118 research outputs found
Strategies of increasing carpooling behavior among urban commuters / BEBR No. 427
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 14-15)
A meta-analytic review of stand-alone interventions to improve body image
Objective
Numerous stand-alone interventions to improve body image have been developed. The
present review used meta-analysis to estimate the effectiveness of such interventions, and
to identify the specific change techniques that lead to improvement in body image.
Methods
The inclusion criteria were that (a) the intervention was stand-alone (i.e., solely focused on
improving body image), (b) a control group was used, (c) participants were randomly
assigned to conditions, and (d) at least one pretest and one posttest measure of body
image was taken. Effect sizes were meta-analysed and moderator analyses were conducted.
A taxonomy of 48 change techniques used in interventions targeted at body image
was developed; all interventions were coded using this taxonomy.
Results
The literature search identified 62 tests of interventions (N = 3,846). Interventions produced
a small-to-medium improvement in body image (d+ = 0.38), a small-to-medium reduction in
beauty ideal internalisation (d+ = -0.37), and a large reduction in social comparison tendencies
(d+ = -0.72). However, the effect size for body image was inflated by bias both within
and across studies, and was reliable but of small magnitude once corrections for bias were
applied. Effect sizes for the other outcomes were no longer reliable once corrections for
bias were applied. Several features of the sample, intervention, and methodology moderated
intervention effects. Twelve change techniques were associated with improvements in
body image, and three techniques were contra-indicated.
Conclusions
The findings show that interventions engender only small improvements in body image, and
underline the need for large-scale, high-quality trials in this area. The review identifies effective
techniques that could be deployed in future interventions
Varespladib and cardiovascular events in patients with an acute coronary syndrome: the VISTA-16 randomized clinical trial
IMPORTANCE: Secretory phospholipase A2(sPLA2) generates bioactive phospholipid products implicated in atherosclerosis. The sPLA2inhibitor varespladib has favorable effects on lipid and inflammatory markers; however, its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of sPLA2inhibition with varespladib on cardiovascular outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial at 362 academic and community hospitals in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, India, and North America of 5145 patients randomized within 96 hours of presentation of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to either varespladib (n = 2572) or placebo (n = 2573) with enrollment between June 1, 2010, and March 7, 2012 (study termination on March 9, 2012). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive varespladib (500 mg) or placebo daily for 16 weeks, in addition to atorvastatin and other established therapies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy measurewas a composite of cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, or unstable angina with evidence of ischemia requiring hospitalization at 16 weeks. Six-month survival status was also evaluated. RESULTS: At a prespecified interim analysis, including 212 primary end point events, the independent data and safety monitoring board recommended termination of the trial for futility and possible harm. The primary end point occurred in 136 patients (6.1%) treated with varespladib compared with 109 patients (5.1%) treated with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95%CI, 0.97-1.61; log-rank P = .08). Varespladib was associated with a greater risk of MI (78 [3.4%] vs 47 [2.2%]; HR, 1.66; 95%CI, 1.16-2.39; log-rank P = .005). The composite secondary end point of cardiovascular mortality, MI, and stroke was observed in 107 patients (4.6%) in the varespladib group and 79 patients (3.8%) in the placebo group (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.82; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with recent ACS, varespladib did not reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and significantly increased the risk of MI. The sPLA2inhibition with varespladib may be harmful and is not a useful strategy to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes after ACS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01130246. Copyright 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved
Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)
We present an overview of state-of-The-Art chemistry-climate and chemistry transport models that are used within phase 1 of the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI-1). The CCMI aims to conduct a detailed evaluation of participating models using process-oriented diagnostics derived from observations in order to gain confidence in the models' projections of the stratospheric ozone layer, tropospheric composition, air quality, where applicable global climate change, and the interactions between them. Interpretation of these diagnostics requires detailed knowledge of the radiative, chemical, dynamical, and physical processes incorporated in the models. Also an understanding of the degree to which CCMI-1 recommendations for simulations have been followed is necessary to understand model responses to anthropogenic and natural forcing and also to explain intermodel differences. This becomes even more important given the ongoing development and the ever-growing complexity of these models. This paper also provides an overview of the available CCMI-1 simulations with the aim of informing CCMI data users.This work has been supported by NIWA as part of its government-funded, core research. Olaf Morgenstern acknowledges support from the Royal Society Marsden Fund, grant 12-NIW-006, and under the Deep South National Science Challenge. The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of NeSI high-performance computing facilities to the results of this research. New Zealand’s national facilities are provided by the New Zealand eScience Infrastructure (NeSI) and funded jointly by NeSI’s collaborator institutions and through the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment’s Research Infrastructure programme (https://www.nesi.org.nz). The SOCOL team acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant agreement CRSII2_147659 (FUPSOL II). CCSRNIES’s research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (2-1303) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, and computations were performed on NEC-SX9/A(ECO) computers at the CGER, NIES. Wuhu Feng (NCAS) provided support for the TOMCAT simulations. Neal Butchart, Steven C. Hardiman, and Fiona M. O’Connor and the development of HadGEM3-ES were supported by the Joint UK DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101). Neal Butchart and Steven C. Hardiman also acknowledge additional support from the European Project 603557-STRATOCLIM under the FP7-ENV.2013.6.1-2 programme. Fiona M. O’Connor acknowledges additional support from the Horizon 2020 European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation CRESCENDO project under grant agreement no. 641816. Slimane Bekki acknowledges support from the European Project 603557-STRATOCLIM under the FP7-ENV.2013.6.1-2 programme and from the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France) within the SOLSPEC project. Kane Stone and Robyn Schofield acknowledge funding from the Australian Government’s Australian Antarctic science grant program (FoRCES 4012), the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (CE110001028), the Commonwealth Department of the Environment (grant 2011/16853), and computational support from National computational infrastructure INCMAS project q90. The CNRM-CM chemistry–climate people acknowledge the support from Météo-France, CNRS, and CERFACS, and in particular the work of the entire team in charge of the CNRM/CERFACS climate model
Chronic Hypoxia Impairs Muscle Function in the Drosophila Model of Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe progressive myopathy caused by mutations in the DMD gene leading to a deficiency of the dystrophin protein. Due to ongoing muscle necrosis in respiratory muscles late-stage DMD is associated with respiratory insufficiency and chronic hypoxia (CH). To understand the effects of CH on dystrophin-deficient muscle in vivo, we exposed the Drosophila model for DMD (dmDys) to CH during a 16-day ascent to the summit of Mount Denali/McKinley (6194 meters above sea level). Additionally, dmDys and wild type (WT) flies were also exposed to CH in laboratory simulations of high altitude hypoxia. Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix GeneChips® and validated using qPCR. Hypoxic dmDys differentially expressed 1281 genes, whereas the hypoxic WT flies differentially expressed 56 genes. Interestingly, a number of genes (e.g. heat shock proteins) were discordantly regulated in response to CH between dmDys and WT. We tested the possibility that the disparate molecular responses of dystrophin-deficient tissues to CH could adversely affect muscle by performing functional assays in vivo. Normoxic and CH WT and dmDys flies were challenged with acute hypoxia and time-to-recover determined as well as subjected to climbing tests. Impaired performance was noted for CH-dmDys compared to normoxic dmDys or WT flies (rank order: Normoxic-WT ≈ CH-WT> Normoxic-dmDys> CH-dmDys). These data suggest that dystrophin-deficiency is associated with a disparate, pathological hypoxic stress response(s) and is more sensitive to hypoxia induced muscle dysfunction in vivo. We hypothesize that targeting/correcting the disparate molecular response(s) to hypoxia may offer a novel therapeutic strategy in DMD
Review of the global models used within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)
We present an overview of state-of-the-art chemistry-climate and -transport models that are used within the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). CCMI aims to conduct a detailed evaluation of participating models using process-oriented diagnostics derived from observations in order to gain confidence in the models’ projections of the stratospheric ozone layer, air quality, where applicable global climate change, and the interactions between them. Interpretation of these diagnostics requires detailed knowledge of the radiative, chemical, dynamical, and physical processes incorporated in the models. Also an understanding of the degree to which CCMI recommendations for simulations have been followed is necessary to understand model response to anthropogenic and natural forcing and also to explain inter-model differences. This becomes even more important given the ongoing development and the ever-growing complexity of these models. This paper also provides an overview of the available CCMI simulations with the aim to inform CCMI data users
Review of the global models used within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)
We present an overview of state-of-the-art chemistry-climate and -transport models that are used within the Chemistry Climate Model Initiative (CCMI). CCMI aims to conduct a detailed evaluation of participating models using process-oriented diagnostics derived from observations in order to gain confidence in the models’ projections of the stratospheric ozone layer, air quality, where applicable global climate change, and the interactions between them. Interpretation of these diagnostics requires detailed knowledge of the radiative, chemical, dynamical, and physical processes incorporated in the models. Also an understanding of the degree to which CCMI recommendations for simulations have been followed is necessary to understand model response to anthropogenic and natural forcing and also to explain inter-model differences. This becomes even more important given the ongoing development and the ever-growing complexity of these models. This paper also provides an overview of the available CCMI simulations with the aim to inform CCMI data users
ATP release via anion channels
ATP serves not only as an energy source for all cell types but as an ‘extracellular messenger-for autocrine and paracrine signalling. It is released from the cell via several different purinergic signal efflux pathways. ATP and its Mg2+ and/or H+ salts exist in anionic forms at physiological pH and may exit cells via some anion channel if the pore physically permits this. In this review we survey experimental data providing evidence for and against the release of ATP through anion channels. CFTR has long been considered a probable pathway for ATP release in airway epithelium and other types of cells expressing this protein, although non-CFTR ATP currents have also been observed. Volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying (VSOR) chloride channels are found in virtually all cell types and can physically accommodate or even permeate ATP4- in certain experimental conditions. However, pharmacological studies are controversial and argue against the actual involvement of the VSOR channel in significant release of ATP. A large-conductance anion channel whose open probability exhibits a bell-shaped voltage dependence is also ubiquitously expressed and represents a putative pathway for ATP release. This channel, called a maxi-anion channel, has a wide nanoscopic pore suitable for nucleotide transport and possesses an ATP-binding site in the middle of the pore lumen to facilitate the passage of the nucleotide. The maxi-anion channel conducts ATP and displays a pharmacological profile similar to that of ATP release in response to osmotic, ischemic, hypoxic and salt stresses. The relation of some other channels and transporters to the regulated release of ATP is also discussed
Estimates of ozone return dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative simulations
We analyse simulations performed for the
Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the
return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion
caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine.
We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including
a range of sensitivity studies which examine the impact
of climate change on ozone recovery. For the control
simulations (unconstrained by nudging towards analysed meteorology)
there is a large spread (±20 DU in the global average)
in the predictions of the absolute ozone column. Therefore,
the model results need to be adjusted for biases against
historical data. Also, the interannual variability in the model
results need to be smoothed in order to provide a reasonably
narrow estimate of the range of ozone return dates. Consistent
with previous studies, but here for a Representative
Concentration Pathway (RCP) of 6.0, these new CCMI simulations
project that global total column ozone will return to
1980 values in 2049 (with a 1σ uncertainty of 2043–2055).
At Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes column ozone is projected
to return to 1980 values in 2045 (2039–2050), and at
Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in 2032 (2020–2044). In
the polar regions, the return dates are 2060 (2055–2066) in
the Antarctic in October and 2034 (2025–2043) in the Arctic
in March. The earlier return dates in the Northern Hemisphere
reflect the larger sensitivity to dynamical changes.
Our estimates of return dates are later than those presented
in the 2014 Ozone Assessment by approximately 5–17 years,
depending on the region, with the previous best estimates
often falling outside of our uncertainty range. In the tropics
only around half the models predict a return of ozone to
1980 values, around 2040, while the other half do not reach
the 1980 value. All models show a negative trend in tropical
total column ozone towards the end of the 21st century. The
CCMI models generally agree in their simulation of the time
evolution of stratospheric chlorine and bromine, which are
the main drivers of ozone loss and recovery. However, there
are a few outliers which show that the multi-model mean results
for ozone recovery are not as tightly constrained as possible.
Throughout the stratosphere the spread of ozone return
dates to 1980 values between models tends to correlate with
the spread of the return of inorganic chlorine to 1980 values.
In the upper stratosphere, greenhouse gas-induced cooling
speeds up the return by about 10–20 years. In the lower
stratosphere, and for the column, there is a more direct link
in the timing of the return dates of ozone and chlorine, especially
for the large Antarctic depletion. Comparisons of total
column ozone between the models is affected by different
predictions of the evolution of tropospheric ozone within
the same scenario, presumably due to differing treatment
of tropospheric chemistry. Therefore, for many scenarios,
clear conclusions can only be drawn for stratospheric ozone
columns rather than the total column. As noted by previous
studies, the timing of ozone recovery is affected by the evolution
of N2O and CH4. However, quantifying the effect in the
simulations analysed here is limited by the few realisations
available for these experiments compared to internal model
variability. The large increase in N2O given in RCP 6.0 extends
the ozone return globally by ∼ 15 years relative to N2O
fixed at 1960 abundances, mainly because it allows tropical
column ozone to be depleted. The effect in extratropical latitudes
is much smaller. The large increase in CH4 given in the
RCP 8.5 scenario compared to RCP 6.0 also lengthens ozone
return by ∼ 15 years, again mainly through its impact in the
tropics. Overall, our estimates of ozone return dates are uncertain
due to both uncertainties in future scenarios, in particular
those of greenhouse gases, and uncertainties in models.
The scenario uncertainty is small in the short term but increases
with time, and becomes large by the end of the century.
There are still some model–model differences related
to well-known processes which affect ozone recovery. Efforts
need to continue to ensure that models used for assessment
purposes accurately represent stratospheric chemistry
and the prescribed scenarios of ozone-depleting substances,
and only those models are used to calculate return dates. For
future assessments of single forcing or combined effects of
CO2, CH4, and N2O on the stratospheric column ozone return
dates, this work suggests that it is more important to
have multi-member (at least three) ensembles for each scenario
from every established participating model, rather than
a large number of individual models
Ridesharing to work : a psychosocial analysis / BEBR No. 345
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 40-42)
- …