Cognitive function in a randomized trial of evolocumab

Inga Stuķēna as well as a complete list of investigators is provided in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1701131/suppl_file/nejmoa1701131_appendix.pdf Funding Information: (Funded by Amgen; EBBINGHAUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02207634.) Supported by Amgen. We thank Sarah T. Farias, Ph.D., at UC Davis Health for providing the English-language and translated versions of the Everyday Cognition (ECog) tool. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society.BACKGROUND: Findings from clinical trials of proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have led to concern that these drugs or the low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol that result from their use are associated with cognitive deficits. METHODS: In a subgroup of patients from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab added to statin therapy, we prospectively assessed cognitive function using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. The primary end point was the score on the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function (scores range from 4 to 28, with lower scores indicating a more efficient use of strategy and planning). Secondary end points were the scores for working memory (scores range from 0 to 279, with lower scores indicating fewer errors), episodic memory (scores range from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating fewer errors), and psychomotor speed (scores range from 100 to 5100 msec, with faster times representing better performance). Assessments of cognitive function were performed at baseline, week 24, yearly, and at the end of the trial. The primary analysis was a noninferiority comparison of the mean change from baseline in the score on the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function between the patients who received evolocumab and those who received placebo; the noninferiority margin was set at 20% of the standard deviation of the score in the placebo group. RESULTS: A total of 1204 patients were followed for a median of 19 months; the mean (±SD) change from baseline over time in the raw score for the spatial working memory strategy index of executive function (primary end point) was −0.21±2.62 in the evolocumab group and −0.29±2.81 in the placebo group (P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.85 for superiority). There were no significant between-group differences in the secondary end points of scores for working memory (change in raw score, −0.52 in the evolocumab group and −0.93 in the placebo group), episodic memory (change in raw score, −1.53 and −1.53, respectively), or psychomotor speed (change in raw score, 5.2 msec and 0.9 msec, respectively). In an exploratory analysis, there were no associations between LDL cholesterol levels and cognitive changes. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial involving patients who received either evolocumab or placebo in addition to statin therapy, no significant between-group difference in cognitive function was observed over a median of 19 months.publishersversionPeer reviewe

Essential versus accessory aspects of cell death: recommendations of the NCCD 2015

Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death’ (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death’ (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death

Traditional and new composite endpoints in heart failure clinical trials: facilitating comprehensive efficacy assessments and improving trial efficiency

Composite endpoints are commonly used as the primary measure of efficacy in heart failure clinical trials to assess the overall treatment effect and to increase the efficiency of trials. Clinical trials still must enrol large numbers of patients to accrue a sufficient number of outcome events and have adequate power to draw conclusions about the efficacy and safety of new treatments for heart failure. Additionally, the societal and health system perspectives on heart failure have raised interest in ascertaining the effects of therapy on outcomes such as repeat hospitalization and the patient's burden of disease. Thus, novel methods for using composite endpoints in clinical trials (e.g. clinical status composite endpoints, recurrent event analyses) are being applied in current and planned trials. Endpoints that measure functional status or reflect the patient experience are important but used cautiously because heart failure treatments may improve function yet have adverse effects on mortality. This paper discusses the use of traditional and new composite endpoints, identifies qualities of robust composites, and outlines opportunities for future research

Apaf-1 deficiency and neural tube closure defects are found in fog mice

The forebrain overgrowth mutation (fog) was originally described as a spontaneous autosomal recessive mutation mapping to mouse chromosome 10 that produces forebrain defects, facial defects, and spina bifida. Although the fog mutant has been characterized and available to investigators for several years, the underlying mutation causing the pathology has not been known. Because of its phenotypic resemblance to apoptotic protease activating factor-1 (Apaf-1) knockout mice, we have investigated the possibility that the fog mutation is in the Apaf-1 gene. Allelic complementation, Western blot analysis, and caspase activation assays indicate that fog mutant mice lack Apaf-1 activity. Northern blot and reverse transcription-PCR analysis show that Apaf-1 mRNA is aberrantly processed, resulting in greatly reduced expression levels of normal Apaf-1 mRNA. These findings are strongly suggestive of the fog mutation being a hypomorphic Apaf-1 defect and implicate neural progenitor cell death in the pathogenesis of spina bifida—a common human congenital malformation. Because a complete deficiency in Apaf-1 usually results in perinatal lethality and fog/fog mice more readily survive into adulthood, these mutants serve as a valuable model with which apoptotic cell death can be studied in vivo

Inflammatory and cholesterol risk in the FOURIER trial (further cardiovascular outcomes research with PCSK9 inhibition in patients with elevated risk)

BACKGROUND : In the FOURIER trial (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients With Elevated Risk), the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor evolocumab reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular risk. It is not known whether the efficacy of evolocumab is modified by baseline inflammatory risk. We explored the efficacy of evolocumab stratified by baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). We also assessed the importance of inflammatory and residual cholesterol risk across the range of on-treatment LDL-C concentrations. METHODS : Patients (n=27564) with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL on a statin were randomly assigned to evolocumab versus placebo and followed for a median of 2.2 years (1.8-2.5). The effects of evolocumab on the primary end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina or coronary revascularization, and the key secondary end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke were compared across strata of baseline hsCRP (3 mg/dL). Outcomes were also assessed across values for baseline hsCRP and 1-month LDL-C in the entire trial population. Multivariable models adjusted for variables associated with hsCRP and 1-month LDL-C were evaluated. RESULTS : A total of 7981 (29%) patients had a baseline hsCRP3 mg/L. Median (interquartile range) baseline hsCRP was 1.8 (0.9-3.6) mg/L and levels were not altered by evolocumab (change at 48 weeks of -0.2 mg/dL [-1.0 to 0.4] in both treatment arms). In the placebo arm, patients in higher baseline hsCRP categories experienced significantly higher 3-year Kaplan-Meier rates of the primary and key secondary end points: 12.0%, 13.7%, and 18.1% for the primary end point (Ptrend3 mg/dL, respectively. The relative risk reductions for the primary end point and key secondary end point with evolocumab were consistent across hsCRP strata (P-interactions>0.15 for both). In contrast, the absolute risk reductions with evolocumab tended to be greater in patients with higher hsCRP: 1.6%, 1.8%, and 2.6% and 0.8%, 2.0%, and 3.0%, respectively, for the primary and key secondary end points across hsCRP strata. In adjusted analyses of the association between LDL-C and hsCRP levels and cardiovascular risk, both LDL-C and hsCRP were independently associated with the primary outcome (P<0.0001 for each). CONCLUSIONS : LDL-C reduction with evolocumab reduces cardiovascular events across hsCRP strata with greater absolute risk reductions in patients with higher-baseline hsCRP. Event rates were lowest in patients with the lowest hsCRP and LDL-C. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION : URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01764633

Clinical benefit of evolocumab by severity and extent of coronary Aartery disease: an analysis from FOURIER

Background -The FOURIER trial recently showed that the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab significantly reduced major vascular events in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including patients with prior MI. Within the broad group of patients with prior MI, we hypothesized that readily ascertainable features would identify subsets that derive greater clinical risk reduction with evolocumab. Methods -The 22,351 patients with a prior MI were characterized based on time from most recent MI, number of prior MIs, and presence of residual multivessel coronary artery disease (≥40% stenosis in ≥2 large vessels). The relative and absolute risk reductions in major vascular events including the primary endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary endpoint (CV death, MI or stroke) with evolocumab in these subgroups were compared. Results -A total of 8402 patients (38%) were within 2 years of their most recent MI, 5285 patients (24%) had ≥2 prior MIs, and 5618 patients (25%) had residual multivessel CAD. In a multivariable adjusted model that simultaneously included all three high-risk features as well as other baseline covariates, more recent MI, multiple prior MIs, and residual multivessel coronary disease remained independent predictors of cardiovascular outcomes, with adjusted HRs for the primary endpoint of 1.37 (1.22-1.53), 1.78 (1.59-1.99) and 1.39 (1.24-1.56), all P<0.001. The relative risk reductions with evolocumab for the primary endpoint tended to be greater in the high-risk subgroups and were 20% (HR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), 18% (HR 0.82, 0.72-0.93), and 21% (HR 0.79, 0.69-0.91) for those with more recent MI, multiple prior MIs, and residual multivessel CAD, whereas they were 5% (HR 0.95, 0.85-1.05), 8% (HR 0.92, 0.84-1.02), and 7% (HR 0.93, 0.85-1.02) in those without, respectively. Given the higher baseline risk, the respective absolute risk reductions at 3 years exceeded 3% in the high-risk groups (3.4%, 3.7%, and 3.6%) vs. approximately 1% in the low-risk groups (0.8%, 1.3%, and 1.2%). Conclusions -Patients closer to their most recent MI, with multiple prior MIs or with residual multivessel CAD are at high risk for major vascular events and experience substantial risk reductions with LDL-C lowering with evolocumab. Clinical Trial Registration -URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01764633

Clinical Benefit of Evolocumab by Severity and Extent of Coronary Artery Disease: An Analysis from FOURIER.

Background -The FOURIER trial recently showed that the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab significantly reduced major vascular events in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, including patients with prior MI. Within the broad group of patients with prior MI, we hypothesized that readily ascertainable features would identify subsets that derive greater clinical risk reduction with evolocumab. Methods -The 22,351 patients with a prior MI were characterized based on time from most recent MI, number of prior MIs, and presence of residual multivessel coronary artery disease (≥40% stenosis in ≥2 large vessels). The relative and absolute risk reductions in major vascular events including the primary endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary endpoint (CV death, MI or stroke) with evolocumab in these subgroups were compared. Results -A total of 8402 patients (38%) were within 2 years of their most recent MI, 5285 patients (24%) had ≥2 prior MIs, and 5618 patients (25%) had residual multivessel CAD. In a multivariable adjusted model that simultaneously included all three high-risk features as well as other baseline covariates, more recent MI, multiple prior MIs, and residual multivessel coronary disease remained independent predictors of cardiovascular outcomes, with adjusted HRs for the primary endpoint of 1.37 (1.22-1.53), 1.78 (1.59-1.99) and 1.39 (1.24-1.56), all P<0.001. The relative risk reductions with evolocumab for the primary endpoint tended to be greater in the high-risk subgroups and were 20% (HR 0.80, 0.71-0.91), 18% (HR 0.82, 0.72-0.93), and 21% (HR 0.79, 0.69-0.91) for those with more recent MI, multiple prior MIs, and residual multivessel CAD, whereas they were 5% (HR 0.95, 0.85-1.05), 8% (HR 0.92, 0.84-1.02), and 7% (HR 0.93, 0.85-1.02) in those without, respectively. Given the higher baseline risk, the respective absolute risk reductions at 3 years exceeded 3% in the high-risk groups (3.4%, 3.7%, and 3.6%) vs. approximately 1% in the low-risk groups (0.8%, 1.3%, and 1.2%). Conclusions -Patients closer to their most recent MI, with multiple prior MIs or with residual multivessel CAD are at high risk for major vascular events and experience substantial risk reductions with LDL-C lowering with evolocumab