Influence of initial vaccination with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine on anti-pneumococcal responses following subsequent pneumococcal vaccination in adults 50 years and older

AbstractBackgroundUnlike free polysaccharide vaccines, pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccines (PCVs) induce a T cell-dependent immune response and have the potential to provide an extended duration of protection with repeated vaccinations.MethodsThis was an extension of a previous study in pneumococcal vaccine-naïve adults aged 50–64 years in which adults 60–64 years of age were given 13-valent PCV (PCV13) or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and adults aged 50–59 were given PCV13. In this follow up study conducted about 4 years later, the 60–64 year olds initially given PCV13 received PCV13 or PPSV23, and those initially given PPSV23 received another PPSV23. All adults aged 50–59 years were re-vaccinated with PCV13. Anti-pneumococcal opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers were measured before and 1 month after vaccination.ResultsA second PCV13 given about 4 years after a first vaccination induced OPA titers that were significantly higher than those following the initial vaccination for 7 of 13 serotypes in the older group, and 6 of 13 serotypes in the younger group, and responses to the remaining serotypes were largely non-inferior. In contrast, OPA titers following revaccination with PPSV23 were statistically significantly lower for 9 of the 13 serotypes, and non-inferior for the remaining serotypes, when compared to the responses to the first PPSV23. OPA titers in the older adults who received PPSV23 after initial PCV13 were significantly higher than those following a first PPSV23 for 10 of the 13 serotypes.ConclusionIn adults 50 to 64 years of age, initial vaccination with PCV13 establishes an immune state that results in recall anti-pneumococcal responses upon subsequent vaccination with either conjugated or free polysaccharide vaccine. In contrast, initial vaccination with PPSV23 results in an immune state in which subsequent PPSV23 administration yields generally lower responses compared with the initial responses

3 years of liraglutide versus placebo for type 2 diabetes risk reduction and weight management in individuals with prediabetes: a randomised, double-blind trial

Background: Liraglutide 3·0 mg was shown to reduce bodyweight and improve glucose metabolism after the 56-week period of this trial, one of four trials in the SCALE programme. In the 3-year assessment of the SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes trial we aimed to evaluate the proportion of individuals with prediabetes who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with prediabetes and a body-mass index of at least 30 kg/m2, or at least 27 kg/m2 with comorbidities, were randomised 2:1, using a telephone or web-based system, to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide 3·0 mg or matched placebo, as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. Time to diabetes onset by 160 weeks was the primary outcome, evaluated in all randomised treated individuals with at least one post-baseline assessment. The trial was conducted at 191 clinical research sites in 27 countries and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01272219. Findings: The study ran between June 1, 2011, and March 2, 2015. We randomly assigned 2254 patients to receive liraglutide (n=1505) or placebo (n=749). 1128 (50%) participants completed the study up to week 160, after withdrawal of 714 (47%) participants in the liraglutide group and 412 (55%) participants in the placebo group. By week 160, 26 (2%) of 1472 individuals in the liraglutide group versus 46 (6%) of 738 in the placebo group were diagnosed with diabetes while on treatment. The mean time from randomisation to diagnosis was 99 (SD 47) weeks for the 26 individuals in the liraglutide group versus 87 (47) weeks for the 46 individuals in the placebo group. Taking the different diagnosis frequencies between the treatment groups into account, the time to onset of diabetes over 160 weeks among all randomised individuals was 2·7 times longer with liraglutide than with placebo (95% CI 1·9 to 3·9, p<0·0001), corresponding with a hazard ratio of 0·21 (95% CI 0·13–0·34). Liraglutide induced greater weight loss than placebo at week 160 (–6·1 [SD 7·3] vs −1·9% [6·3]; estimated treatment difference −4·3%, 95% CI −4·9 to −3·7, p<0·0001). Serious adverse events were reported by 227 (15%) of 1501 randomised treated individuals in the liraglutide group versus 96 (13%) of 747 individuals in the placebo group. Interpretation: In this trial, we provide results for 3 years of treatment, with the limitation that withdrawn individuals were not followed up after discontinuation. Liraglutide 3·0 mg might provide health benefits in terms of reduced risk of diabetes in individuals with obesity and prediabetes. Funding: Novo Nordisk, Denmark

Persistence of antibodies 1 year after sequential administration of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adults

Vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) followed ≥ 1 year by the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) is recommended for immunocompetent adults ≥ 65 years of age in the United States. This study assessed antipneumococcal opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) to PCV13 in PPSV23-naive and PPSV23-preimmunized adults 1 year after a second vaccine dose. Two parent studies were conducted previously: (1) PPSV23 vaccine–naive subjects (60–64 years of age at enrollment) received PCV13 followed by PCV13 or PPSV23 1 year later or PPSV23 followed by PCV13 1 year later; and (2) subjects (≥ 70 years of age at enrollment) vaccinated with PPSV23 ≥ 5 years before study entry received PCV13 or PPSV23 followed by PCV13 1 year later. Overall, 962 subjects (PPSV23-naive, n = 519; PPSV23-preimmunized, n = 443) who received both vaccinations in the parent studies were enrolled. Numerically higher OPA GMTs persisted for at least 1 year after administration of PCV13 as the initial vaccine (PCV13/PPSV23 or PCV13/PCV13) compared with those who received PPSV23 either 1 or 5 years prior (PPSV23/PCV13). This impairment in antibody responses to subsequent PCV13 vaccination produced by initial PPSV23 vaccination persisted for at least 1 year. OPA GMTs were numerically higher for most serotypes 1 year after 2 doses of PCV13 compared with 1 year after the first PCV13 dose. These data suggest PCV13 should be given first if both vaccines are to be administered, higher immune responses were achieved when PCV13 was given first and persisted at least 1 year (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01025336)

Defining the optimal formulation and schedule of a candidate toxoid vaccine against Clostridium difficile infection: A randomized Phase 2 clinical trial

Clostridium difficile, a major cause of nosocomial and antibiotic-associated diarrhea, carries a significant disease and cost burden. This study aimed to select an optimal formulation and schedule for a candidate toxoid vaccine against C. difficile toxins A and B. Randomized, placebo-controlled, two-stage, Phase 2 study in a total of 661 adults aged 40–75 years. Stage I: low (50μg antigen) or high (100μg antigen) dose with or without aluminum hydroxide (AlOH) adjuvant, or placebo, administered on Days 0–7–30. Stage II: Days 0–7–30, 0–7–180, and 0–30–180, using the formulation selected in Stage I through a decision tree defined a priori and based principally on a bootstrap ranking approach. Administration was intramuscular. Blood samples were obtained on Days 0, 7, 14, 30, 60 (Stage I and II), 180, and 210 (Stage II); IgG to toxins A and B was measured by ELISA and in vitro functional activity was measured by toxin neutralizing assay (TNA). Safety data were collected using diary cards. In Stage I the composite immune response against toxins A and B (percentage of participants who seroconverted for both toxins) was highest in the high dose+adjuvant group (97% and 92% for Toxins A and B, respectively) and was chosen for Stage II. In Stage II the immune response profile for this formulation through Day 180 given on Days 0–7–30 ranked above the other two administration schedules. There were no safety issues. The high dose+adjuvant (100μg antigen+AlOH) formulation administered at 0–7–30 days elicited the best immune response profile, including functional antibody responses, through Day 180 and was selected for use in subsequent clinical trials