Effectiveness of community-based integrated care in frail COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generates a high burden on health care, and hospital admissions represent a substantial proportion of the overall costs of the disease. Integrated care (IC) has shown efficacy to reduce hospitalisations in COPD patients at a pilot level. Deployment strategies for IC services require assessment of effectiveness at the health care system level. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a community-based IC service in preventing hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits in stable frail COPD patients. Methods: From April to December 2005, 155 frail community-dwelling COPD patients were randomly allocated either to IC (n=76, age 73 (8) years, forced expiratory volume during the first second, FEV1 41(19) % predicted) or usual care (n=84, age 75(9) years, FEV1 44 (20) % predicted) and followed up for 12 months. The IC intervention consisted of the following: (a) patient’s empowerment for self-management; (b) an individualised care plan; (c) access to a call centre; and (d) coordination between the levels of care. Thereafter, hospital admissions, ED visits and mortality were monitored for 6 years. Results: IC enhanced self-management (P=0.02), reduced anxiety–depression (P=0.001) and improved health-related quality of life (P=0.02). IC reduced both ED visits (P=0.02) and mortality (P=0.03) but not hospital admission. No differences between the two groups were seen after 6 years. Conclusion: The intervention improved clinical outcomes including survival and decreased the ED visits, but it did not reduce hospital admissions. The study facilitated the identification of two key requirements for adoption of IC services in the community: appropriate risk stratification of patients, and preparation of the community-based work force

Effectiveness of community-based integrated care in frail COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generates a high burden on health care, and hospital admissions represent a substantial proportion of the overall costs of the disease. Integrated care (IC) has shown efficacy to reduce hospitalisations in COPD patients at a pilot level. Deployment strategies for IC services require assessment of effectiveness at the health care system level. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a community-based IC service in preventing hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits in stable frail COPD patients. Methods: From April to December 2005, 155 frail community-dwelling COPD patients were randomly allocated either to IC (n=76, age 73 (8) years, forced expiratory volume during the first second, FEV1 41(19) % predicted) or usual care (n=84, age 75(9) years, FEV1 44 (20) % predicted) and followed up for 12 months. The IC intervention consisted of the following: (a) patient's empowerment for self-management; (b) an individualised care plan; (c) access to a call centre; and (d) coordination between the levels of care. Thereafter, hospital admissions, ED visits and mortality were monitored for 6 years. Results: IC enhanced self-management (P=0.02), reduced anxiety-depression (P=0.001) and improved health-related quality of life (P=0.02). IC reduced both ED visits (P=0.02) and mortality (P=0.03) but not hospital admission. No differences between the two groups were seen after 6 years. Conclusion: The intervention improved clinical outcomes including survival and decreased the ED visits, but it did not reduce hospital admissions. The study facilitated the identification of two key requirements for adoption of IC services in the community: appropriate risk stratification of patients, and preparation of the community-based work force

Need and baseline for harmonising nursing education in respiratory care: preliminary results of a global survey

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic confirmed that respiratory nurses are critical healthcare providers. Limited knowledge is available about appropriate education to prepare nurses to deliver high-quality respiratory care. A survey was developed by the International Coalition for Respiratory Nursing (ICRN) group to identify the need for a respiratory nursing core curriculum. Method: A 39-item survey was distributed to 33 respiratory nursing experts in 27 countries. Questions asked about current roles, perception of need, expectations for a core curriculum project and respiratory content in nursing education in their countries. Results: 30 responses from 25 countries were analysed; participants predominantly worked in academia (53.3%, 16/30) and clinical practice (40%, 12/30). In total, 97% (29/30) confirmed a need for a core respiratory nursing curriculum. Post-registration nursing programmes at bachelor (83.3%, 25/30) and masters (63.3%, 19/30) levels include internal/medical nursing care; less than half identified separate respiratory nursing content. The core educational programme developed should include knowledge (70%, 21/30), skills (60%, 18/30), and competencies (50%, 15/30), with separate paediatric and adult content. Conclusion: Survey results confirm a wide variation in nursing education and respiratory nursing education across the world, with many countries lacking any formal educational programmes to prepare nurses capable of providing enhanced quality respiratory care. These findings support the need for a core respiratory curriculum. To advance this significant work the ICRN group plans to conduct a Delphi study to identify core curriculum requirements for respiratory nursing education at pre-registration and advanced educational levels to flexibly meet each country's specific educational requirements for recognition of respiratory nursing speciality practice

ARTICLE Effectiveness of community-based integrated care in frail COPD patients: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) generates a high burden on health care, and hospital admissions represent a substantial proportion of the overall costs of the disease. Integrated care (IC) has shown efficacy to reduce hospitalisations in COPD patients at a pilot level. Deployment strategies for IC services require assessment of effectiveness at the health care system level. AIMS: The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a community-based IC service in preventing hospitalisations and emergency department (ED) visits in stable frail COPD patients. METHODS: From April to December 2005, 155 frail community-dwelling COPD patients were randomly allocated either to IC (n = 76, age 73 (8) years, forced expiratory volume during the first second, FEV 1 41(19) % predicted) or usual care (n = 84, age 75(9) years, FEV 1 44 (20) % predicted) and followed up for 12 months. The IC intervention consisted of the following: (a) patient's empowerment for self-management; (b) an individualised care plan; (c) access to a call centre; and (d) coordination between the levels of care. Thereafter, hospital admissions, ED visits and mortality were monitored for 6 years. RESULTS: IC enhanced self-management (P = 0.02), reduced anxiety-depression (P = 0.001) and improved health-related quality of life (P = 0.02). IC reduced both ED visits (P = 0.02) and mortality (P = 0.03) but not hospital admission. No differences between the two groups were seen after 6 years. CONCLUSION: The intervention improved clinical outcomes including survival and decreased the ED visits, but it did not reduce hospital admissions. The study facilitated the identification of two key requirements for adoption of IC services in the community: appropriate risk stratification of patients, and preparation of the community-based work force

Need and baseline for harmonising nursing education in respiratory care: preliminary results of a global survey

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic confirmed that respiratory nurses are critical healthcare providers. Limited knowledge is available about appropriate education to prepare nurses to deliver high-quality respiratory care. A survey was developed by the International Coalition for Respiratory Nursing (ICRN) group to identify the need for a respiratory nursing core curriculum.Method: A 39-item survey was distributed to 33 respiratory nursing experts in 27 countries. Questions asked about current roles, perception of need, expectations for a core curriculum project and respiratory content in nursing education in their countries.Results: 30 responses from 25 countries were analysed; participants predominantly worked in academia (53.3%, 16/30) and clinical practice (40%, 12/30). In total, 97% (29/30) confirmed a need for a core respiratory nursing curriculum. Post-registration nursing programmes at bachelor (83.3%, 25/30) and masters (63.3%, 19/30) levels include internal/medical nursing care; less than half identified separate respiratory nursing content. The core educational programme developed should include knowledge (70%, 21/30), skills (60%, 18/30), and competencies (50%, 15/30), with separate paediatric and adult content.Conclusion: Survey results confirm a wide variation in nursing education and respiratory nursing education across the world, with many countries lacking any formal educational programmes to prepare nurses capable of providing enhanced quality respiratory care. These findings support the need for a core respiratory curriculum. To advance this significant work the ICRN group plans to conduct a Delphi study to identify core curriculum requirements for respiratory nursing education at pre-registration and advanced educational levels to flexibly meet each country's specific educational requirements for recognition of respiratory nursing speciality practice

Need and baseline for harmonising nursing education in respiratory care: preliminary results of a global survey

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic confirmed that respiratory nurses are critical healthcare providers. Limited knowledge is available about appropriate education to prepare nurses to deliver high-quality respiratory care. A survey was developed by the International Coalition for Respiratory Nursing (ICRN) group to identify the need for a respiratory nursing core curriculum.Method: A 39-item survey was distributed to 33 respiratory nursing experts in 27 countries. Questions asked about current roles, perception of need, expectations for a core curriculum project and respiratory content in nursing education in their countries.Results: 30 responses from 25 countries were analysed; participants predominantly worked in academia (53.3%, 16/30) and clinical practice (40%, 12/30). In total, 97% (29/30) confirmed a need for a core respiratory nursing curriculum. Post-registration nursing programmes at bachelor (83.3%, 25/30) and masters (63.3%, 19/30) levels include internal/medical nursing care; less than half identified separate respiratory nursing content. The core educational programme developed should include knowledge (70%, 21/30), skills (60%, 18/30), and competencies (50%, 15/30), with separate paediatric and adult content.Conclusion: Survey results confirm a wide variation in nursing education and respiratory nursing education across the world, with many countries lacking any formal educational programmes to prepare nurses capable of providing enhanced quality respiratory care. These findings support the need for a core respiratory curriculum. To advance this significant work the ICRN group plans to conduct a Delphi study to identify core curriculum requirements for respiratory nursing education at pre-registration and advanced educational levels to flexibly meet each country's specific educational requirements for recognition of respiratory nursing speciality practice

The relationship of physiological status, coping, and hardiness to patient outcomes in chronic illness

Nurses caring for the chronically ill are confronted with the enigma of disparate outcomes among patients having the same clinical diagnosis and similar physiological status. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships of physiological status, coping, and hardiness to patient outcomes in chronic illness. Hardiness and coping strategies were viewed as mediating variables between physiological status and patient outcomes. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was the prototypic chronic illness under study because of its insidious onset, slow progression, advanced stage symptoms, and associated high mortality. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) model for stress research, consistent with Lazarus\u27 theory of stress and coping, provided a framework for the study. The physiological status of 104 adults (85 men, 19 women) with COPD was measured using standardized Pulmonary Function Testing (PFT). Subjects completed the Health Related Hardiness Scale (HRHS), the Ways of Coping (WCQ) Questionnaire with three additional open-ended questions, a Pulmonary Impact Profile Scale (PIPS), and a 12-minute measured walk (12MD). After psychometric evaluation of the PIPS, data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Pearson Correlation coefficients. Predictor variables for patient outcomes were examined using Multiple Regression Analysis. Coping strategies did not relate to outcomes (12MD: F =.509, p =.603; PIPS: F =.019, p =.982). Patients with COPD incorporated both problem-focused and emotion-focused strategies. Open-end responses identified coping in terms of problem solving and positive reappraisal strategies; the problems most frequently identified were adjustment to limitations and shortness of breath . Commitment (r =.18) and challenge (r =.21) components of hardiness had significant correlations (p $\u3c$.05) with 12MD, whereas control did not. High hardy individuals used Planful Problem Solving strategies significantly more often (F = 7.772, p =.006) than low hardy subjects. Physiological status and hardiness explained a greater amount of variance in distance walked (R\sp2 =.187, p $\u3c$.0001) than in the PIPS score (R\sp2 =.090, p =.008). Coping strategies did not contribute significantly to either PIPS or 12MD outcomes. Face validity of the PIPS was supported by qualitative data depicting perceived problem areas of dyspnea, activity limitations, and emotional adjustment