A nexus of intrinsic dynamics underlies translocase priming

The cytoplasmic ATPase SecA and the membrane-embedded SecYEG channel assemble to form the Sec translocase. How this interaction primes and catalytically activates the translocase remains unclear. We show that priming exploits a nexus of intrinsic dynamics in SecA. Using atomistic simulations, smFRET, and HDX-MS, we reveal multiple dynamic islands that cross-talk with domain and quaternary motions. These dynamic elements are functionally important and conserved. Central to the nexus is a slender stem through which rotation of the preprotein clamp of SecA is biased by ATPase domain motions between open and closed clamping states. An H-bonded framework covering most of SecA enables multi-tier dynamics and conformational alterations with minimal energy input. As a result, cognate ligands select preexisting conformations and alter local dynamics to regulate catalytic activity and clamp motions. These events prime the translocase for high-affinity reception of non-folded preprotein clients. Dynamics nexuses are likely universal and essential in multi-liganded proteins.</p

Preproteins couple the intrinsic dynamics of SecA to its ATPase cycle to translocate via a catch and release mechanism

Protein machines undergo conformational motions to interact with and manipulate polymeric substrates. The Sec translocase promiscuously recognizes, becomes activated, and secretes >500 non-folded preprotein clients across bacterial cytoplasmic membranes. Here, we reveal that the intrinsic dynamics of the translocase ATPase, SecA, and of preproteins combine to achieve translocation. SecA possesses an intrinsically dynamic preprotein clamp attached to an equally dynamic ATPase motor. Alternating motor conformations are finely controlled by the γ-phosphate of ATP, while ADP causes motor stalling, independently of clamp motions. Functional preproteins physically bridge these independent dynamics. Their signal peptides promote clamp closing; their mature domain overcomes the rate-limiting ADP release. While repeated ATP cycles shift the motor between unique states, multiple conformationally frustrated prongs in the clamp repeatedly “catch and release” trapped preprotein segments until translocation completion. This universal mechanism allows any preprotein to promiscuously recognize the translocase, usurp its intrinsic dynamics, and become secreted

Structural dynamics in the evolution of a bilobed protein scaffold

Novel biophysical tools allow the structural dynamics of proteins and the regulation of such dynamics by binding partners to be explored in unprecedented detail. Although this has provided critical insights into protein function, the means by which structural dynamics direct protein evolution remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how proteins with a bilobed structure, composed of two related domains from the periplasmic-binding protein–like II domain family, have undergone divergent evolution, leading to adaptation of their structural dynamics. We performed a structural analysis on ∼600 bilobed proteins with a common primordial structural core, which we complemented with biophysical studies to explore the structural dynamics of selected examples by single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer and Hydrogen–Deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. We show that evolutionary modifications of the structural core, largely at its termini, enable distinct structural dynamics, allowing the diversification of these proteins into transcription factors, enzymes, and extracytoplasmic transport-related proteins. Structural embellishments of the core created interdomain interactions that stabilized structural states, reshaping the active site geometry, and ultimately altered substrate specificity. Our findings reveal an as-yet-unrecognized mechanism for the emergence of functional promiscuity during long periods of evolution and are applicable to a large number of domain architectures

Monitoring Protein Secretion in Streptomyces Using Fluorescent Proteins

Fluorescent proteins are a major cell biology tool to analyze protein sub-cellular topology. Here we have applied this technology to study protein secretion in the Gram-positive bacterium Streptomyces lividans TK24, a widely used host for heterologous protein secretion biotechnology. Green and monomeric red fluorescent proteins were fused behind Sec (SPSec) or Tat (SPTat) signal peptides to direct them through the respective export pathway. Significant secretion of fluorescent eGFP and mRFP was observed exclusively through the Tat and Sec pathways, respectively. Plasmid over-expression was compared to a chromosomally integrated spSec-mRFP gene to allow monitoring secretion under high and low level synthesis in various media. Fluorimetric detection of SPSec-mRFP recorded folded states, while immuno-staining detected even non-folded topological intermediates. Secretion of SPSec-mRFP is unexpectedly complex, is regulated independently of cell growth phase and is influenced by the growth regime. At low level synthesis, highly efficient secretion occurs until it is turned off and secretory preforms accumulate. At high level synthesis, the secretory pathway overflows and proteins are driven to folding and subsequent degradation. High-level synthesis of heterologous secretory proteins, whether secretion competent or not, has a drastic effect on the endogenous secretome, depending on their secretion efficiency. These findings lay the foundations of dissecting how protein targeting and secretion are regulated by the interplay between the metabolome, secretion factors and stress responses in the S. lividans model

Bcl-xL acts as an inhibitor of IP3R channels, thereby antagonizing Ca2+-driven apoptosis

Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-family members not only act at mitochondria but also at the endoplasmic reticulum, where they impact Ca dynamics by controlling IP receptor (IPR) function. Current models propose distinct roles for Bcl-2 vs. Bcl-xL, with Bcl-2 inhibiting IPRs and preventing pro-apoptotic Ca release and Bcl-xL sensitizing IPRs to low [IP] and promoting pro-survival Ca oscillations. We here demonstrate that Bcl-xL too inhibits IPR-mediated Ca release by interacting with the same IPR regions as Bcl-2. Via in silico superposition, we previously found that the residue K87 of Bcl-xL spatially resembled K17 of Bcl-2, a residue critical for Bcl-2’s IPR-inhibitory properties. Mutagenesis of K87 in Bcl-xL impaired its binding to IPR and abrogated Bcl-xL’s inhibitory effect on IPRs. Single-channel recordings demonstrate that purified Bcl-xL, but not Bcl-xL, suppressed IPR single-channel openings stimulated by sub-maximal and threshold [IP]. Moreover, we demonstrate that Bcl-xL-mediated inhibition of IPRs contributes to its anti-apoptotic properties against Ca-driven apoptosis. Staurosporine (STS) elicits long-lasting Ca elevations in wild-type but not in IPR-knockout HeLa cells, sensitizing the former to STS treatment. Overexpression of Bcl-xL in wild-type HeLa cells suppressed STS-induced Ca signals and cell death, while Bcl-xL was much less effective in doing so. In the absence of IPRs, Bcl-xL and Bcl-xL were equally effective in suppressing STS-induced cell death. Finally, we demonstrate that endogenous Bcl-xL also suppress IPR activity in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, whereby Bcl-xL knockdown augmented IPR-mediated Ca release and increased the sensitivity towards STS, without altering the ER Ca content. Hence, this study challenges the current paradigm of divergent functions for Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL in Ca-signaling modulation and reveals that, similarly to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL inhibits IPR-mediated Ca release and IPR-driven cell death. Our work further underpins that IPR inhibition is an integral part of Bcl-xL’s anti-apoptotic function.The work was supported by Grants from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) (G.0901.18N), by the Research Council of the KU Leuven (OT14/101, C14/19/099, C14/19/101, and AKUL/19/34), the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program (Belgian Science Policy; IAP-P7/13), the Central European Leuven Strategic Alliance (CELSA/18/040), and the Canadian Institutes Health Research (FDN143312). NR and HI are recipient of postdoctoral fellowships of the FWO; HI obtained a travel grant from the FWO to perform work in DIY’s laboratory. GB, JBP and DIY are part of the FWO Scientific Research Network CaSign (W0.019.17N). Work in DIY’s lab is supported by NIH (NIDCR) grant DE014756. DWA holds the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Membrane Biogenesis. The Switch laboratory was supported by the Flanders institute for Biotechnology (VIB), the University of Leuven, the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Hercules Foundation/FWO AKUL/15/34—G0H1716N). NL is funded by the Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek (SAO-FRA 2020/0013) and is recipient of FWO postdoctoral fellowships (12P0919N and 12P0922N to NL)

Preprotein mature domains contain translocase targeting signals that are essential for secretion

Secretory proteins are only temporary cytoplasmic residents. They are typically synthesized as preproteins, carrying signal peptides N-terminally fused to their mature domains. In bacteria secretion largely occurs posttranslationally through the membrane-embedded SecA-SecYEG translocase. Upon crossing the plasma membrane, signal peptides are cleaved off and mature domains reach their destinations and fold. Targeting to the translocase is mediated by signal peptides. The role of mature domains in targeting and secretion is unclear. We now reveal that mature domains harbor their own independent targeting signals (mature domain targeting signals [MTSs]). These are multiple, degenerate, interchangeable, linear or 3D hydrophobic stretches that become available because of the unstructured states of targeting-competent preproteins. Their receptor site on the cytoplasmic face of the SecYEG-bound SecA is also of hydrophobic nature and is located adjacent to the signal peptide cleft. Both the preprotein MTSs and their receptor site on SecA are essential for protein secretion. Evidently, mature domains have their own previously unsuspected distinct roles in preprotein targeting and secretion

Editorial: Thematic issue on bacterial protein export: from fundamentals to applications

status: publishe

SecA-mediated targeting and translocation of secretory proteins

More than 30years of research has revealed that the dynamic nanomotor SecA is a central player in bacterial protein secretion. SecA associates with the SecYEG channel and transports polypeptides post-translationally to the trans side of the cytoplasmic membrane. It comprises a helicase-like ATPase core coupled to two domains that provide specificity for preprotein translocation. Apart from SecYEG, SecA associates with multiple ligands like ribosomes, nucleotides, lipids, chaperones and preproteins. It exerts its essential contribution in two phases. First, SecA, alone or in concert with chaperones, helps mediate the targeting of the secretory proteins from the ribosome to the membrane. Next, at the membrane it converts chemical energy to mechanical work and translocates preproteins through the SecYEG channel. SecA is a highly dynamic enzyme, it exploits disorder-order kinetics, swiveling and dissociation of domains and dimer to monomer transformations that are tightly coupled with its catalytic function. Preprotein signal sequences and mature domains exploit these dynamics to manipulate the nanomotor and thus achieve their export at the expense of metabolic energy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein Trafficking & Secretion.publisher: Elsevier articletitle: SecA-mediated targeting and translocation of secretory proteins journaltitle: Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.014 content_type: article copyright: Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.status: publishe

Protein Transport Across the Bacterial Plasma Membrane by the Sec Pathway

More than a third of all bacterial polypeptides, comprising the 'exportome', are transported to extracytoplasmic locations. Most of the exportome is targeted and inserts into ('membranome') or crosses ('secretome') the plasma membrane. The membranome and secretome use distinct targeting signals and factors, and driving forces, but both use the ubiquitous and essential Sec translocase and its SecYEG protein-conducting channel. Membranome export is co-translational and uses highly hydrophobic N-terminal signal anchor sequences recognized by the signal recognition particle on the ribosome, that also targets C-tail anchor sequences. Translating ribosomes drive movement of these polypeptides through the lateral gate of SecY into the inner membrane. On the other hand, secretome export is post-translational and carries two types of targeting signals: cleavable N-terminal signal peptides and multiple short hydrophobic targeting signals in their mature domains. Secretome proteins remain translocation competent due to occupying loosely folded to completely non-folded states during targeting. This is accomplished mainly by the intrinsic properties of mature domains and assisted by signal peptides and/or chaperones. Secretome proteins bind to the dimeric SecA subunit of the translocase. SecA converts from a dimeric preprotein receptor to a monomeric ATPase motor and drives vectorial crossing of chains through SecY aided by the proton motive force. Signal peptides are removed by signal peptidases and translocated chains fold or follow subsequent trafficking.status: publishe

Streptomyces protein secretion and its application in biotechnology

Bacteria are of tremendous importance in the pharma- and bio-industry as producers of a broad range of economically interesting metabolites and proteins. Gram-positive bacteria are valuable hosts for the production of heterologous proteins for obvious reasons. Contrary to Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria release their secreted proteins immediately into the spent culture broth as they are not hindered by an outer membrane. Secretory protein production also avoids the formation of inclusion bodies, hence facilitating downstream processing. Eight protein secretion pathways have been described in Gram-positive bacteria, but solely the general secretion or Sec pathway and, to a lesser extent, the Twin-arginine pathway, are used for the recombinant protein production. This process is not always successful, but might be hampered by inefficient secretion, misfolding of the recombinant protein, its degradation by proteases and metabolic burden by the host hindering proper growth and diminishing product yield. In this review, the different protein export avenues will be briefly discussed, and the potential means to optimize protein secretion and yields for the Streptomyces lividans model presented. The proposed approaches are largely applicable for other Streptomyces host systems.status: publishe