Μια δικαιοσυγκριτική μελέτη για την αντιμετώπιση του κοινωνικού φαινομένου της χρήσης ναρκωτικών ουσιών.

Η παρούσα πραγματεύεται την αντιμετώπιση, από τα διαφορετικά κράτη και κοινωνίες, στους χρήστες ναρκωτικών ουσιών. Ενώ, καθολικά σχεδόν, τα διάφορα κράτη αντιμετωπίζουν σαν ένα βαρύ κακούργημα τη διάθεση των ναρκωτικών ουσιών (πάντως και για τη διάθεση υπάρχουν σοβαρές διαφοροποιήσεις ενίοτε), όταν το ζήτημα επικεντρώνεται στη χρήση των ναρκωτικών ουσιών, τότε εμφανίζονται σοβαρές διαφωνίες που ξεκινούν από την εκάστοτε εκτίμηση της υπό κρίση συμπεριφοράς και συνεπακόλουθα τελικώς εμφανίζονται όχι ασήμαντες αποκλίσεις στην αντιμετώπιση αυτού του φαινομένου.The present deals with the treatment, by the different states and societies, to drug users. While, almost universally, the various states treat as a serious crime the disposition of of narcotic substances (however, there are serious variations sometimes), when the question centers on the use of narcotic substances, then serious disagreements appear starting from the assessment of the behavior in question and its consequences in the end, not insignificant deviations appear in the treatment of this phenomenon

Η προσωδία και η μουσικότητα στην ψυχοθεραπεία: ψυχοδυναμική και νευροβιολογική οπτική.

Η ψυχαναλυτική διαδικασία χαρακτηρίζεται από μια λεκτική-ερμηνευτική πλευρά καθώς και από μια μη-λεκτική η αλλιώς εξωλεκτική πλευρά. Αυτή η μη-λεκτική πλευρά διαθέτει και κάποια χαρακτηριστικά μουσικότητας. Αυτά κάποιος τα παρατηρεί ίσως πιο εύκολα σε ένα εξωλεκτικό χαρακτηριστικό όπως είναι η προσωδία της φωνής του αναλυτή ή του αναλυόμενου. Η προσωδία είναι ο ρυθμός, ο τόνος και ο επιτονισμός της ομιλίας και μπορεί να αντικατοπτρίζει ποικίλα χαρακτηριστικά του ομιλητή όπως την συναισθηματική κατάσταση του και χρησιμοποιείται για να δοθεί με ποικίλους τρόπους το νόημα σε μια πρόταση. Σκοπός αυτής της εργασίας είναι να διερευνήσει τον τρόπο με τον οποίο μπορεί η μουσικότητα που παράγεται από τον αναλυτή ή τον αναλυόμενο να συνδέεται θεωρητικά με την δημιουργία ενός «ψυχικού συντονισμού» μεταξύ του ζεύγους αναλυτή-αναλυόμενου, ο οποίος προάγει την εγκατάσταση της θεραπευτική σχέσης. Μια υπόθεση είναι ότι όπως στο ζευγάρι μητέρας–βρέφους εμφανίζεται ένας προ-λεκτικός ψυχικός «συντονισμός», ίσως κάτι ανάλογο να αναπαράγεται και στην θεραπεία όπου ένα πρώιμο ψυχικό κομμάτι του αναλυόμενου συντονίζεται με ένα πρώιμο ψυχικό κομμάτι του αναλυτή (και αντίστοιχα) μέσω της «μουσικότητας» της θεραπευτικής σχέσης. Διερευνάται αν σε νευροβιολογικό επίπεδο οι κατοπτρικοί νευρώνες παίζουν κάποιο ρόλο στον συντονισμό αυτόν. Μέσω μιας βιβλιογραφικής ανασκόπησης ψυχαναλυτικών και νευροβιολογικών ερευνών θα γίνει προσπάθεια να συνδεθούν νευροβιολογικές έννοιες με ψυχαναλυτικές προκειμένου να διερευνηθεί ο « ψυχικός συντονισμός» που προκύπτει από την μουσικότητα στην θεραπεία. Αναφέρεται επίσης κλινικό παράδειγμα στο οποίο διερευνάται αν μια τροποποίηση της στάσης του θεραπευτή είχε μια επίδραση σε ένα καλύτερο ψυχικό συντονισμό μεταξύ του θεραπευτή και του θεραπευόμενου. Προκύπτει επίσης το ερώτημα αν αυτή η εξωλεκτική μουσική επικοινωνία έχει μεγαλύτερη σημασία σε μη-νευρωσικές προσωπικότητες όπου ο λόγος δεν έχει μια ιδιαίτερα συμβολική διάσταση και άρα μέσω της μουσικότητας μπορεί να προαχθεί μια πιο ασφαλής επένδυση στην θεραπεία.The psychoanalytic process is characterized by a verbal-hermeneutic side, as well as a non-verbal side. This non-verbal side shows some characteristics, one of which is that of musicality. Musicality is something one can observe in the prosody of the voice of the analyst as well as of the patient. The prosody refers to the rhythm, pitch, intonation of the sound of the voice and it usually reflects many characteristics of the speaker such as the emotional state he/she is found and it also conveys the meaning in a sentence. The purpose of this essay is to explore the way the musicality produced by the analyst or the patient can be connected to a theoretic formulation of a “psychic coordination” among the analyst-patient pair and this can promote the establishment of a therapeutic relationship. A hypothesis could be that as in the mother-infant bond, there is a “co-ordination” in a psychic preverbal level, maybe something analogous to that could occur in therapy where a primal psychic part of the patient is co-ordinated with a primal psychic part of the analyst (and vice versa) through the “musicality” of their relationship. It will be explored if in a neurobiological level, mirror neurons play an important role for promoting this co-ordination. A connection of psychoanalytic meanings to neurobiological findings will be tried through a literature review of psychoanalytic as well as neurobiological essays concerning the musicality in therapy so as to investigate the “psychic coordination”. A clinical case will be mentioned in which a change in the attitude of the therapist could have an influence in a better psychic connection between the therapist and the patient. A question also emerges concerning this nonverbal musical communication and if it plays an important role in non-neurotic personalities where speech does not have a particular symbolic dimension and so through the musicality a more secure investment in therapy could be promoted

Data management plans as linked open data

Open Science Graphs (OSGs) sont des graphiques de connaissances scientifiques représentant différentes entités du cycle de vie de la recherche (p. ex., projets, personnes, résultats de la recherche, établissements) et les relations entre eux

Engaging Researchers with Data Management: The Cookbook

Effective Research Data Management (RDM) is a key component of research integrity and reproducible research, and its importance is increasingly emphasised by funding bodies, governments, and research institutions around the world. However, many researchers are unfamiliar with RDM best practices, and research support staff are faced with the difficult task of delivering support to researchers across different disciplines and career stages. What strategies can institutions use to solve these problems?Engaging Researchers with Data Management is an invaluable collection of 24 case studies, drawn from institutions across the globe, that demonstrate clearly and practically how to engage the research community with RDM. These case studies together illustrate the variety of innovative strategies research institutions have developed to engage with their researchers about managing research data. Each study is presented concisely and clearly, highlighting the essential ingredients that led to its success and challenges encountered along the way. By interviewing key staff about their experiences and the organisational context, the authors of this book have created an essential resource for organisations looking to increase engagement with their research communities.This handbook is a collaboration by research institutions, for research institutions. It aims not only to inspire and engage, but also to help drive cultural change towards better data management. It has been written for anyone interested in RDM, or simply, good research practice

Building National Open Science Cloud Initiatives (NOSCIs) in Southeast Europe: supporting research and scholarly communication

The National Initiatives for Open Science in Europe (NI4OS Europe) project supports the development of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) by contributing to its portfolio of services, by involving national and regional research communities in the EOSC governance, by strengthening open science (OS) practices, and by promoting the FAIR principles (Macan et al., 2020; Garavelli et al., 2021) to help build the infrastructure and create a favourable environment for open and intensive scholarly communication. The main instrument in achieving this is the network of 15 national Open Science Cloud Initiatives (NOSCIs) established in the partner countries as national-level coalitions of Open Science stakeholders that have a prominent role and interest in the EOSC. The concept of NOSCI has been developed in response to the specific traits and challenges in the targeted region, based on complex and multilayered analyses of stakeholders, policies, and local contexts (Toli et al., 2020). Inclusive by nature, NOSCIs connect stakeholders from across the research lifecycle at the national level and provide not only a testbed for the formulation of OS policies but also a forum for knowledge dissemination and sharing. Drawing on a secondary analysis of the abundant data collected and materials produced during the project, this presentation focuses on the challenges identified as the NOSCIs were built – from data collection in the context of landscaping (Kosanović & Ševkušić, 2019) and policy analysis, through concept development, to implementation, testing, and verification (use cases). It highlights the relationship between individual challenges and NOSCI elements that address these challenges. The challenges are largely owed to diversities within the region, most notably the varying levels of integration into European structures (of the 15 partner countries, eight are not EU members), linguistic diversity, different research governance systems, policy traditions, and available funding. The framework for NOSCI development, the so-called blueprint (Toli et al., 2020), was designed in full recognition of these diversities. It relies on three modular workflows (Toli et al., 2021) and gives maximum flexibility to countries or national initiatives while making sure that all locally specific aspects are addressed. We believe that the approach adopted by the NI4OS-Europe team could be applied in other highlydiversified environments, as has been demonstrated by the NI4OS-Europe use cases, thanks to the flexible mechanism of interaction between challenges and responses underlying the very concept of NOSCI.Interactive poster: https://open.ac.rs/index.php/ni4os-europe-pubmet2022-posterPoster: [http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7315249]Full paper: [https://dais.sanu.ac.rs/admin/10.3390/publications10040042

Building National Open Science Cloud Initiatives (NOSCIs) in Southeast Europe: supporting research and scholarly communication

The National Initiatives for Open Science in Europe (NI4OS Europe) project supports the development of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) by contributing to its portfolio of services, by involving national and regional research communities in the EOSC governance, by strengthening open science (OS) practices, and by promoting the FAIR principles (Macan et al., 2020; Garavelli et al., 2021) to help build the infrastructure and create a favourable environment for open and intensive scholarly communication.The main instrument in achieving this is the network of 15 national Open Science Cloud Initiatives (NOSCIs) established in the partner countries as national-level coalitions of Open Science stakeholders that have a prominent role and interest in the EOSC. The concept of NOSCI has been developed in response to the specific traits and challenges in the targeted region, based on complex and multilayered analyses of stakeholders, policies, and local contexts (Toli et al., 2020). Inclusive by nature, NOSCIs connect stakeholders from across the research lifecycle at the national level and provide not only a testbed for the formulation of OS policies but also a forum for knowledge dissemination and sharing.Drawing on a secondary analysis of the abundant data collected and materials produced during the project, this presentation focuses on the challenges identified as the NOSCIs were built – from data collection in the context of landscaping (Kosanović & Ševkušić, 2019) and policy analysis, through concept development, to implementation, testing, and verification (use cases). It highlights the relationship between individual challenges and NOSCI elements that address these challenges.The challenges are largely owed to diversities within the region, most notably the varying levels of integration into European structures (of the 15 partner countries, eight are not EU members), linguistic diversity, different research governance systems, policy traditions, and available funding. The framework for NOSCI development, the so-called blueprint (Toli et al., 2020), was designed in full recognition of these diversities. It relies on three modular workflows (Toli et al., 2021) and gives maximum flexibility to countries or national initiatives while making sure that all locally specific aspects are addressed.We believe that the approach adopted by the NI4OS-Europe team could be applied in other highlydiversified environments, as has been demonstrated by the NI4OS-Europe use cases, thanks to the flexible mechanism of interaction between challenges and responses underlying the very concept of NOSCI.The results presented in this poster were subsequently published in: Ševkušić M, Toli E, Lenaki K, Kanavou K, Sifakaki E, Kosanović B, Papastamatiou I, Papadopoulou E. Building National Open Science Cloud Initiatives (NOSCIs) in Southeast Europe: Supporting Research and Scholarly Communication. Publications. 2022; 10(4):42. [https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10040042]Interactive version: [https://open.ac.rs/index.php/ni4os-europe-pubmet2022-poster]Conference abstract: [https://doi.org/10.15291/pubmet.3952]Conference abstract: [https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_dais_13397

A Vision for Open Science

Funders are well positioned to shift the incentives for open science inherent in grant application processes and improve the way research is evaluated. Institutions can change the status quo by promoting and rewarding researchers careers, and collaborating with research libraries in contributing to development of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) infrastructure, tools and relevant skills. This document elaborates on the outcome of the workshop "Research Institutions and Libraries and the role of Funders in the European Open Science Cloud" held at the LIBER 2018 Conference in Lille, France. It sets a vision in which open science is the norm, and all funding bodies as well as institutions and researchers recognise the benefit of open science and embed best open science practice into their processes

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development, Version 2.1 [Pre-print]

This document aims to agree on a broad, international strategy for the implementation of open scholarship that meets the needs of different national and regional communities but works globally. Scholarly research can be idealised as an inspirational process for advancing our collective knowledge to the benefit of all humankind. However, current research practices often struggle with a range of tensions, in part due to the fact that this collective (or “commons”) ideal conflicts with the competitive system in which most scholars work, and in part because much of the infrastructure of the scholarly world is becoming largely digital. What is broadly termed as Open Scholarship is an attempt to realign modern research practices with this ideal. We do not propose a definition of Open Scholarship, but recognise that it is a holistic term that encompasses many disciplines, practices, and principles, sometimes also referred to as Open Science or Open Research. We choose the term Open Scholarship to be more inclusive of these other terms. When we refer to science in this document, we do so historically and use it as shorthand for more general scholarship. The purpose of this document is to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Scholarship movement currently stands: what the common threads and strengths are, where the greatest opportunities and challenges lie, and how we can more effectively work together as a global community to recognise and address the top strategic priorities. This document was inspired by the Foundations for OER Strategy Development and work in the FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group, and developed by an open contribution working group. Our hope is that this document will serve as a foundational resource for continuing discussions and initiatives about implementing effective strategies to help streamline the integration of Open Scholarship practices into a modern, digital research culture. Through this, we hope to extend the reach and impact of Open Scholarship into a global context, making sure that it is truly open for all. We also hope that this document will evolve as the conversations around Open Scholarship progress, and help to provide useful insight for both global co-ordination and local action. We believe this is a step forward in making Open Scholarship the norm. Ultimately, we expect the impact of widespread adoption of Open Scholarship to be diverse. We expect novel research practices to accelerate the pace of innovation, and therefore stimulate critical industries around the world. We could also expect to see an increase in public trust of science and scholarship, as transparency becomes more normative. As such, we expect interest in Open Scholarship to increase at multiple levels, due to its inherent influence on society and global economics

Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development

This document aims to agree on a broad, international strategy for the implementation of open scholarship that meets the needs of different national and regional communities but works globally.Scholarly research can be idealised as an inspirational process for advancing our collective knowledge to the benefit of all humankind. However, current research practices often struggle with a range of tensions, in part due to the fact that this collective (or “commons”) ideal conflicts with the competitive system in which most scholars work, and in part because much of the infrastructure of the scholarly world is becoming largely digital. What is broadly termed as Open Scholarship is an attempt to realign modern research practices with this ideal. We do not propose a definition of Open Scholarship, but recognise that it is a holistic term that encompasses many disciplines, practices, and principles, sometimes also referred to as Open Science or Open Research. We choose the term Open Scholarship to be more inclusive of these other terms. When we refer to science in this document, we do so historically and use it as shorthand for more general scholarship.The purpose of this document is to provide a concise analysis of where the global Open Scholarship movement currently stands: what the common threads and strengths are, where the greatest opportunities and challenges lie, and how we can more effectively work together as a global community to recognise and address the top strategic priorities. This document was inspired by the Foundations for OER Strategy Development and work in the FORCE11 Scholarly Commons Working Group, and developed by an open contribution working group.Our hope is that this document will serve as a foundational resource for continuing discussions and initiatives about implementing effective strategies to help streamline the integration of Open Scholarship practices into a modern, digital research culture. Through this, we hope to extend the reach and impact of Open Scholarship into a global context, making sure that it is truly open for all. We also hope that this document will evolve as the conversations around Open Scholarship progress, and help to provide useful insight for both global co-ordination and local action. We believe this is a step forward in making Open Scholarship the norm.Ultimately, we expect the impact of widespread adoption of Open Scholarship to be diverse. We expect novel research practices to accelerate the pace of innovation, and therefore stimulate critical industries around the world. We could also expect to see an increase in public trust of science and scholarship, as transparency becomes more normative. As such, we expect interest in Open Scholarship to increase at multiple levels, due to its inherent influence on society and global economics

TIER2 D1.2 - Data Management Plan

This project deliverable has been submitted to, but not yet reviewed by the Research Executive Agency, and might thus be subject to change. This deliverable reflects the data management activities of the TIER2 project. TIER2 will develop next-level reproducibility tools, practices & policies across diverse epistemic contexts to increase trust, integrity, & efficiency in research. In this context, TIER2 will itself adhere to radical reproducibility & transparency to ensure best practices, including adherence to Horizon Europe requirements on Research Data Management & Open Science. At the meta-level, the DMP of the project will progressively incorporate elements of reproducible research to realise a prototype of a new concept towards “Reproducibility Management Plans (RMPs)”. This enhancement will be equally supported by the development of the Reproducibility Management Plan tool that is expected to be completed over the course of the project’s lifetime. The TIER2 DMP will be treated as a “living document” that will be continuously updated to record progress and changes in the decisions of the data management and reproducibility practices followed by the consortium. This first version of the DMP as well as its future iterations in M18 and M36 will be linked and available as machine actionable and FAIR outputs produced by ARGOS service (https://argos.openaire.eu): 10.5281/zenodo.8092430. The structure of D1.2 “Data Management Plan” follows the European Commission’s Horizon Europe Data Management Plan Template topics (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/how-to-participate/reference-documents;programCode=HORIZON) and answers the contained questions with information that members have in this initial phase of the project. It should be noted that answers relevant to Section “3. Other Outputs” from the EC’s template are embedded in all sections where relevant, regarding software and code. At the end, we provide specific examples of data that the project is / will be generating, collecting or reusing in the form of tables