Social representations of mask wearing in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic

IntroductionAlthough one of the most prominent interventions against COVID-19, face masks seem poorly adopted by the general population. A growing body of literature has found that using face masks has social meaning. This qualitative study assessed the perceptions, representations and practices of mask wearing in the general population.MethodsA qualitative survey by short semi-structured walking interviews was carried out from April to December 2021 in 11 cities in France's Pays de la Loire region. Study locations were selected for their varied geographical, social, and economic characteristics, with urbanized and rural areas. Four domains linked to perceptions of masks and wearing them were explored: (i) evolution in mask wearing, (ii) decision-making methods for wearing and not wearing; (iii) incorporating the mask into way of life; (iv) projecting into the future.ResultsA total of 116 people were interviewed. Masks marked a shift from the ordinary world to the pandemic. Overall, interviewees considered masks an obstacle to breathing, communication, and social interactions, leading to establishing strategies circumventing the mask mandate. Poor attention was paid to their medical usefulness as an obligatory clothing accessory. Mask-wearing decisions were driven by social relations, common sense, and vulnerability. The greater the feeling of security (i.e., being with close relatives), the less it was worn or worn properly, with decreased attention to others and their health. Most participants did not remember learning to wear a mask. Some were convinced that mask-wearing could not be learned (experiential knowledge). Institutions (school and work) played a central role by facilitating incorporation of masks into daily life.ConclusionsThis study emphasizes the need to reinforce the individual medical values of face masks to prevent COVID-19. Ambitious education and training programmes should be planned to learn how and when to wear masks. Institutions (work and school) may be critical for this purpose

Vasa nervorum angiogenesis in prostate cancer with perineural invasion.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Perineural invasion (PNI) is generally accepted as a major route of cancer dissemination in malignancies associated with highly enervated organs. However, the effect of cancer cells on vasa nervorum remains unknown. We studied this effect in locally advanced prostate cancer, a high-risk feature associated with approximately 20% of prostate cancer specific mortality.METHODS: We used immunohistochemistry for CD34, fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), FSHR, podoplanin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and VEGFR-2 as well as histochemical methods to examine the vasa nervorum of nerves invaded by cancer cells in tissue samples from 85 patients.RESULTS: The percentage of the nerve area occupied by CD34-positive vasa nervorum endothelial cells in nerves with PNI was much higher than in nerves without PNI (7.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.9 ± 0.4; P < 0.001 and 5.8 ± 0.6 vs 1.23 ± 0.8; P < 0.001 in pT3a and pT3b prostate cancer specimens, respectively). In 19/85 of the patients the CD34-positive vasa nervorum microvessels have a thick basement membrane, similar to the vessels in diabetic microangiopathy. This subendothelial layer contains collagen fibers. Vasa nervorum endothelia and Schwann cells express FGF-2 (nuclear localization) and FSHR (plasma membrane and cytoplasmic staining). Prostate cancer cells invading nerves express VEGF, a critical cytokine in tumor angiogenesis. The vasa nervorum of prostatic nerves with PNI did not express detectable levels of VEGFR-2. No podoplanin-positive lymphatic vessels were seen in nerves.CONCLUSION: In locally advanced prostate cancer, PNI of cancer cells is associated with formation of new endoneurial capillaries and changes of vasa nervorum morphology

FDG-PET/CT-based prognostic survival model after surgery for head and neck cancer

Rationale: The aims of this multicenter study were to identify clinical and preoperative PET/CT parameters predicting Overall Survival (OS) and Distant Metastasis Free Survival(DMFS) from a cohort of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) patients treated with surgery, to generate a prognostic model of OS and DMFS and to validate this prognostic model with an independent cohort. Materials and Methods: A total of 382 consecutive HNSCC patients divided into training (n = 318) and validation cohorts (n = 64) were retrospectively included. The following PET/CT parameters were analyzed: clinical parameters, SUVmax, SUVMean, Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) and distance parameters for the primary tumor and lymph nodes defined by two segmentation methods (relative SUVmax threshold and absolute SUV threshold). Cox analyses were performed for OS and DMFS in the training cohort. The c-index was used to identify highly prognostic parameters. These prognostic parameters were externally tested in the validation cohort. Results: In multivariable analysis, the significant parameters for OS were T stage and Nodal-MTV, achieving a c-index of 0.64 (p<0.001). For DMFS, the significant parameters were T stage, Nodal-MTV and maximal tumor-node distance, with a c-index of 0.76 (p<0.001). These combinations of parameters were externally validated, achieving c-indices of 0.63 (p<0.001) and 0.71 (p<0.001) for OS and DMFS, respectively. Conclusion: The Nodal MTV associated with maximal distance between the primary tumor and the lymph node was significantly correlated with the risk of DMFS. Moreover, this parameter in addition to clinical parameters was associated with higher risk of death. These prognostic factors may be used to tailor individualized treatment

FDG-PET/CT-based prognostic survival model after surgery for head and neck cancer

International audienc

Bacillus velezensis BE2 controls wheat and barley diseases by direct antagonism and induced systemic resistance

International audienc

Luzerne références: Edition 2016-2018

Luzerne références. Edition 2016-201

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules (THYCOVID) : a retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-sectional study

Background: Since its outbreak in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has diverted resources from non-urgent and elective procedures, leading to diagnosis and treatment delays, with an increased number of neoplasms at advanced stages worldwide. The aims of this study were to quantify the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to evaluate whether delays in surgery led to an increased occurrence of aggressive tumours. Methods: In this retrospective, international, cross-sectional study, centres were invited to participate in June 22, 2022; each centre joining the study was asked to provide data from medical records on all surgical thyroidectomies consecutively performed from Jan 1, 2019, to Dec 31, 2021. Patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules were divided into three groups according to when they underwent surgery: from Jan 1, 2019, to Feb 29, 2020 (global prepandemic phase), from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021 (pandemic escalation phase), and from June 1 to Dec 31, 2021 (pandemic decrease phase). The main outcomes were, for each phase, the number of surgeries for indeterminate thyroid nodules, and in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancers, the occurrence of tumours larger than 10 mm, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, distant metastases, and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence. Univariate analysis was used to compare the probability of aggressive thyroid features between the first and third study phases. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05178186. Findings: Data from 157 centres (n=49 countries) on 87 467 patients who underwent surgery for benign and malignant thyroid disease were collected, of whom 22 974 patients (18 052 [78·6%] female patients and 4922 [21·4%] male patients) received surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules. We observed a significant reduction in surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the pandemic escalation phase (median monthly surgeries per centre, 1·4 [IQR 0·6-3·4]) compared with the prepandemic phase (2·0 [0·9-3·7]; p&lt;0·0001) and pandemic decrease phase (2·3 [1·0-5·0]; p&lt;0·0001). Compared with the prepandemic phase, in the pandemic decrease phase we observed an increased occurrence of thyroid tumours larger than 10 mm (2554 [69·0%] of 3704 vs 1515 [71·5%] of 2119; OR 1·1 [95% CI 1·0-1·3]; p=0·042), lymph node metastases (343 [9·3%] vs 264 [12·5%]; OR 1·4 [1·2-1·7]; p=0·0001), and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence (203 [5·7%] of 3584 vs 155 [7·7%] of 2006; OR 1·4 [1·1-1·7]; p=0·0039). Interpretation: Our study suggests that the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic period could have led to an increased occurrence of aggressive thyroid tumours. However, other compelling hypotheses, including increased selection of patients with aggressive malignancies during this period, should be considered. We suggest that surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules should no longer be postponed even in future instances of pandemic escalation.</p

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules (THYCOVID): a retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND Since its outbreak in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has diverted resources from non-urgent and elective procedures, leading to diagnosis and treatment delays, with an increased number of neoplasms at advanced stages worldwide. The aims of this study were to quantify the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to evaluate whether delays in surgery led to an increased occurrence of aggressive tumours. METHODS In this retrospective, international, cross-sectional study, centres were invited to participate in June 22, 2022; each centre joining the study was asked to provide data from medical records on all surgical thyroidectomies consecutively performed from Jan 1, 2019, to Dec 31, 2021. Patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules were divided into three groups according to when they underwent surgery: from Jan 1, 2019, to Feb 29, 2020 (global prepandemic phase), from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021 (pandemic escalation phase), and from June 1 to Dec 31, 2021 (pandemic decrease phase). The main outcomes were, for each phase, the number of surgeries for indeterminate thyroid nodules, and in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancers, the occurrence of tumours larger than 10 mm, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, distant metastases, and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence. Univariate analysis was used to compare the probability of aggressive thyroid features between the first and third study phases. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05178186. FINDINGS Data from 157 centres (n=49 countries) on 87 467 patients who underwent surgery for benign and malignant thyroid disease were collected, of whom 22 974 patients (18 052 [78·6%] female patients and 4922 [21·4%] male patients) received surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules. We observed a significant reduction in surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the pandemic escalation phase (median monthly surgeries per centre, 1·4 [IQR 0·6-3·4]) compared with the prepandemic phase (2·0 [0·9-3·7]; p<0·0001) and pandemic decrease phase (2·3 [1·0-5·0]; p<0·0001). Compared with the prepandemic phase, in the pandemic decrease phase we observed an increased occurrence of thyroid tumours larger than 10 mm (2554 [69·0%] of 3704 vs 1515 [71·5%] of 2119; OR 1·1 [95% CI 1·0-1·3]; p=0·042), lymph node metastases (343 [9·3%] vs 264 [12·5%]; OR 1·4 [1·2-1·7]; p=0·0001), and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence (203 [5·7%] of 3584 vs 155 [7·7%] of 2006; OR 1·4 [1·1-1·7]; p=0·0039). INTERPRETATION Our study suggests that the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic period could have led to an increased occurrence of aggressive thyroid tumours. However, other compelling hypotheses, including increased selection of patients with aggressive malignancies during this period, should be considered. We suggest that surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules should no longer be postponed even in future instances of pandemic escalation. FUNDING None