real world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir pibrentasvir for the treatment of patients with chronic hcv infection a meta analysis

Abstract Background and Aims Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is approved for treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1–6. In clinical trials, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was associated with high rates of sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12) and was well tolerated. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the real-world effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were undertaken. Methods Real-world studies reporting SVR12 in adults with HCV infection (N≥20) treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir were identified in journal publications from January 1, 2017, to February 25, 2019, and congress presentations through April 14, 2019. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine SVR12 rates using data from ≥2 cohorts; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses included patients treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir who had SVR12 data available, discontinued early, or were lost to follow-up; modified ITT (mITT) analyses excluded those with non-virologic failure. Naive pooling was used to calculate adverse event (AE) rates. Results Overall, 12,531 adults were treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (18 cohorts). Of patients with post-treatment Week 12 data, SVR12 rates were 96.7% (95% CI, 95.4–98.1) in the ITT population (n=8,583, 15 cohorts) and 98.1 % (95% CI, 97.1–99.2) in the mITT population (n=7,001, 14 cohorts). SVR12 rates were ≥95% across subgroups (HCV genotype, cirrhosis status, treatment history, treatment duration, on-label treatment, and subgroups of interest). AEs were reported in 17.7% (1,271/7,199) of patients (8 cohorts). Serious AEs were reported in 1.0% (55/5,522) of patients (6 cohorts). The most frequent AEs were pruritus, fatigue, and headache. AE-related treatment discontinuations were reported in 0.6% (33/5,595) of patients (6 cohorts). Conclusions Consistent with clinical trials, real-world evidence indicates that glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a well-tolerated and highly effective pangenotypic treatment for a broad range of HCV-infected patients

Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment in Liver or Kidney Transplant Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Well-tolerated, ribavirin-free, pangenotypic hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments for transplant recipients remain a high priority. Once-daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir demonstrates high rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment (SVR12) across all major HCV genotypes (GTs). This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for patients with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection who had received a liver or kidney transplant. MAGELLAN-2 was a phase 3, open-label trial conducted in patients who were ≥3 months posttransplant. Patients without cirrhosis who were HCV treatment-naive (GT1-6) or treatment-experienced (GT1, 2, 4-6; with interferon-based therapy with or without sofosbuvir, or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin) received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (300/120 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint compared the percentage of patients receiving glecaprevir/pibrentasvir with SVR12 to a historic SVR12 rate based on the standard of care. Safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was assessed. In total, 80 liver transplant and 20 kidney transplant patients participated in the trial. Most patients had no or minimal fibrosis (80% had fibrosis scores F0-F1) and were infected with HCV GT1 (57%) or GT3 (24%). The overall SVR12 was 98% (n/N = 98/100; 95% confidence interval, 95.3%-100%), which exceeded the prespecified historic standard-of-care SVR12 threshold of 94%. One patient experienced virologic failure. One patient discontinued because of an adverse event considered to be unrelated to treatment; this patient achieved SVR12. Adverse events were mostly mild in severity, and laboratory abnormalities were infrequent. CONCLUSION: Once-daily glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 12 weeks is a well-tolerated and efficacious, ribavirin-free treatment for patients with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection who have received a liver or kidney transplant. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02692703.) (Hepatology 2018; 00:000-000)

Towards early inclusion of children in tuberculosis drugs trials : a consensus statement

Children younger than 18 years account for a substantial proportion of patients with tuberculosis worldwide. Available treatments for paediatric drug-susceptible and drug-resistant tuberculosis, albeit generally eff ective, are hampered by high pill burden, long duration of treatment, coexistent toxic eff ects, and an overall scarcity of suitable child-friendly formulations. Several new drugs and regimens with promising activity against both drug-susceptible and drug-resistant strains have entered clinical development and are either in various phases of clinical investigation or have received marketing authorisation for adults; however, none have data on their use in children. This consensus statement, generated from an international panel of opinion leaders on childhood tuberculosis and incorporating reviews of published literature from January, 2004, to May, 2014, addressed four key questions: what drugs or regimens should be prioritised for clinical trials in children? Which populations of children are high priorities for study? When can phase 1 or 2 studies be initiated in children? What are the relevant elements of clinical trial design? The consensus panel found that children can be included in studies at the early phases of drug development and should be an integral part of the clinical development plan, rather than studied after regulatory approval in adults is obtained.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institute of Health.Department of Health and Human Services.http://www.thelancet.com/infection2016-06-30hb201

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Adults with Chronic Genotype 1-6 Hepatitis C Virus Infections and Compensated Liver Disease

Background: Untreated, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may lead to progressive liver damage, which can be mitigated by successful treatment. This integrated analysis reports the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the ribavirin-free, direct-acting, antiviral, fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-6 infections and compensated liver disease, including patients with chronic kidney disease stages 4 or 5 (CKD 4/5). Methods: Data from 9 Phase II and III clinical trials, assessing the efficacy and safety of G/P treatment for 8-16 weeks, were included. The presence of cirrhosis was determined at screening using a liver biopsy, transient elastography, or serum biomarkers. The objectives were to evaluate safety, the rate of sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12), and steady-state PK by cirrhosis status. Results: Among 2369 patients, 308 (13%) were Child-Pugh Class A, including 20 with CKD 4/5. Overall, <1% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE) that led to G/P discontinuation or G/P-related serious AEs (SAEs). The most common AEs were headache and fatigue, occurring at similar frequencies with and without cirrhosis. SAEs were more common in patients with CKD 4/5, but all were unrelated to G/P. There were no cases of drug-induced liver injury or clinically relevant hepatic decompensation. SVR12 rates were 96.4% (297/308) with compensated cirrhosis and 97.5% (2010/2061) without cirrhosis. PK analysis demonstrated a 2.2-fold increase in glecaprevir exposure, but not pibrentasvir exposure, in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Conclusions: G/P was safe and efficacious in patients with compensated liver disease, including those with CKD 4/5. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02243280, NCT02243293, NCT02604017, NCT02640482, NCT02640157, NCT02636595, NCT02642432, NCT02651194, and NCT02446717SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Adolescents with Chronic HCV: Part 1 of the DORA Study

The pangenotypic regimen of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) is approved to treat adults with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and has yielded high cure rates in adults in clinical trials. Approved treatment options for pediatrics may include ribavirin (RBV). A pangenotypic regimen for pediatric patients remains an unmet need. DORA is an ongoing phase 2/3, non-randomized, open-label study evaluating the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of G/P in pediatric patients with chronic HCV. This analysis includes Part 1 of the study, conducted in adolescent patients 12-17 years old given the adult regimen of G/P (300 mg/120 mg) once-daily for 8-16 weeks according to the indication durations used in adults. Patients were either treatment-naïve or experienced with interferon (IFN)- based regimens. The primary PK endpoint was steady-state exposures for glecaprevir and pibrentasvir; the primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). The secondary efficacy endpoints were on-treatment virologic failure, relapse, and reinfection. Safety and tolerability were monitored. Part 1 enrolled 48 adolescent patients infected with genotypes 1, 2, 3, or 4; 47 of whom were administered G/P. All 47 patients (100%) achieved SVR12. No on-treatment virologic failures or relapses occurred. PK exposures of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir were comparable to exposures in adults. No AEs led to treatment discontinuation, and no serious AEs occurred. CONCLUSION: Adolescent patients with chronic HCV infection treated with G/P achieved a comparable exposure to adults, 100% SVR12 rate, and safety profile consistent with that in adults. This is the first pangenotypic regimen to demonstrate 100% efficacy within the adolescent population in as little as 8 weeks of treatment

Towards earlier inclusion of Children in Tuberculosis (TB) drugs trials: Consensus statements from an Expert Panel

Children represent a significant proportion of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden, and may be disproportionately more affected by its most severe clinical manifestations. Currently available treatments for pediatric drug-susceptible (DS) and drug-resistant (DR) TB, albeit generally effective, are hampered by high pill burden, long duration of treatment, coexistent toxicities, and an overall lack of suitable, child-friendly formulations. The complex and burdensome nature of administering the existing regimens to treat DS TB also contributes to the rise of DR TB strains. Despite the availability and use of these therapies for decades, a dearth of dosing evidence in children underscores the importance of sustained efforts for TB drug development to better meet the treatment needs of children with TB. Several new TB drugs and regimens with promising activity against both DS and DR TB strains have recently entered clinical development and are in various phases of clinical evaluation in adults or have received marketing authorization for adults. However, initiation of clinical trials to evaluate these drugs in children is often deferred, pending the availability of complete safety and efficacy data in adults or after drug approval. This document summarizes consensus statements from an international panel of childhood TB opinion leaders which support the initiation of evaluation of new TB drugs and regimens in children at earlier phases of the TB Drug development cycle