmas using the method described by Gregori et al. The dynamic structure factors for alkali plasmas are calculated at T = 30 000 K, n (e) = 1.74 x 10(20), 1.11 x 10(22) cm(-3) using the method of moments developed by Adamjan et al. In both methods the screened Hellmann-Gurskii-Krasko potential, obtained on the basis of Bogolyubov's method, has been used taking into account not only the quantum-mechanical effects but also the repulsion due to the Pauli exclusion principle. The repulsive part of the Hellmann-Gurskii-Krasko (HGK) potential reflects important features of the ion structure. Our results on the static structure factors for Be2+ plasma deviate from the data obtained by Gregori et al., while our dynamic structure factors are in a reasonable agreement with those of Adamyan et al.: at higher values of k and with increasing k the curves damp down while at lower values of k, and especially at higher electron coupling, we observe sharp peaks also reported in the mentioned work. For lower electron coupling the dynamic structure factors of Li+, Na+, K+, Rb+ and Cs+ do not differ while at higher electron coupling these curves split. As the number of shell electrons increases from Li+ to Cs+ the curves shift in the direction of low absolute value of omega and their heights diminish. We conclude that the short range forces, which we take into account by means of the HGK model potential, which deviates from the Coulomb and Deutsch ones, influence the static and dynamic structure factors significantly.The work has been realised at the Humboldt University at Berlin (Germany). One of the authors (S. P. Sadykova) would like to express sincere thanks to the Erasmus Mundus Program of the EU for the financial support and especially to Mr. M. Parske for his aid, to the Institute of Physics, Humboldt University at Berlin, for the support which made her participation at some scientific Conferences possible; I. M. T. acknowledges the financial support of the Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia Project No. ENE2007-67406-C02-02/FTN and valuable discussions with Dr. D. Gericke.Sadykova, SP.; Ebeling, W.; Tkachenko Gorski, IM. (2011). Static and dynamic structure factors with account of the ion structure for high-temperature alkali and alkaline earth plasmas. European Physical Journal D. 61(1):117-130. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-10118-yS117130611G. Gregori, O.L. Landen, S.H. Glenzer, Phys. Rev. E 74, 026402 (2006)G. Gregori, A. Ravasio, A. Höll, S.H. Glenzer, S.J. Rose, High Energy Density Physics 3, 99 (2007)V.M. Adamyan, I.M. Tkachenko, Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 21, 417 (1983) [High Temp. (USA) 21, 307 (1983)]V.M. Adamyan, T. Meyer, I.M. Tkachenko, Fiz. Plazmy 11, 826 (1985) [Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 11, 481 (1985)]S.V. Adamjan, I.M. Tkachenko, J.L. Muñoz-Cobo, G. Verdú Martín, Phys. Rev. E 48, 2067 (1993)V.M. Adamyan, I.M. Tkachenko, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 43, 252 (2003)S. Sadykova, W. Ebeling, I. Valuev, I. Sokolov, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 49, 76 (2009)M.J. Rosseinsky, K. Prassides, Nature 464, 39 (2010)Physics and Chemistry of Alkali Metal Adsorption, edited by H.P. Bonzel, A.M. Bradshaw, G. Ertl (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989), Materials Science Monographs, Vol. 57A.N. Klyucharev, N.N. Bezuglov, A.A. Matveev, A.A. Mihajlov, Lj.M. Ignjatović, M.S. Dimitrijević, New Astron. Rev. 51, 547 (2007)F. Hensel, Liquid Metals, edited by R. Evans, D.A. Greenwood, IOP Conf. Ser. No. 30 (IPPS, London, 1977)F. Hensel, S. Juengst, F. Noll, R. Winter, In Localisation and Metal Insulator Transitions, edited by D. Adler, H. Fritsche (Plenum Press, New York, 1985)N.F. Mott, Metal-Insulator Transitions (Taylor and Francis, London, 1974)H. Hess, Physics of nonideal plasmas, edited by W. Ebeling, A. Foerster, R. Radtke, B.G. Teubner (Leipzig, 1992)V. Sizyuk, A. Hassanein, T. Sizyuk, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 103106 (2006)S. Sadykova, W. Ebeling, I. Valuev, I. Sokolov, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 49, 388 (2009)H. Ebert, Physikalisches Taschenbuch (F. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, 1967)S.H. Glenzer, G. Gregori, R.W. Lee, F.J. Rogers, S.W. Pollaine, O.L. Landen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 175002 (2003)G. Gregori, S.H. Glenzer, H.-K. Chung, D.H. Froula, R.W. Lee, N.B. Meezan, J.D. Moody, C. Niemann, O.L. Landen, B. Holst, R. Redmer, S.P. Regan, H. Sawada, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 99, 225237 (2006)D. Riley, N.C. Woolsey, D. McSherry, I. Weaver, A. Djaoui, E. Nardi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1704 (2000)S.H. Glenzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 065002 (2007)J. Sheffield, Plasma Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation (Academic Press, New York, 1975)A. Höll, Th. Bornath, L. Cao, T. Döppner, S. Düsterer, E. Föster, C. Fortmann, S.H. Glenzer, G. Gregori, T. Laarmann, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, A. Przystawik, P. Radcliffe, R. Redmer, H. Reinholz, G. Röpke, R. Thiele, J. Tiggesbäumker, S. Toleikis, N.X. Truong, T. Tschentscher, I. Ushmann, U. Zastrau, High Energy Density Phys. 3, 120 (2007)Yu.V. Arkhipov, A. Askaruly, D. Ballester, A.E. Davletov, G.M. Meirkhanova, I.M. Tkachenko, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026403 (2007)Yu.V. Arkhipov, A. Askaruly, D. Ballester, A.E. Davletov, I.M. Tkachenko, G. Zwicknagel, Phys. Rev. E 81, 026402 (2010)J.P. Hansen, I.R. Mc. Donald, Phys. Rev. A 23, 2041 (1981)J.P. Hansen, E.L. Polock, I.R. McDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 277 (1974)V. Schwarz, B. Holst, T. Bornath, C. Fortmann, W-D. Kraeft, R. Thiele, R. Redmer, G. Gregori, H. Ja Leed, T. Döppner, S.H. Glenzer, High Energy Density Phys. 5, 1 (2009)D.O. Gericke, K. Wünsch, J. Vorberger, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 606, 142 (2009)B. Bernu, D. Ceperley, Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Physics and Chemistry, edited by M.P. Nightingale, C. Umrigar (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999), NATO ASI Series, Series C, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. C-525G. Kelbg, Ann. Physik 13 354 (1964)C. Deutsch, Phys. Lett. A 60, 317 (1977)H. Minoo, M.M. Gombert, C. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A 23, 924 (1981)W. Ebeling, G.E. Norman, A.A. Valuev, I. Valuev, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 39, 61 (1999)A.V. Filinov, M. Bonitz, W. Ebeling, J. Phys. A. 36, 5957 (2003)H. Hellmann, J. Chem. Phys. 3, 61 (1935)H. Hellmann, Acta Fizicochem. USSR 1, 913 (1935)H. Hellmann, Acta Fizicochem. USSR 4, 225 (1936)H. Hellmann, W. Kassatotschkin, Acta Fizicochem. USSR 5, 23 (1936)W.A. Harrison, Pseudopotentials in the Theory of Metals (Benjamin, New York, 1966)V. Heine, M.L. Cohen, D. Weaire, Psevdopotenzcial'naya Teoriya (Mir, Moskva, 1973)V. Heine, The pseudopotential concept, edited by H. Ehrenreich, F. Seitz, D. Turnbull, Solid State Physics 24, 1 (Academic, New York 1970)G.L. Krasko, Z.A. Gurskii, JETP Lett. 9, 363 (1969)W. Ebeling, W.-D. Kraeft, D. Kremp, Theory of Bound State and Ionization Equilibrium in Plasmas and Solids (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1976)W. Zimdahl, W. Ebeling, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 34, 9 (1977)W. Ebeling, C.-V. Meister, R. Saendig, 13 ICPIG (Berlin, 1977) 725W. Ebeling, C.V. Meister, R. Saendig, W.-D. Kraeft, Ann. Phys. 491, 321 (1979)N.N. Bogolyubov, Dynamical Theory Problems in Statistical Physics (in Russian) (GITTL, Moscow, 1946)N.N. Bogolyubov, Studies in Statistical Mechanics, Engl. Transl., edited by J. De Boer, G.E. Uhlenbeck (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962)H. Falkenhagen, Theorie der Elektrolyte (S. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig, 1971), p. 369Yu.V. Arkhipov, F.B. Baimbetov, A.E. Davletov, Eur. Phys. J. D 8, 299 (2000)P. Seuferling, J. Vogel, C. Toepffer, Phys. Rev. A 40, 323 (1989)L. Szasz, Pseudopotential Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Wiley-Intersc., New York, 1985)W.H.E. Schwarz, Acta Phys. Hung. 27, 391 (1969)W.H.E. Schwarz, Theor. Chim. Acta 11, 307 (1968)N.P. Kovalenko, Yu.P. Krasnyj, U. Krey, Physics of Amorphous Metalls (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001)Z.A. Gurski, G.L. Krasko, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR (in Russian) 197, 810 (1971)C. Fiolhais, J.P. Perdew, S.Q. Armster, J.M. MacLaren, Phys. Rev. B 51, 14001 (1995)S.S. Dalgic, S. Dalgic, G. Tezgor, Phys. Chem. Liq. 40, 539, (2002)E.M. Apfelbaum, Phys. Chem. Liq., 48, 534 (2010)Yu.V. Arkhipov, A.E. Davletov, Phys. Lett. A 247, 339 (1998)W. Ebeling, J. Ortner, Physica Scripta T 75, 93 (1998)J. Ortner, F. Schautz, W. Ebeling, Phys. Rev. E 56, 4665 (1997)N.I. Akhieser, The classical Moment Problem (Oliver and Boyd, London, 1965)M.G. Krein, A.A. Nudel'man, The Markov Moment Problem and External Problems (American Mathematical Society, Translations, New York, 1977)M.J. Corbatón, I.M. Tkachenko, Int. Conference on Strongly Coupled Coulomb Systems (SCCS2008), Camerino, Italy, July-August, 2008, Book of Abstracts, p. 90V.M. Adamyan, A.A. Mihajlov, N.M. Sakan, V.A. Srećković, I.M. Tkachenko, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 214005 (2009)S. Ichimaru, Statistical Plasma Physics, Vol. I: Basic Principles (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1992)W. Ebeling, A. Foerster, W. Richert, H. Hess, Physics A 150, 159 (1988)H. Wagenknecht, W. Ebeling, A. Förster, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 41, 15 (2001
    corecore