28 research outputs found

    0130: Mortality related to cardiogenic shock in critically ill patients in France, 1997-2012

    Get PDF
    IntroductionMost of data reporting epidemiology of cardiogenic shock (CS) concern patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted in intensive care unit of cardiology. However, CS patients managed in critical care unit (CCU) have often multiorgan failure and seem to have different characteristics and outcome. To our best knowledge no study reported characteristics and clinical outcomes of CS patients admitted in CCU.AimTo report key features, Mortality and Trends in mortality in a large cohort of patients with CS admitting in 33 French CCUs from 1997 to 2012.Methods and resultsWe queried the 1997–2012 database of Parisian area ICUs-the CubRea (Intensive Care Database User Group) database to identify all hospital stays with a principal or an associated diagnosis of CS (National classification of disease R 570). Among 303 314 hospital stays, 17 494 (5.8%) were CS. The patients were managed in 60% of cases in universitary centers. Mean age was 64.3±17.0. Men accounted for 11047 (63.1%). Mean SAPS II was 62.0±24.3. Among CS, only 535 (3.06%) were AMI whereas 2685 (15.3%) were cardiac arrest and 858 (4.9%) were drug intoxications. Mechanical ventilation was required in 12967 (74.1%) of cases, inotropes in 14640 (83.7%) of cases and renal support in 3886 (22.2%) of cases. Mean duration of hospital was 19.1 days±24.7. Intrahospital Mortality was high (46.2%). Predictors of intrahospital death are reported in Table. Over the 15-year period, mortality decreased (49.8% in 1997-2000 and 42.7% in 2009-2012, p<0.001) whereas the patients were more critically ill (SAPS II 58.8±25.4 in 1997-2000 vs 64.2 8±23.6 in 2009-2012, p<0.001).Conclusionit is the first study reporting the prevalence, determinants and prognostic factors of CS patients managed in reanimation. The mortality of these very critically ill patients remains high. However over the 15-year period, even if these patients are more and more critically ill, early mortality decreased.Abstratct 0130 – TableVariablesOR95% CIDrug intoxication.307.236.401Age (<60 yo).436.383.496Mechanical circulatory support.681.3781.228Sepsis.715.637.8022009-2012.998.8851.125SAPS II1.0361.0331.038Acidosis1.4531.2641.670Mechanical ventilation1.7181.4831.990Acute respiratory distress syndrome1.7941.5582.0661997-20001.8141.4522.267Hemodialysis1.8201.6092.060Inotropic use1.9821.1133.530Disseminated intravascular coagulation2.1191.5912.822Cardiac arrest4.3333.8404.88

    Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome associated with COVID-19: An Emulated Target Trial Analysis.

    Get PDF
    RATIONALE: Whether COVID patients may benefit from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) compared with conventional invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect of ECMO on 90-Day mortality vs IMV only Methods: Among 4,244 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 included in a multicenter cohort study, we emulated a target trial comparing the treatment strategies of initiating ECMO vs. no ECMO within 7 days of IMV in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2/FiO2 <80 or PaCO2 ≥60 mmHg). We controlled for confounding using a multivariable Cox model based on predefined variables. MAIN RESULTS: 1,235 patients met the full eligibility criteria for the emulated trial, among whom 164 patients initiated ECMO. The ECMO strategy had a higher survival probability at Day-7 from the onset of eligibility criteria (87% vs 83%, risk difference: 4%, 95% CI 0;9%) which decreased during follow-up (survival at Day-90: 63% vs 65%, risk difference: -2%, 95% CI -10;5%). However, ECMO was associated with higher survival when performed in high-volume ECMO centers or in regions where a specific ECMO network organization was set up to handle high demand, and when initiated within the first 4 days of MV and in profoundly hypoxemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: In an emulated trial based on a nationwide COVID-19 cohort, we found differential survival over time of an ECMO compared with a no-ECMO strategy. However, ECMO was consistently associated with better outcomes when performed in high-volume centers and in regions with ECMO capacities specifically organized to handle high demand. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Formes graves de grippe en Réanimation (une étude descriptive comparative de la grippe saisonnière et de la grippe pandémique A(H1N1))

    No full text
    Il s'agit d'une étude descriptive rétrospective, comparant deux groupes de 17 et 18 patients, atteints respectivement de grippe A (H1N1) et de grippe saisonnière, et hospitalisés en réanimation entre 1993 et 2011. Le diagnostic de grippe devait être documenté, sur prélèvements respiratoires, par RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, culture cellulaire et/ou sérologie. On relevait données démographiques, comorbidités, statut vaccinal, date des 1ers symptômes, de l'hospitalisation, de l'admission en réanimation et du diagnostic, IGS 2, survenue de défaillances, dont le SDRA, surinfections bactériennes, traitements reçus, et devenir du patient. Les patients H1N1 étaient plus jeunes (41 ans vs 56, p=0.04) et avait plus tendance à être obèse ( 41% vs 6%, p=0.03) et fumeurs (65% vs 287%, p=0.01). Les symptômes grippaux et les complications n'étaient pas différentes pendant le séjour en réanimation. Le délai diagnostique était plus court en période pandémique (<24h vs 4 jours, p=0,01). L'Oseltamivir était plus utilisé en situation pandémique (88% vs 11%, p=0.01). La grippe A (H1N1) a touché des patients plus jeunes, plus fréquemment obèses et fumeurs. Même si la grippe pandémique était diagnostiquée plus rapidement, et traitée plus fréquemment par l'Oseltamivir, le devenir des patients n'était pas différent.RENNES1-BU Santé (352382103) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Perceived inequity, professional and personal fulfillment by women intensivists in France

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: The medical workforce has been feminized for the last two decades worldwide. Nonetheless, women remain under-represented among intensivists. We conducted a survey among French women intensivists to assess their professional and personal quality of life and their perception of potential gender discrimination at work.Methods: We conducted an observational descriptive study by sending a survey, designed by the group FEMMIR (FEmmes Médecins en Médecine Intensive Réanimation), to women intensivists in France, using primarily the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF) mailing list. The questionnaire was also available online between September 2019 and January 2020 and women intensivists were encouraged to answer through email reminders. It pertained to five main domains, including demographic characteristics, work position, workload and clinical/research activities, self-fulfillment scale, perceived discrimination at work and suggested measures to implement.Results: Three hundred and seventy-one women responded to the questionnaire, among whom 16% had an academic position. Being a woman intensivist and pregnancy were both considered to increase difficulties in careers’ advancement by 31% and 73% of the respondents, respectively. Almost half of the respondents (46%) quoted their quality of life equal to or lower than 6 on a scale varying from 1 (very bad quality of life) to 10 (excellent quality of life). They were 52% to feel an imbalance between their personal and professional life at the cost of their personal life. Gender discrimination has been experienced by 55% of the respondents while 37% confided having already been subject of bullying or harassment. Opportunities to adjust their work timetable including part-time work, better considerations for pregnant women including increasing the number of intensivists and the systematic replacement during maternity leave, and the respect of the law regarding the paternity leave were suggested as key measures to enable better professional and personal accomplishment by women intensivists.Conclusion: In this first large French survey in women intensivists, we pointed out issues felt by women intensivists that included an imbalance between professional and personal life, a perceived loss of opportunity due to the fact of being a woman, frequent reported bullying or harassment and a lack of consideration of the needs related to pregnancy and motherhood

    Early versus deferred coronary angiography following cardiac arrest. A systematic review and meta-analysis

    No full text
    Aim: The role of early coronary angiography (CAG) in the evaluation of patients presenting with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and no ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STE) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG) has been subject to considerable debate. We sought to assess the impact of early versus deferred CAG on mortality and neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA and no STE. Methods: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library Register were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines from inception until July 18, 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with OHCA without STE that compared early CAG with deferred CAG were included. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included mortality at discharge or 30-days, favourable neurology at 30-days, major bleeding, renal failure and recurrent cardiac arrest. Results: Of the 7,998 citations, 5 RCTs randomizing 1524 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed no difference in 30-day mortality with early versus deferred CAG (OR 1.17, CI 0.91 – 1.49, I2 = 27%). There was no difference in favourable neurological outcome at 30 days (OR 0.88, CI 0.52 – 1.49, I2 = 63%), major bleeding (OR 0.94, CI 0.33 – 2.68, I2 = 39%), renal failure (OR 1.14, CI 0.77 – 1.69, I2 = 0%), and recurrent cardiac arrest (OR 1.39, CI 0.79 – 2.43, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Early CAG was not associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes among patients with OHCA without STE. This meta-analysis does not support routinely performing early CAG in this select patient cohort

    MOESM1 of Outcomes in elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit with solid tumors

    No full text
    Additional file 1: Table S1. Main characteristics of the whole population. Table S2. Biological data at admission in cancer patients (n = 262). Table S3. Characteristics of ICU survivors with anti tumoral treatment indication according to cessation/resumption of anti cancer drugs after ICU discharge. Table S4. Independent predictors of 90-days mortality (multivariate analysis including life supporting therapies)

    Curative anticoagulation prevents endothelial lesion in COVID‐19 patients

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with cardiovascular complications and coagulation disorders.Objectives: To explore the coagulopathy and endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.Methods: The study analyzed clinical and biological profiles of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection at admission, including hemostasis tests and quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CECs).Results: Among 96 consecutive COVID-19-suspected patients fulfilling criteria for hospitalization, 66 were tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19-positive patients were more likely to present with fever (P = .02), cough (P = .03), and pneumonia at computed tomography (CT) scan (P = .002) at admission. Prevalence of D-dimer >500 ng/mL was higher in COVID-19-positive patients (74.2% versus 43.3%; P = .007). No sign of disseminated intravascular coagulation were identified. Adding D-dimers >500 ng/mL to gender and pneumonia at CT scan in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis significantly increased area under the curve for COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19-positive patients had significantly more CECs at admission (P = .008) than COVID-19-negative ones. COVID-19-positive patients treated with curative anticoagulant prior to admission had fewer CECs (P = .02) than those without. Interestingly, patients treated with curative anticoagulation and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers had even fewer CECs (P = .007).Conclusion: Curative anticoagulation could prevent COVID-19-associated coagulopathy and endothelial lesion

    Predictive Factor for COVID-19 Worsening: Insights for High-Sensitivity Troponin and D-Dimer and Correlation With Right Ventricular Afterload

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been associated with cardiovascular complications and coagulation disorders. Objectives: To explore clinical and biological parameters of COVID-19 patients with hospitalization criteria that could predict referral to intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Analyzing the clinical and biological profiles of COVID-19 patients at admission. Results: Among 99 consecutive patients that fulfilled criteria for hospitalization, 48 were hospitalized in the medicine department, 21 were first admitted to the medicine ward department and referred later to ICU, and 30 were directly admitted to ICU from the emergency department. At admission, patients requiring ICU were more likely to have lymphopenia, decreased SpO2, a D-dimer level above 1,000 ng/mL, and a higher high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (Hs-cTnI) level. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified Hs-cTnI above 9.75 pg/mL as the best predictive criteria for ICU referral [area under the curve (AUC), 86.4; 95% CI, 76.6-96.2]. This cutoff for Hs-cTnI was confirmed in univariate [odds ratio (OR), 22.8; 95% CI, 6.0-116.2] and multivariate analysis after adjustment for D-dimer level (adjusted OR, 20.85; 95% CI, 4.76-128.4). Transthoracic echocardiography parameters subsequently measured in 72 patients showed an increased right ventricular (RV) afterload correlated with Hs-cTnI (r = 0.42, p = 0.010) and D-dimer (r = 0.18, p = 0.047). Conclusion: Hs-cTnI appears to be the best relevant predictive factor for referring COVID-19 patients to ICU. This result associated with the correlation of D-dimer with RV dilatation probably reflects a myocardial injury due to an increased RV wall tension. This reinforces the hypothesis of a COVID-19-associated microvascular thrombosis inducing a higher RV afterload
    corecore