A Review of Pollutant Concentrations in Urban Stormwater Across Eastern Australia, After 20 Years

Concerns about pollutants in urban stormwater were initially raised in the early 1970s. Australian investigations decades later, also found urban stormwater runoff contained elevated levels of sediment and nutrients, as well as heavy metals, that brought stormwater management to the forefront for regulators. Planning policies were implemented to integrate stormwater management into development in the form of water sensitive urban design (WSUD), also known internationally as low-impact design (LID) and Sustainable Urban Design solutions (SUDs). Since their introduction, comprehensive broad scale field research to verify their success in achieving load reduction targets (LRTs), has been limited. Paucity of field data on the performance of WSUD has prompted organisations to initiate their own locally-specific studies. Limited regulatory guidance on design of monitoring programs has resulted in various methodologies and meta-data recording. This research review collates urban stormwater data from 77 Australian studies, from geographic regions of east coast Australia. The raw dataset in this review included 2,836 events and 4,536 individual results, collected between 1993 and 2021 from local councils, research organisations and water authorities. The review examined total suspended solids (TSS), total phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations, prior to any form of treatment measures as they are the focus of current guidelines and standards for stormwater management. Seminal research, used to inform stormwater guidelines and water quality modelling across Australia, is significantly different (p < 0.001), in this case approximately double the reviewed concentrations. International data is also >20% higher, on average. Geographic location of catchments had the greatest influence on pollutant concentrations, after accounting for the effects of land use and catchment urbanisation date (p < 0.001). Based on the findings of this review, generic load reduction targets (expressed as a percentage of annual inputs, e.g. 80% TSS reduction, 45% TN, 45% TP) typical in current Australian planning regulations, may be sub-optimal in achieving receiving water quality goals, particularly given the difficulty of removing pollutants when present in low concentrations. Alternately, place-based discharge targets which meet, or exceed, background water quality, or ecological and hydrological benchmarks may be a more appropriate tool to achieve environmental objectives

Protecting the green behind the gold: catchment-wide restoration efforts necessary to achieve nutrient and sediment load reduction targets in Gold Coast City, Australia

The Gold Coast City is the tourist center of Australia and has undergone rapid and massive urban expansion over the past few decades. The Broadwater estuary, in the heart of the City, not only offers an array of ecosystems services for many important aquatic wildlife species, but also supports the livelihood and lifestyles of residents. Not surprisingly, there have been signs of imbalance between these two major services. This study combined a waterway hydraulic and pollutant transport model to simulate diffuse nutrient and sediment loads under past and future proposed land-use changes. A series of catchment restoration initiatives were modeled in an attempt to define optimal catchment scale restoration efforts necessary to protect and enhance the City's waterways. The modeling revealed that for future proposed development, a business as usual approach to catchment management will not reduce nutrient and sediment loading sufficiently to protect the community values. Considerable restoration of upper catchment tributaries is imperative, combined with treatment of stormwater flow from intensively developed sub-catchment areas. Collectively, initiatives undertaken by regulatory authorities to date have successfully reduced nutrient and sediment loading reaching adjoining waterways, although these programs have been ad hoc without strategic systematic planning and vision. Future conservation requires integration of multidisciplinary science and proactive management driven by the high ecological, economical, and community values placed on the City's waterways. Long-term catchment restoration and conservation planning requires an extensive budget (including political and societal support) to handle ongoing maintenance issues associated with scale of restoration determined here

Recent South East Queensland Developments in Integrated Water Cycle Management – Going Beyond WSUD

In the last 2-3 years, several major integrated water cycle management related developments have been proposed in South East Queensland, which, if they come to fruition, will challenge the conventional urban water cycle paradigm adopted in Australia and worldwide. These developments adopt key elements of what has been seen as conventional WSUD from a stormwater management perspective (e.g. the use of roadside swales for drainage and water quality control purposes in replacement of piped drainage and the capture and reuse of roofwater from individual houses), however they also embrace a much wider gamut of integrated water cycle management techniques including the capture and reuse of rainwater at several spatial scales, the reuse of wastewater for sub potable uses and the beneficial reuse of urban stormwater. The paper presents key details of these projects, the lessons learnt by the authors from their involvement in the projects, attempts to predict where the projects will go in coming years and highlights potential knowledge that will be gained from them. 1