Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey.

UNLABELLED: EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support mammography for population-based screening, demonstrated to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality and treatment impact. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the reduction in mortality is 40 % for women aged 50-69 years taking up the invitation while the probability of false-positive needle biopsy is <1 % per round and overdiagnosis is only 1-10 % for a 20-year screening. Mortality reduction was also observed for the age groups 40-49 years and 70-74 years, although with "limited evidence". Thus, we firstly recommend biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-69 years; extension up to 73 or 75 years, biennially, is a second priority, from 40-45 to 49 years, annually, a third priority. Screening with thermography or other optical tools as alternatives to mammography is discouraged. Preference should be given to population screening programmes on a territorial basis, with double reading. Adoption of digital mammography (not film-screen or phosphor-plate computer radiography) is a priority, which also improves sensitivity in dense breasts. Radiologists qualified as screening readers should be involved in programmes. Digital breast tomosynthesis is also set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future. Dedicated pathways for high-risk women offering breast MRI according to national or international guidelines and recommendations are encouraged. KEY POINTS: • EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support screening mammography. • A first priority is double-reading biennial mammography for women aged 50-69 years. • Extension to 73-75 and from 40-45 to 49 years is also encouraged. • Digital mammography (not film-screen or computer radiography) should be used. • DBT is set to become "routine mammography" in the screening setting in the next future

Intraductal papilloma without atypia on image-guided breast biopsy: upgrade rates to carcinoma at surgical excision

Background: The management of intraductal papilloma without atypia (IDP) in breast needle biopsy remains controversial. This study investigates the upgrade rate of IDP to carcinoma and clinical and radiologic features predictive of an upgrade. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of IDP on image-guided (mammography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging) core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy and surgical excision of this lesion at a certified breast center between 2007 and 2017 were included in this institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Appropriate statistical tests were performed to assess clinical and radiologic characteristics associated with an upgrade to malignancy at excision. Results: For 60 women with 62 surgically removed IDPs, the upgrade rate to malignancy was 16.1% (10 upgrades, 4 invasive ductal carcinoma, 6 ductal carcinoma in situ). IDPs with upgrade to carcinoma showed a significantly greater distance to the nipple (63.5 vs. 36.8 mm; p = 0.012). No significant associations were found between upgrade to carcinoma and age, menopausal status, lesion size, microcalcifications, BI-RADS descriptors, initial BI-RADS category, and biopsy modality. Conclusion: The upgrade rate at excision for IDPs diagnosed with needle biopsy was higher than expected according to some guideline recommendations. Observation only might not be appropriate for all patients with IDP, particularly for those with peripheral IDP

Galactography with tomosynthesis technique (Galactomosynthesis) – renaissance of a method?

Einleitung: Die konventionelle Galaktografie stellte jahrzehntelang das einzige bildgebende Verfahren zur Darstellung von Milchgängen in der Brust dar. Heute verfügen wir in der Diagnostik über ein multimodales Konzept aus hochauflösendem Ultraschall, der Magnetresonanz-(MR-)Mammografie und der Duktoskopie/Galaktoskopie mit Sensitivitäten und Spezifitäten bis zu 95%. Ziel unserer Untersuchung war es, erstmalig die Tomosynthesetechnik in der Galaktografie einzusetzen und die daraus generierten synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien mit der etablierten Methode der duktusorientierten Sonografie zu vergleichen. Es sollen mit beiden Methoden invasive Mammakarzinome und deren Vorstufen wie duktale Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) sowie benigne Befunde erkannt werden. Material und Methoden: Wir führten bei 5 Patientinnen mit pathologischer Mamillensekretion sowohl eine duktusorientierte Sonografie, eine kontrastmittelunterstützte Galaktografie mithilfe der Tomosynthese in 3-D sowie auch den daraus generierten synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien durch. Die Auswertung der unterschiedlichen Untersuchungsmodalitäten erfolgte durch 3 in der komplementären Mammadiagnostik erfahrene Untersucher (1, 5 und 15 Jahre) und wurde mit der endgültigen Histologie korreliert. Ergebnisse: Alle 3 Untersucher beurteilten unabhängig voneinander die Bilder des duktusorientierten Ultraschalls und der kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik in 3-D und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit den histopathologischen Befunden der Operationspräparate korreliert, wobei sich bei den 5 Patientinnen 1 invasives Mammakarzinom, 2-mal ein duktales Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) und 2 benigne Befunde ergaben. Alle drei Untersucher lagen bei der Verdachtsdiagnose in der Standardbildgebung der duktusorientierten Sonografie seltener richtig als bei der erstmalig durchgeführten, kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien. Schlussfolgerung: Erstmalig wurde die Brusttomosynthese in der Galaktografie (Galaktomosynthese) eingesetzt und ermöglichte eine digitale, 3-dimensionale Darstellung von suspekten Befunden. Zusammen mit den daraus synthetisierten, digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien könnte dies in Zukunft eine sinnvolle Ergänzung der komplementären Mammadiagnostik sein – und eine Renaissance dieser Methode. Im Vergleich mit dem duktusorientierten Ultraschall in Hochauflösung erzielten die Untersucher mit der kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien bessere Ergebnisse in Korrelation mit den histopathologischen Befunden.Introduction: For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings. Material and Methods: Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings. Results: All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Conclusion: This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings

Galaktografie mit Tomosynthese (Galaktomosynthese) – Renaissance einer Methode?

Introduction: For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings. Material and Methods: Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings. Results: All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Conclusion: This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings.Einleitung: Die konventionelle Galaktografie stellte jahrzehntelang das einzige bildgebende Verfahren zur Darstellung von Milchgängen in der Brust dar. Heute verfügen wir in der Diagnostik über ein multimodales Konzept aus hochauflösendem Ultraschall, der Magnetresonanz-(MR-)Mammografie und der Duktoskopie/Galaktoskopie mit Sensitivitäten und Spezifitäten bis zu 95%. Ziel unserer Untersuchung war es, erstmalig die Tomosynthesetechnik in der Galaktografie einzusetzen und die daraus generierten synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien mit der etablierten Methode der duktusorientierten Sonografie zu vergleichen. Es sollen mit beiden Methoden invasive Mammakarzinome und deren Vorstufen wie duktale Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) sowie benigne Befunde erkannt werden. Material und Methoden: Wir führten bei 5 Patientinnen mit pathologischer Mamillensekretion sowohl eine duktusorientierte Sonografie, eine kontrastmittelunterstützte Galaktografie mithilfe der Tomosynthese in 3-D sowie auch den daraus generierten synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien durch. Die Auswertung der unterschiedlichen Untersuchungsmodalitäten erfolgte durch 3 in der komplementären Mammadiagnostik erfahrene Untersucher (1, 5 und 15 Jahre) und wurde mit der endgültigen Histologie korreliert. Ergebnisse: Alle 3 Untersucher beurteilten unabhängig voneinander die Bilder des duktusorientierten Ultraschalls und der kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik in 3-D und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien. Die Ergebnisse wurden mit den histopathologischen Befunden der Operationspräparate korreliert, wobei sich bei den 5 Patientinnen 1 invasives Mammakarzinom, 2-mal ein duktales Carcinoma in situ (DCIS) und 2 benigne Befunde ergaben. Alle drei Untersucher lagen bei der Verdachtsdiagnose in der Standardbildgebung der duktusorientierten Sonografie seltener richtig als bei der erstmalig durchgeführten, kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien. Schlussfolgerung: Erstmalig wurde die Brusttomosynthese in der Galaktografie (Galaktomosynthese) eingesetzt und ermöglichte eine digitale, 3-dimensionale Darstellung von suspekten Befunden. Zusammen mit den daraus synthetisierten, digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien könnte dies in Zukunft eine sinnvolle Ergänzung der komplementären Mammadiagnostik sein – und eine Renaissance dieser Methode. Im Vergleich mit dem duktusorientierten Ultraschall in Hochauflösung erzielten die Untersucher mit der kontrastmittelunterstützten Galaktografie in Tomosynthesetechnik und den daraus generierten, synthetischen digitalen 2-D-Vollfeld-Mammografien bessere Ergebnisse in Korrelation mit den histopathologischen Befunden