Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction with treatment as usual in reducing psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and their partners: the MILON study

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and characterized by a poor prognosis. It has a major impact on the psychological wellbeing of patients and their partners. Recently, it has been shown that Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is effective in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in cancer patients. The generalization of these results is limited since most participants were female patients with breast cancer. Moreover, only one study examined the effectiveness of MBSR in partners of cancer patients. Therefore, in the present trial we study the effectiveness of MBSR versus treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with lung cancer and their partners. METHODS/DESIGN: A parallel group, randomized controlled trial is conducted to compare MBSR with TAU. Lung cancer patients who have received or are still under treatment, and their partners are recruited. Assessments will take place at baseline, post intervention and at three-month follow-up. The primary outcome is psychological distress (i.e. anxiety and depressive symptoms). Secondary outcomes are quality of life (only for patients), caregiver appraisal (only for partners), relationship quality and spirituality. In addition, cost-effectiveness ratio (only in patients) and several process variables are assessed. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide information about the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MBSR compared to TAU in patients with lung cancer and their partners. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01494883

Perspectives of bereaved partners of lung cancer patients on the role of mindfulness in dying and grieving:A qualitative study

Background: Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has been shown to reduce psychological distress in cancer patients but not their partners. Whether MBSR can support patients and partners in coping with the dying and grieving process is less well examined. Aim: We aimed to gain more insight in the role of mindfulness in the dying and grieving process from the perspective of the partner after the patient’s death. Design: As part of a pilot study or subsequent randomized controlled trial, partners had participated together with the patient in MBSR. After the patient’s death partners were invited for qualitative in-depth interviews. Data from the interviews was analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Setting/participants: Interviews were conducted with 11 partners in their homes, on average 11 months after the patient’s death (SD = 7.8). Results: Mindfulness helped couples to allow and regulate difficult thoughts and feelings, which in turn helped them to accept the patient’s impending death. It also facilitated them to enjoy things together and communicate more openly. For a few couples, however, participation was physically too burdensome or emotionally too confrontational. During the partners’ grieving process, mindfulness helped allowing difficult thoughts and feelings, and taking the time to grieve, which helped them to take good care of themselves, giving them faith in the future. Conclusion: The present study showed that MBSR can facilitate lung cancer patients and their partners in accepting the forthcoming death and openly communicating about this, which can support a peaceful death and healthy grieving process.</p

The Clinical Value of Lymphatic Micrometastases in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Contains fulltext : 88963tjan-heijnen.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)INTRODUCTION: In early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), presence of lymphatic micrometastases and isolated tumor cells, primarily detected by immunohistochemistry, is suggested to be a prognostic factor. However, there is no consensus whether immunohistochemistry should be used routinely in lymph node assessment.The goal of our study was to determine whether recurrent disease is associated with the presence of lymphatic micrometastases and/or isolated tumor cells, at the time of the lung resection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prevalence of lymphatic micrometastases and/or isolated tumor cells in two groups of patients, who underwent a curative resection for early stage NSCLC. Group I had a follow-up of 5 years without recurrent disease. Group II consisted of a matched group of patients with recurrent disease. Patients were originally classified as having negative mediastinal lymph nodes.All lymph nodes obtained by mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy were re-examined by serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Micrometastases and/or isolated tumor cells were found in one of 16 patients in group I, which was significantly different from six of 16 patients in group II. (Fisher exact test, 4.6; p, 0.04; risk ratio, 2.4).Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry did not change N-stage for the single patient in group I, in contrast to all six patients in group II. CONCLUSION: Presence of lymphatic micrometastases and/or isolated tumor cells is associated with distant recurrence in patients with early stage NSCLC. We recommend the routine use of serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry in lymph node assessment to improve the accuracy of staging.1 augustus 201

Modest improvements of survival for patients with small cell lung cancer aged 45 to 59 years only, diagnosed in the Netherlands, 1989 to 2008.

Item does not contain fulltextINTRODUCTION: Lung cancer was a major epidemic in the last decades; 10 to 15% of lung cancer consists of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Several changes in the diagnostic and treatment procedures took place during the last 20 years. This article focuses on trends in incidence, treatment, and survival of SCLC observed since the 1990 s. METHODS: All cases with SCLC diagnosed in 1989 to 2009 in the Netherlands were included (n = 34,100). Follow-up was complete until January 1, 2010. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with extensive disease increased from 47 to 63%. The proportion of patients with limited disease receiving chemoradiation increased from 22% in 1989 to 2003 to 72% in 2004 to 2009 among those younger than 45 to 59 years, from 15 to 58% among those aged 60 to 74 years, and from 7 to 27% among those 75 years or older. Among patients with extensive disease, the proportion receiving chemotherapy remained stable over time (84, 75, and almost 50% for the above mentioned age groups, respectively). Significant improvements in 1-year relative survival occurred for patients aged 45 to 59 years, but not for the other age groups. Relative survival has significantly increased for both stage groups. CONCLUSION: Improved staging resulted in improved survival for both stage groups, whereas survival of the total group has only significantly improved for patients aged 45 to 59 years. The latter is possibly related with improved treatment strategies. As survival is still very poor, prevention of lung cancer remains important.1 januari 201

Progress in Standard of Care Therapy and Modest Survival Benefits in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in the Netherlands in the Last 20 Years

Introduction: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. We analyzed changes in treatment and their potential effect on survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the Netherlands.\ud \ud Methods: All NSCLC patients diagnosed during 1989–2009 (n=147,760) were selected from the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Differences in treatment over time were tested by the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The effects of sex, age, histology, and treatment on relative survival were estimated in multivariable models. Follow-up was completed until January 1, 2010.\ud \ud Results: Between 1989 and 2009, the proportion of younger patients (younger than 75 years) with stage I undergoing surgery increased from 84 to 89% and among elderly (75 years or elder) from 35 to 49%; for stage II, this proportion decreased from 80 to 70% and remained about 25% in respectively younger and older patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II increased to from 0 to 24% in younger patients but remained less than 5% among the elderly. Chemoradiation increased from 8 to 43% among younger patients with stage III and from 1 to 13% among elderly. In stage IV, chemotherapy in younger patients increased from 10 to 54% and in elderly from 5 to 21%. Five-year relative survival of the total group increased from 14.8 to 17% (especially among females, younger patients, and within each stage), which could be partly explained by changes in treatment and better staging.\ud \ud Conclusions: Over a 20-year period, application of therapy, which is currently considered as standard, has improved. This resulted in small improvements in survival within all stages

Safety and efficacy of sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by weekly paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Improving survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will require new strategies or new drugs. Sequential administration of conventional non-cross-resistant cytotoxic drugs offers an opportunity to increase drug diversity while maintaining dose intensity. This Phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and feasibility of such a regimen in advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV received as first-line treatment four cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5) (day 1) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. Thereafter, treatment continued with 12 weekly cycles of paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). RESULTS: In total, 46 patients were included. Median age was 59.6 years (range 41.3-74.3 years) and 93.5 % (n = 43) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. All but 6 had stage IV disease, and 13 (28.3 %) had squamous cell carcinomas. Thirty-six (78 %) patients completed 4 cycles of carboplatin-gemcitabine and 35 patients received at least 1 cycle of paclitaxel, of whom 16 (46 % of total) patients completed 12 cycles of paclitaxel. The overall objective response rate was 49 %. Sixteen (37 %) patients had a response to carboplatin-gemcitabine, increasing to 21 (49 %) patients after administration of paclitaxel. Of the 13 assessable patients who showed a partial response (PR) on carboplatin-gemcitabine, 12 (92 %) patients showed also a PR on paclitaxel. Of 19 assessable patients with stable disease (SD) on carboplatin-gemcitabine, 4 (21 %) had a PR and 13 (68 %) SD on paclitaxel. Toxicity was moderate: 24 % stopped because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy with carboplatin-gemcitabine and weekly paclitaxel is active and feasible in advanced NSCLC patients