8 research outputs found
Effect of cannabidiol oil on post-ureteroscopy pain for urinary calculi: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Recommended from our members
The effect of travel distance on health-related quality of life for patients with nephrolithiasis
IntroductionUrolithiasis causes a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients with kidney stones have high levels of stress and anxiety. Symptom resolution often requires treatment. Travel distance is a barrier to care but little is known about its effects on HRQOL. We hypothesize that increased distance to treatment site is associated with decreased HRQOL.MethodsPatients with a history of stones were enrolled at 11 tertiary centers as part of the QOL Stone Consortium of North America. HRQOL data were obtained using the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire (WISQOL). We calculated distance between patient and treatment site using national ZIP codes. We used linear models to evaluate the effect of distance on HRQOL, while also considering demographics data, stones/symptom status, and distance.ResultsOf the 1676 enrolled patients, 52% were male, 86% non-Latino White, and the mean age was 53 years. Mean distance to treatment site was 63.3 km (range 0-3774), with 74% reporting current stones and 45% current symptoms. WISQOL score and distance were negatively correlated for patients reporting current stones and symptoms (p=0.0010). Linear modelling revealed decreased WISQOL scores for patients with symptoms as distance increased from treatment site (p=0.0001), with a 4.7-point decrease for every 100 km traveled.ConclusionsStone disease imposes significant burden on patients' HRQOL due to a variety of factors. Patients with active stone symptoms report worse HRQOL with increased distance to their treatment site. Possible etiologies include travel burden, increased disease burden, decreased healthcare use, and delays in care
Recommended from our members
Grndad and Disease Modifying Therapy (DMT): Shifts in Dmt Are Seen at the Adolescent/Young Adult Transition in Sickle Cell Disease in a Multi-Site Prospective Registry
The ability to characterize the modern person living with SCD in the US has been limited by the lack of a well-curated longitudinal registry. The Globin Research Network for Data and Discovery ( GRNDaD) registry aims to overcome this challenge by collecting data from the now 53 IRB-approved centers across the US in collaboration with the National Alliance of Sickle Cell Centers (NASCC) and the HRSA-funded Sickle Cell Disease Treatment Demonstration Project Grant. Here, we describe the use of disease-modifying therapy in (actively consented) adults and children with Hgb SS/ SB 0 thalassemia (SCA) from 37 sites. Methods: Each site consents subjects and enters extensive baseline data including SCD complications and labs, subjects also complete patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-both at baseline and annually. Each subject is expected to have an annual follow-up where data is extracted from the Electronic Health Record (EHR). All data is stored in REDCap and, for this abstract, data were extracted into R on all active subjects (data entry in the last two years) who have complete minimum data collected. Median values were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in this study comprises hydroxyurea (HU), chronic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, crizanlizumab, L-glutamine, and voxelotor. Results: There are 2501 active patients in GRNDaD. Twenty-six percent of subjects are pediatric </= 18 years of age, 55.5% are female and 66.7% have HgbSS or HgbSB 0 thalassemia (SCA). Here, we report data on people with SCA only, whose minimum data were complete (n=1272). Table 1 shows DMT by age. 187 (21%) adults and 31 (8.5%) children were not on DMT. Figure 2 is a box plot of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) comparing adults and children who are and are not taking HU. Adults on HU had significantly lower ANCs than those not on HU (median = 4.4 (IQR: 3.07, 6.3) v 6.6 (IQR:4.07, 8.14), p<0.001) (Figure). Similar findings were observed for children ( median = 3.5 (IQR:2.5, 5.7) Vs 8.1 (5.8, 12.8) , p =0.04) Both children and adults on HU had higher MCVs than those not on HU (median for peds: 91.5 (IQR: 85.1, 98.75) v 86 (IQR: 83.3, 86.1), p=0.05, median for adults: 96.5 (IQR: 89, 107) v 90 (IQR: 86.1, 95.1), p<0.001). We compared hemoglobin for those on and off HU, and on and off voxelotor, excluding patients on chronic transfusion therapy. There was a statistically significant difference in hemoglobin when comparing on or off of HU (median 8.9 g/dl (IQR 7.95, 9.9) v 8.2 g/dl (IQR: 7.2, 9.7, p =0.047)). There were no statistically significant differences in hemoglobin when comparing subjects on or off of voxelotor (median = 8.4 g/dl (IQR: 7.5, 9.6) vs 7.9 (IQR: 7.4, 9.8), p =0.57). In the adults, there were statistically significantly more males than females on HU, but there were no differences seen in the pediatric cohort. Examining DMT by age group, chronic RBC transfusion use doubled from the 11-17 age group to the 18-29-year age group (12% to 25%) and HU use decreased (83%-59%) over this same period. Limitations: This cohort may over-represent those on DMT as those enrolled in GRNDaD were more likely to have clinic visits. Discussion: GRNDaD has doubled the number of sites consenting subjects and entering data over the last year. The number is expected to increase again in the next 12 months, as an additional 15 sites are already IRB-approved with a goal to include all SCD centers in NASCC. This cross-sectional description of the current population of people living with SCD and treated in NASCC-recognized SCD centers in the US shows that the majority of those with SCA are receiving DMT. There is a noticeable decrease in HU use during the transition period with an increase in the use of chronic transfusion therapy. Newer DMT has had limited uptake in this cohort. The next steps will be to provide longitudinal data on this population and examine associations of DMT and important clinical outcomes including PROs
Recent advancements in mechanistic studies and structure activity relationship of FoF1 ATP synthase inhibitor as antimicrobial agent
Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease
BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline
Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease
BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used