”Opettaja on silloin paras opettaja, kun hän tuntee oppilaansa tarpeeksi hyvin”:opettajien kokemuksia haastavista vuorovaikutustilanteista oppilaiden kanssa ja niihin käytetyistä ratkaisukeinoista

Tiivistelmä. Tämän pro gradu -tutkielman tavoitteena on selvittää luokanopettajien kokemuksia haastavista vuorovaikutustilanteista työssään oppilaiden kanssa ja niihin käytetyistä ratkaisukeinoista. Tarkastelun kohteena on opettajien omakohtaiset kokemukset ja käsitykset siitä, mikä on haastava vuorovaikutustilanne ja miten opettajan toiminta on auttanut tilanteen ratkaisemiseksi. Tutkielman aineisto kerättiin teemahaastatteluna. Metodologisena lähestymistapana on laadullisen tutkimusten piiriin kuuluva fenomenologia, jonka lähtökohtana ovat ihmisten kokemukset. Tutkielman luotettavuutta lisää tutkimusprosessin vaiheiden tarkka kuvaaminen sekä monipuolinen lähdekirjallisuus. Tutkielman viitekehys rakentuu opettajan ja oppilaan väliseen vuorovaikutukseen liittyvien käsitteiden ympärille, joita tarkastellaan opettajan, oppilaan ja vuorovaikutuksen näkökulmasta. Teoreettinen viitekehys pohjautuu aiempiin aiheesta tehtyihin tutkimuksiin, mutta tutkimuksen aineisto muodostaa lopullisen teorian tutkielmalle. Vuorovaikutuksen käsite on laaja ja opettaja-oppilas-vuorovaikutussuhde käsitteenä on erilainen tutkittaessa sitä oppilaan vai opettajan näkökulmasta. Tässä tutkielmassa pääpaino on opettajan näkökulmassa. Haastava vuorovaikutus ei ole käsitteenä yksiselitteinen, vaan käsitteen määrittelyyn vaikuttaa vuorovaikutustilannetta arvioineen henkilön subjektiiviset käsitykset ja kokemukset. Tutkielman tulosten mukaan haastavat vuorovaikutustilanteet voivat olla fyysistä tai psyykkistä väkivaltaa sekä oppilaan vetäytyvää käyttäytymistä. Ammattimainen ja läsnä oleva opettaja kohtaa oppilaansa lämpimästi, mikä auttaa ratkaisemaan haastavia vuorovaikutustilanteita. Opettajan aito kiinnostus oppilaaseen ja hyvän huomaaminen koettiin keskeisiksi tekijöiksi haastavien tilanteiden selvittämisessä. Tutkielma vahvistaa omalta osaltaan käsitystä haastavista vuorovaikutustilanteista ja sitä, että opettajan oma toiminta vaikuttaa vahvasti siihen, mihin suuntaan tilanne kehittyy

Maksaetäpesäkkeiden leikkaushoito - missä menevät rajat?

Maksaetäpesäkekirurgia tarjoaa mahdollisuuden parantavaan hoitoon osalle levinnyttä kolorektaalisyöpää ja neuroendokriinista syöpää sairastavista potilaista. Potilasvalinta ja hoidon suunnittelu vaativat moniammatillista yhteistyötä maksakirurgin, gastrokirurgin, onkologin, gastroradiologin ja maksapatologin kesken. Suunnittelussa huomioidaan syöpätaudin käyttäytyminen, kasvainten sijainti maksassa, maksan toiminta ja potilaan yleissairaudet.</p

Centralized repeated resectability assessment of patients with colorectalliver metastases during first-line treatment : prospective study

Y Background: Metastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases. Methods: The prospective RAXO study was a nationwide study in Finland. Patients with treatable metastatic colorectal cancer at any site were eligible. This planned substudy included patients with baseline liver metastases between 2012 and 2018. Resectability was reassessed by the multidisciplinary team at Helsinki tertiary referral centre upfront and twice during first-line systemic therapy. Outcomes were resectability rates, management changes, and survival. Results: Of 812 patients included, 301 (37.1 per cent) had liver-only metastases. Of these, tumours were categorized as upfront resectable in 161 (53.5 per cent), and became amenable to surgery during systemic treatment in 63 (20.9 per cent). Some 207 patients (68.7 per cent) eventually underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy in resectability between central and local judgement was noted for 102 patients (33.9 per cent). Median disease-free survival (DFS) after first resection was 20 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 80, 32, and 21 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, and 5-year OS rates were 68, 37, and 9 per cent, respectively. Liver and extrahepatic metastases were present in 511 patients. Of these, tumours in 72 patients (14.1 per cent) were categorized as upfront resectable, and 53 patients (10.4 per cent) became eligible for surgery. Eventually 110 patients (21.5 per cent) underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy between local and central resectability was noted for 116 patients (22.7 per cent). Median DFS from first resection was 7 months and median OS 55 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 79, 42, and 17 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, with 5-year OS rates of 65, 39, and 2 per cent, respectively. Conclusion: Repeated centralized resectability assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases improved resection and survival rates.Peer reviewe

Centralized repeated resectability assessment of patients with colorectalliver metastases during first-line treatment: prospective study

Background: Metastasectomy is probably underused in metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of centralized repeated assessment on resectability rate of liver metastases.Methods: The prospective RAXO study was a nationwide study in Finland. Patients with treatable metastatic colorectal cancer at any site were eligible. This planned substudy included patients with baseline liver metastases between 2012 and 2018. Resectability was reassessed by the multidisciplinary team at Helsinki tertiary referral centre upfront and twice during first-line systemic therapy. Outcomes were resectability rates, management changes, and survival.Results: Of 812 patients included, 301 (37.1 per cent) had liver-only metastases. Of these, tumours were categorized as upfront resectable in 161 (53.5 per cent), and became amenable to surgery during systemic treatment in 63 (20.9 per cent). Some 207 patients (68.7 per cent) eventually underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy in resectability between central and local judgement was noted for 102 patients (33.9 per cent). Median disease-free survival (DFS) after first resection was 20 months and overall survival (OS) 79 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 80, 32, and 21 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, and 5-year OS rates were 68, 37, and 9 per cent, respectively. Liver and extrahepatic metastases were present in 511 patients. Of these, tumours in 72 patients (14.1 per cent) were categorized as upfront resectable, and 53 patients (10.4 per cent) became eligible for surgery. Eventually 110 patients (21.5 per cent) underwent liver resection or ablation. At baseline, a discrepancy between local and central resectability was noted for 116 patients (22.7 per cent). Median DFS from first resection was 7 months and median OS 55 months. Median OS after diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer was 79, 42, and 17 months in R0-1 resection, R2/ablation, and non-resected groups, with 5-year OS rates of 65, 39, and 2 per cent, respectively.Conclusion: Repeated centralized resectability assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases improved resection and survival rates.</p

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic duct disruption or disconnection: an international expert survey and case vignette study

Background: Pancreatic duct disruption or disconnection is a potentially severe complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. With no existing treatment guidelines, it is unclear whether there is any consensus among experts in clinical practice. We evaluated current expert opinion regarding the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic duct disruption and disconnection in an international case vignette study. Methods: An online case vignette survey was sent to 110 international expert pancreatologists. Expert selection was based on publications in the last 5 years and/or participation in development of IAP/APA and ESGE guidelines on acute pancreatitis. Consensus was defined as agreement by at least 75% of the experts. Results: The response rate was 51% (n = 56). Forty-four experts (79%) obtained a MRI/MRCP and 52 experts (93%) measured amylase levels in percutaneous drain fluid to evaluate pancreatic duct integrity. The majority of experts favored endoscopic transluminal drainage for infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic duct disruption (84%, n = 45) or disconnection (88%, n = 43). Consensus was lacking regarding the treatment of patients with persistent percutaneous drain production, and with persistent sterile necrosis. Conclusion: This international survey of experts demonstrates that there are many areas for which no consensus existed, providing clear focus for future investigation

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Correction to: Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake

Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study

Funder: European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100013347Funder: Flemish Society for Critical Care NursesAbstract: Purpose: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are particularly susceptible to developing pressure injuries. Epidemiologic data is however unavailable. We aimed to provide an international picture of the extent of pressure injuries and factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries in adult ICU patients. Methods: International 1-day point-prevalence study; follow-up for outcome assessment until hospital discharge (maximum 12 weeks). Factors associated with ICU-acquired pressure injury and hospital mortality were assessed by generalised linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results: Data from 13,254 patients in 1117 ICUs (90 countries) revealed 6747 pressure injuries; 3997 (59.2%) were ICU-acquired. Overall prevalence was 26.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.9–27.3). ICU-acquired prevalence was 16.2% (95% CI 15.6–16.8). Sacrum (37%) and heels (19.5%) were most affected. Factors independently associated with ICU-acquired pressure injuries were older age, male sex, being underweight, emergency surgery, higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Braden score 3 days, comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency), organ support (renal replacement, mechanical ventilation on ICU admission), and being in a low or lower-middle income-economy. Gradually increasing associations with mortality were identified for increasing severity of pressure injury: stage I (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.2–1.8), stage II (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4–1.9), and stage III or worse (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.3–3.3). Conclusion: Pressure injuries are common in adult ICU patients. ICU-acquired pressure injuries are associated with mainly intrinsic factors and mortality. Optimal care standards, increased awareness, appropriate resource allocation, and further research into optimal prevention are pivotal to tackle this important patient safety threat

Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of pancreatic fistulas in severe necrotizing pancreatitis and the long-term outcome of acute pancreatitis

Abstract Acute infected necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is a very complex disease with a high risk of complications and death. ANP is difficult to treat and is often associated with poor outcomes. Despite the increasing data on the technical details required to perform a mini-invasive necrosectomy for walled-off necrosis (WON), relatively few studies have focused on the presence and consequences of pancreatic duct disruption in the context of APN. Moreover, the long-term prognosis of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) is scant. The aim of this study was to examine the diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of pancreatic fistulas (PFs) associated with APN. In addition, the long-term prognosis of AP was evaluated. The study population consists of the patients with AP treated at Oulu University Hospital, Finland (Studies I–IV) and Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark (Study II) during 1995–2015. In the first part of the study, all consecutive patients following open necrosectomy for infected ANP were demonstrated to have PF. Endoscopic transpapillary pancreatic stenting (ETPS) was attempted and proven to be an effective and safe treatment for patients with PF. In Study II, prophylactic pancreatic stenting in the early stage of the disease was tested in a randomized controlled trial to the patients with ANP to prevent PFs associated with the disease. However, the study showed that the patients with ANP did not benefit from early prophylactic pancreatic ductal stenting (PPDS); instead, it seemed to be harmful for the patients. The results of Study III showed that single drain amylase level measurement after surgical necrosectomy is unreliable. According to this study, serial measurements are recommended to diagnose PFs after necrosectomy. Study IV including 1644 patients showed that AP, especially alcohol AP, was associated with a high long-term mortality. On the other hand, AP without an alcohol aetiology had a minimal impact on survival. In conclusion, in patients with infected ANP, a PF has to be considered in treatment, but the prevention of ductal leak with PPDS is not recommended. In addition, the poor long-term outcome among alcohol AP patients was due to alcohol-related diseases.Tiivistelmä Akuutti nekrotisoiva haimatulehdus ja erityisesti siihen liittyvä bakteeri-infektio on sairaus, johon liittyy korkea komplikaatio- ja kuolleisuusriski. Tautia usein komplisoi infektion lisäksi nekroosiin liittyvä haimafisteli, joka tekee hoidosta entistä haasteellisemman. Viime aikaisissa tutkimuksissa on käsitelty runsaasti mini-invasiivista nekrosektomiaa, mutta suhteellisen vähän on tutkimuksia nekrotisoivaan haimatulehdukseen liittyvästä fisteliongelmasta. Haimatulehdus-potilaiden pitkäaikaisennuste on myös epäselvä. Tämän väitöskirjatutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää nekrotisoivaan haimatulehdukseen liittyvän haimafistelin yleisyyttä, diagnostiikkaa, ehkäisyä ja hoitoa. Lisäksi tarkasteltiin akuuttiin haimatulehdukseen sairastuneiden potilaiden pitkäaikaisennustetta. Ensimmäisessä osatyössä ilmeni, että kaikille potilaille, joille suoritettiin haiman nekrosektomia kehittyi fisteli ja endoskooppinen transpapillaarinen haimateiden stenttaus (ETPS) osoittautui hyväksi ja turvalliseksi hoidoksi fistelin hoidossa. Toisessa prospektiivisessa randomoidussa kontrolloidussa osatyössä tutkittiin profylaktista haimateiden stenttausta nekrotisoivassa haimatulehduksessa. Tutkimus osoitti, etteivät potilaat hyötyneet stenttauksesta: toimenpiteestä oli enemmän haittaa kuin hyötyä. Tämän tutkimuksen mukaan protetisointia ei suositella tehtäväksi taudin alkuvaiheessa. Kolmannessa osatyössä selvitettiin haiman nekrosektomian jälkeisen haimafistelin diagnosointia. Tutkimustuloksen mukaan haimafistelin osoittamiseksi dreenieritteen amylaasitasoa mittaamalla tarvitaan useita mittauskertoja, koska yksittäisen mittauksen sensitiivisyys on matala. Neljännessä osatyössä analysoitiin Oulun yliopistollisessa sairaalassa 1995–2012 akuutin haimatulehduksen sairastaneiden työikäisten potilaiden pitkäaikaisennustetta ja kuolinsyitä. Noin kymmenen vuoden seurannassa tutkimusryhmän (n = 1 644) kuolleisuus oli yli nelinkertainen verrattuna ikä- ja sukupuolivakioituihin verrokeihin (n = 8 220). Merkittävin kuolleisuutta lisäävä tekijä oli alkoholi. Tutkimuksemme osoitti, että infektoituneen haimanekroosiin liittyvä haimafisteli on huomioitava hoidossa. Varhaisesta profylaktisesta haimateiden protetisoinnista ei tutkimuksessa osoitettu olevan hyötyä. Alkoholin aiheuttaman haimatulehduksen pitkäaikaisennusteen mortaliteetti on korkea johtuen alkoholin käytöstä ja siihen liittyvistä sairauksista

Large Bowel Obstruction in a Young Woman Simulating a Malignant Neoplasm: A Case Report of Actinomyces Infection

Pelvic and intra-abdominal Actinomycosis can be difficult to diagnose preoperatively and it may also mimic many other diseases, including malignancies. We present a patient with pelvic Actinomycosis probably caused by a long-standing intrauterine device (IUD). We emphasize the challenges in diagnostic process and stress that though a rare disease, intra-abdominal Actinomycosis should be suspected in cases with intra-abdominal mass of uncertain etiology. The early recognition may spare the patient from extensive surgical operation