26 research outputs found
Aging and Wisdom: Culture Matters
People from different cultures vary in the ways they approach social conflicts, with Japanese being more motivated to maintain interpersonal harmony and avoid conflicts than Americans are. Such cultural differences have developmental consequences for reasoning about social conflict. In the study reported here, we interviewed random samples of Americans from the Midwest United States and Japanese from the larger Tokyo area about their reactions to stories of intergroup and interpersonal conflicts. Responses showed that wisdom (e.g., recognition of multiple perspectives, the limits of personal knowledge, and the importance of compromise) increased with increasing age among Americans, but older age was not associated with wiser responses among Japanese. Younger and middle-aged Japanese showed greater use of wise-reasoning strategies than younger and middle-aged Americans did. This cultural difference was weaker for older participantsâ reactions to interpersonal conflicts and was actually reversed for intergroup conflicts. This research has important implications for the study of aging, cultural psychology, and wisdom.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline
Family Matters:Rethinking the Psychology of Human Social Motivation
What motives do people prioritize in their social lives? Historically, social psychologists, especially those adopting an evolutionary perspective, have devoted a great deal of research attention to sexual attraction and romantic-partner choice (mate seeking). Research on long-term familial bonds (mate retention and kin care) has been less thoroughly connected to relevant comparative and evolutionary work on other species, and in the case of kin care, these bonds have been less well researched. Examining varied sources of data from 27 societies around the world, we found that people generally view familial motives as primary in importance and mate-seeking motives as relatively low in importance. Compared with other groups, college students, single people, and men place relatively higher emphasis on mate seeking, but even those samples rated kin-care motives as more important. Furthermore, motives linked to long-term familial bonds are positively associated with psychological well-being, but mate-seeking motives are associated with anxiety and depression. We address theoretical and empirical reasons why there has been extensive research on mate seeking and why people prioritize goals related to long-term familial bonds over mating goals. Reallocating relatively greater research effort toward long-term familial relationships would likely yield many interesting new findings relevant to everyday peopleâs highest social priorities
Recommended from our members
Proximal and distal honor fit and subjective well-being in the mediterranean region
Introduction
People's psychological tendencies are attuned to their sociocultural context and culture-specific ways of being, feeling, and thinking are believed to assist individuals in successfully navigating their environment. Supporting this idea, stronger âfitâ with one's cultural environment has often been linked to positive psychological outcomes. The current research expands the cultural, conceptual, and methodological space of cultural fit research by exploring the link between well-being and honor, a central driver of social behavior in the Mediterranean region.
Method
Drawing on a multi-national sample from eight countries circum-Mediterranean (N =â2,257), we examined the relationship between cultural fit in honor and well-being at the distal level (fit with one's perceived society) using response surface analysis (RSA) and at the proximal level (fit with one's university gender group) using profile analysis.
Results
We found positive links between fit and well-being in both distal (for some, but not all, honor facets) and proximal fit analyses (across all honor facets). Furthermore, most fit effects in the RSA were complemented with positive level effects of the predictors, with higher average honor levels predicting higher well-being.
Conclusion
Our findings highlight the interplay between individual and environmental factors in honor as well as the important role honor plays in well-being in the Mediterranean region
Rhizobium Promotes Non-Legumes Growth and Quality in Several Production Steps: Towards a Biofertilization of Edible Raw Vegetables Healthy for Humans
The biofertilization of crops with plant-growth-promoting microorganisms is currently considered as a healthy alternative to chemical fertilization. However, only microorganisms safe for humans can be used as biofertilizers, particularly in vegetables that are raw consumed, in order to avoid sanitary problems derived from the presence of pathogenic bacteria in the final products. In the present work we showed that Rhizobium strains colonize the roots of tomato and pepper plants promoting their growth in different production stages increasing yield and quality of seedlings and fruits. Our results confirmed those obtained in cereals and alimentary oil producing plants extending the number of non-legumes susceptible to be biofertilized with rhizobia to those whose fruits are raw consumed. This is a relevant conclusion since safety of rhizobia for human health has been demonstrated after several decades of legume inoculation ensuring that they are optimal bacteria for biofertilization
Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves
How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motivesâself-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin careâare high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which datawere gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; Mage = 24.43, SD = 7.91). Wave 2 was collected from April through
November 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic (29 countries, N = 6,917; 2,249 male, 4,218 female; Mage = 28.59, SD = 11.31). These data can be used to assess differences and similarities in peopleâs fundamental social motives both across and within cultures, at different time points, and in relation to other commonly studied cultural indicators and outcomes
The misasandry myth: An inaccurate stereotype about feminists' attitudes toward men
In six studies, we examined the accuracy and underpinnings of the damaging stereotype that feminists harbor negative attitudes toward men. In Study 1 (nâ=â1,664), feminist and nonfeminist women displayed similarly positive attitudes toward men. Study 2 (nâ=â3,892) replicated these results in non-WEIRD countries and among male participants. Study 3 (nâ=â198) extended them to implicit attitudes. Investigating the mechanisms underlying feministsâ actual and perceived attitudes, Studies 4 (nâ=â2,092) and 5 (nationally representative UK sample, nâ=â1,953) showed that feminists (vs. nonfeminists) perceived men as more threatening, but also more similar, to women. Participants also underestimated feministsâ warmth toward men, an error associated with hostile sexism and a misperception that feminists see men and women as dissimilar. Random-effects meta-analyses of all data (Study 6, nâ=â9,799) showed that feministsâ attitudes toward men were positive in absolute terms and did not differ significantly from nonfeminists'. An important comparative benchmark was established in Study 6, which showed that feminist women's attitudes toward men were no more negative than men's attitudes toward men. We term the focal stereotype the misandry myth in light of the evidence that it is false and widespread, and discuss its implications for the movement
What motivates behaviors? Cultural differences in na
There are at least two critical tasks in our social life. First, since we only have a limited amount of resources, we need to make a choice and invest our resources to the chosen activities at the expense of other alternatives. Second, it is really important to properly understand othersâ behaviors because our interaction with other individuals constitutes a significant portion of our life. Although seemingly different, I propose that both tasks are related to our general beliefs about action, more specifically beliefs about what motivates behaviors. Furthermore, these beliefs systematically vary across cultures. In independent cultures (e.g., the U.S.), the self is primarily defined by internal attributes such as personality traits and it is these internal attributes that are believed to motivate behaviors. In contrast, in interdependent cultures (e.g., Japan & Korea), the self is primarily defined by social relations with important others and oneâs behaviors are believed to be constrained by these social relations. Therefore, I predict that there would be corresponding cultural differences in the way we make a choice and the way we
interpret othersâ behaviors. To test the prediction, four studies were conducted. Studies 1 & 2 examined whether psychological consequences of choice depend on the way the choice is made. I predict that a choice would be psychologically significant when it is made in a way that is compatible with cultural models of action either as internally motivated in independent cultures or as socially constrained in interdependent cultures. Studies 3 & 4 investigated cultural variations in the degree to which individuals make reference to internal attributes in explaining othersâ behaviors. I predicted and found that trait inference is in line with the independent model of action that oneâs behavior is internally motivated and, thus, it would become automatic and spontaneous in independent cultures but not in interdependent cultures.Ph.D.PsychologyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86407/1/jinna_1.pd