Outpatient treatment of worsening heart failure with intravenous and subcutaneous diuretics: a systematic review of the literature

Aims: In the coming decade, heart failure (HF) represents a major global healthcare challenge due to an ageing population and rising prevalence combined with scarcity of medical resources and increasing healthcare costs. A transitional care strategy within the period of clinical worsening of HF before hospitalization may offer a solution to prevent hospitalization. The outpatient treatment of worsening HF with intravenous or subcutaneous diuretics as an alternative strategy for hospitalization has been described in the literature. Methods and results: In this systematic review, the available evidence for the efficacy and safety of outpatient treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous diuretics of patients with worsening HF is analysed. A search was performed in the electronic databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. Of the 11 included studies 10 were single-centre, using non-randomized, observational registries of treatment with intravenous or subcutaneous diuretics for patients with worsening HF with highly variable selection criteria, baseline characteristics, and treatment design. One study was a randomized study comparing subcutaneous furosemide with intravenous furosemide. In a total of 984 unique individual patients treated in the reviewed studies, only a few adverse events were reported. Re-hospitalization rates for HF at 30 and 180 days were 28 and 46%, respectively. All-cause re-hospitalization rates at 30 and 60 days were 18–37 and 22%, respectively. The highest HF re-hospitalization was 52% in 30 days in the subcutaneous diuretic group and 42% in 30 days in the intravenous diuretic group. Conclusions: The reviewed studies present practice-based results of treatment of patients with worsening HF with intravenous or subcutaneous diuretics in an outpatient HF care unit and report that it is effective by relieving symptoms with a low risk of adverse events. The studies do not provide satisfactory evidence for reduction in rates of re-hospitalization or improvement in mortality or quality of life. The conclusions drawn from these studies are limited by the quality of the individual studies. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of outpatient intravenous or subcutaneous diuretic treatment for patient with worsening HF

The Value of Hemodynamic Measurements or Cardiac MRI in the Follow-up of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background: Treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is conventionally based on functional plus invasive measurements obtained during right heart catheterization (RHC). Whether risk assessment during repeated measurements could also be performed on the basis of imaging parameters is unclear, as a direct comparison of strategies is lacking. Research Question: How does the predictive value of noninvasive parameters compare with that of invasive hemodynamic measurements 1 year after the diagnosis of idiopathic PAH? Study Design and Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients with idiopathic PAH who underwent RHC and cardiac MRI (CMR) were included in this study (median time between baseline evaluation and first parameter measures, 1.0 [0.8-1.2] years). Forty-four patients died or underwent lung transplantation. Forward Cox regression analyses were done to determine the best predictive functional, hemodynamic, and/or imaging model. Patients were classified as high risk if the event occurred < 5 years after diagnosis (n = 24), whereas patients without event were classified as low risk. Results: A prognostic model based on age, sex, and absolute values at follow-up of functional parameters (6-min walk distance) performed well (Akaike information criterion [AIC], 279; concordance, 0.67). Predictive models with only hemodynamic (right atrial pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation; AIC, 322; concordance, 0.66) or imaging parameters (right ventricular ejection fraction; AIC, 331; concordance, 0.63) at 1 year of follow-up performed similarly. The predictive value improved when functional data were combined with either hemodynamic data (AIC, 268; concordance, 0.69) or imaging data (AIC, 273; concordance, 0.70). A model composed of functional, hemodynamic, and imaging data performed only marginally better (AIC, 266; concordance, 0.69). Finally, changes between baseline and 1-year follow-up were observed for multiple hemodynamic and CMR parameters; only a change in CMR parameters was of prognostic predictive value. Interpretation: At 1 year of follow-up, risk assessment based on CMR is at least equal to risk assessment based on RHC. In this study, only changes in CMR, but not hemodynamic parameters, were of prognostic predictive value during the first year of follow-up