Does hospitalisation affect hypnotic and anxiolytic drug prescribing?

International audienceOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the impact of hospitalisation on hypnotic and anxiolytic (HA) drug prescription, during and after hospitalisation. METHOD: A descriptive study was carried out over three periods: before, during and after hospitalisation (three-month follow-up), examining the presence or absence of HA treatment at each stage. The HA drug list studied was selected using the World Health Organisation (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification system. Trained final-year pharmacy students asked a series of structured questions during hospitalisation and postal questionnaires were sent to included patients one and three months after discharge. All the in-patient departments in the University Hospital of Besançon-France-were included, except units with pre-, peri-, and post-operative HA treatments. All in-patients present in the selected units on February 12, 2003, aged over 18, who gave their consent and were considered able to answer by the nursing team, were finally included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: An eight-branch descriptive model, including the three study periods with two states (presence or absence of HA treatment) at each stage. RESULTS: A total of 260 in-patients were included, and a further 112 (43%) completed the whole study (alive, non re-hospitalised, one- and three- months post discharge response). 48% (n = 260), 64% (n = 260) and 58% (n = 112) of the included patients had sleep disorder complaints respectively before, during and after hospitalisation. HA usage increased when comparing pre- and during hospitalisation (33% vs. 51%; n = 112; p < 0.0001) and decreased when comparing during hospitalisation and post-discharge (51% vs. 43%; n = 112; p < 0.0001). The descriptive model showed an overall persistence of treatment induced by hospital stay in 5.35% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Hospital appeared to have a significant impact on delayed HA use in the French general population. Our results should incite hospital prescribers to transversally reconsider the whole sleep disorder treatment strategy in hospital settings, from improving patient's accommodation conditions, to working out a consensus on the justification of prescription of HA and precising the exact place of nursing team in sleep disorders management

La « recommandation temporaire d’utilisation » sur le baclofène : point de vue des prescripteurs du dispositif CAMTEA

L’utilisation du baclofène hautes-doses dans l’alcoolo-dépendance a émergé en France depuis 2008 à partir de constatations empiriques, et cette utilisation se fait toujours aujourd’hui en dehors de l’autorisation de mise sur le marché. Néanmoins, en raison de la diffusion rapide de cette pratique de prescription, les autorités françaises de santé ont décidé de l’encadrer grâce à une mesure régulatoire exceptionnelle appelée « recommandation temporaire d’utilisation » (RTU). Les prescripteurs de baclofène de CAMTEA, un dispositif collégial de prescription encadré de baclofène hautes-doses mis en place bien avant la RTU, discutent ici des avantages et des inconvénients de cette mesure et de l’applicabilité de ses différentes modalités dans la pratique clinique quotidienne

Machine‐learning approach for prediction of pT3a upstaging and outcomes of localized renal cell carcinoma ( UroCCR ‐15)

Objectives To assess the impact of pathological upstaging from clinically localized to locally advanced pT3a on survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as well as the oncological safety of various surgical approaches in this setting, and to develop a machine‐learning‐based, contemporary, clinically relevant model for individual preoperative prediction of pT3a upstaging. Materials and Methods Clinical data from patients treated with either partial nephrectomy (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for cT1/cT2a RCC from 2000 to 2019, included in the French multi‐institutional kidney cancer database UroCCR, were retrospectively analysed. Seven machine‐learning algorithms were applied to the cohort after a training/testing split to develop a predictive model for upstaging to pT3a. Survival curves for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between PN and RN after G‐computation for pT3a tumours. Results A total of 4395 patients were included, among whom 667 patients (15%, 337 PN and 330 RN) had a pT3a‐upstaged RCC. The UroCCR‐15 predictive model presented an area under the receiver‐operating characteristic curve of 0.77. Survival analysis after adjustment for confounders showed no difference in DFS or OS for PN vs RN in pT3a tumours (DFS: hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, P = 0.7; OS: HR 1.03, P > 0.9). Conclusions Our study shows that machine‐learning technology can play a useful role in the evaluation and prognosis of upstaged RCC. In the context of incidental upstaging, PN does not compromise oncological outcomes, even for large tumour sizes

Effect of emergent carotid stenting during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke patients with tandem occlusion: A multicenter, randomized, clinical trial (TITAN) protocol

International audienceBackground and hypothesis: There is no consensus on the optimal endovascular management of the extracranial internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion. We hypothesized that intracranial mechanical thrombectomy plus emergent internal carotid artery stenting (and at least one antiplatelet therapy) is superior to intracranial mechanical thrombectomy alone in patients with acute tandem occlusion. Study design: TITAN is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) study. Eligibility requires a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS)≤2 (no upper age limit), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)≥6, Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS)≥6, and tandem occlusion on the initial catheter angiogram. Tandem occlusion is defined as large vessel occlusion (intracranial internal carotid artery, M1 and/or M2 segment) and extracranial severe internal carotid artery stenosis ≥90% (NASCET) or complete occlusion. Patients are randomized in two balanced parallel groups (1:1) to receive either intracranial mechanical thrombectomy plus internal carotid artery stenting (and at least one antiplatelet therapy) or intracranial mechanical thrombectomy alone within 8 h of stroke onset. Up to 432 patients are randomized after tandem occlusion confirmation on angiogram. Study outcomes: The primary outcome measure is complete reperfusion rate at the end of endovascular procedure, assessed as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3, and ≥4 point decrease in NIHSS at 24 h. Secondary outcomes include infarct growth, recurrent clinical ischemic event in the ipsilateral carotid territory, type and dose of antiplatelet therapy used, mRS at 90 (±15) days and 12 (±1) months. Safety outcomes are procedural complications, stent patency, intracerebral hemorrhage, and death. Economics analysis includes health-related quality of life, and costs utility comparison, especially with the need or not of endarterectomy. Discussion: TITAN is the first randomized trial directly comparing two types of treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusion, and especially assessing the safety and efficacy of emergent internal carotid artery stenting associated with at least one antiplatelet therapy in the acute phase of stroke reperfusion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0397898

Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Background: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. Methods: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. Findings: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09–2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75–3·10, p&lt;0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14–2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons