Siberian Subtype Tickborne Encephalitis Virus, Finland

We isolated 11 Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus (TBEV) strains from Ixodes persulcatus ticks from a TBEV-endemic focus in the Kokkola Archipelago, western Finland. Thus I. persulcatus and the Siberian TBEV are reported in a focus considerably northwest of their previously known range in eastern Europe and Siberia

Multi-laboratory evaluation of ReaScan TBE IgM rapid test, 2016 to 2017

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a potentially severe neurological disease caused by TBE virus (TBEV). In Europe and Asia, TBEV infection has become a growing public health concern and requires fast and specific detection. Aim: In this observational study, we evaluated a rapid TBE IgM test, ReaScan TBE, for usage in a clinical laboratory setting. Methods: Patient sera found negative or positive for TBEV by serological and/or molecular methods in diagnostic laboratories of five European countries endemic for TBEV (Estonia, Finland, Slovenia, the Netherlands and Sweden) were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the test. The patients' diagnoses were based on other commercial or quality assured in-house assays, i.e. each laboratory's conventional routine methods. For specificity analysis, serum samples from patients with infections known to cause problems in serology were employed. These samples tested positive for e.g. Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, or for flaviviruses other than TBEV, i.e. dengue, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and Zika viruses. Samples from individuals vaccinated against flaviviruses other than TBEV were also included. Altogether, 172 serum samples from patients with acute TBE and 306 TBE IgM negative samples were analysed. Results: Compared with each laboratory's conventional methods, the tested assay had similar sensitivity and specificity (99.4% and 97.7%, respectively). Samples containing potentially interfering antibodies did not cause specificity problems. Conclusion: Regarding diagnosis of acute TBEV infections, ReaScan TBE offers rapid and convenient complementary IgM detection. If used as a stand-alone, it can provide preliminary results in a laboratory or point of care setting.Peer reviewe

Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients

Background Understanding the false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is pivotal for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and it has implications for patient management. Our aim was to determine the real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Methods This population-based retrospective study was conducted in March-April 2020 in the Helsinki Capital Region, Finland. Adults who were clinically suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection and underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, with sufficient data in their medical records for grading of clinical suspicion were eligible. In addition to examining the first RT-PCR test of repeat-tested individuals, we also used high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 as the reference standard for calculating the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Results All 1,194 inpatients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [18.3] years; 45.2% women) admitted to COVID-19 cohort wards during the study period were included. The outpatient cohort of 1,814 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [17.2] years; 69.1% women) was sampled from epidemiological line lists by systematic quasi-random sampling. The sensitivity (95% CI) for laboratory confirmed cases (repeat-tested patients) was 85.7% (81.5-89.1%) inpatients; 95.5% (92.2-97.5%) outpatients, 89.9% (88.2-92.1%) all. When also patients that were graded as high suspicion but never tested positive were included in the denominator, the sensitivity (95% CI) was: 67.5% (62.9-71.9%) inpatients; 34.9% (31.4-38.5%) outpatients; 47.3% (44.4-50.3%) all. Conclusions The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was only moderate at best. The relatively high false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing need to be accounted for in clinical decision making, epidemiological interpretations, and when using RT-PCR as a reference for other tests.Peer reviewe

Global variations in diabetes mellitus based on fasting glucose and haemogloblin A1c

Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are both used to diagnose diabetes, but may identify different people as having diabetes. We used data from 117 population-based studies and quantified, in different world regions, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes, and whether those who were previously undiagnosed and detected as having diabetes in survey screening had elevated FPG, HbA1c, or both. We developed prediction equations for estimating the probability that a person without previously diagnosed diabetes, and at a specific level of FPG, had elevated HbA1c, and vice versa. The age-standardised proportion of diabetes that was previously undiagnosed, and detected in survey screening, ranged from 30% in the high-income western region to 66% in south Asia. Among those with screen-detected diabetes with either test, the agestandardised proportion who had elevated levels of both FPG and HbA1c was 29-39% across regions; the remainder had discordant elevation of FPG or HbA1c. In most low- and middle-income regions, isolated elevated HbA1c more common than isolated elevated FPG. In these regions, the use of FPG alone may delay diabetes diagnosis and underestimate diabetes prevalence. Our prediction equations help allocate finite resources for measuring HbA1c to reduce the global gap in diabetes diagnosis and surveillance.peer-reviewe

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) stool multiplex PCR can replace culture for clinical diagnosis and follow-up

Shiga toxin (stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) causes potentially severe gastrointestinal infections. Due to its public health importance, control measures are required, and carriers may need to refrain from work or daycare when the risk of spread to vulnerable people is high. We evaluated the use of direct stool multiplex PCR compared to culture for primary STEC diagnostics and for follow-up in order to update the national guidelines for STEC monitoring. We analyzed primary and follow-up samples of 236 STEC PCR-positive cases at HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland in 2016-2017, altogether 858 samples. All STEC PCR-positive samples were inoculated on non-selective chromogenic agar plates. Culture positivity was confirmed from culture sweeps by PCR. 211 (89%) of the cases were culture positive in their primary sample. Of all primary and follow-up samples, 499 were PCR positive and of these 450 (90%) were culture positive. PCR-negative follow-up samples were available from 125 cases. Of these, 88 cases were followed for at least three consecutive PCR-negative samples. Two cases (2%) had culture-positive sample(s) after two consecutive PCR-negative samples. The median time for STEC clearance was 22-23 days. The laboratory-developed multiplex PCR test used in this study is a reliable method for STEC diagnostics and follow-up in a clinical laboratory. When non-selective methodology is used, the majority of PCR-positive samples (90%) are also culture positive. Furthermore, only two cases (2%) in our material had two consecutive PCR-negative samples followed by positive samples. Consequently, to demonstrate the clearance from STEC infection, we consider two PCR-negative follow-up samples sufficient. The Finnish national guidelines for STEC monitoring have been updated accordingly.Peer reviewe

Miten itsemurhariskiä voidaan arvioida?

Tiivistelmä Suomi on muihin Pohjoismaihin verrattuna suuren itsemurhakuolleisuuden maa. Yksilöllistä itsemurhariskiä ei nykyisillä menetelmillä pystytä luotettavasti määrittämään, mutta suhteellista riskin suurenemista voidaan arvioida selvittämällä riskitekijöiden kasautumista ja potilaan elämäntilannetta kokonaisuutena. Merkittävin yksittäinen itsemurhan riskitekijä on aiempi itsemurhayritys. Muita merkittäviä itsemurhan riskitekijöitä ovat muun muassa mielenterveyden häiriöt, kuten mielialahäiriöt, psykoosit, persoonallisuushäiriöt ja päihdehäiriöt, sekä tietyt sosiodemografiset tekijät kuten työttömyys. Toivottomuus oirekuvassa on diagnoosista riippumatta suuren riskin merkki. Riskiä arvioitaessa tulee itsemurha-ajatuksista kysyä potilaalta suoraan. Myös strukturoituja kyselyjä voidaan käyttää riskinarvion tukena. Arviossa tulee pyrkiä kokonaisvaltaiseen ymmärrykseen potilaan psyykkisestä voinnista ja ajankohtaisista kuormitustekijöistä. Myös suojaavien tekijöiden kartoittaminen on osa onnistunutta kokonaisarviota

Multi-laboratory evaluation of ReaScan TBE IgM rapid test, 2016 to 2017.

BackgroundTick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a potentially severe neurological disease caused by TBE virus (TBEV). In Europe and Asia, TBEV infection has become a growing public health concern and requires fast and specific detection.AimIn this observational study, we evaluated a rapid TBE IgM test, ReaScan TBE, for usage in a clinical laboratory setting.MethodsPatient sera found negative or positive for TBEV by serological and/or molecular methods in diagnostic laboratories of five European countries endemic for TBEV (Estonia, Finland, Slovenia, the Netherlands and Sweden) were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the test. The patients' diagnoses were based on other commercial or quality assured in-house assays, i.e. each laboratory's conventional routine methods. For specificity analysis, serum samples from patients with infections known to cause problems in serology were employed. These samples tested positive for e.g. Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and Anaplasma phagocytophilum, or for flaviviruses other than TBEV, i.e. dengue, Japanese encephalitis, West Nile and Zika viruses. Samples from individuals vaccinated against flaviviruses other than TBEV were also included. Altogether, 172 serum samples from patients with acute TBE and 306 TBE IgM negative samples were analysed.ResultsCompared with each laboratory's conventional methods, the tested assay had similar sensitivity and specificity (99.4% and 97.7%, respectively). Samples containing potentially interfering antibodies did not cause specificity problems.ConclusionRegarding diagnosis of acute TBEV infections, ReaScan TBE offers rapid and convenient complementary IgM detection. If used as a stand-alone, it can provide preliminary results in a laboratory or point of care setting