Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets after Stroke

BACKGROUND Trials of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure to prevent recurrent stroke have been inconclusive. We investigated whether patients with cryptogenic stroke and echocardiographic features representing risk of stroke would benefit from PFO closure or anticoagulation, as compared with antiplatelet therapy. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, patients 16 to 60 years of age who had had a recent stroke attributed to PFO, with an associated atrial septal aneurysm or large interatrial shunt, to transcatheter PFO closure plus long-term antiplatelet therapy (PFO closure group), antiplatelet therapy alone (antiplatelet-only group), or oral anticoagulation (anticoagulation group) (randomization group 1). Patients with contraindications to anticoagulants or to PFO closure were randomly assigned to the alternative noncontraindicated treatment or to antiplatelet therapy (randomization groups 2 and 3). The primary outcome was occurrence of stroke. The comparison of PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy with antiplatelet therapy alone was performed with combined data from randomization groups 1 and 2, and the comparison of oral anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy alone was performed with combined data from randomization groups 1 and 3. RESULTS A total of 663 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a mean (+/- SD) of 5.3 +/- 2.0 years. In the analysis of randomization groups 1 and 2, no stroke occurred among the 238 patients in the PFO closure group, whereas stroke occurred in 14 of the 235 patients in the antiplatelet-only group (hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0 to 0.26; P<0.001). Procedural complications from PFO closure occurred in 14 patients (5.9%). The rate of atrial fibrillation was higher in the PFO closure group than in the antiplatelet-only group (4.6% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.02). The number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the treatment groups (P = 0.56). In the analysis of randomization groups 1 and 3, stroke occurred in 3 of 187 patients assigned to oral anticoagulants and in 7 of 174 patients assigned to antiplatelet therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who had had a recent cryptogenic stroke attributed to PFO with an associated atrial septal aneurysm or large interatrial shunt, the rate of stroke recurrence was lower among those assigned to PFO closure combined with antiplatelet therapy than among those assigned to antiplatelet therapy alone. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation

Persistent cardiac rhabdomyoma in an adult with tuberous sclerosis

International audienc

Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

International audiencePulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia may cause severe cerebral complications that may be prevented by embolization therapy. We retrospectively compared the diagnostic value of noninvasive tests for the screening of treatable (amenable to embolization) PAVMs in a series of 105 patients, using chest computerized tomography (CT) and/or pulmonary angiography as a "gold standard." Patients had assessment of dyspnea, chest radiograph, alveolar-arterial PO2 gradient under 100% oxygen (AaPO(2)), contrast echocardiography, and radionuclide perfusion lung scanning. Contrast echocardiography in the supine position was the most sensitive test (93%). The sensitivity of self-reported dyspnea (59%), chest radiograph alone (70%), measurement Of AaPO(2) by the 100% oxygen method (62%), or radionuclide lung scanning (71%), was not suitable for efficient screening. A 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value could be obtained when combining anteroposterior chest radiograph and contrast echocardiography. Our data support a screening algorithm based on the combined use of contrast echocardiography and anteroposterior chest radiograph, followed by chest CT if either test is positive. An alternative is to screen directly by chest CT. However, this algorithm may obviate the need for chest CT in patients without PAVM, who represent a majority of patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy : the edge-to-edge secures the correction of the systolic anterior motion

Objectives: Although septal myectomy is the technique of choice for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the surgical management of concomitant mitral valve lesions is controversial. Various complex surgeries have been proposed to address mitral valve lesions. We propose a simple option using an edge-to-edge mitral valve repair through the aortic valve in addition to the septal myectomy. Methods: We performed an observational analysis of our prospectively collected database. The clinical follow-up was done by telephone contact with each patient. The echocardiographic follow-up was performed in our Department of Cardiology or by the referring cardiologist. Results: Between January 2009 and March 2016, we operated 22 symptomatic patients (mean age 48.5 years, males 59%). The mean interventricular septum diameter and resting intraventricular gradient were 25.8 mm and 75.4 mmHg, respectively. The systolic anterior motion was present in every patient. The mean mitral regurgitation grade was 2.4. There were no in-hospital deaths. Two (9%) patients required a pacemaker. After a mean follow-up of 26.3 months, the mean New York Heart Association functional class decreased from 2.5 to 1.2 (P < 0.001). The echocardiographic follow-up showed a sustained significant reduction of the septal thickness (P < 0.001), resting intraventricular gradient (P < 0.001), presence of systolic anterior motion (P < 0.001) and grade of mitral regurgitation (P = 0.002). Conclusions:Septal myectomy remains the gold standard of any surgery for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy owing to its good clinical and echocardiographic results. The edge-to-edge mitral valve repair is an additional simple option to avoid the systolic anterior motion and effectively reduce the grade of mitral regurgitation

Marfan Sartan: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

International audienceAims - To evaluate the benefit of adding Losartan to baseline therapy in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods and results - A double-blind, randomized, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, add on trial comparing Losartan (50 mg when 10 years old, and receiving standard therapy. 303 patients, mean age 29.9 years old, were randomized. The two groups were similar at baseline, 86% receiving β-blocker therapy. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. The evolution of aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva was not modified by the adjunction of Losartan, with a mean increase in aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva of 0.44 mm/year (s.e. = 0.07) (-0.043 z/year, s.e. = 0.04) in patients receiving Losartan and 0.51 mm/year (s.e. = 0.06) (-0.01 z/year, s.e. = 0.03) in those receiving placebo (P = 0.36 for the comparison on slopes in millimeter per year and P = 0.69 for the comparison on slopes on z-scores). Patients receiving Losartan had a slight but significant decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the study (5 mmHg). During the study period, aortic surgery was performed in 28 patients (15 Losartan, 13 placebo), death occurred in 3 patients [0 Losartan, 3 placebo, sudden death (1) suicide (1) oesophagus cancer (1)]. Conclusion - Losartan was able to decrease blood pressure in patients with MFS but not to limit aortic dilatation during a 3-year period in patients >10 years old. β-Blocker therapy alone should therefore remain the standard first line therapy in these patients

close: Closure of patent foramen ovale, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence: Study design.

RATIONALE: Currently available data do not provide definitive evidence on the comparative benefits of closure of patent foramen ovale, oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet therapy in patients with patent foramen ovale-associated cryptogenic stroke AIM: To assess whether transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure plus antiplatelet therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy alone and whether oral anticoagulant therapy is superior to antiplatelet therapy, for secondary stroke prevention in patients aged 16 to 60 years with a large patent foramen ovale or a patent foramen ovale associated with an atrial septal aneurysm, and an otherwise unexplained ischaemic stroke or retinal ischaemia. SAMPLE SIZE: Six hundred and sixty-four patients were included in the study. METHODS AND DESIGN: CLOSE is an academic-driven, multicentre, randomized, open-label, three-group, superiority trial with blinded adjudication of outcome events. The trial has been registered with Clinical Trials Register (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00562289). Patient recruitment started in December 2007. Patient follow-up will continue until December 2016. Expected mean follow-up = 5.6 years. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome is the occurrence of fatal or nonfatal stroke. Safety outcomes include fatal, life-threatening or major procedure- or device-related complications and fatal, life-threatening or major haemorrhagic complications. DISCUSSION: CLOSE is the first specifically designed trial to assess the superiority of patent foramen ovale closure over antiplatelet therapy alone and the superiority of oral anticoagulants over antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with patent foramen ovale-associated cryptogenic stroke