Single-Cell Profiling of Coding and Noncoding Genes in Human Dopamine Neuron Differentiation

Dopaminergic (DA) neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) represent a renewable and available source of cells useful for understanding development, developing disease models, and stem-cell therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD). To assess the utility of stem cell cultures as an in vitro model system of human DA neurogenesis, we performed high-throughput transcriptional profiling of ~20,000 ventral midbrain (VM)-patterned stem cells at different stages of maturation using droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Using this dataset, we defined the cellular composition of human VM cultures at different timepoints and found high purity DA progenitor formation at an early stage of differentiation. DA neurons sharing similar molecular identities to those found in authentic DA neurons derived from human fetal VM were the major cell type after two months in culture. We also developed a bioinformatic pipeline that provided a comprehensive long noncoding RNA landscape based on temporal and cell-type specificity, which may contribute to unraveling the intricate regulatory network of coding and noncoding genes in DA neuron differentiation. Our findings serve as a valuable resource to elucidate the molecular steps of development, maturation, and function of human DA neurons, and to identify novel candidate coding and noncoding genes driving specification of progenitors into functionally mature DA neurons

Efficacy of early use of remdesivir: a systematic review of subgroup analysis

Introduction A possible benefit has been suggested for early treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with remdesivir. The efficacy of this drug is controversial and could significantly influence the efficiency in healthcare systems. The objective is the methodological interpretation of subgroup analyzes according to starting of remdesivir treatment with respect to symptom onset of COVID-19. Methods A search in Pubmed® database was performed. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with subgroup analysis regarding early and late use of remdesivir were selected. All endpoints were assessed using two methodologies. First methodology considered statistical interaction, pre-specification, biological plausibility, and consistency of results. Second methodology was a validated tool with preliminary questions to discard subset analysis without relevant minimum conditions, and a checklist with recommendations for applicability. Results A total of 54 results were found and five RCTs were selected. According first methodology, consistent heterogeneity was only found in time to clinical improvement and better clinical status score at day 15 for patients with severe COVID-19 and <7 days of symptoms. About second methodology, these results about early use of remdesivir may be applied to clinical practice with caution. Conclusions We developed a systematic search and application of an established methodology for interpretation of subgroup analysis about early use of remdesivir. Results in severe COVID-19 suggested that early use of remdesivir provides a greater benefit in <7 days of symptoms for time to clinical improvement and better clinical status score at day 15. Future studies could use 7-day cut-off of symptoms to evaluate remdesivir.Introduction. Se ha sugerido un posible beneficio para el tratamiento temprano de la enfermedad grave por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) con remdesivir. La eficacia de este fármaco es controvertida y podría influir significativamente en la eficiencia de los sistemas sanitarios. El objetivo es la interpretación metodológica de los análisis de subgrupos según el inicio del tratamiento con remdesivir respecto al inicio de los síntomas de la COVID-19. Material y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda en la base de datos Pubmed®. Se seleccionaron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) con análisis de subgrupos respecto al uso temprano y tardío de remdesivir. Todas las variables se evaluaron mediante dos metodologías. La primera metodología consideró la interacción estadística, pre-especificación, la plausibilidad biológica y la consistencia de los resultados. La segunda metodología fue una herramienta validada con preguntas preliminares para descartar el análisis de subgrupos sin condiciones mínimas relevantes, y una lista de verificación con recomendaciones de aplicabilidad. Resultados. Se encontraron un total de 54 resultados y se seleccionaron cinco ECA. Según la primera metodología, sólo se encontró heterogeneidad consistente en el tiempo hasta la mejora clínica y la mejor puntuación del estado clínico en el día 15 para los pacientes con COVID-19 grave y <7 días de síntomas. Sobre la segunda metodología, estos resultados sobre el uso temprano de remdesivir pueden aplicarse a la práctica clínica con precaución. Conclusiones. Se desarrolló una búsqueda sistemática y la aplicación de una metodología establecida para la interpretación del análisis de subgrupos sobre el uso temprano de remdesivir. Los resultados en la COVID-19 grave sugirieron que el uso temprano de remdesivir proporciona un mayor beneficio en <7 días de síntomas para el tiempo de mejora clínica y mejor puntuación del estado clínico en el día 15. Los estudios futuros podrían utilizar el corte de 7 días de síntomas para evaluar el remdesivi

Remdesivir y reducción de mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19: análisis sistematizado de subgrupos de los ensayos clínicos

Objective: Remdesivir has not shown survival benefit for patients with severe COVID-19. However, subgroup analysis of ACTT-1 Study Group showed an apparent reduction in mortality for patients who required non-high-flow oxygen. Presentation of SOLIDARITY study results were associated by a meta-analysis combining mortality results by subsets from randomized clinical trials. The aim is a methodological assessment of reliability and clinical applicability about findings by subgroups on the effect of remdesivir on mortality in patients with COVID-19. Method: A validated tool was used to evaluate the findings of subgroup analyses in randomized clinical trials, including meta-analysis attached to SOLIDARITY study. It is structured in preliminary questions to reject subset analyses without relevant minimum conditions, and a specific checklist. The latter considers certain criteria: statistical association, which encompassed p of interaction, prespecification of subgroups, sample size, number of factors analyzed, and overall study result; biological plausibility of observed differences; and consistency between results of similar studies. A score was assigned to each criterion and the tool related global summation to a recommendation on the applicability of subset results in clinical decision making. Results: Preliminary questions had positive answers, so checklist was applied. Statistical association obtained “null” assessment (–3 points), including a “doubtful” p of interaction (p = 0.0650) among subgroups and mortality reached no statistical significance for global population. These findings reduced the reliability of subset analysis. Biological plausibility was considered “probable” (+3 points) because antiviral could have a greater effect before the inflammatory process and clinical worsening. Consistency between results of similar studies was evaluated as “possible” (+2 points) analysis for compatibility of ACTT-1 and SOLIDARITY study results. The recommendation about application of subset analysis results according to the risk of patients was “null”. Conclusions: This structured interpretation of subgroup analysis suggested too much uncertainty in hypothesis about remdesivir could reduce mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 who required non-high-flow oxygen. It was probably a random finding. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial about effect of remdesivir in mortality in patients with COVID-19 and non-high-flow oxygen is essential.Objetivo: Remdesivir no ha mostrado beneficio en supervivencia para pacientes con COVID-19 grave. Sin embargo, el análisis por subgrupos del estudio ACTT-1 mostró aparente reducción de mortalidad en pacientes que requerían oxígeno –no de alto flujo–. La difusión de resultados del estudio SOLIDARITY se acompañó de un metaanálisis que combinó resultados de mortalidad por subgrupos de los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar metodológicamente la fiabilidad y aplicabilidad clínica de los hallazgos por subgrupos sobre el efecto de remdesivir en mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19. Método: Se usó una herramienta validada para valorar los hallazgos de los análisis por subgrupos en ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, incluido el metaanálisis anexo al estudio SOLIDARITY. La herramienta utilizada está estructurada en cuestiones preliminares para descartar análisis por subgrupos sin condiciones mínimas relevantes, y un cuestionario específico. Este último considera determinados criterios: asociación estadística, incluyendo p de interacción, preespecificación de subgrupos, tamaño muestral, número de factores valorados y resultado global del estudio; plausibilidad biológica de las diferencias observadas; y consistencia entre resultados de estudios similares. Se asignó una puntuación a cada criterio y la herramienta relacionó el sumatorio global con una recomendación sobre la aplicabilidad de los resultados de los subgrupos en la toma de decisiones clínicas. Resultados: Las cuestiones preliminares tuvieron respuestas positivas, aplicándose el cuestionario. La asociación estadística obtuvo valoración “nula” (–3 puntos), con p de interacción dudosa (p = 0,0650) y resultado de mortalidad no significativo en población global, restando fiabilidad al análisis de subgrupos. La plausibilidad biológica fue considerada “probable” (+3 puntos), ya que el antiviral pudiera tener mayor efecto antes del proceso inflamatorio y empeoramiento clínico. La consistencia se valoró “posible” (+2 puntos) por compatibilidad de resultados del estudio ACTT-1 y SOLIDARITY. La recomendación de aplicación del análisis por subgrupos según el riesgo de los pacientes fue “nula”. Conclusiones: Esta interpretación estructurada de análisis por subgrupos sugiere que la hipótesis de que remdesivir podría reducir la mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 grave que precisan oxígeno –no de alto flujo– presenta demasiada incertidumbre, y es probable que sea un hallazgo casual. Por tanto, es imprescindible la realización de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado sobre mortalidad en pacientes con oxígeno –no de alto flujo–

Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma

Objetivo: Mepolizumab está indicado como tratamiento adicional del asma eosinofílica refractaria grave. Las diferencias observadas en subgrupos poblacionales según recuento eosinofílico plasmático, existencia de pacientes con altos niveles de inmunoglobulina E candidatos a omalizumab y mepolizumab, e impacto económico de mepolizumab obligan a realizar estudios económicos para tomar decisiones clínicas eficientes. El objetivo fue realizar un análisis de coste/eficacia e impacto presupuestario de mepolizumab. Método: Se realizó la comparación de costes e impacto presupuestario del uso de mepolizumab desde la perspectiva del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Las alternativas valoradas fueron corticosteroides sistémicos inhalados + agonista β2 de larga duración y/o corticosteroides sistémicos orales en pacientes con asma alérgica grave no mediada por inmunoglobulina E, y este tratamiento junto a omalizumab en pacientes con asma eosinofílica alérgica mediada por inmunoglobulina E. La eficacia se evaluó mediante exacerbaciones clínicamente relevantes evitadas. Se valoraron los costes directos asociados a exacerbación. Resultados: El coste incremental medio de mepolizumab respecto a omalizumab es de 797 euros por paciente y año. Considerando precio alternativo con descuento de omalizumab, incluir mepolizumab para pa cientes con asma eosinofílica alérgica y mediada por inmunoglobulina E supondría incrementar el gasto público de 2,3 a 4,6 millones de euros. Teniendo en cuenta el precio notificado de omalizumab, la introducción gradual de mepolizumab en el Sistema Nacional de Salud supondría ahorrar 3,6 millones de euros en tres años. Para pacientes con asma grave no mediada por inmunoglobulina E, el coste/exacerbación evitada al añadir mepolizumab es de 15.085 euros, con un impacto presupuestario en tres años de 578,4 millones de euros, asumiendo una penetración progresiva de mepolizumab en el mercado. En los pacientes con ≥500 eosinófilos/µl, este coste disminuye a 7.767 euros por exacerbación evitada, con un impacto presupuestario de 183,2 millones de euros en tres años con penetración progresiva de mepolizumab. Conclusiones: La comparación de costes entre mepolizumab y omalizumab en pacientes con asma eosinofílica mediada por inmunoglobulina E señala como razonable utilizar el fármaco de menor coste, promoviendo competencia de precios. Asimismo, priorizar su uso en pacientes con asma eosinofílica refractaria grave no mediada por inmunoglobulina E y niveles plasmáticos ≥500 eosinófilos/µl permitiría mejorar la eficiencia y disminuir el impacto presupuestario.Objective: Mepolizumab is indicated as additional treatment of severe refractory eosinophilic asthma. Differences in subgroups according to plasmatic eosinophil count, existence of patients with high levels of immunoglobulin E candidates for omalizumab and mepolizumab, and budget impact of mepolizumab require economic studies for efficient clinical decisions. The objective was to perform a cost-efficacy and budget impact analysis of mepolizumab. Method: An analysis of comparison of costs and budgetary impact of use of mepolizumab has been performed from National Health System perspective. Evaluated alternatives were inhaled systemic corticosteroids + long-acting β2-agonist and/or oral systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe allergic asthma not mediated by immunoglobulin E, and the same treatment associated with omalizumab in patients with immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic eosinophilic asthma. Efficacy was assessed by clinically relevant exacerbations avoided. Direct costs associated with exacerbation were assessed Results: An average incremental cost of 797 euros/patient-year was estimated. Considering alternative price with discount for omalizumab, including mepolizumab for patients with immunoglobulin E-mediated allergic eosinophilic asthma would increase public spending from 2.3 to 4.6 million euros. According reported price for omalizumab, gradual introduction of mepolizumab into the National Health System would save 3.6 million euros in three years. For patients with immunoglobulin E-not mediated severe asthma, adding mepolizumab presented a cost/exacerbation avoided of 15,085 euros and a budgetary impact for three years of 578.4 million euros according a progressive penetration of mepolizumab in market. In patients with ≥ 500 eosinophils/μL, cost/exacerbation avoided is reduced to 7,767 euros and the budgetary impact is 183.2 million euros in three years according progressive penetration of mepolizumab. Conclusions: With analysis of cost comparison of mepolizumab vs. omalizumab in patients with eosinophilic immunoglobulin E-mediated asthma, it would be reasonable to prioritize the drug more economic to promote price competition. According this pharmacoeconomic study, prioritizing mepolizumab in patients with immunoglobulin E-not mediated severe refractory eosinophilic asthma and higher plasmatic eosinophil count (≥500 eosinophils/μL) would improve efficiency and decrease budgetary impac

AMP-activated kinase in human spermatozoa: Identification, intracellular localization, and key function in the regulation of sperm motility

AMP‑activated kinase (AMPK), a protein that regulates energy balance and metabolism, has recently been identified in boar spermatozoa where regulates key functional sperm processes essential for fertilization. This work’s aims are AMPK identification, intracellular localization, and their role in human spermatozoa function. Semen was obtained from healthy human donors. Sperm AMPK and phospho‑Thr172‑AMPK were analyzed by Western blotting and indirect immunofluorescence. High‑ and low‑quality sperm populations were separated by a 40%–80% density gradient. Human spermatozoa motility was evaluated by an Integrated Semen Analysis System (ISAS) in the presence or absence of the AMPK inhibitor compound C (CC). AMPK is localized along the human spermatozoa, at the entire acrosome, midpiece and tail with variable intensity, whereas its active form, phospho‑Thr172‑AMPK, shows a prominent staining at the acrosome and sperm tail with a weaker staining in the midpiece and the postacrosomal region. Interestingly, spermatozoa bearing an excess residual cytoplasm show strong AMPK staining in this subcellular compartment. Both AMPK and phospho‑Thr172‑AMPK human spermatozoa contents exhibit important individual variations. Moreover, active AMPK is predominant in the high motility sperm population, where shows a stronger intensity compared with the low motility sperm population. Inhibition of AMPK activity in human spermatozoa by CC treatment leads to a significant reduction in any sperm motility parameter analyzed: percent of motile sperm, sperm velocities, progressivity, and other motility coefficients. This work identifies and points out AMPK as a new molecular mechanism involved in human spermatozoa motility. Further AMPK implications in the clinical efficiency of assisted reproduction and in other reproductive areas need to be studied.Trabajo patrocinado por: Mutua Madrileña. Beca Junta de Extremadura y Fondos FEDER. Ayudas JUEX‑IBI13121, PCJ1008, GR10125, y GR10156 Fundación Tatiana Pérez Guzmán el Bueno. Beca para Violeta Calle Guisado Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Beca Predoctoral FPU para Violeta Calle GuisadopeerReviewe

Design, 3D modeling and mechanoacoustical behaviour optimization of a new ventilation tube

Introducción y Objetivos: En este trabajo mostramos un nuevo tubo de ventilación transtimpánico cuyo diseño pretende solventar los efectos indeseables aparecidos durante la inserción de tubos de ventilación actualmente comercializados; analizamos su comportamiento mecánico en un modelo 3D del oído a fin de optimizar su comportamiento acústico. Métodos: Para el diseño del tubo se empleó un software autoCAD; El comportamiento mecánico se analizó en un modelo computadorizado dinámico 3D del oído humano basado en el método de los elementos finitos (FEM). Resultados: El nuevo tubo de ventilación posee un tamaño y una masa significativamente menores a los actualmente disponibles en el mercado lo que provoca un menor interferencia en la vibración del sistema tímpano-osicular; su diseño facilita que permanezca insertado mientras las condiciones del paciente así lo aconsejen evitando su caída hacia la caja o su precoz extrusión. Conclusiones: Las ventajas teóricas biológicas y acústicas del nuevo tubo desarrollado (con menor masa y cuyo diseño evita las complicaciones de los actuales) puede abrir una nueva posibilidad de tratamiento de la otitis media seromucosa crónica.Introduction and Objetive: We show a new trans-tympanic ventilation tube whose design and mass are intended to solve the undesirable effects that appeared during the insertion of currently commercialized ventilation tubes; We analyze its mechanical behavior in a 3D model of the ear in order to optimize its acoustic behavior. Methods: For the design of the tube an autoCAD software was used; The mechanical behavior was analyzed in a 3D dynamic computerized model of the human ear based on the finite element method (FEM). Results: The new ventilation tube has a size and mass significantly smaller than those currently available in the market, which causes less interference in the vibration of the eardrum-osicular system; Its design facilitates it to remain inserted while the patient's conditions so advise avoiding its fall into the middle ear cavity or its early extrusion. Conclusions: The biological and acoustic advantages of the new developed tube (with less mass and whose design avoids the complications of the current ones) can open a new possibility of treatment of chronic seromucous otitis media

Ampicillin Plus Ceftriaxone Combined Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis Infective Endocarditis in OPAT

Cardiovascular Infectious Study Group of the Andalusian Society of Infectious Diseases.Ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) is a well-recognized inpatient regimen for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (IE). In this regimen, ceftriaxone is usually administered 2 g every 2 h (AC12). The administration of AC in outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) programs is challenging because multiple daily doses are required. AC regimens useful for OPAT programs include once-daily high-dose administration of ceftriaxone (AC24) or AC co-diluted and jointly administered in bolus every 4 h (ACjoined). In this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cases, we aimed to assess the clinical effectivity and safety of three AC regimens for the treatment of E. faecalis IE. Fifty-nine patients were treated with AC combinations (AC12 n = 32, AC24 n = 17, and ACjoined n = 10). Six relapses occurred in the whole cohort: five (29.4%) treated with AC24 regimen and one (10.0%) with ACjoined. Patients were cured in 30 (93.3%), 16 (94.1%), and eight (80.0%) cases in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. Unplanned readmission occurred in eight (25.0%), six (35.3%), and two (20.0%) patients in the AC12, AC24 and ACjoined groups, respectively. The outcome of patients with E. faecalis IE treated with AC in OPAT programs relies on an optimization of the delivery of the combination. AC24 exhibit an unexpected rate of failures, however, ACjoined might be an effective alternative which clinical results should corroborate in further studies.The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. GVA was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund (“A way to achieve Europe”), Subprograma Miguel Servet (grant CP19/00159). HHL was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subprograma Rio Hortega (grant CM19/00152)

The Nature of Starbursts: I. The Star Formation Histories of Eighteen Nearby Starburst Dwarf Galaxies

We use archival HST observations of resolved stellar populations to derive the star formation histories (SFHs) of 18 nearby starburst dwarf galaxies. In this first paper we present the observations, color-magnitude diagrams, and the SFHs of the 18 starburst galaxies, based on a homogeneous approach to the data reduction, differential extinction, and treatment of photometric completeness. We adopt a star formation rate (SFR) threshold normalized to the average SFR of the individual system as a metric for classifying starbursts in SFHs derived from resolved stellar populations. This choice facilitates finding not only currently bursting galaxies but also "fossil" bursts increasing the sample size of starburst galaxies in the nearby (D<8 Mpc) universe. Thirteen of the eighteen galaxies are experiencing ongoing bursts and five galaxies show fossil bursts. From our reconstructed SFHs, it is evident that the elevated SFRs of a burst are sustained for hundreds of Myr with variations on small timescales. A long >100 Myr temporal baseline is thus fundamental to any starburst definition or identification method. The longer lived bursts rule out rapid "self-quenching" of starbursts on global scales. The bursting galaxies' gas consumption timescales are shorter than the Hubble time for all but one galaxy confirming the short-lived nature of starbursts based on fuel limitations. Additionally, we find the strength of the H{\alpha} emission usually correlates with the CMD based SFR during the last 4-10 Myr. However, in four cases, the H{\alpha} emission is significantly less than what is expected for models of starbursts; the discrepancy is due to the SFR changing on timescales of a few Myr. The inherently short timescale of the H{\alpha} emission limits identifying galaxies as starbursts based on the current characteristics which may or may not be representative of the recent SFH of a galaxy.Comment: 53 pages, 11 figure

Phenotypic characterization of X-linked hypophosphatemia in pediatric Spanish population

BACKGROUND: X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a hereditary rare disease caused by loss-of-function mutations in PHEX gene leading tohypophosphatemia and high renal loss of phosphate. Rickets and growth retardation are the major manifestations of XLH in children, but there is a broad phenotypic variability. Few publications have reported large series of patients. Current data on the clinical spectrum of the disease, the correlation with the underlying gene mutations, and the long-term outcome of patients on conventional treatment are needed, particularly because of the recent availability of new specific medications to treat XLH. RESULTS: The RenalTube database was used to retrospectively analyze 48 Spanish patients (15 men) from 39 different families, ranging from 3months to 8years and 2months of age at the time of diagnosis (median age of 2.0years), and with XLH confirmed by genetic analysis. Bone deformities, radiological signs of active rickets and growth retardation were the most common findings at diagnosis. Mean (±SEM) height was - 1.89±0.19 SDS and 55% (22/40) of patients had height SDS below-2. All cases had hypophosphatemia, serum phosphate being - 2.81±0.11 SDS. Clinical manifestations and severity of the disease were similar in both genders. No genotype-phenotype correlation was found. Conventional treatment did not attenuate growth retardation after a median follow up of 7.42years (IQR=11.26; n=26 patients) and failed to normalize serum concentrations of phosphate. Eleven patients had mild hyperparathyroidism and 8 patients nephrocalcinosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that growth retardation and rickets were the most prevalent clinical manifestations at diagnosis in a large series of Spanish pediatric patients with XLH confirmed by mutations in the PHEX gene. Traditional treatment with phosphate and vitamin D supplements did not improve height or corrected hypophosphatemia and was associated with a risk of hyperparathyroidism and nephrocalcinosis. The severity of the disease was similar in males and females