12 research outputs found

    Minimal group - maximal effect? Evaluation and anthropomorphization of the humanoid robot NAO

    No full text
    Kuchenbrandt D, Eyssel FA, Bobinger S, Neufeldt M. Minimal group - maximal effect? Evaluation and anthropomorphization of the humanoid robot NAO. In: Mutlu B, Bartneck C, Ham J, Evers V, Kanda T, eds. Social Robotics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol 7072. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011: 104-113.How can we increase acceptance and anthropomorphism of robots? In an experiment with N = 45 participants, we tested whether categorizing the humanoid robot NAO as an in-group member vs. an out-group member would result in more positive evaluations and higher levels of anthropomorphism of the robot NAO. Results fully support our hypotheses. Moreover, the present findings also indicate that sharing in-group membership with NAO led to greater willingness to interact with robots in general

    Agroecology as a transformative approach to tackle climatic, food, and ecosystemic crises

    No full text
    Agroecology (AE) has been proposed as a transformative approach to climate change mitigation and adaptation that reduces climate risk while supporting long-term productivity and resilience of food systems by applying ecological and humanistic principles. Agroecology is a holistic systems approach to producing food, which incorporates social, economic, and political dimensions. Agroecological practices include landscape and farm diversification, intercropping, crop and pasture rotation, adding organic amendments, cover crops, and minimizing or avoiding synthetic inputs. Social dimensions of agroecology include co-creation of knowledge with farmers, participatory processes, nonwage labor relations, collective property and management of resources, and addressing social inequities. This paper reviews the recent evidence and potential for agroecology as a transformative approach, both as climate change adaptation and mitigation strategy as well as to meet key societal goals such as healthy ecosystems, food security, and nutrition

    Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target

    Get PDF
    More than 100 countries pledged to reduce agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the 2015 Paris Agreement of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Yet technical information about how much mitigation is needed in the sector vs. how much is feasible remains poor. We identify a preliminary global target for reducing emissions from agriculture of ~1 GtCO2e yr−1 by 2030 to limit warming in 2100 to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels. Yet plausible agricultural development pathways with mitigation cobenefits deliver only 21–40% of needed mitigation. The target indicates that more transformative technical and policy options will be needed, such as methane inhibitors and finance for new practices. A more comprehensive target for the 2 °C limit should be developed to include soil carbon and agriculture-related mitigation options. Excluding agricultural emissions from mitigation targets and plans will increase the cost of mitigation in other sectors or reduce the feasibility of meeting the 2 °C limit
    corecore