Metal-Metal Bonding in Uranium-Group 10 Complexes

Heterobimetallic complexes containing short uranium–group 10 metal bonds have been prepared from monometallic IU^IV(OAr^P-κ²<i>O</i>,<i>P</i>)₃ (<b>2</b>) {[Ar^PO]⁻ = 2-<i>tert</i>-butyl-4-methyl-6-(diphenylphosphino)­phenolate}. The U–M bond in IU^IV(μ-OAr^P-1κ¹<i>O</i>,2κ¹<i>P</i>)₃M⁰, M = Ni (<b>3–Ni</b>), Pd (<b>3–Pd</b>), and Pt (<b>3–Pt</b>), has been investigated by experimental and DFT computational methods. Comparisons of <b>3–Ni</b> with two further U–Ni complexes XU^IV(μ-OAr^P-1κ¹<i>O</i>,2κ¹<i>P</i>)₃Ni⁰, X = Me₃SiO (<b>4</b>) and F (<b>5</b>), was also possible via iodide substitution. All complexes were characterized by variable-temperature NMR spectroscopy, electrochemistry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. The U–M bonds are significantly shorter than any other crystallographically characterized d–f-block bimetallic, even though the ligand flexes to allow a variable U–M separation. Excellent agreement is found between the experimental and computed structures for <b>3–Ni</b> and <b>3–Pd</b>. Natural population analysis and natural localized molecular orbital (NLMO) compositions indicate that U employs both 5f and 6d orbitals in covalent bonding to a significant extent. Quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules analysis reveals U–M bond critical point properties typical of metallic bonding and a larger delocalization index (bond order) for the less polar U–Ni bond than U–Pd. Electrochemical studies agree with the computational analyses and the X-ray structural data for the U–X adducts <b>3–Ni</b>, <b>4</b>, and <b>5</b>. The data show a trend in uranium–metal bond strength that decreases from <b>3–Ni</b> down to <b>3–Pt</b> and suggest that exchanging the iodide for a fluoride strengthens the metal–metal bond. Despite short U–TM (transition metal) distances, four other computational approaches also suggest low U–TM bond orders, reflecting highly transition metal localized valence NLMOs. These are more so for <b>3–Pd</b> than <b>3–Ni</b>, consistent with slightly larger U–TM bond orders in the latter. Computational studies of the model systems (PH₃)₃MU­(OH)₃I (M = Ni, Pd) reveal longer and weaker unsupported U–TM bonds vs <b>3</b>

Self-seeded growth of germanium nanowires: coalescence and ostwald ripening

We report the controlled self-seeded growth of highly crystalline Ge nanowires, in the absence of conventional metal seed catalysts, using a variety of oligosilylgermane precursors and mixtures of germane and silane compounds (Ge:Si ratios between 1:4 and 1:1). The nanowires produced were encased in an amorphous shell of material derived from the precursors, which acted to isolate the Ge seed particles from which the nanowires were nucleated. The mode diameter and size distribution of the nanowires were found to increase as the growth temperature and Ge content in the precursors increased. Specifically, a model was developed to describe the main stages of self-seeded Ge nanowire growth (nucleation, coalescence, and Ostwald ripening) from the oligosilylgermane precursors and, in conjunction with TEM analysis, a mechanism of growth was proposed

Differential uranyl(v) oxo-group bonding between the uranium and metal cations from groups 1, 2, 4, and 12; a high energy resolution X-ray absorption, computational, and synthetic study

The uranyl(VI) ‘Pacman’ complex [(UO₂)(py)(H₂L)] A (L = polypyrrolic Schiff-base macrocycle) is reduced by Cp₂Ti(η²-Me₃SiC[triple bond, length as m-dash]CSiMe₃) and [Cp₂TiCl]₂ to oxo-titanated uranyl(V) complexes [(py)(Cp₂$Ti^{III}$OUO)(py)(H₂L)] 1 and [(ClCp₂$Ti^{IV}$OUO)(py)(H₂L)] 2. Combination of $Zr^{II}$ and $Zr^{IV}$ synthons with A yields the first $Zr^{IV}$–uranyl(V) complex, [(ClCp₂ZrOUO)(py)(H₂L)] 3. Similarly, combinations of $Ae^{0}$ and $Ae^{II}$ synthons (Ae = alkaline earth) afford the mono-oxo metalated uranyl(V) complexes [(py)₂(ClMgOUO)(py)(H₂L)] 4, [(py)₂(thf)₂(ICaOUO)(py) (H₂L)] 5; the zinc complexes [(py)₂(XZnOUO)(py)(H₂L)] (X = Cl 6, I 7) are formed in a similar manner. In contrast, the direct reactions of Rb or Cs metal with A generate the first mono-rubidiated and mono-caesiated uranyl(V) complexes; monomeric [(py)₃(RbOUO)(py)(H₂L)] 8 and hexameric [(MOUO)(py)(H₂L)]₆ (M = Rb 8b or Cs 9). In these uranyl(V) complexes, the pyrrole N–H atoms show strengthened hydrogen-bonding interactions with the endo-oxos, classified computationally as moderate-strength hydrogen bonds. Computational DFT MO (density functional theory molecular orbital) and EDA (energy decomposition analysis), uranium M₄ edge HR-XANES (High Energy Resolution X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure) and 3d4f RIXS (Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering) have been used (the latter two for the first time for uranyl(V) in 7 (ZnI)) to compare the covalent character in the $U^{V}$–O and O–M bonds and show the 5f orbitals in uranyl(VI) complex A are unexpectedly more delocalised than in the uranyl(V) 7 (ZnI) complex. The $O_{exo}$–Zn bonds have a larger covalent contribution compared to the Mg–$O_{exo}$/Ca–$O_{exo}$ bonds, and more covalency is found in the U–$O_{exo}$ bond in 7 (ZnI), in agreement with the calculations

σ-Bond Electron Delocalization in Oligosilanes as Function of Substitution Pattern, Chain Length, and Spatial Orientation

Polysilanes are known to exhibit the interesting property of σ-bond electron delocalization. By employing optical spectroscopy (UV-vis), it is possible to judge the degree of delocalization and also differentiate parts of the molecules which are conjugated or not. The current study compares oligosilanes of similar chain length but different substitution pattern. The size of the substituents determines the spatial orientation of the main chain and also controls the conformational flexibility. The chemical nature of the substituents affects the orbital energies of the molecules and thus the positions of the absorption bands

CCDC 1430511: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

An entry from the Cambridge Structural Database, the world’s repository for small molecule crystal structures. The entry contains experimental data from a crystal diffraction study. The deposited dataset for this entry is freely available from the CCDC and typically includes 3D coordinates, cell parameters, space group, experimental conditions and quality measures