LTBK-01. INO-5401 AND INO-9012 DELIVERED INTRAMUSCULARLY (IM) WITH ELECTROPORATION (EP) IN COMBINATION WITH CEMIPLIMAB (REGN2810) IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA

Abstract BACKGROUND Novel T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve OS in GBM. INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding hTERT, WT-1, PSMA) plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12), and the PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab, is given to patients with newly diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, efficacy and immunogenicity. METHODS Phase I/II, single arm, 2 cohort study (A: MGMT unmethylated, B: MGMT methylated). Primary endpoint is safety; efficacy and immunogenicity are secondary. Nine mg INO-5401 plus 1 mg INO-9012 (every 3 weeks x 4 doses, then Q9W) is given IM with EP by CELLECTRA® 2000 with cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over 3 weeks. TMZ is given with radiation (all patients), and adjuvantly (Cohort B only). RESULTS Fifty-two subjects enrolled: 32 in Cohort A; 20 in Cohort B. 35% women; median age 60 years (19–78 years). The adverse event profile is consistent with single-agent (INO-5401, INO-9012, EP and cemiplimab) reported events. OS at 12 months was 84.4% (Cohort A) and 85% (Cohort B). OS at 18 months in Cohort A is 50% (95% CI 31.9 - 68.1); median OS is 17.9 months (14.5 - NR); Cohort B OS18 and median OS will be presented. Tumor gene transcripts at diagnosis confirmed expression of INO-5401 antigens. Peripheral immune responses following INO-5401 revealed antigen-specific T cell responses by Interferon gamma ELISpot and flow cytometry, including cytokine production and expansion of antigen specific CD8+T cells with lytic potential. CONCLUSIONS INO-5401 + INO-9012, a novel DNA plasmid immunotherapy, demonstrates acceptable risk/benefit and generates robust systemic immune responses to encoded tumor antigens when administered with cemiplimab and RT/TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Overall survival is encouraging. Clinical trial information: NCT03491683

Extensive identification of genes involved in congenital and structural heart disorders and cardiomyopathy

Clinical presentation of congenital heart disease is heterogeneous, making identification of the disease-causing genes and their genetic pathways and mechanisms of action challenging. By using in vivo electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography and microcomputed tomography imaging to screen 3,894 single-gene-null mouse lines for structural and functional cardiac abnormalities, here we identify 705 lines with cardiac arrhythmia, myocardial hypertrophy and/or ventricular dilation. Among these 705 genes, 486 have not been previously associated with cardiac dysfunction in humans, and some of them represent variants of unknown relevance (VUR). Mice with mutations in Casz1, Dnajc18, Pde4dip, Rnf38 or Tmem161b genes show developmental cardiac structural abnormalities, with their human orthologs being categorized as VUR. Using UK Biobank data, we validate the importance of the DNAJC18 gene for cardiac homeostasis by showing that its loss of function is associated with altered left ventricular systolic function. Our results identify hundreds of previously unappreciated genes with potential function in congenital heart disease and suggest causal function of five VUR in congenital heart disease

Developing the Evidence Base to Inform Best Practice: A Scoping Study of Breast and Cervical Cancer Reviews in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

<div><p>Background</p><p>Breast and cervical cancers have emerged as major global health challenges and disproportionately lead to excess morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) when compared to high-income countries. The objective of this paper was to highlight key findings, recommendations, and gaps in research and practice identified through a scoping study of recent reviews in breast and cervical cancer in LMICs.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We conducted a scoping study based on the six-stage framework of Arskey and O’Malley. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, and CINAHL with the following inclusion criteria: 1) published between 2005-February 2015, 2) focused on breast or cervical cancer 3) focused on LMIC, 4) review article, and 5) published in English.</p><p>Results</p><p>Through our systematic search, 63 out of the 94 identified cervical cancer reviews met our selection criteria and 36 of the 54 in breast cancer. Cervical cancer reviews were more likely to focus upon prevention and screening, while breast cancer reviews were more likely to focus upon treatment and survivorship. Few of the breast cancer reviews referenced research and data from LMICs themselves; cervical cancer reviews were more likely to do so. Most reviews did not include elements of the PRISMA checklist.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Overall, a limited evidence base supports breast and cervical cancer control in LMICs. Further breast and cervical cancer prevention and control studies are necessary in LMICs.</p></div

Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists are highly effective in preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation but have several limitations. Apixaban is a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in a similar population in comparison with aspirin. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 5 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation and at least one additional risk factor for stroke. The primary outcome was ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism. The trial was designed to test for noninferiority, with key secondary objectives of testing for superiority with respect to the primary outcome and to the rates of major bleeding and death from any cause. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 1.8 years. The rate of the primary outcome was 1.27% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 1.60% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio with apixaban, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.95; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P = 0.01 for superiority). The rate of major bleeding was 2.13% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 3.09% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.80; P<0.001), and the rates of death from any cause were 3.52% and 3.94%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.99; P = 0.047). The rate of hemorrhagic stroke was 0.24% per year in the apixaban group, as compared with 0.47% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.75; P<0.001), and the rate of ischemic or uncertain type of stroke was 0.97% per year in the apixaban group and 1.05% per year in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.13; P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, apixaban was superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, caused less bleeding, and resulted in lower mortality. Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved