2,570 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Taking the High Line: Elevated Parks, Evolving Neighborhoods, and the Ever Changing Relationship between Urban and Nature
βIf you were actually able to make a park on the High Line, it would be great for property values. But this will never happen; it is just too far-fetched. These people are dreamers.β (A local property owner at a Community hearing, April 2001 David and Hammond 2011 p. 31)
Everyone talks about it and everyone wants one; The High Line in New York City started a worldwide trend of elevated parks. Old and unused rail lines are transformed into exciting urban environments. New Yorkβs Mayor Bloomberg has noted that the project has ushered in a renaissance for the area impacting the real estate values and development in the surrounding vicinity. This was one of the main arguments for the realization of the project and even though thereβs been strong community support for the project, voices have been raised on how this change is affecting the neighborhood.
The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the evolving trend of elevated parks and especially the High Line project, by investigating what reactions and debates it has triggered. Highly acclaimed as an expression of Landscape Urbanism, it focuses on the reuse of abandoned infrastructure and active landscapes. The project has been a success, seeing millions of visitors since its opening, but the neighborhoods around it have undergone changes. Gentrification raises alarms as projects like these have a dual function in both increasing property values (as intended by supporters), and causing friction with those negatively impacted by those forces.
The High Line story is one of an evolving view on urban planning and design; a product of a constantly changing view on parks and public places. Robert Hammond, one of the activists behind the creation of the High Line commented that: βCentral Park was meant to be an escape (β¦) On the High Line, youβre in nature, but you can hear the traffic, you can see the Empire State Buildingβ (Jacobs, 2012), highlighting the interrelationship between the βurbanβ and nature
New constraints on the Middle Palaeozoic to enozoic burial and hermal history of the Holy ross Mts. (Central Poland) : results of numerical modelling
A 1-D burial-thermal modelling was performed using data from two borehole sections representative of the central part of the Holy Cross Mts. area. This area is located in the axial part of the Permian-Mesozoic Mid-Polish Trough that was inverted during the latest Cretaceous-Paleocene. The modelling involved different variants of restored stratigraphy of eroded Carboniferous to Cretaceous strata, whereas calibration was based on samples from cored Middle-Upper Devonian sediments. The modelling results are consistent with the assumption of a Variscan (Carboniferous-Early Permian) heat flow elevated up to 80 mWm-2, which is further confirmed by independent regional evidence. The zone of increased thermal maturity in the Devonian may be partly accounted for by a thicker Carboniferous section (by ca. 500 m) compared to previous estimates. Two variants of the post-Carboniferous geohistory were analysed. The variant of a thinner Permian-Mesozoic section, implying lower magnitude of the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene inversion, allows more realistic assumptions regarding heat flow distribution through time, including the possibility to incorporate an elevated Variscan heat flow. The alternative scenario, assuming deeper burial, generally lower heat flow and smaller Carboniferous thickness, is regarded as less probable. The accepted variant of the Permian-Mesozoic burial history implies that the total post-Carboniferous burial in the study area was on the order of 2000-2500 metres rather than 3000-3500 metres. The respective Upper Cretaceous thickness could have been 400 to 500 m instead of ca. 1000 m, whereas the Late Cretaceous Paleogene inversion more likely started in the Santonian than in the late Maastrichtian. Consequently, the preferred magnitude of total inversion was on the order of 2500 m
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π³ΡΡΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ 8.0305801 ΡΡΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡ
Π ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²ΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π²ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π²ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ Π·ΠΌΡΡΡΡ, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΊΡ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ° Π·Π°Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π³ΡΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ 8.03050801β ΡΡ-
Π½Π°Π½ΡΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡ (Π·Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ). ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΠΈ-
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡ, Π·Π°ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π°Π²ΡΠ°Π½Π½Ρ Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΆ Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ
8.030508 01 ΡΡΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡ(Π·Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ).ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ Π²ΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ½Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°Π³ΡΡΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ² ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ 8.0305801 ΡΡΠ½Π°Π½ΡΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡ (Π·Π° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°ΠΌΠΈ) / Π£ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ.: ΠΠ°Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎ Π.Π‘., Π¨ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ Π.Π. β ΠΠ½ΡΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΊ: ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ½ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ,
2012 β 39 Ρ
New constraints on the Middle Palaeozoic to Cenozoic burial and thermal history of the Holy Cross Mts. (Central Poland): results from numerical modelling
A 1-D burial-thermal modelling was performed using data from two borehole sections representative of the central
part of the Holy Cross Mts. area. This area is located in the axial part of the Permian-Mesozoic Mid-Polish Trough
that was inverted during the latest Cretaceous-Paleocene. The modelling involved different variants of restored stratigraphy of eroded Carboniferous to Cretaceous strata, whereas calibration was based on samples from cored Middle-Upper Devonian sediments. The modelling results are consistent with the assumption of a Variscan (Carboniferous-Early Permian) heat flow elevated up to 80 mWm-2, which is further confirmed by independent regional evidence. The zone of increased thermal maturity in the Devonian may be partly accounted for by a thicker Carboniferous section (by ca. 500 m) compared to previous estimates. Two variants of the post-Carboniferous geohistory were analysed. The variant of a thinner Permian-Mesozoic section, implying lower magnitude of the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene inversion, allows more realistic assumptions regarding heat flow distribution through time, including the possibility to incorporate an elevated Variscan heat flow. The alternative scenario, assuming deeper burial, generally lower heat flow and smaller Carboniferous thickness, is regarded as less probable. The accepted variant of the Permian-Mesozoic burial history implies that the total post-Carboniferous burial in the study area was on the order of 2000-2500 metres rather than 3000-3500 metres. The respective Upper Cretaceous thickness could have been 400 to 500 m instead of ca. 1000 m, whereas the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene inversion more likely started in the Santonian than in the late Maastrichtian. Consequently, the preferred magnitude of total inversion was on the order of 2500 m
ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Ρ Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ
ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ Π±Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Si. Π‘ ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ΄Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ
ΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΈΡ, ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π° Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ
New constraints on the Middle Palaeozoic to Cenozoic burial and thermal history of the Holy Cross Mts. (Central Poland): results from numerical modelling
A 1-D burial-thermal modelling was performed using data from two borehole sections representative of the central part of the Holy Cross Mts. area. This area is located in the axial part of the Permian-Mesozoic Mid-Polish Trough that was inverted during the latest Cretaceous-Paleocene. The modelling involved different variants of restored stratigraphy of eroded Carboniferous to Cretaceous strata, whereas calibration was based on samples from cored Middle-Upper Devonian sediments. The modelling results are consistent with the assumption of a Variscan (Carboniferous-Early Permian) heat flow elevated up to 80 mWm-2, which is further confirmed by independent regional evidence. The zone of increased thermal maturity in the Devonian may be partly accounted for by a thicker Carboniferous section (by ca. 500 m) compared to previous estimates. Two variants of the post-Carboniferous geohistory were analysed. The variant of a thinner Permian-Mesozoic section, implying lower magnitude of the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene inversion, allows more realistic assumptions regarding heat flow distribution through time, including the possibility to incorporate an elevated Variscan heat flow. The alternative scenario, assuming deeper burial, generally lower heat flow and smaller Carboniferous thickness, is regarded as less probable. The accepted variant of the Permian-Mesozoic burial history implies that the total post-Carboniferous burial in the study area was on the order of 2000-2500 metres rather than 3000-3500 metres. The respective Upper Cretaceous thickness could have been 400 to 500 m instead of ca. 1000 m, whereas the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene inversion more likely started in the Santonian than in the late Maastrichtian. Consequently, the preferred magnitude of total inversion was on the order of 2500 m
- β¦