Golimumab in refractory uveitis related to spondyloarthritis. Multicenter study of 15 patients

Objective: To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in refractory uveitis associated to spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: Multicenter study of SpA-related uveitis refractory to at least one immunosuppressive drug. The main outcome variables were degree of anterior and posterior chamber inflammation, visual acuity, and macular thickness. Results: Fifteen patients (13 men/2 women; 18 affected eyes; mean age 39±6 years) were evaluated. The underlying SpA subtypes were ankylosing spondylitis (n=8), psoriatic arthritis (n=6) and non-radiographic axial SpA (n=1). The ocular involvement patterns were recurrent anterior uveitis in 8 patients and chronic anterior uveitis in 7. Before GLM they have received methotrexate (n=13), sulfasalazine (n=6), pulses of methylprednisolone (n=4), azathioprine (n=3), leflunomide (n=2) and cyclosporine (n=1). Ten of them had also been treated with TNF-? blockers; etanercept (n=7), adalimumab (n=7), infliximab (n=6), and certolizumab (n=1). GLM was given at the standard dose (50 mg/sc/monthly) as monotherapy (n=7) or in combination with conventional immunosuppressive drugs (n=8), mainly methotrexate. Most patients had rapid and progressive improvement of intraocular inflammation parameters. The median number of cells in the anterior chamber at 2 years (0 [0-0]) was significantly reduced compared to baseline findings (1 [0-3]); p=0.04). The mean best corrected visual acuity value also improved (0.84±0.3 at 2 years versus 0.62±0.3 at baseline; p=0.03). Only minor side effects were observed after a mean follow-up of 23±7 months. Conclusions: Our results indicate that GLM may be a useful therapeutic option in refractory SpA-related uveitis

Model Uncertainty and Policy Choice: A Plea for Integrated Subjectivism

A question at the intersection of scientific modeling and public choice is how to deal with uncertainty about model predictions. This "high-level" uncertainty is necessarily value-laden, and thus must be treated as irreducibly subjective. Nevertheless, formal methods of uncertainty analysis should still be employed for the purpose of clarifying policy debates. I argue that such debates are best informed by models which integrate objective features (which model the world) with subjective ones (modeling the policy-maker). This integrated subjectivism is illustrated with a case study from the literature on monetary policy. The paper concludes with some morals for the use of models in determining climate policy

Statins for primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease in the elderly: estimation of individual absolute treatment effects

Pathophysiology, epidemiology and therapy of agein